What is x in terms of p?
$begingroup$
In this equation
$$frac x{ln(x)} = p$$
How can I have $x$ as a function of $p$?
logarithms inverse-function
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In this equation
$$frac x{ln(x)} = p$$
How can I have $x$ as a function of $p$?
logarithms inverse-function
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I don't think the function $f(x)=frac{x}{ln x}$ has an elementary inverse. That is, the function is invertible, but there is no way to "nicely" write the inverse of it.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 14 at 13:53
2
$begingroup$
Assuming $p$ is an integer, $x$ is almost the $p$th prime, if that helps.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 14 at 13:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In this equation
$$frac x{ln(x)} = p$$
How can I have $x$ as a function of $p$?
logarithms inverse-function
$endgroup$
In this equation
$$frac x{ln(x)} = p$$
How can I have $x$ as a function of $p$?
logarithms inverse-function
logarithms inverse-function
edited Jan 14 at 13:57
mrtaurho
5,44541237
5,44541237
asked Jan 14 at 13:51
Matin N.Matin N.
51
51
1
$begingroup$
I don't think the function $f(x)=frac{x}{ln x}$ has an elementary inverse. That is, the function is invertible, but there is no way to "nicely" write the inverse of it.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 14 at 13:53
2
$begingroup$
Assuming $p$ is an integer, $x$ is almost the $p$th prime, if that helps.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 14 at 13:55
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I don't think the function $f(x)=frac{x}{ln x}$ has an elementary inverse. That is, the function is invertible, but there is no way to "nicely" write the inverse of it.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 14 at 13:53
2
$begingroup$
Assuming $p$ is an integer, $x$ is almost the $p$th prime, if that helps.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 14 at 13:55
1
1
$begingroup$
I don't think the function $f(x)=frac{x}{ln x}$ has an elementary inverse. That is, the function is invertible, but there is no way to "nicely" write the inverse of it.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 14 at 13:53
$begingroup$
I don't think the function $f(x)=frac{x}{ln x}$ has an elementary inverse. That is, the function is invertible, but there is no way to "nicely" write the inverse of it.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 14 at 13:53
2
2
$begingroup$
Assuming $p$ is an integer, $x$ is almost the $p$th prime, if that helps.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 14 at 13:55
$begingroup$
Assuming $p$ is an integer, $x$ is almost the $p$th prime, if that helps.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 14 at 13:55
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is a typical example of a transcendental equation with a solution that cannot be expressed with most widely known analytical functions (trigonometric, exponential and logarithmic).
Rule of thumb: if $x$ is found both inside and outside log/exp/sin, the equation cannot be inverted in terms of these functions.
However, the equation is common enough to have a so called "special function" which can be used to invert it: Lambert's function $x=W(y)$, which solves equation $xe^{x}=y$.
Of course, as Lambert's function doesn't usually have a button on a calculator, that does not help much, but does mean people have studied this function and have efficient means of calculating its value.
You just have to transform it into the form to apply the rule for Lambert's function;
$$ln x = frac{x}{p}$$
$$x=e^{x/p}$$
$$xe^{-x/p}=1$$
new variable $u=-x/p$
$$-pu e^{u}=1$$
$$ue^u=-1/p$$
$$u=W(-1/p)$$
$$x=-pu=-p W(-1/p)$$
Of course you have to be careful because for negative arguments, $W$ can have two branches (equation has two solutions), or no real solution at all, if the value is too negative (below $-1/e$).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073254%2fwhat-is-x-in-terms-of-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is a typical example of a transcendental equation with a solution that cannot be expressed with most widely known analytical functions (trigonometric, exponential and logarithmic).
Rule of thumb: if $x$ is found both inside and outside log/exp/sin, the equation cannot be inverted in terms of these functions.
However, the equation is common enough to have a so called "special function" which can be used to invert it: Lambert's function $x=W(y)$, which solves equation $xe^{x}=y$.
Of course, as Lambert's function doesn't usually have a button on a calculator, that does not help much, but does mean people have studied this function and have efficient means of calculating its value.
You just have to transform it into the form to apply the rule for Lambert's function;
$$ln x = frac{x}{p}$$
$$x=e^{x/p}$$
$$xe^{-x/p}=1$$
new variable $u=-x/p$
$$-pu e^{u}=1$$
$$ue^u=-1/p$$
$$u=W(-1/p)$$
$$x=-pu=-p W(-1/p)$$
Of course you have to be careful because for negative arguments, $W$ can have two branches (equation has two solutions), or no real solution at all, if the value is too negative (below $-1/e$).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a typical example of a transcendental equation with a solution that cannot be expressed with most widely known analytical functions (trigonometric, exponential and logarithmic).
Rule of thumb: if $x$ is found both inside and outside log/exp/sin, the equation cannot be inverted in terms of these functions.
However, the equation is common enough to have a so called "special function" which can be used to invert it: Lambert's function $x=W(y)$, which solves equation $xe^{x}=y$.
Of course, as Lambert's function doesn't usually have a button on a calculator, that does not help much, but does mean people have studied this function and have efficient means of calculating its value.
You just have to transform it into the form to apply the rule for Lambert's function;
$$ln x = frac{x}{p}$$
$$x=e^{x/p}$$
$$xe^{-x/p}=1$$
new variable $u=-x/p$
$$-pu e^{u}=1$$
$$ue^u=-1/p$$
$$u=W(-1/p)$$
$$x=-pu=-p W(-1/p)$$
Of course you have to be careful because for negative arguments, $W$ can have two branches (equation has two solutions), or no real solution at all, if the value is too negative (below $-1/e$).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a typical example of a transcendental equation with a solution that cannot be expressed with most widely known analytical functions (trigonometric, exponential and logarithmic).
Rule of thumb: if $x$ is found both inside and outside log/exp/sin, the equation cannot be inverted in terms of these functions.
However, the equation is common enough to have a so called "special function" which can be used to invert it: Lambert's function $x=W(y)$, which solves equation $xe^{x}=y$.
Of course, as Lambert's function doesn't usually have a button on a calculator, that does not help much, but does mean people have studied this function and have efficient means of calculating its value.
You just have to transform it into the form to apply the rule for Lambert's function;
$$ln x = frac{x}{p}$$
$$x=e^{x/p}$$
$$xe^{-x/p}=1$$
new variable $u=-x/p$
$$-pu e^{u}=1$$
$$ue^u=-1/p$$
$$u=W(-1/p)$$
$$x=-pu=-p W(-1/p)$$
Of course you have to be careful because for negative arguments, $W$ can have two branches (equation has two solutions), or no real solution at all, if the value is too negative (below $-1/e$).
$endgroup$
This is a typical example of a transcendental equation with a solution that cannot be expressed with most widely known analytical functions (trigonometric, exponential and logarithmic).
Rule of thumb: if $x$ is found both inside and outside log/exp/sin, the equation cannot be inverted in terms of these functions.
However, the equation is common enough to have a so called "special function" which can be used to invert it: Lambert's function $x=W(y)$, which solves equation $xe^{x}=y$.
Of course, as Lambert's function doesn't usually have a button on a calculator, that does not help much, but does mean people have studied this function and have efficient means of calculating its value.
You just have to transform it into the form to apply the rule for Lambert's function;
$$ln x = frac{x}{p}$$
$$x=e^{x/p}$$
$$xe^{-x/p}=1$$
new variable $u=-x/p$
$$-pu e^{u}=1$$
$$ue^u=-1/p$$
$$u=W(-1/p)$$
$$x=-pu=-p W(-1/p)$$
Of course you have to be careful because for negative arguments, $W$ can have two branches (equation has two solutions), or no real solution at all, if the value is too negative (below $-1/e$).
edited Jan 14 at 14:52
answered Jan 14 at 13:56
orionorion
13.6k11837
13.6k11837
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073254%2fwhat-is-x-in-terms-of-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
I don't think the function $f(x)=frac{x}{ln x}$ has an elementary inverse. That is, the function is invertible, but there is no way to "nicely" write the inverse of it.
$endgroup$
– 5xum
Jan 14 at 13:53
2
$begingroup$
Assuming $p$ is an integer, $x$ is almost the $p$th prime, if that helps.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
Jan 14 at 13:55