Refinement of triangles











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












I have given the triangulation in black:



enter image description here



The task is to refine the two triangles on the top (left) in 4 congruent triangles each. I have done this in red colour.



In addition to that, there should not be any hanging nodes. I tried this using the violet colour. Is this correct, or is there any fault?



Thanks in advance for checking my draft.



Corrected version:



enter image description here






geometry numerical-methods







share|cite|improve this question
























  • Check the 2 triangles in the top left square block. You forgot making 2 lines.
    – Love Invariants
    21 hours ago












  • May help:math.stackexchange.com/questions/1885393/…
    – NoChance
    21 hours ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












I have given the triangulation in black:



enter image description here



The task is to refine the two triangles on the top (left) in 4 congruent triangles each. I have done this in red colour.



In addition to that, there should not be any hanging nodes. I tried this using the violet colour. Is this correct, or is there any fault?



Thanks in advance for checking my draft.



Corrected version:



enter image description here






geometry numerical-methods







share|cite|improve this question
























  • Check the 2 triangles in the top left square block. You forgot making 2 lines.
    – Love Invariants
    21 hours ago












  • May help:math.stackexchange.com/questions/1885393/…
    – NoChance
    21 hours ago













up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





I have given the triangulation in black:



enter image description here



The task is to refine the two triangles on the top (left) in 4 congruent triangles each. I have done this in red colour.



In addition to that, there should not be any hanging nodes. I tried this using the violet colour. Is this correct, or is there any fault?



Thanks in advance for checking my draft.



Corrected version:



enter image description here






geometry numerical-methods







share|cite|improve this question















I have given the triangulation in black:



enter image description here



The task is to refine the two triangles on the top (left) in 4 congruent triangles each. I have done this in red colour.



In addition to that, there should not be any hanging nodes. I tried this using the violet colour. Is this correct, or is there any fault?



Thanks in advance for checking my draft.



Corrected version:



enter image description here






geometry numerical-methods




geometry numerical-methods






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago

























asked 22 hours ago









StMan

1387




1387












  • Check the 2 triangles in the top left square block. You forgot making 2 lines.
    – Love Invariants
    21 hours ago












  • May help:math.stackexchange.com/questions/1885393/…
    – NoChance
    21 hours ago


















  • Check the 2 triangles in the top left square block. You forgot making 2 lines.
    – Love Invariants
    21 hours ago












  • May help:math.stackexchange.com/questions/1885393/…
    – NoChance
    21 hours ago
















Check the 2 triangles in the top left square block. You forgot making 2 lines.
– Love Invariants
21 hours ago






Check the 2 triangles in the top left square block. You forgot making 2 lines.
– Love Invariants
21 hours ago














May help:math.stackexchange.com/questions/1885393/…
– NoChance
21 hours ago




May help:math.stackexchange.com/questions/1885393/…
– NoChance
21 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













This is it maybe if I figured out your question correctly.



enter image description here






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Oh yes, I just forgot to add the two lines to the picture. I added a corrected version. Does it hold true now?
    – StMan
    7 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003755%2frefinement-of-triangles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote













This is it maybe if I figured out your question correctly.



enter image description here






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Oh yes, I just forgot to add the two lines to the picture. I added a corrected version. Does it hold true now?
    – StMan
    7 hours ago















up vote
0
down vote













This is it maybe if I figured out your question correctly.



enter image description here






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Oh yes, I just forgot to add the two lines to the picture. I added a corrected version. Does it hold true now?
    – StMan
    7 hours ago













up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









This is it maybe if I figured out your question correctly.



enter image description here






share|cite|improve this answer












This is it maybe if I figured out your question correctly.



enter image description here







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 21 hours ago









Love Invariants

83715




83715












  • Oh yes, I just forgot to add the two lines to the picture. I added a corrected version. Does it hold true now?
    – StMan
    7 hours ago


















  • Oh yes, I just forgot to add the two lines to the picture. I added a corrected version. Does it hold true now?
    – StMan
    7 hours ago
















Oh yes, I just forgot to add the two lines to the picture. I added a corrected version. Does it hold true now?
– StMan
7 hours ago




Oh yes, I just forgot to add the two lines to the picture. I added a corrected version. Does it hold true now?
– StMan
7 hours ago


















 

draft saved


draft discarded



















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003755%2frefinement-of-triangles%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Image
28 6 $begingroup$ Per the Font of Magic feature, sorcerer can use Flexible Casting to create 5th-level spell slots at level 7, even though they are not typically available until level 9. You can transform unexpended sorcery points into one spell slot as a bonus action on your turn. The Creating Spell Slots table shows the cost of creating a spell slot of [5th level is 7] If such a sorcerer levels up while still having this 5th-level spell slot, can they choose a 5th-level spell as the spell they gain upon levelling up? The Spellcasting feature states: Additionally, when you gain a level in this class, you can choose one of the sorcerer spells you know and replace it with another spell from the sorcerer spell list, which also must be of a level for which you have spell slots.
Read more

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

Image
up vote 13 down vote favorite 1 After the 2018 errata, the disintegrate spell description now reads: A creature targeted by this spell must make a Dexterity saving throw. On a failed save, the target takes 10d6 + 40 force damage. The target is disintegrated if this damage leaves it with 0 hit points. If you were to polymorph an enemy into a rat and then disintegrate it, would the enemy be disintegrated or would it just return to its original form? I know that for Druids, it’s not an instant kill anymore, but is this the case for polymorph as well? dnd-5e spells polymorph errata share | improve this question edited 18 hours ago
Read more

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$

Image
3 3 $begingroup$ Recently, I saw a construction of topological invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$ with $ngeq 2$ : $$ N=frac{1}{24pi^2}int_{S^3} d^3x epsilon^{ijk} Tr[(U^{-1}partial_{x_i}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_j}U)(U^{-1}partial_{x_k}U)] , $$ where $Uin U(n)$ depends on $boldsymbol{x}=(x_1,x_2,x_3)in S^3$ , $epsilon^{ijk}$ is the Levi-Civita symbol, $i,j,k=1,2,3$ , and the duplicated indexes are summed over. It is claimed that $N$ is an integer, but why? Update 02/02/2019 I think I got an argument for $n=2$ . In this case, $U=e^{i varphi} q$ with $qin SU(2)$ . Due to the trace and the Levi-Civita symbol in $N$ , $varphi$ does not contribute to $N$ . As $Tr[q^{dagger}partial_i q]=0$ and $(q^{dagger}partial_i q)^{dagger}=-q^{dagger}partial_i q$ , $q^{dagger}partial_i q$ in geneeral has the form $q^{dagger}partia
Read more