Mixing
Is there an orthogonal matrix that is not unitary?
I could find a example of a unitary matrix such that is not orthogonal, thats simple in $mathbb{C}$, but for this exercise of a orthogonal that is not unitary i realize that is possible just on $mathbb{C}$ because all orthogonal matrix on $mathbb{R}$ is unitary, so anyone have a exemple of this case?
linear-algebra matrices
edited Feb 16 '16 at 20:16
John B
12.2k51840
asked Feb 16 '16 at 20:11
Eduardo Silva
68239
add a comment |
I could find a example of a unitary matrix such that is not orthogonal, thats simple in $mathbb{C}$, but for this exercise of a orthogonal that is not unitary i realize that is possible just on $mathbb{C}$ because all orthogonal matrix on $mathbb{R}$ is unitary, so anyone have a exemple of this case?
linear-algebra matrices
edited Feb 16 '16 at 20:16
John B
12.2k51840
asked Feb 16 '16 at 20:11
Eduardo Silva
68239
2
Just to be clear: you're asking for a matrix $A$ with complex entries for which $AA^T = I$, but $AA^* neq I$. Is that correct?
– Omnomnomnom
Feb 16 '16 at 20:19
yes, exactly, can u help?
– Eduardo Silva
Feb 16 '16 at 20:23
3
Note that Omnomnomnom's clarification is very important: if a matrix $A$ with real entries satisfies $A A^T=I$ then certainly $A A^*=I$ (since $A^*=A^T$).
– Ian
Feb 16 '16 at 20:38
add a comment |
I could find a example of a unitary matrix such that is not orthogonal, thats simple in $mathbb{C}$, but for this exercise of a orthogonal that is not unitary i realize that is possible just on $mathbb{C}$ because all orthogonal matrix on $mathbb{R}$ is unitary, so anyone have a exemple of this case?
linear-algebra matrices
edited Feb 16 '16 at 20:16
John B
12.2k51840
asked Feb 16 '16 at 20:11
Eduardo Silva
68239
I could find a example of a unitary matrix such that is not orthogonal, thats simple in $mathbb{C}$, but for this exercise of a orthogonal that is not unitary i realize that is possible just on $mathbb{C}$ because all orthogonal matrix on $mathbb{R}$ is unitary, so anyone have a exemple of this case?
linear-algebra matrices
linear-algebra matrices
edited Feb 16 '16 at 20:16
John B
12.2k51840
asked Feb 16 '16 at 20:11
Eduardo Silva
68239
edited Feb 16 '16 at 20:16
John B
12.2k51840
asked Feb 16 '16 at 20:11
Eduardo Silva
68239
edited Feb 16 '16 at 20:16
John B
12.2k51840
edited Feb 16 '16 at 20:16
John B
12.2k51840
edited Feb 16 '16 at 20:16
John B
12.2k51840
12.2k51840
asked Feb 16 '16 at 20:11
Eduardo Silva
68239
asked Feb 16 '16 at 20:11
Eduardo Silva
68239
asked Feb 16 '16 at 20:11
Eduardo Silva
68239
68239
2
Just to be clear: you're asking for a matrix $A$ with complex entries for which $AA^T = I$, but $AA^* neq I$. Is that correct?
– Omnomnomnom
Feb 16 '16 at 20:19
yes, exactly, can u help?
– Eduardo Silva
Feb 16 '16 at 20:23
3
Note that Omnomnomnom's clarification is very important: if a matrix $A$ with real entries satisfies $A A^T=I$ then certainly $A A^*=I$ (since $A^*=A^T$).
– Ian
Feb 16 '16 at 20:38
add a comment |
2
Just to be clear: you're asking for a matrix $A$ with complex entries for which $AA^T = I$, but $AA^* neq I$. Is that correct?
– Omnomnomnom
Feb 16 '16 at 20:19
yes, exactly, can u help?
– Eduardo Silva
Feb 16 '16 at 20:23
3
Note that Omnomnomnom's clarification is very important: if a matrix $A$ with real entries satisfies $A A^T=I$ then certainly $A A^*=I$ (since $A^*=A^T$).
– Ian
Feb 16 '16 at 20:38
2
2
Just to be clear: you're asking for a matrix $A$ with complex entries for which $AA^T = I$, but $AA^* neq I$. Is that correct?
– Omnomnomnom
Feb 16 '16 at 20:19
Just to be clear: you're asking for a matrix $A$ with complex entries for which $AA^T = I$, but $AA^* neq I$. Is that correct?
– Omnomnomnom
Feb 16 '16 at 20:19
yes, exactly, can u help?
– Eduardo Silva
Feb 16 '16 at 20:23
yes, exactly, can u help?
– Eduardo Silva
Feb 16 '16 at 20:23
3
3
Note that Omnomnomnom's clarification is very important: if a matrix $A$ with real entries satisfies $A A^T=I$ then certainly $A A^*=I$ (since $A^*=A^T$).
– Ian
Feb 16 '16 at 20:38
Note that Omnomnomnom's clarification is very important: if a matrix $A$ with real entries satisfies $A A^T=I$ then certainly $A A^*=I$ (since $A^*=A^T$).
– Ian
Feb 16 '16 at 20:38
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The matrix
$$
A = pmatrix{
sqrt{2}&i\
i&-sqrt{2}
}
$$
satisfies $AA^T = I$ but
$$
AA^* = pmatrix{5&-2isqrt{2}\2isqrt{2}&5}
$$
answered Feb 16 '16 at 20:36
Omnomnomnom
126k788176
Almost irrelevant, but you missed a factor of $2$ in the terms outside the main diagonal, didn't you? My calculations give $-2isqrt{2}$ and $2isqrt{2}$
– Danilo Gregorin
Nov 20 '18 at 18:46
@DaniloGregorin well spotted
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 20 '18 at 19:51
add a comment |
Late remark. In general, if $K$ is complex skew-symmetric, then $Q=e^{zK}$ is complex orthogonal for every $zinmathbb C$. When $Kne0$, since $e^{zK}$ is holomorphic and its power series expansion has some nonzero high-order terms, $e^{zK}$ is not a constant function. Therefore it cannot be real all the time (otherwise it will fail to satisfy Cauchy-Riemann equations). Pick a $z$ such that $Q=e^{zK}$ is not real. Then $Q$ is not unitary, because all unitary orthogonal matrices are real.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:01
user1551
71.5k566125
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1658707%2fis-there-an-orthogonal-matrix-that-is-not-unitary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The matrix
$$
A = pmatrix{
sqrt{2}&i\
i&-sqrt{2}
}
$$
satisfies $AA^T = I$ but
$$
AA^* = pmatrix{5&-2isqrt{2}\2isqrt{2}&5}
$$
answered Feb 16 '16 at 20:36
Omnomnomnom
126k788176
Almost irrelevant, but you missed a factor of $2$ in the terms outside the main diagonal, didn't you? My calculations give $-2isqrt{2}$ and $2isqrt{2}$
– Danilo Gregorin
Nov 20 '18 at 18:46
@DaniloGregorin well spotted
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 20 '18 at 19:51
add a comment |
The matrix
$$
A = pmatrix{
sqrt{2}&i\
i&-sqrt{2}
}
$$
satisfies $AA^T = I$ but
$$
AA^* = pmatrix{5&-2isqrt{2}\2isqrt{2}&5}
$$
answered Feb 16 '16 at 20:36
Omnomnomnom
126k788176
Almost irrelevant, but you missed a factor of $2$ in the terms outside the main diagonal, didn't you? My calculations give $-2isqrt{2}$ and $2isqrt{2}$
– Danilo Gregorin
Nov 20 '18 at 18:46
@DaniloGregorin well spotted
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 20 '18 at 19:51
add a comment |
The matrix
$$
A = pmatrix{
sqrt{2}&i\
i&-sqrt{2}
}
$$
satisfies $AA^T = I$ but
$$
AA^* = pmatrix{5&-2isqrt{2}\2isqrt{2}&5}
$$
answered Feb 16 '16 at 20:36
Omnomnomnom
126k788176
The matrix
$$
A = pmatrix{
sqrt{2}&i\
i&-sqrt{2}
}
$$
satisfies $AA^T = I$ but
$$
AA^* = pmatrix{5&-2isqrt{2}\2isqrt{2}&5}
$$
answered Feb 16 '16 at 20:36
Omnomnomnom
126k788176
edited Nov 20 '18 at 19:51
answered Feb 16 '16 at 20:36
Omnomnomnom
126k788176
answered Feb 16 '16 at 20:36
Omnomnomnom
126k788176
answered Feb 16 '16 at 20:36
Omnomnomnom
126k788176
126k788176
Almost irrelevant, but you missed a factor of $2$ in the terms outside the main diagonal, didn't you? My calculations give $-2isqrt{2}$ and $2isqrt{2}$
– Danilo Gregorin
Nov 20 '18 at 18:46
@DaniloGregorin well spotted
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 20 '18 at 19:51
add a comment |
Almost irrelevant, but you missed a factor of $2$ in the terms outside the main diagonal, didn't you? My calculations give $-2isqrt{2}$ and $2isqrt{2}$
– Danilo Gregorin
Nov 20 '18 at 18:46
@DaniloGregorin well spotted
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 20 '18 at 19:51
Almost irrelevant, but you missed a factor of $2$ in the terms outside the main diagonal, didn't you? My calculations give $-2isqrt{2}$ and $2isqrt{2}$
– Danilo Gregorin
Nov 20 '18 at 18:46
Almost irrelevant, but you missed a factor of $2$ in the terms outside the main diagonal, didn't you? My calculations give $-2isqrt{2}$ and $2isqrt{2}$
– Danilo Gregorin
Nov 20 '18 at 18:46
@DaniloGregorin well spotted
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 20 '18 at 19:51
@DaniloGregorin well spotted
– Omnomnomnom
Nov 20 '18 at 19:51
add a comment |
Late remark. In general, if $K$ is complex skew-symmetric, then $Q=e^{zK}$ is complex orthogonal for every $zinmathbb C$. When $Kne0$, since $e^{zK}$ is holomorphic and its power series expansion has some nonzero high-order terms, $e^{zK}$ is not a constant function. Therefore it cannot be real all the time (otherwise it will fail to satisfy Cauchy-Riemann equations). Pick a $z$ such that $Q=e^{zK}$ is not real. Then $Q$ is not unitary, because all unitary orthogonal matrices are real.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:01
user1551
71.5k566125
add a comment |
Late remark. In general, if $K$ is complex skew-symmetric, then $Q=e^{zK}$ is complex orthogonal for every $zinmathbb C$. When $Kne0$, since $e^{zK}$ is holomorphic and its power series expansion has some nonzero high-order terms, $e^{zK}$ is not a constant function. Therefore it cannot be real all the time (otherwise it will fail to satisfy Cauchy-Riemann equations). Pick a $z$ such that $Q=e^{zK}$ is not real. Then $Q$ is not unitary, because all unitary orthogonal matrices are real.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:01
user1551
71.5k566125
add a comment |
Late remark. In general, if $K$ is complex skew-symmetric, then $Q=e^{zK}$ is complex orthogonal for every $zinmathbb C$. When $Kne0$, since $e^{zK}$ is holomorphic and its power series expansion has some nonzero high-order terms, $e^{zK}$ is not a constant function. Therefore it cannot be real all the time (otherwise it will fail to satisfy Cauchy-Riemann equations). Pick a $z$ such that $Q=e^{zK}$ is not real. Then $Q$ is not unitary, because all unitary orthogonal matrices are real.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:01
user1551
71.5k566125
Late remark. In general, if $K$ is complex skew-symmetric, then $Q=e^{zK}$ is complex orthogonal for every $zinmathbb C$. When $Kne0$, since $e^{zK}$ is holomorphic and its power series expansion has some nonzero high-order terms, $e^{zK}$ is not a constant function. Therefore it cannot be real all the time (otherwise it will fail to satisfy Cauchy-Riemann equations). Pick a $z$ such that $Q=e^{zK}$ is not real. Then $Q$ is not unitary, because all unitary orthogonal matrices are real.
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:01
user1551
71.5k566125
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:01
user1551
71.5k566125
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:01
user1551
71.5k566125
answered Nov 21 '18 at 5:01
user1551
71.5k566125
71.5k566125
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1658707%2fis-there-an-orthogonal-matrix-that-is-not-unitary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Just to be clear: you're asking for a matrix $A$ with complex entries for which $AA^T = I$, but $AA^* neq I$. Is that correct?
– Omnomnomnom
Feb 16 '16 at 20:19
yes, exactly, can u help?
– Eduardo Silva
Feb 16 '16 at 20:23
3
Note that Omnomnomnom's clarification is very important: if a matrix $A$ with real entries satisfies $A A^T=I$ then certainly $A A^*=I$ (since $A^*=A^T$).
– Ian
Feb 16 '16 at 20:38