continuous-sup property and equicontinuous set.












0












$begingroup$



Suppose that $Lambda subset C^{0}$ is equicontinuous and bounded.



(a) Prove that $sup{f(x)mid f in Lambda}$ is a continuous function.



(b) Show that (a) fails without equicontinuity.



(c) Show that this continuous-sup property does not imply equicontinuity.



(d) Assume that the continuous-sup property is true for each subset $mathcal{F} subset Lambda$. Is $Lambda$ equicontinuous? Give a proof or counterexample.




My attempt.



(a) We have that
$$sup f(x) = sup (f(x)-f(y) + f(y)) leq sup f(y) + sup(f(x)-f(y)),$$
then
$$sup f(x) - sup f(y) leq sup (f(x)-f(y)) leq Vert f(x) - f(y) Vert$$
and
$$sup f(y) - sup f(x) leq sup (f(y)-f(x)) leq Vert f(x) - f(y) Vert,$$
that is,
$$|sup f(x) - sup f(y)| leq Vert f(x) - f(y) Vert.$$
Since $Lambda$ is equicontinuous, given $epsilon > 0$ there is $delta > 0$ such that $|x - y| < delta$ implies $|f(x) - f(y)| < epsilon$ for each $f in Lambda$. Therefore,
$$|x - y| < delta Longrightarrow |sup f(x) - sup f(y)| < epsilon$$





(b) I can see why without equicontinuity, (a) fails: can be exist a function $f$ that not satisfies $|f(x) - f(y)| < epsilon$. But I cannot find a counterexample.





(c) Consider $C^{0}([0,1],mathbb{R})$ and $Lambda = {f_{n}(x) = x^{n}}_{n}$. Note that
$$sup_{x in [0,1]} f(x) = 1quad forall f in Lambda.$$
Thus, $g = sup f$ is continuous, but $Lambda$ is not equicontinuous.





(d) By Mindlack's observation, the same example of (c) works in (d).





Can someone help me?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$



    Suppose that $Lambda subset C^{0}$ is equicontinuous and bounded.



    (a) Prove that $sup{f(x)mid f in Lambda}$ is a continuous function.



    (b) Show that (a) fails without equicontinuity.



    (c) Show that this continuous-sup property does not imply equicontinuity.



    (d) Assume that the continuous-sup property is true for each subset $mathcal{F} subset Lambda$. Is $Lambda$ equicontinuous? Give a proof or counterexample.




    My attempt.



    (a) We have that
    $$sup f(x) = sup (f(x)-f(y) + f(y)) leq sup f(y) + sup(f(x)-f(y)),$$
    then
    $$sup f(x) - sup f(y) leq sup (f(x)-f(y)) leq Vert f(x) - f(y) Vert$$
    and
    $$sup f(y) - sup f(x) leq sup (f(y)-f(x)) leq Vert f(x) - f(y) Vert,$$
    that is,
    $$|sup f(x) - sup f(y)| leq Vert f(x) - f(y) Vert.$$
    Since $Lambda$ is equicontinuous, given $epsilon > 0$ there is $delta > 0$ such that $|x - y| < delta$ implies $|f(x) - f(y)| < epsilon$ for each $f in Lambda$. Therefore,
    $$|x - y| < delta Longrightarrow |sup f(x) - sup f(y)| < epsilon$$





    (b) I can see why without equicontinuity, (a) fails: can be exist a function $f$ that not satisfies $|f(x) - f(y)| < epsilon$. But I cannot find a counterexample.





    (c) Consider $C^{0}([0,1],mathbb{R})$ and $Lambda = {f_{n}(x) = x^{n}}_{n}$. Note that
    $$sup_{x in [0,1]} f(x) = 1quad forall f in Lambda.$$
    Thus, $g = sup f$ is continuous, but $Lambda$ is not equicontinuous.





    (d) By Mindlack's observation, the same example of (c) works in (d).





    Can someone help me?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      Suppose that $Lambda subset C^{0}$ is equicontinuous and bounded.



      (a) Prove that $sup{f(x)mid f in Lambda}$ is a continuous function.



      (b) Show that (a) fails without equicontinuity.



      (c) Show that this continuous-sup property does not imply equicontinuity.



      (d) Assume that the continuous-sup property is true for each subset $mathcal{F} subset Lambda$. Is $Lambda$ equicontinuous? Give a proof or counterexample.




      My attempt.



      (a) We have that
      $$sup f(x) = sup (f(x)-f(y) + f(y)) leq sup f(y) + sup(f(x)-f(y)),$$
      then
      $$sup f(x) - sup f(y) leq sup (f(x)-f(y)) leq Vert f(x) - f(y) Vert$$
      and
      $$sup f(y) - sup f(x) leq sup (f(y)-f(x)) leq Vert f(x) - f(y) Vert,$$
      that is,
      $$|sup f(x) - sup f(y)| leq Vert f(x) - f(y) Vert.$$
      Since $Lambda$ is equicontinuous, given $epsilon > 0$ there is $delta > 0$ such that $|x - y| < delta$ implies $|f(x) - f(y)| < epsilon$ for each $f in Lambda$. Therefore,
      $$|x - y| < delta Longrightarrow |sup f(x) - sup f(y)| < epsilon$$





      (b) I can see why without equicontinuity, (a) fails: can be exist a function $f$ that not satisfies $|f(x) - f(y)| < epsilon$. But I cannot find a counterexample.





      (c) Consider $C^{0}([0,1],mathbb{R})$ and $Lambda = {f_{n}(x) = x^{n}}_{n}$. Note that
      $$sup_{x in [0,1]} f(x) = 1quad forall f in Lambda.$$
      Thus, $g = sup f$ is continuous, but $Lambda$ is not equicontinuous.





      (d) By Mindlack's observation, the same example of (c) works in (d).





      Can someone help me?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      Suppose that $Lambda subset C^{0}$ is equicontinuous and bounded.



      (a) Prove that $sup{f(x)mid f in Lambda}$ is a continuous function.



      (b) Show that (a) fails without equicontinuity.



      (c) Show that this continuous-sup property does not imply equicontinuity.



      (d) Assume that the continuous-sup property is true for each subset $mathcal{F} subset Lambda$. Is $Lambda$ equicontinuous? Give a proof or counterexample.




      My attempt.



      (a) We have that
      $$sup f(x) = sup (f(x)-f(y) + f(y)) leq sup f(y) + sup(f(x)-f(y)),$$
      then
      $$sup f(x) - sup f(y) leq sup (f(x)-f(y)) leq Vert f(x) - f(y) Vert$$
      and
      $$sup f(y) - sup f(x) leq sup (f(y)-f(x)) leq Vert f(x) - f(y) Vert,$$
      that is,
      $$|sup f(x) - sup f(y)| leq Vert f(x) - f(y) Vert.$$
      Since $Lambda$ is equicontinuous, given $epsilon > 0$ there is $delta > 0$ such that $|x - y| < delta$ implies $|f(x) - f(y)| < epsilon$ for each $f in Lambda$. Therefore,
      $$|x - y| < delta Longrightarrow |sup f(x) - sup f(y)| < epsilon$$





      (b) I can see why without equicontinuity, (a) fails: can be exist a function $f$ that not satisfies $|f(x) - f(y)| < epsilon$. But I cannot find a counterexample.





      (c) Consider $C^{0}([0,1],mathbb{R})$ and $Lambda = {f_{n}(x) = x^{n}}_{n}$. Note that
      $$sup_{x in [0,1]} f(x) = 1quad forall f in Lambda.$$
      Thus, $g = sup f$ is continuous, but $Lambda$ is not equicontinuous.





      (d) By Mindlack's observation, the same example of (c) works in (d).





      Can someone help me?







      real-analysis equicontinuity






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 10 at 17:28







      Lucas Corrêa

















      asked Jan 10 at 17:11









      Lucas CorrêaLucas Corrêa

      1,6151321




      1,6151321






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          $b$: try piecewise affine functions $f_n$ that are $0$ on $[0,1/2n]$ and $1$ on $[1/n,1]$.



          $d$: have you tried re-using $c$?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Of course! Seems to me that (c) works in (d), thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Corrêa
            Jan 10 at 17:21










          • $begingroup$
            About (a), what would be the problem?
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Corrêa
            Jan 10 at 17:22






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Nothing, it works.
            $endgroup$
            – Mindlack
            Jan 10 at 17:24










          • $begingroup$
            All right. I'll try your suggestion for (b). Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Corrêa
            Jan 10 at 17:26











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068921%2fcontinuous-sup-property-and-equicontinuous-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          $b$: try piecewise affine functions $f_n$ that are $0$ on $[0,1/2n]$ and $1$ on $[1/n,1]$.



          $d$: have you tried re-using $c$?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Of course! Seems to me that (c) works in (d), thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Corrêa
            Jan 10 at 17:21










          • $begingroup$
            About (a), what would be the problem?
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Corrêa
            Jan 10 at 17:22






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Nothing, it works.
            $endgroup$
            – Mindlack
            Jan 10 at 17:24










          • $begingroup$
            All right. I'll try your suggestion for (b). Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Corrêa
            Jan 10 at 17:26
















          1












          $begingroup$

          $b$: try piecewise affine functions $f_n$ that are $0$ on $[0,1/2n]$ and $1$ on $[1/n,1]$.



          $d$: have you tried re-using $c$?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Of course! Seems to me that (c) works in (d), thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Corrêa
            Jan 10 at 17:21










          • $begingroup$
            About (a), what would be the problem?
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Corrêa
            Jan 10 at 17:22






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Nothing, it works.
            $endgroup$
            – Mindlack
            Jan 10 at 17:24










          • $begingroup$
            All right. I'll try your suggestion for (b). Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Corrêa
            Jan 10 at 17:26














          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          $b$: try piecewise affine functions $f_n$ that are $0$ on $[0,1/2n]$ and $1$ on $[1/n,1]$.



          $d$: have you tried re-using $c$?






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          $b$: try piecewise affine functions $f_n$ that are $0$ on $[0,1/2n]$ and $1$ on $[1/n,1]$.



          $d$: have you tried re-using $c$?







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 10 at 17:25

























          answered Jan 10 at 17:16









          MindlackMindlack

          3,61517




          3,61517












          • $begingroup$
            Of course! Seems to me that (c) works in (d), thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Corrêa
            Jan 10 at 17:21










          • $begingroup$
            About (a), what would be the problem?
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Corrêa
            Jan 10 at 17:22






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Nothing, it works.
            $endgroup$
            – Mindlack
            Jan 10 at 17:24










          • $begingroup$
            All right. I'll try your suggestion for (b). Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Corrêa
            Jan 10 at 17:26


















          • $begingroup$
            Of course! Seems to me that (c) works in (d), thank you!
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Corrêa
            Jan 10 at 17:21










          • $begingroup$
            About (a), what would be the problem?
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Corrêa
            Jan 10 at 17:22






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Nothing, it works.
            $endgroup$
            – Mindlack
            Jan 10 at 17:24










          • $begingroup$
            All right. I'll try your suggestion for (b). Thanks!
            $endgroup$
            – Lucas Corrêa
            Jan 10 at 17:26
















          $begingroup$
          Of course! Seems to me that (c) works in (d), thank you!
          $endgroup$
          – Lucas Corrêa
          Jan 10 at 17:21




          $begingroup$
          Of course! Seems to me that (c) works in (d), thank you!
          $endgroup$
          – Lucas Corrêa
          Jan 10 at 17:21












          $begingroup$
          About (a), what would be the problem?
          $endgroup$
          – Lucas Corrêa
          Jan 10 at 17:22




          $begingroup$
          About (a), what would be the problem?
          $endgroup$
          – Lucas Corrêa
          Jan 10 at 17:22




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Nothing, it works.
          $endgroup$
          – Mindlack
          Jan 10 at 17:24




          $begingroup$
          Nothing, it works.
          $endgroup$
          – Mindlack
          Jan 10 at 17:24












          $begingroup$
          All right. I'll try your suggestion for (b). Thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – Lucas Corrêa
          Jan 10 at 17:26




          $begingroup$
          All right. I'll try your suggestion for (b). Thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – Lucas Corrêa
          Jan 10 at 17:26


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068921%2fcontinuous-sup-property-and-equicontinuous-set%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

          android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

          WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]