A natural isomomorphism of $G$-modules












0












$begingroup$



Let $A$ be a $G$ module, $Bbb Z$ regarded as a trivial $Bbb ZG$ module . Then
$$ Bbb Z otimes _G A rightarrow A/mathcal{G}A, quad motimes a mapsto ma+ mathcal{G}A $$
is an isomorphism. $mathcal{G}$ is the defined as the kernel of the augmentation map,
$$ 0 rightarrow mathcal{G} rightarrow Bbb Z G xrightarrow{epsilon} Bbb Z rightarrow 0 $$
$epsilon (sum m_g g): = sum m_g $




So my strategy to this problem is $-otimes_G A$ the exact sequence. So that $Bbb Z G otimes A/mathcal{G} otimes A cong Bbb Z otimes A$



So I guess the general question is: if $I$ is an ideal of ring $R$, $A$ is an $R$ module $I otimes_R A cong IA$? But this does not seem to be true in general.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$



    Let $A$ be a $G$ module, $Bbb Z$ regarded as a trivial $Bbb ZG$ module . Then
    $$ Bbb Z otimes _G A rightarrow A/mathcal{G}A, quad motimes a mapsto ma+ mathcal{G}A $$
    is an isomorphism. $mathcal{G}$ is the defined as the kernel of the augmentation map,
    $$ 0 rightarrow mathcal{G} rightarrow Bbb Z G xrightarrow{epsilon} Bbb Z rightarrow 0 $$
    $epsilon (sum m_g g): = sum m_g $




    So my strategy to this problem is $-otimes_G A$ the exact sequence. So that $Bbb Z G otimes A/mathcal{G} otimes A cong Bbb Z otimes A$



    So I guess the general question is: if $I$ is an ideal of ring $R$, $A$ is an $R$ module $I otimes_R A cong IA$? But this does not seem to be true in general.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      Let $A$ be a $G$ module, $Bbb Z$ regarded as a trivial $Bbb ZG$ module . Then
      $$ Bbb Z otimes _G A rightarrow A/mathcal{G}A, quad motimes a mapsto ma+ mathcal{G}A $$
      is an isomorphism. $mathcal{G}$ is the defined as the kernel of the augmentation map,
      $$ 0 rightarrow mathcal{G} rightarrow Bbb Z G xrightarrow{epsilon} Bbb Z rightarrow 0 $$
      $epsilon (sum m_g g): = sum m_g $




      So my strategy to this problem is $-otimes_G A$ the exact sequence. So that $Bbb Z G otimes A/mathcal{G} otimes A cong Bbb Z otimes A$



      So I guess the general question is: if $I$ is an ideal of ring $R$, $A$ is an $R$ module $I otimes_R A cong IA$? But this does not seem to be true in general.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      Let $A$ be a $G$ module, $Bbb Z$ regarded as a trivial $Bbb ZG$ module . Then
      $$ Bbb Z otimes _G A rightarrow A/mathcal{G}A, quad motimes a mapsto ma+ mathcal{G}A $$
      is an isomorphism. $mathcal{G}$ is the defined as the kernel of the augmentation map,
      $$ 0 rightarrow mathcal{G} rightarrow Bbb Z G xrightarrow{epsilon} Bbb Z rightarrow 0 $$
      $epsilon (sum m_g g): = sum m_g $




      So my strategy to this problem is $-otimes_G A$ the exact sequence. So that $Bbb Z G otimes A/mathcal{G} otimes A cong Bbb Z otimes A$



      So I guess the general question is: if $I$ is an ideal of ring $R$, $A$ is an $R$ module $I otimes_R A cong IA$? But this does not seem to be true in general.







      abstract-algebra group-theory modules homology-cohomology homological-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 18 at 8:19







      CL.

















      asked Jan 18 at 7:58









      CL.CL.

      2,2402925




      2,2402925






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          It's not necessary to have $Iotimes Asimeq IA$ for it to work.



          Just note that the image of $Iotimes A$ under $iotimes amapsto ia$ is $IA$ - this is easy.



          Then you have an exact sequence $mathcal{G}otimes Ato Ato mathbb{Z}otimes Ato 0$ and the image of the first map is $mathcal{G}A$; therefore the cokernel of this first map is $A/mathcal{G}A$



          Note that in general for an ideal $I$, you have a short exact sequence $0to Ito Rto R/Ito 0$, so that tensoring with an $R$-module $A$ yields an exact sequence $mathrm{Tor}^R_1(R/I,A) to Iotimes Ato Ato A/IAto 0$; so the kernel of the map $Iotimes Ato IA$ is $mathrm{Tor}^R_1(R/I,A)$ : it may not be trivial.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            1












            $begingroup$

            This is not a special property of $G$-modules.



            Let $R$ be a ring (not necessarily commutative), $I$ a right ideal of $R$ and $M$ a left $R$-module. Then
            $$
            R/Iotimes_R Mcong M/IM
            $$

            as abelian groups.



            Just show that $M/IM$ has the required universal property of the tensor product.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077951%2fa-natural-isomomorphism-of-g-modules%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              It's not necessary to have $Iotimes Asimeq IA$ for it to work.



              Just note that the image of $Iotimes A$ under $iotimes amapsto ia$ is $IA$ - this is easy.



              Then you have an exact sequence $mathcal{G}otimes Ato Ato mathbb{Z}otimes Ato 0$ and the image of the first map is $mathcal{G}A$; therefore the cokernel of this first map is $A/mathcal{G}A$



              Note that in general for an ideal $I$, you have a short exact sequence $0to Ito Rto R/Ito 0$, so that tensoring with an $R$-module $A$ yields an exact sequence $mathrm{Tor}^R_1(R/I,A) to Iotimes Ato Ato A/IAto 0$; so the kernel of the map $Iotimes Ato IA$ is $mathrm{Tor}^R_1(R/I,A)$ : it may not be trivial.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                It's not necessary to have $Iotimes Asimeq IA$ for it to work.



                Just note that the image of $Iotimes A$ under $iotimes amapsto ia$ is $IA$ - this is easy.



                Then you have an exact sequence $mathcal{G}otimes Ato Ato mathbb{Z}otimes Ato 0$ and the image of the first map is $mathcal{G}A$; therefore the cokernel of this first map is $A/mathcal{G}A$



                Note that in general for an ideal $I$, you have a short exact sequence $0to Ito Rto R/Ito 0$, so that tensoring with an $R$-module $A$ yields an exact sequence $mathrm{Tor}^R_1(R/I,A) to Iotimes Ato Ato A/IAto 0$; so the kernel of the map $Iotimes Ato IA$ is $mathrm{Tor}^R_1(R/I,A)$ : it may not be trivial.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  It's not necessary to have $Iotimes Asimeq IA$ for it to work.



                  Just note that the image of $Iotimes A$ under $iotimes amapsto ia$ is $IA$ - this is easy.



                  Then you have an exact sequence $mathcal{G}otimes Ato Ato mathbb{Z}otimes Ato 0$ and the image of the first map is $mathcal{G}A$; therefore the cokernel of this first map is $A/mathcal{G}A$



                  Note that in general for an ideal $I$, you have a short exact sequence $0to Ito Rto R/Ito 0$, so that tensoring with an $R$-module $A$ yields an exact sequence $mathrm{Tor}^R_1(R/I,A) to Iotimes Ato Ato A/IAto 0$; so the kernel of the map $Iotimes Ato IA$ is $mathrm{Tor}^R_1(R/I,A)$ : it may not be trivial.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  It's not necessary to have $Iotimes Asimeq IA$ for it to work.



                  Just note that the image of $Iotimes A$ under $iotimes amapsto ia$ is $IA$ - this is easy.



                  Then you have an exact sequence $mathcal{G}otimes Ato Ato mathbb{Z}otimes Ato 0$ and the image of the first map is $mathcal{G}A$; therefore the cokernel of this first map is $A/mathcal{G}A$



                  Note that in general for an ideal $I$, you have a short exact sequence $0to Ito Rto R/Ito 0$, so that tensoring with an $R$-module $A$ yields an exact sequence $mathrm{Tor}^R_1(R/I,A) to Iotimes Ato Ato A/IAto 0$; so the kernel of the map $Iotimes Ato IA$ is $mathrm{Tor}^R_1(R/I,A)$ : it may not be trivial.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 18 at 9:08









                  MaxMax

                  14.7k11143




                  14.7k11143























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      This is not a special property of $G$-modules.



                      Let $R$ be a ring (not necessarily commutative), $I$ a right ideal of $R$ and $M$ a left $R$-module. Then
                      $$
                      R/Iotimes_R Mcong M/IM
                      $$

                      as abelian groups.



                      Just show that $M/IM$ has the required universal property of the tensor product.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        This is not a special property of $G$-modules.



                        Let $R$ be a ring (not necessarily commutative), $I$ a right ideal of $R$ and $M$ a left $R$-module. Then
                        $$
                        R/Iotimes_R Mcong M/IM
                        $$

                        as abelian groups.



                        Just show that $M/IM$ has the required universal property of the tensor product.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          1












                          1








                          1





                          $begingroup$

                          This is not a special property of $G$-modules.



                          Let $R$ be a ring (not necessarily commutative), $I$ a right ideal of $R$ and $M$ a left $R$-module. Then
                          $$
                          R/Iotimes_R Mcong M/IM
                          $$

                          as abelian groups.



                          Just show that $M/IM$ has the required universal property of the tensor product.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          This is not a special property of $G$-modules.



                          Let $R$ be a ring (not necessarily commutative), $I$ a right ideal of $R$ and $M$ a left $R$-module. Then
                          $$
                          R/Iotimes_R Mcong M/IM
                          $$

                          as abelian groups.



                          Just show that $M/IM$ has the required universal property of the tensor product.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Jan 18 at 9:01









                          egregegreg

                          183k1486205




                          183k1486205






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077951%2fa-natural-isomomorphism-of-g-modules%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                              SQL update select statement

                              'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules