Mixing
Converting BitSet to Byte[]
3
I have a BitSet, which needs to be converted to a Byte. However, by using BitSet.toByteArray(), I don't get the correct output. I have tried converting the Byte to its binary form in order to check whether the Bitset and the binary form of the Byte are similiar.
public static void generate() {
BitSet temp1 = new BitSet(64);
for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
if(i % 8 != 0 && i < 23) {
temp1.set(i, true);
}
}
StringBuilder s = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
s.append(temp1.get(i) == true ? 1 : 0);
}
System.out.println(s);
byte tempByteKey1 = temp1.toByteArray();
for (byte b : tempByteKey1) {
System.out.print(Integer.toBinaryString(b & 255 | 256).substring(1));
}
}
Output:
Bitset: 0111111101111111011111100000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Converted Byte: 1111111011111110011111100000000000000000000000000000000000000000
They are both 64 bits, but the first 0 in the BitSet is placed somewhere else after the conversion. Why is this happening, and how can I fix it?
java arrays bitset
asked Nov 20 '18 at 22:17
user8231110user8231110
486
add a comment |
3
I have a BitSet, which needs to be converted to a Byte. However, by using BitSet.toByteArray(), I don't get the correct output. I have tried converting the Byte to its binary form in order to check whether the Bitset and the binary form of the Byte are similiar.
public static void generate() {
BitSet temp1 = new BitSet(64);
for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
if(i % 8 != 0 && i < 23) {
temp1.set(i, true);
}
}
StringBuilder s = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
s.append(temp1.get(i) == true ? 1 : 0);
}
System.out.println(s);
byte tempByteKey1 = temp1.toByteArray();
for (byte b : tempByteKey1) {
System.out.print(Integer.toBinaryString(b & 255 | 256).substring(1));
}
}
Output:
Bitset: 0111111101111111011111100000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Converted Byte: 1111111011111110011111100000000000000000000000000000000000000000
They are both 64 bits, but the first 0 in the BitSet is placed somewhere else after the conversion. Why is this happening, and how can I fix it?
java arrays bitset
asked Nov 20 '18 at 22:17
user8231110user8231110
486
1
the bit order is being printed in reverse bytoBinaryStringas you are printing the BitSet. You start with the less significant bit,toBinaryStringstarts with the most significant one.(see how the zero is in first position on first output, and at 8th position on second output)
– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:28
But they both have six trues as low order and seven trues as high order
– user8231110
Nov 20 '18 at 22:33
1
what are you counting??? BitSet:01111111 01111111 01111110 0...; toBinaryString:11111110 11111110 01111110 0...=> each corresponding 8 bits are reversed. Or, using chars for bits, BitSet:hgfedcba ponmlkji ..., toBinaryString:abcdefgh ijklmnop ...
– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:36
That makes sense, but is it possible to store it as it originally was i.e. without the reversing?
– user8231110
Nov 20 '18 at 22:40
??? it is stored as originally , just the way you represent it differs as howtoBinaryStringdoes
– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:40
add a comment |
3
3
3
I have a BitSet, which needs to be converted to a Byte. However, by using BitSet.toByteArray(), I don't get the correct output. I have tried converting the Byte to its binary form in order to check whether the Bitset and the binary form of the Byte are similiar.
public static void generate() {
BitSet temp1 = new BitSet(64);
for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
if(i % 8 != 0 && i < 23) {
temp1.set(i, true);
}
}
StringBuilder s = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
s.append(temp1.get(i) == true ? 1 : 0);
}
System.out.println(s);
byte tempByteKey1 = temp1.toByteArray();
for (byte b : tempByteKey1) {
System.out.print(Integer.toBinaryString(b & 255 | 256).substring(1));
}
}
Output:
Bitset: 0111111101111111011111100000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Converted Byte: 1111111011111110011111100000000000000000000000000000000000000000
They are both 64 bits, but the first 0 in the BitSet is placed somewhere else after the conversion. Why is this happening, and how can I fix it?
java arrays bitset
asked Nov 20 '18 at 22:17
user8231110user8231110
486
I have a BitSet, which needs to be converted to a Byte. However, by using BitSet.toByteArray(), I don't get the correct output. I have tried converting the Byte to its binary form in order to check whether the Bitset and the binary form of the Byte are similiar.
public static void generate() {
BitSet temp1 = new BitSet(64);
for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
if(i % 8 != 0 && i < 23) {
temp1.set(i, true);
}
}
StringBuilder s = new StringBuilder();
for (int i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
s.append(temp1.get(i) == true ? 1 : 0);
}
System.out.println(s);
byte tempByteKey1 = temp1.toByteArray();
for (byte b : tempByteKey1) {
System.out.print(Integer.toBinaryString(b & 255 | 256).substring(1));
}
}
Output:
Bitset: 0111111101111111011111100000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Converted Byte: 1111111011111110011111100000000000000000000000000000000000000000
They are both 64 bits, but the first 0 in the BitSet is placed somewhere else after the conversion. Why is this happening, and how can I fix it?
java arrays bitset
java arrays bitset
asked Nov 20 '18 at 22:17
user8231110user8231110
486
asked Nov 20 '18 at 22:17
user8231110user8231110
486
asked Nov 20 '18 at 22:17
user8231110user8231110
486
asked Nov 20 '18 at 22:17
user8231110user8231110
486
asked Nov 20 '18 at 22:17
user8231110user8231110
486
486
1
the bit order is being printed in reverse bytoBinaryStringas you are printing the BitSet. You start with the less significant bit,toBinaryStringstarts with the most significant one.(see how the zero is in first position on first output, and at 8th position on second output)
– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:28
But they both have six trues as low order and seven trues as high order
– user8231110
Nov 20 '18 at 22:33
1
what are you counting??? BitSet:01111111 01111111 01111110 0...; toBinaryString:11111110 11111110 01111110 0...=> each corresponding 8 bits are reversed. Or, using chars for bits, BitSet:hgfedcba ponmlkji ..., toBinaryString:abcdefgh ijklmnop ...
– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:36
That makes sense, but is it possible to store it as it originally was i.e. without the reversing?
– user8231110
Nov 20 '18 at 22:40
??? it is stored as originally , just the way you represent it differs as howtoBinaryStringdoes
– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:40
add a comment |
1
the bit order is being printed in reverse bytoBinaryStringas you are printing the BitSet. You start with the less significant bit,toBinaryStringstarts with the most significant one.(see how the zero is in first position on first output, and at 8th position on second output)
– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:28
But they both have six trues as low order and seven trues as high order
– user8231110
Nov 20 '18 at 22:33
1
what are you counting??? BitSet:01111111 01111111 01111110 0...; toBinaryString:11111110 11111110 01111110 0...=> each corresponding 8 bits are reversed. Or, using chars for bits, BitSet:hgfedcba ponmlkji ..., toBinaryString:abcdefgh ijklmnop ...
– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:36
That makes sense, but is it possible to store it as it originally was i.e. without the reversing?
– user8231110
Nov 20 '18 at 22:40
??? it is stored as originally , just the way you represent it differs as howtoBinaryStringdoes
– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:40
1
1
the bit order is being printed in reverse by
toBinaryString as you are printing the BitSet. You start with the less significant bit, toBinaryString starts with the most significant one.(see how the zero is in first position on first output, and at 8th position on second output)– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:28
the bit order is being printed in reverse by
toBinaryString as you are printing the BitSet. You start with the less significant bit, toBinaryString starts with the most significant one.(see how the zero is in first position on first output, and at 8th position on second output)– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:28
But they both have six trues as low order and seven trues as high order
– user8231110
Nov 20 '18 at 22:33
But they both have six trues as low order and seven trues as high order
– user8231110
Nov 20 '18 at 22:33
1
1
what are you counting??? BitSet:
01111111 01111111 01111110 0...; toBinaryString: 11111110 11111110 01111110 0... => each corresponding 8 bits are reversed. Or, using chars for bits, BitSet: hgfedcba ponmlkji ... , toBinaryString: abcdefgh ijklmnop ...– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:36
what are you counting??? BitSet:
01111111 01111111 01111110 0...; toBinaryString: 11111110 11111110 01111110 0... => each corresponding 8 bits are reversed. Or, using chars for bits, BitSet: hgfedcba ponmlkji ... , toBinaryString: abcdefgh ijklmnop ...– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:36
That makes sense, but is it possible to store it as it originally was i.e. without the reversing?
– user8231110
Nov 20 '18 at 22:40
That makes sense, but is it possible to store it as it originally was i.e. without the reversing?
– user8231110
Nov 20 '18 at 22:40
??? it is stored as originally , just the way you represent it differs as how
toBinaryString does– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:40
??? it is stored as originally , just the way you represent it differs as how
toBinaryString does– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:40
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53402433%2fconverting-bitset-to-byte%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53402433%2fconverting-bitset-to-byte%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
the bit order is being printed in reverse by
toBinaryStringas you are printing the BitSet. You start with the less significant bit,toBinaryStringstarts with the most significant one.(see how the zero is in first position on first output, and at 8th position on second output)– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:28
But they both have six trues as low order and seven trues as high order
– user8231110
Nov 20 '18 at 22:33
1
what are you counting??? BitSet:
01111111 01111111 01111110 0...; toBinaryString:11111110 11111110 01111110 0...=> each corresponding 8 bits are reversed. Or, using chars for bits, BitSet:hgfedcba ponmlkji ..., toBinaryString:abcdefgh ijklmnop ...– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:36
That makes sense, but is it possible to store it as it originally was i.e. without the reversing?
– user8231110
Nov 20 '18 at 22:40
??? it is stored as originally , just the way you represent it differs as how
toBinaryStringdoes– Carlos Heuberger
Nov 20 '18 at 22:40