does the language 𝐿 = {, : 𝐿(𝑀1 ) ⊆ 𝐿(𝑀2)} is in co-RE?












0












$begingroup$


i was asked to determine if its in RE and if its in co-RE.
well i think its easy to say the language is not in RE but i was wondering if this language is in co-RE.
so the question is if $overline{L}$= {< 𝑀1 >, < 𝑀2 >: $ 𝐿(𝑀1 )notsubseteq 𝐿(𝑀2)$} is in RE?
my intuition is that if there is a word in 𝐿(𝑀1 ) which is not in 𝐿(𝑀2 ), we can eventually get to this word and try to run it on both machines.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Since $bar L$ includes any string that is not in $L$, it includes the string $langle M1 rangle$ so your definition of $bar L$ is not correct. What you could do is prove that $L notin R$ and $L in RE$ which would mean that $bar L notin RE$ and hence $L notin$ co-RE
    $endgroup$
    – user137481
    Jan 15 at 23:34
















0












$begingroup$


i was asked to determine if its in RE and if its in co-RE.
well i think its easy to say the language is not in RE but i was wondering if this language is in co-RE.
so the question is if $overline{L}$= {< 𝑀1 >, < 𝑀2 >: $ 𝐿(𝑀1 )notsubseteq 𝐿(𝑀2)$} is in RE?
my intuition is that if there is a word in 𝐿(𝑀1 ) which is not in 𝐿(𝑀2 ), we can eventually get to this word and try to run it on both machines.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Since $bar L$ includes any string that is not in $L$, it includes the string $langle M1 rangle$ so your definition of $bar L$ is not correct. What you could do is prove that $L notin R$ and $L in RE$ which would mean that $bar L notin RE$ and hence $L notin$ co-RE
    $endgroup$
    – user137481
    Jan 15 at 23:34














0












0








0





$begingroup$


i was asked to determine if its in RE and if its in co-RE.
well i think its easy to say the language is not in RE but i was wondering if this language is in co-RE.
so the question is if $overline{L}$= {< 𝑀1 >, < 𝑀2 >: $ 𝐿(𝑀1 )notsubseteq 𝐿(𝑀2)$} is in RE?
my intuition is that if there is a word in 𝐿(𝑀1 ) which is not in 𝐿(𝑀2 ), we can eventually get to this word and try to run it on both machines.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




i was asked to determine if its in RE and if its in co-RE.
well i think its easy to say the language is not in RE but i was wondering if this language is in co-RE.
so the question is if $overline{L}$= {< 𝑀1 >, < 𝑀2 >: $ 𝐿(𝑀1 )notsubseteq 𝐿(𝑀2)$} is in RE?
my intuition is that if there is a word in 𝐿(𝑀1 ) which is not in 𝐿(𝑀2 ), we can eventually get to this word and try to run it on both machines.







turing-machines decidability






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 14 at 13:21









Ori BenamiOri Benami

63




63












  • $begingroup$
    Since $bar L$ includes any string that is not in $L$, it includes the string $langle M1 rangle$ so your definition of $bar L$ is not correct. What you could do is prove that $L notin R$ and $L in RE$ which would mean that $bar L notin RE$ and hence $L notin$ co-RE
    $endgroup$
    – user137481
    Jan 15 at 23:34


















  • $begingroup$
    Since $bar L$ includes any string that is not in $L$, it includes the string $langle M1 rangle$ so your definition of $bar L$ is not correct. What you could do is prove that $L notin R$ and $L in RE$ which would mean that $bar L notin RE$ and hence $L notin$ co-RE
    $endgroup$
    – user137481
    Jan 15 at 23:34
















$begingroup$
Since $bar L$ includes any string that is not in $L$, it includes the string $langle M1 rangle$ so your definition of $bar L$ is not correct. What you could do is prove that $L notin R$ and $L in RE$ which would mean that $bar L notin RE$ and hence $L notin$ co-RE
$endgroup$
– user137481
Jan 15 at 23:34




$begingroup$
Since $bar L$ includes any string that is not in $L$, it includes the string $langle M1 rangle$ so your definition of $bar L$ is not correct. What you could do is prove that $L notin R$ and $L in RE$ which would mean that $bar L notin RE$ and hence $L notin$ co-RE
$endgroup$
– user137481
Jan 15 at 23:34










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073222%2fdoes-the-language-1-2-1-%25e2%258a%2586-2-is-in-co-re%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073222%2fdoes-the-language-1-2-1-%25e2%258a%2586-2-is-in-co-re%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$