Is it appropriate to say that $lim_{x to 4}{(sqrt x-2)}$ is both $0$ and $-4$?












1












$begingroup$


Our teachers seem to ignore that, but if I take a limit of a function with square root, for example:
$$lim_{x to 4}{(sqrt x-2)}$$ is it appropriate to say that there are two answers? $0$ and $-4$?



Because in the solutions they gave us, nobody mentions the fact that $sqrt {x^2}=|x|$, and they only say that the answer is the positive result. In the example - $0$.



Is it correct? if so, why?



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    $sqrt{x^2} = |x|$ is in the definition of square root.
    $endgroup$
    – OmG
    Jan 13 at 10:41










  • $begingroup$
    no a limit of real numbers can only have one value. Note that $sqrt{x}>0$ so there's no way you get a limit that is less than $-2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 13 at 10:44








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    No, by convention/definition, the square root function always returns a non-negative value, so $sqrt{x} = vert xvert geq 0$. Here, $sqrt{4} = +2$ only.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 13 at 10:48












  • $begingroup$
    @KM101 I don't mean to be picky here, but I think you mean $sqrt{x^{color{red}{2}}}=|x|geq0$ for which you did not write the $2$, but we all know what you mean ;)
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    Jan 13 at 11:17








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It's true that $x^2=4$ has two solutions: $x=pm 2$. (More generally, $x^2=m$ has two solutions $x=pm sqrt{m}$. (Well, it's only one solution if $m=0$, but I digress...)) That is not the same thing as saying $sqrt{4}$ has two values, $pm 2$. When we write "$sqrt{4}$", we mean the "principal square root of $4$"; that is, the non-negative number whose square is $4$; that number is $2$ and only $2$. (Things get a little messier among the complex numbers, but that's a discussion for another time.)
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Jan 13 at 11:21
















1












$begingroup$


Our teachers seem to ignore that, but if I take a limit of a function with square root, for example:
$$lim_{x to 4}{(sqrt x-2)}$$ is it appropriate to say that there are two answers? $0$ and $-4$?



Because in the solutions they gave us, nobody mentions the fact that $sqrt {x^2}=|x|$, and they only say that the answer is the positive result. In the example - $0$.



Is it correct? if so, why?



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    $sqrt{x^2} = |x|$ is in the definition of square root.
    $endgroup$
    – OmG
    Jan 13 at 10:41










  • $begingroup$
    no a limit of real numbers can only have one value. Note that $sqrt{x}>0$ so there's no way you get a limit that is less than $-2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 13 at 10:44








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    No, by convention/definition, the square root function always returns a non-negative value, so $sqrt{x} = vert xvert geq 0$. Here, $sqrt{4} = +2$ only.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 13 at 10:48












  • $begingroup$
    @KM101 I don't mean to be picky here, but I think you mean $sqrt{x^{color{red}{2}}}=|x|geq0$ for which you did not write the $2$, but we all know what you mean ;)
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    Jan 13 at 11:17








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It's true that $x^2=4$ has two solutions: $x=pm 2$. (More generally, $x^2=m$ has two solutions $x=pm sqrt{m}$. (Well, it's only one solution if $m=0$, but I digress...)) That is not the same thing as saying $sqrt{4}$ has two values, $pm 2$. When we write "$sqrt{4}$", we mean the "principal square root of $4$"; that is, the non-negative number whose square is $4$; that number is $2$ and only $2$. (Things get a little messier among the complex numbers, but that's a discussion for another time.)
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Jan 13 at 11:21














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


Our teachers seem to ignore that, but if I take a limit of a function with square root, for example:
$$lim_{x to 4}{(sqrt x-2)}$$ is it appropriate to say that there are two answers? $0$ and $-4$?



Because in the solutions they gave us, nobody mentions the fact that $sqrt {x^2}=|x|$, and they only say that the answer is the positive result. In the example - $0$.



Is it correct? if so, why?



Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Our teachers seem to ignore that, but if I take a limit of a function with square root, for example:
$$lim_{x to 4}{(sqrt x-2)}$$ is it appropriate to say that there are two answers? $0$ and $-4$?



Because in the solutions they gave us, nobody mentions the fact that $sqrt {x^2}=|x|$, and they only say that the answer is the positive result. In the example - $0$.



Is it correct? if so, why?



Thank you.







limits roots radicals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 13 at 11:13









Blue

48.4k870154




48.4k870154










asked Jan 13 at 10:39









NetanelNetanel

974




974












  • $begingroup$
    $sqrt{x^2} = |x|$ is in the definition of square root.
    $endgroup$
    – OmG
    Jan 13 at 10:41










  • $begingroup$
    no a limit of real numbers can only have one value. Note that $sqrt{x}>0$ so there's no way you get a limit that is less than $-2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 13 at 10:44








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    No, by convention/definition, the square root function always returns a non-negative value, so $sqrt{x} = vert xvert geq 0$. Here, $sqrt{4} = +2$ only.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 13 at 10:48












  • $begingroup$
    @KM101 I don't mean to be picky here, but I think you mean $sqrt{x^{color{red}{2}}}=|x|geq0$ for which you did not write the $2$, but we all know what you mean ;)
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    Jan 13 at 11:17








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It's true that $x^2=4$ has two solutions: $x=pm 2$. (More generally, $x^2=m$ has two solutions $x=pm sqrt{m}$. (Well, it's only one solution if $m=0$, but I digress...)) That is not the same thing as saying $sqrt{4}$ has two values, $pm 2$. When we write "$sqrt{4}$", we mean the "principal square root of $4$"; that is, the non-negative number whose square is $4$; that number is $2$ and only $2$. (Things get a little messier among the complex numbers, but that's a discussion for another time.)
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Jan 13 at 11:21


















  • $begingroup$
    $sqrt{x^2} = |x|$ is in the definition of square root.
    $endgroup$
    – OmG
    Jan 13 at 10:41










  • $begingroup$
    no a limit of real numbers can only have one value. Note that $sqrt{x}>0$ so there's no way you get a limit that is less than $-2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 13 at 10:44








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    No, by convention/definition, the square root function always returns a non-negative value, so $sqrt{x} = vert xvert geq 0$. Here, $sqrt{4} = +2$ only.
    $endgroup$
    – KM101
    Jan 13 at 10:48












  • $begingroup$
    @KM101 I don't mean to be picky here, but I think you mean $sqrt{x^{color{red}{2}}}=|x|geq0$ for which you did not write the $2$, but we all know what you mean ;)
    $endgroup$
    – user477343
    Jan 13 at 11:17








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It's true that $x^2=4$ has two solutions: $x=pm 2$. (More generally, $x^2=m$ has two solutions $x=pm sqrt{m}$. (Well, it's only one solution if $m=0$, but I digress...)) That is not the same thing as saying $sqrt{4}$ has two values, $pm 2$. When we write "$sqrt{4}$", we mean the "principal square root of $4$"; that is, the non-negative number whose square is $4$; that number is $2$ and only $2$. (Things get a little messier among the complex numbers, but that's a discussion for another time.)
    $endgroup$
    – Blue
    Jan 13 at 11:21
















$begingroup$
$sqrt{x^2} = |x|$ is in the definition of square root.
$endgroup$
– OmG
Jan 13 at 10:41




$begingroup$
$sqrt{x^2} = |x|$ is in the definition of square root.
$endgroup$
– OmG
Jan 13 at 10:41












$begingroup$
no a limit of real numbers can only have one value. Note that $sqrt{x}>0$ so there's no way you get a limit that is less than $-2$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 13 at 10:44






$begingroup$
no a limit of real numbers can only have one value. Note that $sqrt{x}>0$ so there's no way you get a limit that is less than $-2$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 13 at 10:44






4




4




$begingroup$
No, by convention/definition, the square root function always returns a non-negative value, so $sqrt{x} = vert xvert geq 0$. Here, $sqrt{4} = +2$ only.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Jan 13 at 10:48






$begingroup$
No, by convention/definition, the square root function always returns a non-negative value, so $sqrt{x} = vert xvert geq 0$. Here, $sqrt{4} = +2$ only.
$endgroup$
– KM101
Jan 13 at 10:48














$begingroup$
@KM101 I don't mean to be picky here, but I think you mean $sqrt{x^{color{red}{2}}}=|x|geq0$ for which you did not write the $2$, but we all know what you mean ;)
$endgroup$
– user477343
Jan 13 at 11:17






$begingroup$
@KM101 I don't mean to be picky here, but I think you mean $sqrt{x^{color{red}{2}}}=|x|geq0$ for which you did not write the $2$, but we all know what you mean ;)
$endgroup$
– user477343
Jan 13 at 11:17






3




3




$begingroup$
It's true that $x^2=4$ has two solutions: $x=pm 2$. (More generally, $x^2=m$ has two solutions $x=pm sqrt{m}$. (Well, it's only one solution if $m=0$, but I digress...)) That is not the same thing as saying $sqrt{4}$ has two values, $pm 2$. When we write "$sqrt{4}$", we mean the "principal square root of $4$"; that is, the non-negative number whose square is $4$; that number is $2$ and only $2$. (Things get a little messier among the complex numbers, but that's a discussion for another time.)
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 13 at 11:21




$begingroup$
It's true that $x^2=4$ has two solutions: $x=pm 2$. (More generally, $x^2=m$ has two solutions $x=pm sqrt{m}$. (Well, it's only one solution if $m=0$, but I digress...)) That is not the same thing as saying $sqrt{4}$ has two values, $pm 2$. When we write "$sqrt{4}$", we mean the "principal square root of $4$"; that is, the non-negative number whose square is $4$; that number is $2$ and only $2$. (Things get a little messier among the complex numbers, but that's a discussion for another time.)
$endgroup$
– Blue
Jan 13 at 11:21










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

This is a common misconception about the function $sqrt{cdot},:[0,infty)toBbb R$ as the "inverse" of $f(x)=x^2$.



In general, a function can have an inverse only when it is injective but $f(x)=x^2$ is not injective (e.g. $f(2)=f(-2) = 4$ ), so strictly speaking its inverse doesn't exist.



However, we can restrict its domain to $[0,infty)$ and the function $flvert_{[0,infty)}$ would be injective there, hence we can define $$sqrt{x}:=flvert_{[0,infty)}^{-1}.$$ The function $sqrt{x}$ thus takes only one positive value for each input $xge 0$ (e.g. $sqrt{4}=2$) even though there are two numbers such that $x^2=4$.





Remark: There are some cases where $sqrt{cdot}$ is defined to be multivalued, e.g. in complex analysis. However, $sqrt{cdot}$ wouldn't be a "function" in that case. Note also that we could very well define
$$sqrt{x}:=flvert_{(-infty,0]}^{-1}$$
and we'd have $sqrt{4} = -2$ according to this definition. This is not popular for obvious reasons.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    4












    $begingroup$

    According to definition of principal square root this is impossible. The principal square root of $xge0$ is denoted by $sqrt x$ and is always non-negative.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071874%2fis-it-appropriate-to-say-that-lim-x-to-4-sqrt-x-2-is-both-0-and-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      This is a common misconception about the function $sqrt{cdot},:[0,infty)toBbb R$ as the "inverse" of $f(x)=x^2$.



      In general, a function can have an inverse only when it is injective but $f(x)=x^2$ is not injective (e.g. $f(2)=f(-2) = 4$ ), so strictly speaking its inverse doesn't exist.



      However, we can restrict its domain to $[0,infty)$ and the function $flvert_{[0,infty)}$ would be injective there, hence we can define $$sqrt{x}:=flvert_{[0,infty)}^{-1}.$$ The function $sqrt{x}$ thus takes only one positive value for each input $xge 0$ (e.g. $sqrt{4}=2$) even though there are two numbers such that $x^2=4$.





      Remark: There are some cases where $sqrt{cdot}$ is defined to be multivalued, e.g. in complex analysis. However, $sqrt{cdot}$ wouldn't be a "function" in that case. Note also that we could very well define
      $$sqrt{x}:=flvert_{(-infty,0]}^{-1}$$
      and we'd have $sqrt{4} = -2$ according to this definition. This is not popular for obvious reasons.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        3












        $begingroup$

        This is a common misconception about the function $sqrt{cdot},:[0,infty)toBbb R$ as the "inverse" of $f(x)=x^2$.



        In general, a function can have an inverse only when it is injective but $f(x)=x^2$ is not injective (e.g. $f(2)=f(-2) = 4$ ), so strictly speaking its inverse doesn't exist.



        However, we can restrict its domain to $[0,infty)$ and the function $flvert_{[0,infty)}$ would be injective there, hence we can define $$sqrt{x}:=flvert_{[0,infty)}^{-1}.$$ The function $sqrt{x}$ thus takes only one positive value for each input $xge 0$ (e.g. $sqrt{4}=2$) even though there are two numbers such that $x^2=4$.





        Remark: There are some cases where $sqrt{cdot}$ is defined to be multivalued, e.g. in complex analysis. However, $sqrt{cdot}$ wouldn't be a "function" in that case. Note also that we could very well define
        $$sqrt{x}:=flvert_{(-infty,0]}^{-1}$$
        and we'd have $sqrt{4} = -2$ according to this definition. This is not popular for obvious reasons.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          This is a common misconception about the function $sqrt{cdot},:[0,infty)toBbb R$ as the "inverse" of $f(x)=x^2$.



          In general, a function can have an inverse only when it is injective but $f(x)=x^2$ is not injective (e.g. $f(2)=f(-2) = 4$ ), so strictly speaking its inverse doesn't exist.



          However, we can restrict its domain to $[0,infty)$ and the function $flvert_{[0,infty)}$ would be injective there, hence we can define $$sqrt{x}:=flvert_{[0,infty)}^{-1}.$$ The function $sqrt{x}$ thus takes only one positive value for each input $xge 0$ (e.g. $sqrt{4}=2$) even though there are two numbers such that $x^2=4$.





          Remark: There are some cases where $sqrt{cdot}$ is defined to be multivalued, e.g. in complex analysis. However, $sqrt{cdot}$ wouldn't be a "function" in that case. Note also that we could very well define
          $$sqrt{x}:=flvert_{(-infty,0]}^{-1}$$
          and we'd have $sqrt{4} = -2$ according to this definition. This is not popular for obvious reasons.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          This is a common misconception about the function $sqrt{cdot},:[0,infty)toBbb R$ as the "inverse" of $f(x)=x^2$.



          In general, a function can have an inverse only when it is injective but $f(x)=x^2$ is not injective (e.g. $f(2)=f(-2) = 4$ ), so strictly speaking its inverse doesn't exist.



          However, we can restrict its domain to $[0,infty)$ and the function $flvert_{[0,infty)}$ would be injective there, hence we can define $$sqrt{x}:=flvert_{[0,infty)}^{-1}.$$ The function $sqrt{x}$ thus takes only one positive value for each input $xge 0$ (e.g. $sqrt{4}=2$) even though there are two numbers such that $x^2=4$.





          Remark: There are some cases where $sqrt{cdot}$ is defined to be multivalued, e.g. in complex analysis. However, $sqrt{cdot}$ wouldn't be a "function" in that case. Note also that we could very well define
          $$sqrt{x}:=flvert_{(-infty,0]}^{-1}$$
          and we'd have $sqrt{4} = -2$ according to this definition. This is not popular for obvious reasons.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 13 at 13:19

























          answered Jan 13 at 11:53









          BigbearZzzBigbearZzz

          8,72621652




          8,72621652























              4












              $begingroup$

              According to definition of principal square root this is impossible. The principal square root of $xge0$ is denoted by $sqrt x$ and is always non-negative.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                4












                $begingroup$

                According to definition of principal square root this is impossible. The principal square root of $xge0$ is denoted by $sqrt x$ and is always non-negative.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  4












                  4








                  4





                  $begingroup$

                  According to definition of principal square root this is impossible. The principal square root of $xge0$ is denoted by $sqrt x$ and is always non-negative.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  According to definition of principal square root this is impossible. The principal square root of $xge0$ is denoted by $sqrt x$ and is always non-negative.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 13 at 11:57









                  Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz

                  15.6k3939




                  15.6k3939






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071874%2fis-it-appropriate-to-say-that-lim-x-to-4-sqrt-x-2-is-both-0-and-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                      Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

                      in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith