The square trinomial $y=ax^2+ bx + c$ has no roots and $a + b + c > 0$. Find the sign of the coefficient...












3












$begingroup$


The square trinomial $y=ax^2 + bx + c$ has no roots and $a + b + c > 0$. Find the sign of the coefficient $c$.
I'm having difficulties with this problem.



What I've tried:
I realized that a quadratic equation doesn't have roots if the discriminant $b^2 - 4ac < 0$, so I've tried to combine that with the condition $a + b + c > 0 <=> a > -b -c $, but that didn't help me that much.



I would appreciate if someone could help me to understand this. I'll ask a lot of questions on this network while I'm learning, so please don't judge me for that :) .










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What happens for simple choices of values of $x$? (What values might you choose, and why, to help answer the question)
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 17 at 22:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You have the right idea. You know $0 ≤ b^2 < 4ac$, so neither $a$ nor $c$ is zero. $a$ and $c$ thus have the same sign...
    $endgroup$
    – diracdeltafunk
    Jan 17 at 22:10
















3












$begingroup$


The square trinomial $y=ax^2 + bx + c$ has no roots and $a + b + c > 0$. Find the sign of the coefficient $c$.
I'm having difficulties with this problem.



What I've tried:
I realized that a quadratic equation doesn't have roots if the discriminant $b^2 - 4ac < 0$, so I've tried to combine that with the condition $a + b + c > 0 <=> a > -b -c $, but that didn't help me that much.



I would appreciate if someone could help me to understand this. I'll ask a lot of questions on this network while I'm learning, so please don't judge me for that :) .










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What happens for simple choices of values of $x$? (What values might you choose, and why, to help answer the question)
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 17 at 22:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You have the right idea. You know $0 ≤ b^2 < 4ac$, so neither $a$ nor $c$ is zero. $a$ and $c$ thus have the same sign...
    $endgroup$
    – diracdeltafunk
    Jan 17 at 22:10














3












3








3





$begingroup$


The square trinomial $y=ax^2 + bx + c$ has no roots and $a + b + c > 0$. Find the sign of the coefficient $c$.
I'm having difficulties with this problem.



What I've tried:
I realized that a quadratic equation doesn't have roots if the discriminant $b^2 - 4ac < 0$, so I've tried to combine that with the condition $a + b + c > 0 <=> a > -b -c $, but that didn't help me that much.



I would appreciate if someone could help me to understand this. I'll ask a lot of questions on this network while I'm learning, so please don't judge me for that :) .










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The square trinomial $y=ax^2 + bx + c$ has no roots and $a + b + c > 0$. Find the sign of the coefficient $c$.
I'm having difficulties with this problem.



What I've tried:
I realized that a quadratic equation doesn't have roots if the discriminant $b^2 - 4ac < 0$, so I've tried to combine that with the condition $a + b + c > 0 <=> a > -b -c $, but that didn't help me that much.



I would appreciate if someone could help me to understand this. I'll ask a lot of questions on this network while I'm learning, so please don't judge me for that :) .







polynomials quadratics quadratic-forms






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 17 at 22:08









MPW

30.3k12157




30.3k12157










asked Jan 17 at 22:04









Wolf M.Wolf M.

1097




1097








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What happens for simple choices of values of $x$? (What values might you choose, and why, to help answer the question)
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 17 at 22:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You have the right idea. You know $0 ≤ b^2 < 4ac$, so neither $a$ nor $c$ is zero. $a$ and $c$ thus have the same sign...
    $endgroup$
    – diracdeltafunk
    Jan 17 at 22:10














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What happens for simple choices of values of $x$? (What values might you choose, and why, to help answer the question)
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Jan 17 at 22:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You have the right idea. You know $0 ≤ b^2 < 4ac$, so neither $a$ nor $c$ is zero. $a$ and $c$ thus have the same sign...
    $endgroup$
    – diracdeltafunk
    Jan 17 at 22:10








1




1




$begingroup$
What happens for simple choices of values of $x$? (What values might you choose, and why, to help answer the question)
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Jan 17 at 22:08




$begingroup$
What happens for simple choices of values of $x$? (What values might you choose, and why, to help answer the question)
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Jan 17 at 22:08




1




1




$begingroup$
You have the right idea. You know $0 ≤ b^2 < 4ac$, so neither $a$ nor $c$ is zero. $a$ and $c$ thus have the same sign...
$endgroup$
– diracdeltafunk
Jan 17 at 22:10




$begingroup$
You have the right idea. You know $0 ≤ b^2 < 4ac$, so neither $a$ nor $c$ is zero. $a$ and $c$ thus have the same sign...
$endgroup$
– diracdeltafunk
Jan 17 at 22:10










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Call $p(x)=ax^2+bx+c$. Then
$$p(1)=a+b+c >0$$
$$p(0)=c$$
If $c$ were negative, then there would be a root between $0$ and $1$. This contradicts our hypothesis, hence necessarily $c>0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    +1, beautiful argument
    $endgroup$
    – gt6989b
    Jan 17 at 22:10










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much! I understand now and I really like this way of solving the problem.
    $endgroup$
    – Wolf M.
    Jan 17 at 22:25



















3












$begingroup$

That $a+b+c > 0$ gives $ax^2+bx+c$ evaluated at $x=1$ is $a+b+c$ which is positive.



Suppose that $c$ is negative. Then $ax^2+bx+c$ evaluated at $x=0$ is $c$ which is negative. Then the Intermediate Value Theorem would imply that there is a root $x in (0,1)$. So $c$ cannot be negative.



If $c$ is 0 then 0 is a root of $ax^2 +bx+c$.



So $c$ must be positive for there to be no real root.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    It's easy to see that since $b^2<4ac$, you have $c > b^2/(4a) > 0$ if $a>0$ and $c < b^2/(4a) < 0$ if $a < 0$.



    But you have no roots, so it is either a parabola opening down below $x$-axis or opening up above $x$-axis, and since $a+b+c=1$ it must be all above.



    Can you conclude?






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Yes! With your and other answers, I understand even better :). Thank you!
      $endgroup$
      – Wolf M.
      Jan 17 at 22:25



















    1












    $begingroup$

    Since the polynomial has no roots, its graph is either strictly above or below the $x$-axis. But $f(1)=a+b+c>0$, so the graph is above the $x$-axis. The parabola then intersects the positive part $y$-axis, but this intersection point is $(0,c)$, so $c>0$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      Short answer:



      Perforce
      $$text{sgn}(y(0))=text{sgn}(y(1)).$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        If you prefer, $text{sgn}(c)=text{sgn}(a+b+c)$.
        $endgroup$
        – Yves Daoust
        Jan 17 at 22:22













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077572%2fthe-square-trinomial-y-ax2-bx-c-has-no-roots-and-a-b-c-0-find-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      6












      $begingroup$

      Call $p(x)=ax^2+bx+c$. Then
      $$p(1)=a+b+c >0$$
      $$p(0)=c$$
      If $c$ were negative, then there would be a root between $0$ and $1$. This contradicts our hypothesis, hence necessarily $c>0$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        +1, beautiful argument
        $endgroup$
        – gt6989b
        Jan 17 at 22:10










      • $begingroup$
        Thank you so much! I understand now and I really like this way of solving the problem.
        $endgroup$
        – Wolf M.
        Jan 17 at 22:25
















      6












      $begingroup$

      Call $p(x)=ax^2+bx+c$. Then
      $$p(1)=a+b+c >0$$
      $$p(0)=c$$
      If $c$ were negative, then there would be a root between $0$ and $1$. This contradicts our hypothesis, hence necessarily $c>0$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        +1, beautiful argument
        $endgroup$
        – gt6989b
        Jan 17 at 22:10










      • $begingroup$
        Thank you so much! I understand now and I really like this way of solving the problem.
        $endgroup$
        – Wolf M.
        Jan 17 at 22:25














      6












      6








      6





      $begingroup$

      Call $p(x)=ax^2+bx+c$. Then
      $$p(1)=a+b+c >0$$
      $$p(0)=c$$
      If $c$ were negative, then there would be a root between $0$ and $1$. This contradicts our hypothesis, hence necessarily $c>0$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      Call $p(x)=ax^2+bx+c$. Then
      $$p(1)=a+b+c >0$$
      $$p(0)=c$$
      If $c$ were negative, then there would be a root between $0$ and $1$. This contradicts our hypothesis, hence necessarily $c>0$.







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered Jan 17 at 22:09









      CrostulCrostul

      27.9k22352




      27.9k22352












      • $begingroup$
        +1, beautiful argument
        $endgroup$
        – gt6989b
        Jan 17 at 22:10










      • $begingroup$
        Thank you so much! I understand now and I really like this way of solving the problem.
        $endgroup$
        – Wolf M.
        Jan 17 at 22:25


















      • $begingroup$
        +1, beautiful argument
        $endgroup$
        – gt6989b
        Jan 17 at 22:10










      • $begingroup$
        Thank you so much! I understand now and I really like this way of solving the problem.
        $endgroup$
        – Wolf M.
        Jan 17 at 22:25
















      $begingroup$
      +1, beautiful argument
      $endgroup$
      – gt6989b
      Jan 17 at 22:10




      $begingroup$
      +1, beautiful argument
      $endgroup$
      – gt6989b
      Jan 17 at 22:10












      $begingroup$
      Thank you so much! I understand now and I really like this way of solving the problem.
      $endgroup$
      – Wolf M.
      Jan 17 at 22:25




      $begingroup$
      Thank you so much! I understand now and I really like this way of solving the problem.
      $endgroup$
      – Wolf M.
      Jan 17 at 22:25











      3












      $begingroup$

      That $a+b+c > 0$ gives $ax^2+bx+c$ evaluated at $x=1$ is $a+b+c$ which is positive.



      Suppose that $c$ is negative. Then $ax^2+bx+c$ evaluated at $x=0$ is $c$ which is negative. Then the Intermediate Value Theorem would imply that there is a root $x in (0,1)$. So $c$ cannot be negative.



      If $c$ is 0 then 0 is a root of $ax^2 +bx+c$.



      So $c$ must be positive for there to be no real root.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        3












        $begingroup$

        That $a+b+c > 0$ gives $ax^2+bx+c$ evaluated at $x=1$ is $a+b+c$ which is positive.



        Suppose that $c$ is negative. Then $ax^2+bx+c$ evaluated at $x=0$ is $c$ which is negative. Then the Intermediate Value Theorem would imply that there is a root $x in (0,1)$. So $c$ cannot be negative.



        If $c$ is 0 then 0 is a root of $ax^2 +bx+c$.



        So $c$ must be positive for there to be no real root.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          That $a+b+c > 0$ gives $ax^2+bx+c$ evaluated at $x=1$ is $a+b+c$ which is positive.



          Suppose that $c$ is negative. Then $ax^2+bx+c$ evaluated at $x=0$ is $c$ which is negative. Then the Intermediate Value Theorem would imply that there is a root $x in (0,1)$. So $c$ cannot be negative.



          If $c$ is 0 then 0 is a root of $ax^2 +bx+c$.



          So $c$ must be positive for there to be no real root.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          That $a+b+c > 0$ gives $ax^2+bx+c$ evaluated at $x=1$ is $a+b+c$ which is positive.



          Suppose that $c$ is negative. Then $ax^2+bx+c$ evaluated at $x=0$ is $c$ which is negative. Then the Intermediate Value Theorem would imply that there is a root $x in (0,1)$. So $c$ cannot be negative.



          If $c$ is 0 then 0 is a root of $ax^2 +bx+c$.



          So $c$ must be positive for there to be no real root.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 17 at 22:11









          MikeMike

          4,171412




          4,171412























              2












              $begingroup$

              It's easy to see that since $b^2<4ac$, you have $c > b^2/(4a) > 0$ if $a>0$ and $c < b^2/(4a) < 0$ if $a < 0$.



              But you have no roots, so it is either a parabola opening down below $x$-axis or opening up above $x$-axis, and since $a+b+c=1$ it must be all above.



              Can you conclude?






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Yes! With your and other answers, I understand even better :). Thank you!
                $endgroup$
                – Wolf M.
                Jan 17 at 22:25
















              2












              $begingroup$

              It's easy to see that since $b^2<4ac$, you have $c > b^2/(4a) > 0$ if $a>0$ and $c < b^2/(4a) < 0$ if $a < 0$.



              But you have no roots, so it is either a parabola opening down below $x$-axis or opening up above $x$-axis, and since $a+b+c=1$ it must be all above.



              Can you conclude?






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Yes! With your and other answers, I understand even better :). Thank you!
                $endgroup$
                – Wolf M.
                Jan 17 at 22:25














              2












              2








              2





              $begingroup$

              It's easy to see that since $b^2<4ac$, you have $c > b^2/(4a) > 0$ if $a>0$ and $c < b^2/(4a) < 0$ if $a < 0$.



              But you have no roots, so it is either a parabola opening down below $x$-axis or opening up above $x$-axis, and since $a+b+c=1$ it must be all above.



              Can you conclude?






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              It's easy to see that since $b^2<4ac$, you have $c > b^2/(4a) > 0$ if $a>0$ and $c < b^2/(4a) < 0$ if $a < 0$.



              But you have no roots, so it is either a parabola opening down below $x$-axis or opening up above $x$-axis, and since $a+b+c=1$ it must be all above.



              Can you conclude?







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Jan 17 at 22:10









              gt6989bgt6989b

              34.4k22456




              34.4k22456












              • $begingroup$
                Yes! With your and other answers, I understand even better :). Thank you!
                $endgroup$
                – Wolf M.
                Jan 17 at 22:25


















              • $begingroup$
                Yes! With your and other answers, I understand even better :). Thank you!
                $endgroup$
                – Wolf M.
                Jan 17 at 22:25
















              $begingroup$
              Yes! With your and other answers, I understand even better :). Thank you!
              $endgroup$
              – Wolf M.
              Jan 17 at 22:25




              $begingroup$
              Yes! With your and other answers, I understand even better :). Thank you!
              $endgroup$
              – Wolf M.
              Jan 17 at 22:25











              1












              $begingroup$

              Since the polynomial has no roots, its graph is either strictly above or below the $x$-axis. But $f(1)=a+b+c>0$, so the graph is above the $x$-axis. The parabola then intersects the positive part $y$-axis, but this intersection point is $(0,c)$, so $c>0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                Since the polynomial has no roots, its graph is either strictly above or below the $x$-axis. But $f(1)=a+b+c>0$, so the graph is above the $x$-axis. The parabola then intersects the positive part $y$-axis, but this intersection point is $(0,c)$, so $c>0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Since the polynomial has no roots, its graph is either strictly above or below the $x$-axis. But $f(1)=a+b+c>0$, so the graph is above the $x$-axis. The parabola then intersects the positive part $y$-axis, but this intersection point is $(0,c)$, so $c>0$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Since the polynomial has no roots, its graph is either strictly above or below the $x$-axis. But $f(1)=a+b+c>0$, so the graph is above the $x$-axis. The parabola then intersects the positive part $y$-axis, but this intersection point is $(0,c)$, so $c>0$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 17 at 22:13









                  Teddan the TerranTeddan the Terran

                  1,206210




                  1,206210























                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      Short answer:



                      Perforce
                      $$text{sgn}(y(0))=text{sgn}(y(1)).$$






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        If you prefer, $text{sgn}(c)=text{sgn}(a+b+c)$.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Yves Daoust
                        Jan 17 at 22:22


















                      1












                      $begingroup$

                      Short answer:



                      Perforce
                      $$text{sgn}(y(0))=text{sgn}(y(1)).$$






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$













                      • $begingroup$
                        If you prefer, $text{sgn}(c)=text{sgn}(a+b+c)$.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Yves Daoust
                        Jan 17 at 22:22
















                      1












                      1








                      1





                      $begingroup$

                      Short answer:



                      Perforce
                      $$text{sgn}(y(0))=text{sgn}(y(1)).$$






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      Short answer:



                      Perforce
                      $$text{sgn}(y(0))=text{sgn}(y(1)).$$







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Jan 18 at 10:40

























                      answered Jan 17 at 22:16









                      Yves DaoustYves Daoust

                      129k675227




                      129k675227












                      • $begingroup$
                        If you prefer, $text{sgn}(c)=text{sgn}(a+b+c)$.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Yves Daoust
                        Jan 17 at 22:22




















                      • $begingroup$
                        If you prefer, $text{sgn}(c)=text{sgn}(a+b+c)$.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Yves Daoust
                        Jan 17 at 22:22


















                      $begingroup$
                      If you prefer, $text{sgn}(c)=text{sgn}(a+b+c)$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Yves Daoust
                      Jan 17 at 22:22






                      $begingroup$
                      If you prefer, $text{sgn}(c)=text{sgn}(a+b+c)$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Yves Daoust
                      Jan 17 at 22:22




















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3077572%2fthe-square-trinomial-y-ax2-bx-c-has-no-roots-and-a-b-c-0-find-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                      How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                      in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith