Excercise 4.3 (3) in Brezis. Convergence in $L_p$
$begingroup$
Let $(f_n)$ in $L_p(Omega)$ $1leq p< infty$ and $(g_n)$ bounded in $L_{infty}(Omega)$ assume that $f_n rightarrow f$ in $L_p(Omega)$ and $g_n rightarrow g$ a.e. Prove that $$f_ng_nrightarrow fg$$ in $L_p(Omega)$.
I have done the following:
Note that $f_ng_n-fg=(f_n-f)g_n+f(g_n-g)$ therefore $$||f_ng_n-fg||_p=||(f_n-f)g_n+f(g_n-g)||_pleq||f_n-f||_p||g_n||_{infty}+||f(g_n-g)||_p$$
I know the first term is less than $epsilon$ (because $f_n$ converges in $L_p(Omega)$ to $f$) however there is a hint in the book that says $f(g_n-g)rightarrow 0$ in $L_p(Omega)$ by the dominated convergence theorem. Is the first part of my reasoning correct? how can I see what the hint is telling me? Thanks in advance.
functional-analysis convergence lp-spaces
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(f_n)$ in $L_p(Omega)$ $1leq p< infty$ and $(g_n)$ bounded in $L_{infty}(Omega)$ assume that $f_n rightarrow f$ in $L_p(Omega)$ and $g_n rightarrow g$ a.e. Prove that $$f_ng_nrightarrow fg$$ in $L_p(Omega)$.
I have done the following:
Note that $f_ng_n-fg=(f_n-f)g_n+f(g_n-g)$ therefore $$||f_ng_n-fg||_p=||(f_n-f)g_n+f(g_n-g)||_pleq||f_n-f||_p||g_n||_{infty}+||f(g_n-g)||_p$$
I know the first term is less than $epsilon$ (because $f_n$ converges in $L_p(Omega)$ to $f$) however there is a hint in the book that says $f(g_n-g)rightarrow 0$ in $L_p(Omega)$ by the dominated convergence theorem. Is the first part of my reasoning correct? how can I see what the hint is telling me? Thanks in advance.
functional-analysis convergence lp-spaces
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Are you asking how the $L_p$ convergence is shown from the dominated convergence theorem? Because if you show that the hint is true then the second term will also be smaller then $epsilon$ for $n$ large.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 9 at 20:02
$begingroup$
yes but i made another advance, since $g_nrightarrow g$ a.e. can i say that $fg_nrightarrow fg$ a.e. ???? Because if so, since i have that $|fg_n|^pleq M^p|f|^p$ then I can use dominated convergence.
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:16
$begingroup$
The first thing you wrote is true, but I'm not sure you can say the latter simply follows from dominated convergence theorem, because I think you need to bound $vert f(g-g_n) vert^p $ instead of $vert fg_nvert^p$.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 9 at 20:24
$begingroup$
$f(g_n-g)=fg_n-fg$ if the first one is bounded that is $|fg_n|^pleq M^p|f|^p$ and converges a.e. to the second one that is $fg$ then by dominated convergence $fg$ belongs in $L_p$ and $||f(g_n-g)||_p=||fg_n-fg||_p<epsilon$
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:41
$begingroup$
I only needed to know if the a.e. convergence was correct, because I think the dominated convergence theorem applies the way i did it
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:43
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(f_n)$ in $L_p(Omega)$ $1leq p< infty$ and $(g_n)$ bounded in $L_{infty}(Omega)$ assume that $f_n rightarrow f$ in $L_p(Omega)$ and $g_n rightarrow g$ a.e. Prove that $$f_ng_nrightarrow fg$$ in $L_p(Omega)$.
I have done the following:
Note that $f_ng_n-fg=(f_n-f)g_n+f(g_n-g)$ therefore $$||f_ng_n-fg||_p=||(f_n-f)g_n+f(g_n-g)||_pleq||f_n-f||_p||g_n||_{infty}+||f(g_n-g)||_p$$
I know the first term is less than $epsilon$ (because $f_n$ converges in $L_p(Omega)$ to $f$) however there is a hint in the book that says $f(g_n-g)rightarrow 0$ in $L_p(Omega)$ by the dominated convergence theorem. Is the first part of my reasoning correct? how can I see what the hint is telling me? Thanks in advance.
functional-analysis convergence lp-spaces
$endgroup$
Let $(f_n)$ in $L_p(Omega)$ $1leq p< infty$ and $(g_n)$ bounded in $L_{infty}(Omega)$ assume that $f_n rightarrow f$ in $L_p(Omega)$ and $g_n rightarrow g$ a.e. Prove that $$f_ng_nrightarrow fg$$ in $L_p(Omega)$.
I have done the following:
Note that $f_ng_n-fg=(f_n-f)g_n+f(g_n-g)$ therefore $$||f_ng_n-fg||_p=||(f_n-f)g_n+f(g_n-g)||_pleq||f_n-f||_p||g_n||_{infty}+||f(g_n-g)||_p$$
I know the first term is less than $epsilon$ (because $f_n$ converges in $L_p(Omega)$ to $f$) however there is a hint in the book that says $f(g_n-g)rightarrow 0$ in $L_p(Omega)$ by the dominated convergence theorem. Is the first part of my reasoning correct? how can I see what the hint is telling me? Thanks in advance.
functional-analysis convergence lp-spaces
functional-analysis convergence lp-spaces
asked Jan 9 at 19:36
AlfdavAlfdav
787
787
1
$begingroup$
Are you asking how the $L_p$ convergence is shown from the dominated convergence theorem? Because if you show that the hint is true then the second term will also be smaller then $epsilon$ for $n$ large.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 9 at 20:02
$begingroup$
yes but i made another advance, since $g_nrightarrow g$ a.e. can i say that $fg_nrightarrow fg$ a.e. ???? Because if so, since i have that $|fg_n|^pleq M^p|f|^p$ then I can use dominated convergence.
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:16
$begingroup$
The first thing you wrote is true, but I'm not sure you can say the latter simply follows from dominated convergence theorem, because I think you need to bound $vert f(g-g_n) vert^p $ instead of $vert fg_nvert^p$.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 9 at 20:24
$begingroup$
$f(g_n-g)=fg_n-fg$ if the first one is bounded that is $|fg_n|^pleq M^p|f|^p$ and converges a.e. to the second one that is $fg$ then by dominated convergence $fg$ belongs in $L_p$ and $||f(g_n-g)||_p=||fg_n-fg||_p<epsilon$
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:41
$begingroup$
I only needed to know if the a.e. convergence was correct, because I think the dominated convergence theorem applies the way i did it
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:43
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Are you asking how the $L_p$ convergence is shown from the dominated convergence theorem? Because if you show that the hint is true then the second term will also be smaller then $epsilon$ for $n$ large.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 9 at 20:02
$begingroup$
yes but i made another advance, since $g_nrightarrow g$ a.e. can i say that $fg_nrightarrow fg$ a.e. ???? Because if so, since i have that $|fg_n|^pleq M^p|f|^p$ then I can use dominated convergence.
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:16
$begingroup$
The first thing you wrote is true, but I'm not sure you can say the latter simply follows from dominated convergence theorem, because I think you need to bound $vert f(g-g_n) vert^p $ instead of $vert fg_nvert^p$.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 9 at 20:24
$begingroup$
$f(g_n-g)=fg_n-fg$ if the first one is bounded that is $|fg_n|^pleq M^p|f|^p$ and converges a.e. to the second one that is $fg$ then by dominated convergence $fg$ belongs in $L_p$ and $||f(g_n-g)||_p=||fg_n-fg||_p<epsilon$
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:41
$begingroup$
I only needed to know if the a.e. convergence was correct, because I think the dominated convergence theorem applies the way i did it
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:43
1
1
$begingroup$
Are you asking how the $L_p$ convergence is shown from the dominated convergence theorem? Because if you show that the hint is true then the second term will also be smaller then $epsilon$ for $n$ large.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 9 at 20:02
$begingroup$
Are you asking how the $L_p$ convergence is shown from the dominated convergence theorem? Because if you show that the hint is true then the second term will also be smaller then $epsilon$ for $n$ large.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 9 at 20:02
$begingroup$
yes but i made another advance, since $g_nrightarrow g$ a.e. can i say that $fg_nrightarrow fg$ a.e. ???? Because if so, since i have that $|fg_n|^pleq M^p|f|^p$ then I can use dominated convergence.
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:16
$begingroup$
yes but i made another advance, since $g_nrightarrow g$ a.e. can i say that $fg_nrightarrow fg$ a.e. ???? Because if so, since i have that $|fg_n|^pleq M^p|f|^p$ then I can use dominated convergence.
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:16
$begingroup$
The first thing you wrote is true, but I'm not sure you can say the latter simply follows from dominated convergence theorem, because I think you need to bound $vert f(g-g_n) vert^p $ instead of $vert fg_nvert^p$.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 9 at 20:24
$begingroup$
The first thing you wrote is true, but I'm not sure you can say the latter simply follows from dominated convergence theorem, because I think you need to bound $vert f(g-g_n) vert^p $ instead of $vert fg_nvert^p$.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 9 at 20:24
$begingroup$
$f(g_n-g)=fg_n-fg$ if the first one is bounded that is $|fg_n|^pleq M^p|f|^p$ and converges a.e. to the second one that is $fg$ then by dominated convergence $fg$ belongs in $L_p$ and $||f(g_n-g)||_p=||fg_n-fg||_p<epsilon$
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:41
$begingroup$
$f(g_n-g)=fg_n-fg$ if the first one is bounded that is $|fg_n|^pleq M^p|f|^p$ and converges a.e. to the second one that is $fg$ then by dominated convergence $fg$ belongs in $L_p$ and $||f(g_n-g)||_p=||fg_n-fg||_p<epsilon$
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:41
$begingroup$
I only needed to know if the a.e. convergence was correct, because I think the dominated convergence theorem applies the way i did it
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:43
$begingroup$
I only needed to know if the a.e. convergence was correct, because I think the dominated convergence theorem applies the way i did it
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:43
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The only remaining thing to is show that $int_Omega h_nto 0$, where $h_n(x)=leftlvert f(x)left(g_n(x)-g(x)right)rightrvert^p$.
Since $f$ belongs to $mathbb L^p$, the quantity $leftlvert f(x) rightrvert^p$ is finite for almost every $c$ hence the fact that $h_n(x)to 0$ follows from the implication (if $cgeqslant 0$ and $a_nto 0$) then $ccdot a_nto 0$.
For the domination condition, let $M:=sup_{ngeqslant 1}leftlVert g_nrightrVert_infty$. Then $leftlvert g(x)rightrvertleqslant M$ for almost every $x$ hence
$$leftlvert h_n(x) rightrvertleqslant left(2Mright)^pleftlvert f(x) rightrvert^p mbox{ a.e.}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067866%2fexcercise-4-3-3-in-brezis-convergence-in-l-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The only remaining thing to is show that $int_Omega h_nto 0$, where $h_n(x)=leftlvert f(x)left(g_n(x)-g(x)right)rightrvert^p$.
Since $f$ belongs to $mathbb L^p$, the quantity $leftlvert f(x) rightrvert^p$ is finite for almost every $c$ hence the fact that $h_n(x)to 0$ follows from the implication (if $cgeqslant 0$ and $a_nto 0$) then $ccdot a_nto 0$.
For the domination condition, let $M:=sup_{ngeqslant 1}leftlVert g_nrightrVert_infty$. Then $leftlvert g(x)rightrvertleqslant M$ for almost every $x$ hence
$$leftlvert h_n(x) rightrvertleqslant left(2Mright)^pleftlvert f(x) rightrvert^p mbox{ a.e.}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The only remaining thing to is show that $int_Omega h_nto 0$, where $h_n(x)=leftlvert f(x)left(g_n(x)-g(x)right)rightrvert^p$.
Since $f$ belongs to $mathbb L^p$, the quantity $leftlvert f(x) rightrvert^p$ is finite for almost every $c$ hence the fact that $h_n(x)to 0$ follows from the implication (if $cgeqslant 0$ and $a_nto 0$) then $ccdot a_nto 0$.
For the domination condition, let $M:=sup_{ngeqslant 1}leftlVert g_nrightrVert_infty$. Then $leftlvert g(x)rightrvertleqslant M$ for almost every $x$ hence
$$leftlvert h_n(x) rightrvertleqslant left(2Mright)^pleftlvert f(x) rightrvert^p mbox{ a.e.}$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The only remaining thing to is show that $int_Omega h_nto 0$, where $h_n(x)=leftlvert f(x)left(g_n(x)-g(x)right)rightrvert^p$.
Since $f$ belongs to $mathbb L^p$, the quantity $leftlvert f(x) rightrvert^p$ is finite for almost every $c$ hence the fact that $h_n(x)to 0$ follows from the implication (if $cgeqslant 0$ and $a_nto 0$) then $ccdot a_nto 0$.
For the domination condition, let $M:=sup_{ngeqslant 1}leftlVert g_nrightrVert_infty$. Then $leftlvert g(x)rightrvertleqslant M$ for almost every $x$ hence
$$leftlvert h_n(x) rightrvertleqslant left(2Mright)^pleftlvert f(x) rightrvert^p mbox{ a.e.}$$
$endgroup$
The only remaining thing to is show that $int_Omega h_nto 0$, where $h_n(x)=leftlvert f(x)left(g_n(x)-g(x)right)rightrvert^p$.
Since $f$ belongs to $mathbb L^p$, the quantity $leftlvert f(x) rightrvert^p$ is finite for almost every $c$ hence the fact that $h_n(x)to 0$ follows from the implication (if $cgeqslant 0$ and $a_nto 0$) then $ccdot a_nto 0$.
For the domination condition, let $M:=sup_{ngeqslant 1}leftlVert g_nrightrVert_infty$. Then $leftlvert g(x)rightrvertleqslant M$ for almost every $x$ hence
$$leftlvert h_n(x) rightrvertleqslant left(2Mright)^pleftlvert f(x) rightrvert^p mbox{ a.e.}$$
answered Jan 10 at 20:04


Davide GiraudoDavide Giraudo
126k16150261
126k16150261
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067866%2fexcercise-4-3-3-in-brezis-convergence-in-l-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Are you asking how the $L_p$ convergence is shown from the dominated convergence theorem? Because if you show that the hint is true then the second term will also be smaller then $epsilon$ for $n$ large.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 9 at 20:02
$begingroup$
yes but i made another advance, since $g_nrightarrow g$ a.e. can i say that $fg_nrightarrow fg$ a.e. ???? Because if so, since i have that $|fg_n|^pleq M^p|f|^p$ then I can use dominated convergence.
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:16
$begingroup$
The first thing you wrote is true, but I'm not sure you can say the latter simply follows from dominated convergence theorem, because I think you need to bound $vert f(g-g_n) vert^p $ instead of $vert fg_nvert^p$.
$endgroup$
– Keen-ameteur
Jan 9 at 20:24
$begingroup$
$f(g_n-g)=fg_n-fg$ if the first one is bounded that is $|fg_n|^pleq M^p|f|^p$ and converges a.e. to the second one that is $fg$ then by dominated convergence $fg$ belongs in $L_p$ and $||f(g_n-g)||_p=||fg_n-fg||_p<epsilon$
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:41
$begingroup$
I only needed to know if the a.e. convergence was correct, because I think the dominated convergence theorem applies the way i did it
$endgroup$
– Alfdav
Jan 9 at 20:43