Inequality of small two numbers with power












0














Let $0<x,y<1$ are two real numbers and $ninmathbb N$. Is the following inequality true $$x^n-y^nleq x^{n+1}-y^{n+1}?$$



I split into two cases:



Case1: when $y<x$.



Case2:when $x<y.$



But in both the cases, I can't conclude anything.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • It's enough to assume that $x geq y$, say. Have you considered some values of $x$ and $y$ to test if it's true? In what context did this question arise? What tools are available for use here?
    – JavaMan
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:32










  • I estimate some integration and on this, I face this problem.
    – MathRock
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:46
















0














Let $0<x,y<1$ are two real numbers and $ninmathbb N$. Is the following inequality true $$x^n-y^nleq x^{n+1}-y^{n+1}?$$



I split into two cases:



Case1: when $y<x$.



Case2:when $x<y.$



But in both the cases, I can't conclude anything.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • It's enough to assume that $x geq y$, say. Have you considered some values of $x$ and $y$ to test if it's true? In what context did this question arise? What tools are available for use here?
    – JavaMan
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:32










  • I estimate some integration and on this, I face this problem.
    – MathRock
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:46














0












0








0







Let $0<x,y<1$ are two real numbers and $ninmathbb N$. Is the following inequality true $$x^n-y^nleq x^{n+1}-y^{n+1}?$$



I split into two cases:



Case1: when $y<x$.



Case2:when $x<y.$



But in both the cases, I can't conclude anything.










share|cite|improve this question













Let $0<x,y<1$ are two real numbers and $ninmathbb N$. Is the following inequality true $$x^n-y^nleq x^{n+1}-y^{n+1}?$$



I split into two cases:



Case1: when $y<x$.



Case2:when $x<y.$



But in both the cases, I can't conclude anything.







real-analysis inequality real-numbers a.m.-g.m.-inequality






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 20 '18 at 19:29









MathRock

356




356












  • It's enough to assume that $x geq y$, say. Have you considered some values of $x$ and $y$ to test if it's true? In what context did this question arise? What tools are available for use here?
    – JavaMan
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:32










  • I estimate some integration and on this, I face this problem.
    – MathRock
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:46


















  • It's enough to assume that $x geq y$, say. Have you considered some values of $x$ and $y$ to test if it's true? In what context did this question arise? What tools are available for use here?
    – JavaMan
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:32










  • I estimate some integration and on this, I face this problem.
    – MathRock
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:46
















It's enough to assume that $x geq y$, say. Have you considered some values of $x$ and $y$ to test if it's true? In what context did this question arise? What tools are available for use here?
– JavaMan
Nov 20 '18 at 19:32




It's enough to assume that $x geq y$, say. Have you considered some values of $x$ and $y$ to test if it's true? In what context did this question arise? What tools are available for use here?
– JavaMan
Nov 20 '18 at 19:32












I estimate some integration and on this, I face this problem.
– MathRock
Nov 20 '18 at 19:46




I estimate some integration and on this, I face this problem.
– MathRock
Nov 20 '18 at 19:46










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














If its true for all $x,y$ with $0<x,y<1$, then it must also be true for all $x,y$ with $0 leq x, y leq 1$, since both $x^n-y^n$ and $x^{n+1}-y^{n+1}$ are continuous functions.



What happens if you let $y=0?$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • foy y=0 and y=1 it's not true as $x<1$
    – MathRock
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:38












  • Exactly, so if you prove the assertion that it also must hold for $x,y$ with $0 leq x,y leq 1$ then you are done.
    – Eric
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:40










  • Can you tell more?
    – MathRock
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:41










  • I claim that if $f(x,y)$ and $g(x,y)$ are continuous functions and you a sequences $(x_n,y_n)$ which converges to $(x,y)$ and $f(x_n,y_n) leq g(x_n, y_n)$ for all $n$ then you must have $f(x,y) leq g(x,y)$. If not then $f(x,y)-g(x,y)> epsilon >0$ for some $epsilon$. You should be able to use that and the continuity of $f$ and $g$ (hence the fact that $f(x_n, y_n) $ converges to $f(x,y)$ and likewise for $g$) to get a contradiction.
    – Eric
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:51











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006779%2finequality-of-small-two-numbers-with-power%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














If its true for all $x,y$ with $0<x,y<1$, then it must also be true for all $x,y$ with $0 leq x, y leq 1$, since both $x^n-y^n$ and $x^{n+1}-y^{n+1}$ are continuous functions.



What happens if you let $y=0?$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • foy y=0 and y=1 it's not true as $x<1$
    – MathRock
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:38












  • Exactly, so if you prove the assertion that it also must hold for $x,y$ with $0 leq x,y leq 1$ then you are done.
    – Eric
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:40










  • Can you tell more?
    – MathRock
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:41










  • I claim that if $f(x,y)$ and $g(x,y)$ are continuous functions and you a sequences $(x_n,y_n)$ which converges to $(x,y)$ and $f(x_n,y_n) leq g(x_n, y_n)$ for all $n$ then you must have $f(x,y) leq g(x,y)$. If not then $f(x,y)-g(x,y)> epsilon >0$ for some $epsilon$. You should be able to use that and the continuity of $f$ and $g$ (hence the fact that $f(x_n, y_n) $ converges to $f(x,y)$ and likewise for $g$) to get a contradiction.
    – Eric
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:51
















0














If its true for all $x,y$ with $0<x,y<1$, then it must also be true for all $x,y$ with $0 leq x, y leq 1$, since both $x^n-y^n$ and $x^{n+1}-y^{n+1}$ are continuous functions.



What happens if you let $y=0?$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • foy y=0 and y=1 it's not true as $x<1$
    – MathRock
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:38












  • Exactly, so if you prove the assertion that it also must hold for $x,y$ with $0 leq x,y leq 1$ then you are done.
    – Eric
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:40










  • Can you tell more?
    – MathRock
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:41










  • I claim that if $f(x,y)$ and $g(x,y)$ are continuous functions and you a sequences $(x_n,y_n)$ which converges to $(x,y)$ and $f(x_n,y_n) leq g(x_n, y_n)$ for all $n$ then you must have $f(x,y) leq g(x,y)$. If not then $f(x,y)-g(x,y)> epsilon >0$ for some $epsilon$. You should be able to use that and the continuity of $f$ and $g$ (hence the fact that $f(x_n, y_n) $ converges to $f(x,y)$ and likewise for $g$) to get a contradiction.
    – Eric
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:51














0












0








0






If its true for all $x,y$ with $0<x,y<1$, then it must also be true for all $x,y$ with $0 leq x, y leq 1$, since both $x^n-y^n$ and $x^{n+1}-y^{n+1}$ are continuous functions.



What happens if you let $y=0?$






share|cite|improve this answer














If its true for all $x,y$ with $0<x,y<1$, then it must also be true for all $x,y$ with $0 leq x, y leq 1$, since both $x^n-y^n$ and $x^{n+1}-y^{n+1}$ are continuous functions.



What happens if you let $y=0?$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Nov 20 '18 at 19:40

























answered Nov 20 '18 at 19:36









Eric

2068




2068












  • foy y=0 and y=1 it's not true as $x<1$
    – MathRock
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:38












  • Exactly, so if you prove the assertion that it also must hold for $x,y$ with $0 leq x,y leq 1$ then you are done.
    – Eric
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:40










  • Can you tell more?
    – MathRock
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:41










  • I claim that if $f(x,y)$ and $g(x,y)$ are continuous functions and you a sequences $(x_n,y_n)$ which converges to $(x,y)$ and $f(x_n,y_n) leq g(x_n, y_n)$ for all $n$ then you must have $f(x,y) leq g(x,y)$. If not then $f(x,y)-g(x,y)> epsilon >0$ for some $epsilon$. You should be able to use that and the continuity of $f$ and $g$ (hence the fact that $f(x_n, y_n) $ converges to $f(x,y)$ and likewise for $g$) to get a contradiction.
    – Eric
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:51


















  • foy y=0 and y=1 it's not true as $x<1$
    – MathRock
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:38












  • Exactly, so if you prove the assertion that it also must hold for $x,y$ with $0 leq x,y leq 1$ then you are done.
    – Eric
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:40










  • Can you tell more?
    – MathRock
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:41










  • I claim that if $f(x,y)$ and $g(x,y)$ are continuous functions and you a sequences $(x_n,y_n)$ which converges to $(x,y)$ and $f(x_n,y_n) leq g(x_n, y_n)$ for all $n$ then you must have $f(x,y) leq g(x,y)$. If not then $f(x,y)-g(x,y)> epsilon >0$ for some $epsilon$. You should be able to use that and the continuity of $f$ and $g$ (hence the fact that $f(x_n, y_n) $ converges to $f(x,y)$ and likewise for $g$) to get a contradiction.
    – Eric
    Nov 20 '18 at 19:51
















foy y=0 and y=1 it's not true as $x<1$
– MathRock
Nov 20 '18 at 19:38






foy y=0 and y=1 it's not true as $x<1$
– MathRock
Nov 20 '18 at 19:38














Exactly, so if you prove the assertion that it also must hold for $x,y$ with $0 leq x,y leq 1$ then you are done.
– Eric
Nov 20 '18 at 19:40




Exactly, so if you prove the assertion that it also must hold for $x,y$ with $0 leq x,y leq 1$ then you are done.
– Eric
Nov 20 '18 at 19:40












Can you tell more?
– MathRock
Nov 20 '18 at 19:41




Can you tell more?
– MathRock
Nov 20 '18 at 19:41












I claim that if $f(x,y)$ and $g(x,y)$ are continuous functions and you a sequences $(x_n,y_n)$ which converges to $(x,y)$ and $f(x_n,y_n) leq g(x_n, y_n)$ for all $n$ then you must have $f(x,y) leq g(x,y)$. If not then $f(x,y)-g(x,y)> epsilon >0$ for some $epsilon$. You should be able to use that and the continuity of $f$ and $g$ (hence the fact that $f(x_n, y_n) $ converges to $f(x,y)$ and likewise for $g$) to get a contradiction.
– Eric
Nov 20 '18 at 19:51




I claim that if $f(x,y)$ and $g(x,y)$ are continuous functions and you a sequences $(x_n,y_n)$ which converges to $(x,y)$ and $f(x_n,y_n) leq g(x_n, y_n)$ for all $n$ then you must have $f(x,y) leq g(x,y)$. If not then $f(x,y)-g(x,y)> epsilon >0$ for some $epsilon$. You should be able to use that and the continuity of $f$ and $g$ (hence the fact that $f(x_n, y_n) $ converges to $f(x,y)$ and likewise for $g$) to get a contradiction.
– Eric
Nov 20 '18 at 19:51


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006779%2finequality-of-small-two-numbers-with-power%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith