Verapoulous Algebra $C(K) mathbin{hatotimes} C(L)$ is a subalgebra of $C(Ktimes L)$?












1












$begingroup$


Let $K$ and $L$ be compact spaces. Consider the Banach algebra $V(K,L)=C(K)mathbin{hatotimes} C(L)$ , which is the completion of the $C(K)otimes C(L)$ with respect to the projective tensor norm. It is known that $V(K,L)$ is a subalgebra of $C(Ktimes L)$ , not isometrically. I am trying to establish this result . Heres what I have figured out.
Due to the universal property of tensor product , there is an algebra homomorphism $theta : C(K)otimes C(L)to C(Ktimes L)$ such that $$theta(sum_{i=1}^nf_iotimes g_i)(x,y)=sum_{i=1}^nf_i(x)g_i(y)$$



I want to show that this map is injective. Once this is done then we can extend it to its completion.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    But be careful: The extension of an injective uniformly continuous map to the completion needn't be injective! Consider a Banach space $(X,|cdot|)$ and a strictly finer norm $||cdot||$ on it (e.g., $|x|+|f(x)|$ for a discontinuous linear functional). Then the identity from $(X,||cdot||)$ to $(X,|cdot|)$ is continuous and injective but its extension to the completion is not injective (because otherwise its inverse would be continuous by the closed graph theorem).
    $endgroup$
    – Jochen
    Jan 15 at 13:47












  • $begingroup$
    @jochen Thanks for reminding , I was actually thinking the same .
    $endgroup$
    – Lav Kumar
    Jan 16 at 13:55
















1












$begingroup$


Let $K$ and $L$ be compact spaces. Consider the Banach algebra $V(K,L)=C(K)mathbin{hatotimes} C(L)$ , which is the completion of the $C(K)otimes C(L)$ with respect to the projective tensor norm. It is known that $V(K,L)$ is a subalgebra of $C(Ktimes L)$ , not isometrically. I am trying to establish this result . Heres what I have figured out.
Due to the universal property of tensor product , there is an algebra homomorphism $theta : C(K)otimes C(L)to C(Ktimes L)$ such that $$theta(sum_{i=1}^nf_iotimes g_i)(x,y)=sum_{i=1}^nf_i(x)g_i(y)$$



I want to show that this map is injective. Once this is done then we can extend it to its completion.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    But be careful: The extension of an injective uniformly continuous map to the completion needn't be injective! Consider a Banach space $(X,|cdot|)$ and a strictly finer norm $||cdot||$ on it (e.g., $|x|+|f(x)|$ for a discontinuous linear functional). Then the identity from $(X,||cdot||)$ to $(X,|cdot|)$ is continuous and injective but its extension to the completion is not injective (because otherwise its inverse would be continuous by the closed graph theorem).
    $endgroup$
    – Jochen
    Jan 15 at 13:47












  • $begingroup$
    @jochen Thanks for reminding , I was actually thinking the same .
    $endgroup$
    – Lav Kumar
    Jan 16 at 13:55














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


Let $K$ and $L$ be compact spaces. Consider the Banach algebra $V(K,L)=C(K)mathbin{hatotimes} C(L)$ , which is the completion of the $C(K)otimes C(L)$ with respect to the projective tensor norm. It is known that $V(K,L)$ is a subalgebra of $C(Ktimes L)$ , not isometrically. I am trying to establish this result . Heres what I have figured out.
Due to the universal property of tensor product , there is an algebra homomorphism $theta : C(K)otimes C(L)to C(Ktimes L)$ such that $$theta(sum_{i=1}^nf_iotimes g_i)(x,y)=sum_{i=1}^nf_i(x)g_i(y)$$



I want to show that this map is injective. Once this is done then we can extend it to its completion.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $K$ and $L$ be compact spaces. Consider the Banach algebra $V(K,L)=C(K)mathbin{hatotimes} C(L)$ , which is the completion of the $C(K)otimes C(L)$ with respect to the projective tensor norm. It is known that $V(K,L)$ is a subalgebra of $C(Ktimes L)$ , not isometrically. I am trying to establish this result . Heres what I have figured out.
Due to the universal property of tensor product , there is an algebra homomorphism $theta : C(K)otimes C(L)to C(Ktimes L)$ such that $$theta(sum_{i=1}^nf_iotimes g_i)(x,y)=sum_{i=1}^nf_i(x)g_i(y)$$



I want to show that this map is injective. Once this is done then we can extend it to its completion.







functional-analysis tensor-products operator-algebras c-star-algebras banach-algebras






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 14 at 10:39









Andreas Caranti

56.6k34395




56.6k34395










asked Jan 14 at 10:30









Lav KumarLav Kumar

219112




219112












  • $begingroup$
    But be careful: The extension of an injective uniformly continuous map to the completion needn't be injective! Consider a Banach space $(X,|cdot|)$ and a strictly finer norm $||cdot||$ on it (e.g., $|x|+|f(x)|$ for a discontinuous linear functional). Then the identity from $(X,||cdot||)$ to $(X,|cdot|)$ is continuous and injective but its extension to the completion is not injective (because otherwise its inverse would be continuous by the closed graph theorem).
    $endgroup$
    – Jochen
    Jan 15 at 13:47












  • $begingroup$
    @jochen Thanks for reminding , I was actually thinking the same .
    $endgroup$
    – Lav Kumar
    Jan 16 at 13:55


















  • $begingroup$
    But be careful: The extension of an injective uniformly continuous map to the completion needn't be injective! Consider a Banach space $(X,|cdot|)$ and a strictly finer norm $||cdot||$ on it (e.g., $|x|+|f(x)|$ for a discontinuous linear functional). Then the identity from $(X,||cdot||)$ to $(X,|cdot|)$ is continuous and injective but its extension to the completion is not injective (because otherwise its inverse would be continuous by the closed graph theorem).
    $endgroup$
    – Jochen
    Jan 15 at 13:47












  • $begingroup$
    @jochen Thanks for reminding , I was actually thinking the same .
    $endgroup$
    – Lav Kumar
    Jan 16 at 13:55
















$begingroup$
But be careful: The extension of an injective uniformly continuous map to the completion needn't be injective! Consider a Banach space $(X,|cdot|)$ and a strictly finer norm $||cdot||$ on it (e.g., $|x|+|f(x)|$ for a discontinuous linear functional). Then the identity from $(X,||cdot||)$ to $(X,|cdot|)$ is continuous and injective but its extension to the completion is not injective (because otherwise its inverse would be continuous by the closed graph theorem).
$endgroup$
– Jochen
Jan 15 at 13:47






$begingroup$
But be careful: The extension of an injective uniformly continuous map to the completion needn't be injective! Consider a Banach space $(X,|cdot|)$ and a strictly finer norm $||cdot||$ on it (e.g., $|x|+|f(x)|$ for a discontinuous linear functional). Then the identity from $(X,||cdot||)$ to $(X,|cdot|)$ is continuous and injective but its extension to the completion is not injective (because otherwise its inverse would be continuous by the closed graph theorem).
$endgroup$
– Jochen
Jan 15 at 13:47














$begingroup$
@jochen Thanks for reminding , I was actually thinking the same .
$endgroup$
– Lav Kumar
Jan 16 at 13:55




$begingroup$
@jochen Thanks for reminding , I was actually thinking the same .
$endgroup$
– Lav Kumar
Jan 16 at 13:55










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Suppose $hin C(K)otimes C(L)$ and $theta(h)=0$. Write $h=sum_{i=1}^nf_iotimes g_i$, where the $g_i$ are linearly independent. But then this implies that for all $xin K$,
$$0=theta(h)(x,cdot)=sum_{i=1}^nf_i(x)g_i(cdot),$$
whence $f_i=0$ for all $i$, and thus $h=0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – Lav Kumar
    Jan 14 at 16:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You're welcome. Glad to help!
    $endgroup$
    – Aweygan
    Jan 14 at 17:00










  • $begingroup$
    Is the choice of representation of h with g's linearly independent comes from smallest representation of h as sums of elementary tensors ?
    $endgroup$
    – Lav Kumar
    Jan 14 at 17:02










  • $begingroup$
    I wouldn't think so, but possibly. You might be able to do it with the $f_i$ linearly independent and obtain a representation with less elementary tensors.
    $endgroup$
    – Aweygan
    Jan 14 at 17:09













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073079%2fverapoulous-algebra-ck-mathbin-hat-otimes-cl-is-a-subalgebra-of-ck-ti%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Suppose $hin C(K)otimes C(L)$ and $theta(h)=0$. Write $h=sum_{i=1}^nf_iotimes g_i$, where the $g_i$ are linearly independent. But then this implies that for all $xin K$,
$$0=theta(h)(x,cdot)=sum_{i=1}^nf_i(x)g_i(cdot),$$
whence $f_i=0$ for all $i$, and thus $h=0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – Lav Kumar
    Jan 14 at 16:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You're welcome. Glad to help!
    $endgroup$
    – Aweygan
    Jan 14 at 17:00










  • $begingroup$
    Is the choice of representation of h with g's linearly independent comes from smallest representation of h as sums of elementary tensors ?
    $endgroup$
    – Lav Kumar
    Jan 14 at 17:02










  • $begingroup$
    I wouldn't think so, but possibly. You might be able to do it with the $f_i$ linearly independent and obtain a representation with less elementary tensors.
    $endgroup$
    – Aweygan
    Jan 14 at 17:09


















2












$begingroup$

Suppose $hin C(K)otimes C(L)$ and $theta(h)=0$. Write $h=sum_{i=1}^nf_iotimes g_i$, where the $g_i$ are linearly independent. But then this implies that for all $xin K$,
$$0=theta(h)(x,cdot)=sum_{i=1}^nf_i(x)g_i(cdot),$$
whence $f_i=0$ for all $i$, and thus $h=0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – Lav Kumar
    Jan 14 at 16:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You're welcome. Glad to help!
    $endgroup$
    – Aweygan
    Jan 14 at 17:00










  • $begingroup$
    Is the choice of representation of h with g's linearly independent comes from smallest representation of h as sums of elementary tensors ?
    $endgroup$
    – Lav Kumar
    Jan 14 at 17:02










  • $begingroup$
    I wouldn't think so, but possibly. You might be able to do it with the $f_i$ linearly independent and obtain a representation with less elementary tensors.
    $endgroup$
    – Aweygan
    Jan 14 at 17:09
















2












2








2





$begingroup$

Suppose $hin C(K)otimes C(L)$ and $theta(h)=0$. Write $h=sum_{i=1}^nf_iotimes g_i$, where the $g_i$ are linearly independent. But then this implies that for all $xin K$,
$$0=theta(h)(x,cdot)=sum_{i=1}^nf_i(x)g_i(cdot),$$
whence $f_i=0$ for all $i$, and thus $h=0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Suppose $hin C(K)otimes C(L)$ and $theta(h)=0$. Write $h=sum_{i=1}^nf_iotimes g_i$, where the $g_i$ are linearly independent. But then this implies that for all $xin K$,
$$0=theta(h)(x,cdot)=sum_{i=1}^nf_i(x)g_i(cdot),$$
whence $f_i=0$ for all $i$, and thus $h=0$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 14 at 14:52









AweyganAweygan

14.2k21441




14.2k21441












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – Lav Kumar
    Jan 14 at 16:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You're welcome. Glad to help!
    $endgroup$
    – Aweygan
    Jan 14 at 17:00










  • $begingroup$
    Is the choice of representation of h with g's linearly independent comes from smallest representation of h as sums of elementary tensors ?
    $endgroup$
    – Lav Kumar
    Jan 14 at 17:02










  • $begingroup$
    I wouldn't think so, but possibly. You might be able to do it with the $f_i$ linearly independent and obtain a representation with less elementary tensors.
    $endgroup$
    – Aweygan
    Jan 14 at 17:09




















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you so much.
    $endgroup$
    – Lav Kumar
    Jan 14 at 16:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You're welcome. Glad to help!
    $endgroup$
    – Aweygan
    Jan 14 at 17:00










  • $begingroup$
    Is the choice of representation of h with g's linearly independent comes from smallest representation of h as sums of elementary tensors ?
    $endgroup$
    – Lav Kumar
    Jan 14 at 17:02










  • $begingroup$
    I wouldn't think so, but possibly. You might be able to do it with the $f_i$ linearly independent and obtain a representation with less elementary tensors.
    $endgroup$
    – Aweygan
    Jan 14 at 17:09


















$begingroup$
Thank you so much.
$endgroup$
– Lav Kumar
Jan 14 at 16:59




$begingroup$
Thank you so much.
$endgroup$
– Lav Kumar
Jan 14 at 16:59




1




1




$begingroup$
You're welcome. Glad to help!
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 14 at 17:00




$begingroup$
You're welcome. Glad to help!
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 14 at 17:00












$begingroup$
Is the choice of representation of h with g's linearly independent comes from smallest representation of h as sums of elementary tensors ?
$endgroup$
– Lav Kumar
Jan 14 at 17:02




$begingroup$
Is the choice of representation of h with g's linearly independent comes from smallest representation of h as sums of elementary tensors ?
$endgroup$
– Lav Kumar
Jan 14 at 17:02












$begingroup$
I wouldn't think so, but possibly. You might be able to do it with the $f_i$ linearly independent and obtain a representation with less elementary tensors.
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 14 at 17:09






$begingroup$
I wouldn't think so, but possibly. You might be able to do it with the $f_i$ linearly independent and obtain a representation with less elementary tensors.
$endgroup$
– Aweygan
Jan 14 at 17:09




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073079%2fverapoulous-algebra-ck-mathbin-hat-otimes-cl-is-a-subalgebra-of-ck-ti%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith