Proof that the binary entropy is concave
Defining the binary entropy function as $H_{bin}(x) = - xlog(x) - (1-x)log(1-x)$, how do I show that it is concave? I can see the intuition but not the proof.
Namely, I need to prove that $H_{bin}(px_1 + (1-p)x_2) geq pH_{bin}(x_1) + (1-p)H_{bin}(x_2)$.
Following the comment posted, I take the second derivative of $H_{bin}$ with respect to $p$ and obtain $frac{partial^2 H}{partial p^2} = -(x_1 - x_2)^2 frac{1-2a}{a(1-a)}$, where $a = px_1 + (1-p)x_2$. How do I see that $frac{1-2a}{a(1-a)}$ is positive?
entropy
add a comment |
Defining the binary entropy function as $H_{bin}(x) = - xlog(x) - (1-x)log(1-x)$, how do I show that it is concave? I can see the intuition but not the proof.
Namely, I need to prove that $H_{bin}(px_1 + (1-p)x_2) geq pH_{bin}(x_1) + (1-p)H_{bin}(x_2)$.
Following the comment posted, I take the second derivative of $H_{bin}$ with respect to $p$ and obtain $frac{partial^2 H}{partial p^2} = -(x_1 - x_2)^2 frac{1-2a}{a(1-a)}$, where $a = px_1 + (1-p)x_2$. How do I see that $frac{1-2a}{a(1-a)}$ is positive?
entropy
This is best done using Calculus. Show that the second derivative is negative on this interval.
– Hans Engler
Nov 20 '18 at 17:06
@HansEngler, thanks. I think I'm close but I don't quite see the solution yet.
– user1936752
Nov 20 '18 at 18:31
add a comment |
Defining the binary entropy function as $H_{bin}(x) = - xlog(x) - (1-x)log(1-x)$, how do I show that it is concave? I can see the intuition but not the proof.
Namely, I need to prove that $H_{bin}(px_1 + (1-p)x_2) geq pH_{bin}(x_1) + (1-p)H_{bin}(x_2)$.
Following the comment posted, I take the second derivative of $H_{bin}$ with respect to $p$ and obtain $frac{partial^2 H}{partial p^2} = -(x_1 - x_2)^2 frac{1-2a}{a(1-a)}$, where $a = px_1 + (1-p)x_2$. How do I see that $frac{1-2a}{a(1-a)}$ is positive?
entropy
Defining the binary entropy function as $H_{bin}(x) = - xlog(x) - (1-x)log(1-x)$, how do I show that it is concave? I can see the intuition but not the proof.
Namely, I need to prove that $H_{bin}(px_1 + (1-p)x_2) geq pH_{bin}(x_1) + (1-p)H_{bin}(x_2)$.
Following the comment posted, I take the second derivative of $H_{bin}$ with respect to $p$ and obtain $frac{partial^2 H}{partial p^2} = -(x_1 - x_2)^2 frac{1-2a}{a(1-a)}$, where $a = px_1 + (1-p)x_2$. How do I see that $frac{1-2a}{a(1-a)}$ is positive?
entropy
entropy
edited Nov 20 '18 at 18:18
asked Nov 20 '18 at 16:58
user1936752
5181513
5181513
This is best done using Calculus. Show that the second derivative is negative on this interval.
– Hans Engler
Nov 20 '18 at 17:06
@HansEngler, thanks. I think I'm close but I don't quite see the solution yet.
– user1936752
Nov 20 '18 at 18:31
add a comment |
This is best done using Calculus. Show that the second derivative is negative on this interval.
– Hans Engler
Nov 20 '18 at 17:06
@HansEngler, thanks. I think I'm close but I don't quite see the solution yet.
– user1936752
Nov 20 '18 at 18:31
This is best done using Calculus. Show that the second derivative is negative on this interval.
– Hans Engler
Nov 20 '18 at 17:06
This is best done using Calculus. Show that the second derivative is negative on this interval.
– Hans Engler
Nov 20 '18 at 17:06
@HansEngler, thanks. I think I'm close but I don't quite see the solution yet.
– user1936752
Nov 20 '18 at 18:31
@HansEngler, thanks. I think I'm close but I don't quite see the solution yet.
– user1936752
Nov 20 '18 at 18:31
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006576%2fproof-that-the-binary-entropy-is-concave%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006576%2fproof-that-the-binary-entropy-is-concave%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
This is best done using Calculus. Show that the second derivative is negative on this interval.
– Hans Engler
Nov 20 '18 at 17:06
@HansEngler, thanks. I think I'm close but I don't quite see the solution yet.
– user1936752
Nov 20 '18 at 18:31