Does negative correlation survive monotone transformation?
$begingroup$
Let $X$ and $Y$ be two non-negative random variables and be negative correlated, i.e.,
$$mathbb{E}[XY] leq mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y].$$
Let $h(cdot)$ and $g(cdot)$ be two non-negative, monotone increasing functions. Do we have
$h(X)$ and $g(Y)$ being negative correlated as well? Intuitively this quite makes sense to me..
probability probability-theory correlation expected-value
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Let $X$ and $Y$ be two non-negative random variables and be negative correlated, i.e.,
$$mathbb{E}[XY] leq mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y].$$
Let $h(cdot)$ and $g(cdot)$ be two non-negative, monotone increasing functions. Do we have
$h(X)$ and $g(Y)$ being negative correlated as well? Intuitively this quite makes sense to me..
probability probability-theory correlation expected-value
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Counterexample: Consider the discrete uniform distribution on ${(0,1),(0.9,0),(1,0)}$, and let $h$ be the monotone function that maps ${0,0.9,1}$ to ${0,0.1,1}$.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 18 '18 at 6:56
$begingroup$
@Rahul Thanks. Isn't it still being negative correlated after the transformation, because the expectation of the product is still zero?
$endgroup$
– Stupid_Guy
Nov 18 '18 at 16:35
1
$begingroup$
Whoops, typo: the third point should be $(1,1)$.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 18 '18 at 16:40
$begingroup$
@Rahul Hi Rahul, your ideas make sense to me. Thanks so much. However, we may still need a little bit of work as after the transformation they are still negative correlated, because $h(Y) = Y$ thus $Cov(h(X),h(Y)) = -frac{2.3}{3}$. I'll think more about this. Many thanks.
$endgroup$
– Stupid_Guy
Nov 18 '18 at 16:48
$begingroup$
One of us must be making a mistake. I get covariances $-0.8/9$ and $0.8/9$ before and after transformation by $h$ respectively. $E[XY]=1/3$ and $E[Y]=2/3$ in both cases, but $E[X]$ changes from $1.9/3$ to $1.1/3$. It's also easy to visualize the change in correlation if you plot the data and consider the best fitting line.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 19 '18 at 5:29
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Let $X$ and $Y$ be two non-negative random variables and be negative correlated, i.e.,
$$mathbb{E}[XY] leq mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y].$$
Let $h(cdot)$ and $g(cdot)$ be two non-negative, monotone increasing functions. Do we have
$h(X)$ and $g(Y)$ being negative correlated as well? Intuitively this quite makes sense to me..
probability probability-theory correlation expected-value
$endgroup$
Let $X$ and $Y$ be two non-negative random variables and be negative correlated, i.e.,
$$mathbb{E}[XY] leq mathbb{E}[X]mathbb{E}[Y].$$
Let $h(cdot)$ and $g(cdot)$ be two non-negative, monotone increasing functions. Do we have
$h(X)$ and $g(Y)$ being negative correlated as well? Intuitively this quite makes sense to me..
probability probability-theory correlation expected-value
probability probability-theory correlation expected-value
asked Nov 18 '18 at 5:23
Stupid_GuyStupid_Guy
567317
567317
1
$begingroup$
Counterexample: Consider the discrete uniform distribution on ${(0,1),(0.9,0),(1,0)}$, and let $h$ be the monotone function that maps ${0,0.9,1}$ to ${0,0.1,1}$.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 18 '18 at 6:56
$begingroup$
@Rahul Thanks. Isn't it still being negative correlated after the transformation, because the expectation of the product is still zero?
$endgroup$
– Stupid_Guy
Nov 18 '18 at 16:35
1
$begingroup$
Whoops, typo: the third point should be $(1,1)$.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 18 '18 at 16:40
$begingroup$
@Rahul Hi Rahul, your ideas make sense to me. Thanks so much. However, we may still need a little bit of work as after the transformation they are still negative correlated, because $h(Y) = Y$ thus $Cov(h(X),h(Y)) = -frac{2.3}{3}$. I'll think more about this. Many thanks.
$endgroup$
– Stupid_Guy
Nov 18 '18 at 16:48
$begingroup$
One of us must be making a mistake. I get covariances $-0.8/9$ and $0.8/9$ before and after transformation by $h$ respectively. $E[XY]=1/3$ and $E[Y]=2/3$ in both cases, but $E[X]$ changes from $1.9/3$ to $1.1/3$. It's also easy to visualize the change in correlation if you plot the data and consider the best fitting line.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 19 '18 at 5:29
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
Counterexample: Consider the discrete uniform distribution on ${(0,1),(0.9,0),(1,0)}$, and let $h$ be the monotone function that maps ${0,0.9,1}$ to ${0,0.1,1}$.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 18 '18 at 6:56
$begingroup$
@Rahul Thanks. Isn't it still being negative correlated after the transformation, because the expectation of the product is still zero?
$endgroup$
– Stupid_Guy
Nov 18 '18 at 16:35
1
$begingroup$
Whoops, typo: the third point should be $(1,1)$.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 18 '18 at 16:40
$begingroup$
@Rahul Hi Rahul, your ideas make sense to me. Thanks so much. However, we may still need a little bit of work as after the transformation they are still negative correlated, because $h(Y) = Y$ thus $Cov(h(X),h(Y)) = -frac{2.3}{3}$. I'll think more about this. Many thanks.
$endgroup$
– Stupid_Guy
Nov 18 '18 at 16:48
$begingroup$
One of us must be making a mistake. I get covariances $-0.8/9$ and $0.8/9$ before and after transformation by $h$ respectively. $E[XY]=1/3$ and $E[Y]=2/3$ in both cases, but $E[X]$ changes from $1.9/3$ to $1.1/3$. It's also easy to visualize the change in correlation if you plot the data and consider the best fitting line.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 19 '18 at 5:29
1
1
$begingroup$
Counterexample: Consider the discrete uniform distribution on ${(0,1),(0.9,0),(1,0)}$, and let $h$ be the monotone function that maps ${0,0.9,1}$ to ${0,0.1,1}$.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 18 '18 at 6:56
$begingroup$
Counterexample: Consider the discrete uniform distribution on ${(0,1),(0.9,0),(1,0)}$, and let $h$ be the monotone function that maps ${0,0.9,1}$ to ${0,0.1,1}$.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 18 '18 at 6:56
$begingroup$
@Rahul Thanks. Isn't it still being negative correlated after the transformation, because the expectation of the product is still zero?
$endgroup$
– Stupid_Guy
Nov 18 '18 at 16:35
$begingroup$
@Rahul Thanks. Isn't it still being negative correlated after the transformation, because the expectation of the product is still zero?
$endgroup$
– Stupid_Guy
Nov 18 '18 at 16:35
1
1
$begingroup$
Whoops, typo: the third point should be $(1,1)$.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 18 '18 at 16:40
$begingroup$
Whoops, typo: the third point should be $(1,1)$.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 18 '18 at 16:40
$begingroup$
@Rahul Hi Rahul, your ideas make sense to me. Thanks so much. However, we may still need a little bit of work as after the transformation they are still negative correlated, because $h(Y) = Y$ thus $Cov(h(X),h(Y)) = -frac{2.3}{3}$. I'll think more about this. Many thanks.
$endgroup$
– Stupid_Guy
Nov 18 '18 at 16:48
$begingroup$
@Rahul Hi Rahul, your ideas make sense to me. Thanks so much. However, we may still need a little bit of work as after the transformation they are still negative correlated, because $h(Y) = Y$ thus $Cov(h(X),h(Y)) = -frac{2.3}{3}$. I'll think more about this. Many thanks.
$endgroup$
– Stupid_Guy
Nov 18 '18 at 16:48
$begingroup$
One of us must be making a mistake. I get covariances $-0.8/9$ and $0.8/9$ before and after transformation by $h$ respectively. $E[XY]=1/3$ and $E[Y]=2/3$ in both cases, but $E[X]$ changes from $1.9/3$ to $1.1/3$. It's also easy to visualize the change in correlation if you plot the data and consider the best fitting line.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 19 '18 at 5:29
$begingroup$
One of us must be making a mistake. I get covariances $-0.8/9$ and $0.8/9$ before and after transformation by $h$ respectively. $E[XY]=1/3$ and $E[Y]=2/3$ in both cases, but $E[X]$ changes from $1.9/3$ to $1.1/3$. It's also easy to visualize the change in correlation if you plot the data and consider the best fitting line.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 19 '18 at 5:29
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Copying from Rahul's comment since it answers the question:
No. Counterexample: Consider the discrete uniform distribution on {(0,1),(0.9,0),(1,1)}, and let h be the monotone function that maps {0,0.9,1} to {0,0.1,1}.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003157%2fdoes-negative-correlation-survive-monotone-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Copying from Rahul's comment since it answers the question:
No. Counterexample: Consider the discrete uniform distribution on {(0,1),(0.9,0),(1,1)}, and let h be the monotone function that maps {0,0.9,1} to {0,0.1,1}.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Copying from Rahul's comment since it answers the question:
No. Counterexample: Consider the discrete uniform distribution on {(0,1),(0.9,0),(1,1)}, and let h be the monotone function that maps {0,0.9,1} to {0,0.1,1}.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Copying from Rahul's comment since it answers the question:
No. Counterexample: Consider the discrete uniform distribution on {(0,1),(0.9,0),(1,1)}, and let h be the monotone function that maps {0,0.9,1} to {0,0.1,1}.
$endgroup$
Copying from Rahul's comment since it answers the question:
No. Counterexample: Consider the discrete uniform distribution on {(0,1),(0.9,0),(1,1)}, and let h be the monotone function that maps {0,0.9,1} to {0,0.1,1}.
answered Jan 20 at 22:57
VeechVeech
1184
1184
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003157%2fdoes-negative-correlation-survive-monotone-transformation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Counterexample: Consider the discrete uniform distribution on ${(0,1),(0.9,0),(1,0)}$, and let $h$ be the monotone function that maps ${0,0.9,1}$ to ${0,0.1,1}$.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 18 '18 at 6:56
$begingroup$
@Rahul Thanks. Isn't it still being negative correlated after the transformation, because the expectation of the product is still zero?
$endgroup$
– Stupid_Guy
Nov 18 '18 at 16:35
1
$begingroup$
Whoops, typo: the third point should be $(1,1)$.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 18 '18 at 16:40
$begingroup$
@Rahul Hi Rahul, your ideas make sense to me. Thanks so much. However, we may still need a little bit of work as after the transformation they are still negative correlated, because $h(Y) = Y$ thus $Cov(h(X),h(Y)) = -frac{2.3}{3}$. I'll think more about this. Many thanks.
$endgroup$
– Stupid_Guy
Nov 18 '18 at 16:48
$begingroup$
One of us must be making a mistake. I get covariances $-0.8/9$ and $0.8/9$ before and after transformation by $h$ respectively. $E[XY]=1/3$ and $E[Y]=2/3$ in both cases, but $E[X]$ changes from $1.9/3$ to $1.1/3$. It's also easy to visualize the change in correlation if you plot the data and consider the best fitting line.
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Nov 19 '18 at 5:29