Mixing
Cocompact & discrete lattice
$begingroup$
I don't understand a step in the proof of the following proposition:
Let $Lambda$ be a subgroup of a real vector space $V$ of finite dimension. Then $Lambda$ is a full lattice if and only if $Lambda$ is discrete and $V/Lambda$ is compact.
Proof.(the part I don't understand) Assume $Lambda$ is discrete and $V/Lambda$ is compact, let $W$ be the subspace of $V$ spanned by $Lambda$, then the real vector space $V/W$ can't have positive dimension since $V/Lambda$ is compact.
Why is $V/W$ a trivial vector space?
number-theory algebraic-number-theory vector-lattices
asked Jan 14 at 14:16
CYCCYC
972711
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't understand a step in the proof of the following proposition:
Let $Lambda$ be a subgroup of a real vector space $V$ of finite dimension. Then $Lambda$ is a full lattice if and only if $Lambda$ is discrete and $V/Lambda$ is compact.
Proof.(the part I don't understand) Assume $Lambda$ is discrete and $V/Lambda$ is compact, let $W$ be the subspace of $V$ spanned by $Lambda$, then the real vector space $V/W$ can't have positive dimension since $V/Lambda$ is compact.
Why is $V/W$ a trivial vector space?
number-theory algebraic-number-theory vector-lattices
asked Jan 14 at 14:16
CYCCYC
972711
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't understand a step in the proof of the following proposition:
Let $Lambda$ be a subgroup of a real vector space $V$ of finite dimension. Then $Lambda$ is a full lattice if and only if $Lambda$ is discrete and $V/Lambda$ is compact.
Proof.(the part I don't understand) Assume $Lambda$ is discrete and $V/Lambda$ is compact, let $W$ be the subspace of $V$ spanned by $Lambda$, then the real vector space $V/W$ can't have positive dimension since $V/Lambda$ is compact.
Why is $V/W$ a trivial vector space?
number-theory algebraic-number-theory vector-lattices
asked Jan 14 at 14:16
CYCCYC
972711
$endgroup$
I don't understand a step in the proof of the following proposition:
Let $Lambda$ be a subgroup of a real vector space $V$ of finite dimension. Then $Lambda$ is a full lattice if and only if $Lambda$ is discrete and $V/Lambda$ is compact.
Proof.(the part I don't understand) Assume $Lambda$ is discrete and $V/Lambda$ is compact, let $W$ be the subspace of $V$ spanned by $Lambda$, then the real vector space $V/W$ can't have positive dimension since $V/Lambda$ is compact.
Why is $V/W$ a trivial vector space?
number-theory algebraic-number-theory vector-lattices
number-theory algebraic-number-theory vector-lattices
asked Jan 14 at 14:16
CYCCYC
972711
asked Jan 14 at 14:16
CYCCYC
972711
asked Jan 14 at 14:16
CYCCYC
972711
asked Jan 14 at 14:16
CYCCYC
972711
asked Jan 14 at 14:16
CYCCYC
972711
972711
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The first thing going on here is a sequence of equivalencies: $Lambda$ does not span $V iff W$ is a proper subspace of $V iff V/W$ has positive dimension $iff V/W$ is a nontrivial vector space.
But if all of that happens then $V/W$ is noncompact. The inclusion $Lambda subset W$ induces a surjective continuous function $V / Lambda mapsto V / W$, and therefore $V / Lambda$ is noncompact, a contradiction.
answered Jan 14 at 14:31
Lee MosherLee Mosher
49.4k33686
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073267%2fcocompact-discrete-lattice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The first thing going on here is a sequence of equivalencies: $Lambda$ does not span $V iff W$ is a proper subspace of $V iff V/W$ has positive dimension $iff V/W$ is a nontrivial vector space.
But if all of that happens then $V/W$ is noncompact. The inclusion $Lambda subset W$ induces a surjective continuous function $V / Lambda mapsto V / W$, and therefore $V / Lambda$ is noncompact, a contradiction.
answered Jan 14 at 14:31
Lee MosherLee Mosher
49.4k33686
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first thing going on here is a sequence of equivalencies: $Lambda$ does not span $V iff W$ is a proper subspace of $V iff V/W$ has positive dimension $iff V/W$ is a nontrivial vector space.
But if all of that happens then $V/W$ is noncompact. The inclusion $Lambda subset W$ induces a surjective continuous function $V / Lambda mapsto V / W$, and therefore $V / Lambda$ is noncompact, a contradiction.
answered Jan 14 at 14:31
Lee MosherLee Mosher
49.4k33686
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The first thing going on here is a sequence of equivalencies: $Lambda$ does not span $V iff W$ is a proper subspace of $V iff V/W$ has positive dimension $iff V/W$ is a nontrivial vector space.
But if all of that happens then $V/W$ is noncompact. The inclusion $Lambda subset W$ induces a surjective continuous function $V / Lambda mapsto V / W$, and therefore $V / Lambda$ is noncompact, a contradiction.
answered Jan 14 at 14:31
Lee MosherLee Mosher
49.4k33686
$endgroup$
The first thing going on here is a sequence of equivalencies: $Lambda$ does not span $V iff W$ is a proper subspace of $V iff V/W$ has positive dimension $iff V/W$ is a nontrivial vector space.
But if all of that happens then $V/W$ is noncompact. The inclusion $Lambda subset W$ induces a surjective continuous function $V / Lambda mapsto V / W$, and therefore $V / Lambda$ is noncompact, a contradiction.
answered Jan 14 at 14:31
Lee MosherLee Mosher
49.4k33686
answered Jan 14 at 14:31
Lee MosherLee Mosher
49.4k33686
answered Jan 14 at 14:31
Lee MosherLee Mosher
49.4k33686
answered Jan 14 at 14:31
Lee MosherLee Mosher
49.4k33686
49.4k33686
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073267%2fcocompact-discrete-lattice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
