$forall{x}inmathbb{Z}$, if $forall{x}inmathbb{N}$, $a^xmid{x}$, then $a=1$ or $a=-1$.












0












$begingroup$


Prove or disprove:



$forall{x}inmathbb{Z}$, if $forall{x}inmathbb{N}$, $a^xmid{x}$, then $a=1$ or $a=-1$.



I tried proving the positive but I'm not sure if it is the right approach.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Why do you have both $forall x in mathbb{Z}$ and $forall x in mathbb{N}$? I don't understand including both in the problem. Isn't the problem statement the same if you delete one of them?
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    Jan 21 at 5:30


















0












$begingroup$


Prove or disprove:



$forall{x}inmathbb{Z}$, if $forall{x}inmathbb{N}$, $a^xmid{x}$, then $a=1$ or $a=-1$.



I tried proving the positive but I'm not sure if it is the right approach.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Why do you have both $forall x in mathbb{Z}$ and $forall x in mathbb{N}$? I don't understand including both in the problem. Isn't the problem statement the same if you delete one of them?
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    Jan 21 at 5:30
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


Prove or disprove:



$forall{x}inmathbb{Z}$, if $forall{x}inmathbb{N}$, $a^xmid{x}$, then $a=1$ or $a=-1$.



I tried proving the positive but I'm not sure if it is the right approach.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Prove or disprove:



$forall{x}inmathbb{Z}$, if $forall{x}inmathbb{N}$, $a^xmid{x}$, then $a=1$ or $a=-1$.



I tried proving the positive but I'm not sure if it is the right approach.







proof-writing divisibility






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 21 at 5:31









David G. Stork

11k41432




11k41432










asked Jan 21 at 5:26









macymacy

305




305








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Why do you have both $forall x in mathbb{Z}$ and $forall x in mathbb{N}$? I don't understand including both in the problem. Isn't the problem statement the same if you delete one of them?
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    Jan 21 at 5:30
















  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Why do you have both $forall x in mathbb{Z}$ and $forall x in mathbb{N}$? I don't understand including both in the problem. Isn't the problem statement the same if you delete one of them?
    $endgroup$
    – David G. Stork
    Jan 21 at 5:30










3




3




$begingroup$
Why do you have both $forall x in mathbb{Z}$ and $forall x in mathbb{N}$? I don't understand including both in the problem. Isn't the problem statement the same if you delete one of them?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
Jan 21 at 5:30






$begingroup$
Why do you have both $forall x in mathbb{Z}$ and $forall x in mathbb{N}$? I don't understand including both in the problem. Isn't the problem statement the same if you delete one of them?
$endgroup$
– David G. Stork
Jan 21 at 5:30












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

We have: if $a ge 2 implies a^x ge 2^x > ximplies a^x > ximplies a^x nmid x$. Thus if $a^x mid x implies a = 1$. Also, if $a le -2 implies |a^x| ge 2^x > x implies |a^x| > ximplies |a^x| nmid ximplies a^x nmid x$. Thus $a^x mid x implies a = -1$. Together we have: $a = pm 1$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    0












    $begingroup$

    Note that if $a^x | x,$ then $ a^x leq x.$ Now consider when this is possible and try to take it from there.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      0












      $begingroup$

      If $a > 1$ is should be become apparent that $a^m > m$. After all $a^m = a*a*a.... $ and as $a*a = a+a+a+a... ge a+a$ we have $a*a*a* ge a+a+a+.... > 1+1+1+.... = m$.



      (To make this clearer consider $5^3 = 5*5^2 = 5^2 + 5^2 + 5^2 + 5^2 +5^2 ge 5^2 + 5^2 > 1 + 5^2 = 1 + 5*5 = 1 + 5+5 +5 +5+5 ge 1+ 5+5 > 1+1+1 = 3$)



      We can try to prove that more formally.



      If $a > 1$ then $a ge 2$ and $a^m ge 2^m =(1+1)^m =_{text{by binomial theorem}} sum_{k=0}^m {mchoose k}1^k ge sum_{k=0}^m ge m+1$.



      Now for positive numbers if $a|b$ then $ale b$ so $a^m|m$ means $a^m le m$ but that's a contradiction if $a > 1$.



      So if $a$ is a positive integer and $a^m|m$ then $a =1$.



      But what about $0$ and negative values?



      Well $0 not mid k$ if $kne 0$ so that $a ne 0$.



      And for negative numbers $a|b iff small{|}asmall{|}large{mid}small{|}bsmall{|}$ and if $a < 0$ then $a^m = pm |a|^m$. So this holds for negative $a$ as well.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081543%2fforallx-in-mathbbz-if-forallx-in-mathbbn-ax-midx-then-a-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        2












        $begingroup$

        We have: if $a ge 2 implies a^x ge 2^x > ximplies a^x > ximplies a^x nmid x$. Thus if $a^x mid x implies a = 1$. Also, if $a le -2 implies |a^x| ge 2^x > x implies |a^x| > ximplies |a^x| nmid ximplies a^x nmid x$. Thus $a^x mid x implies a = -1$. Together we have: $a = pm 1$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          2












          $begingroup$

          We have: if $a ge 2 implies a^x ge 2^x > ximplies a^x > ximplies a^x nmid x$. Thus if $a^x mid x implies a = 1$. Also, if $a le -2 implies |a^x| ge 2^x > x implies |a^x| > ximplies |a^x| nmid ximplies a^x nmid x$. Thus $a^x mid x implies a = -1$. Together we have: $a = pm 1$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            We have: if $a ge 2 implies a^x ge 2^x > ximplies a^x > ximplies a^x nmid x$. Thus if $a^x mid x implies a = 1$. Also, if $a le -2 implies |a^x| ge 2^x > x implies |a^x| > ximplies |a^x| nmid ximplies a^x nmid x$. Thus $a^x mid x implies a = -1$. Together we have: $a = pm 1$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            We have: if $a ge 2 implies a^x ge 2^x > ximplies a^x > ximplies a^x nmid x$. Thus if $a^x mid x implies a = 1$. Also, if $a le -2 implies |a^x| ge 2^x > x implies |a^x| > ximplies |a^x| nmid ximplies a^x nmid x$. Thus $a^x mid x implies a = -1$. Together we have: $a = pm 1$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 21 at 5:35









            DeepSeaDeepSea

            71.3k54488




            71.3k54488























                0












                $begingroup$

                Note that if $a^x | x,$ then $ a^x leq x.$ Now consider when this is possible and try to take it from there.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  Note that if $a^x | x,$ then $ a^x leq x.$ Now consider when this is possible and try to take it from there.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    Note that if $a^x | x,$ then $ a^x leq x.$ Now consider when this is possible and try to take it from there.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Note that if $a^x | x,$ then $ a^x leq x.$ Now consider when this is possible and try to take it from there.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Jan 21 at 5:35









                    Jack PfaffingerJack Pfaffinger

                    374112




                    374112























                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        If $a > 1$ is should be become apparent that $a^m > m$. After all $a^m = a*a*a.... $ and as $a*a = a+a+a+a... ge a+a$ we have $a*a*a* ge a+a+a+.... > 1+1+1+.... = m$.



                        (To make this clearer consider $5^3 = 5*5^2 = 5^2 + 5^2 + 5^2 + 5^2 +5^2 ge 5^2 + 5^2 > 1 + 5^2 = 1 + 5*5 = 1 + 5+5 +5 +5+5 ge 1+ 5+5 > 1+1+1 = 3$)



                        We can try to prove that more formally.



                        If $a > 1$ then $a ge 2$ and $a^m ge 2^m =(1+1)^m =_{text{by binomial theorem}} sum_{k=0}^m {mchoose k}1^k ge sum_{k=0}^m ge m+1$.



                        Now for positive numbers if $a|b$ then $ale b$ so $a^m|m$ means $a^m le m$ but that's a contradiction if $a > 1$.



                        So if $a$ is a positive integer and $a^m|m$ then $a =1$.



                        But what about $0$ and negative values?



                        Well $0 not mid k$ if $kne 0$ so that $a ne 0$.



                        And for negative numbers $a|b iff small{|}asmall{|}large{mid}small{|}bsmall{|}$ and if $a < 0$ then $a^m = pm |a|^m$. So this holds for negative $a$ as well.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          If $a > 1$ is should be become apparent that $a^m > m$. After all $a^m = a*a*a.... $ and as $a*a = a+a+a+a... ge a+a$ we have $a*a*a* ge a+a+a+.... > 1+1+1+.... = m$.



                          (To make this clearer consider $5^3 = 5*5^2 = 5^2 + 5^2 + 5^2 + 5^2 +5^2 ge 5^2 + 5^2 > 1 + 5^2 = 1 + 5*5 = 1 + 5+5 +5 +5+5 ge 1+ 5+5 > 1+1+1 = 3$)



                          We can try to prove that more formally.



                          If $a > 1$ then $a ge 2$ and $a^m ge 2^m =(1+1)^m =_{text{by binomial theorem}} sum_{k=0}^m {mchoose k}1^k ge sum_{k=0}^m ge m+1$.



                          Now for positive numbers if $a|b$ then $ale b$ so $a^m|m$ means $a^m le m$ but that's a contradiction if $a > 1$.



                          So if $a$ is a positive integer and $a^m|m$ then $a =1$.



                          But what about $0$ and negative values?



                          Well $0 not mid k$ if $kne 0$ so that $a ne 0$.



                          And for negative numbers $a|b iff small{|}asmall{|}large{mid}small{|}bsmall{|}$ and if $a < 0$ then $a^m = pm |a|^m$. So this holds for negative $a$ as well.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            If $a > 1$ is should be become apparent that $a^m > m$. After all $a^m = a*a*a.... $ and as $a*a = a+a+a+a... ge a+a$ we have $a*a*a* ge a+a+a+.... > 1+1+1+.... = m$.



                            (To make this clearer consider $5^3 = 5*5^2 = 5^2 + 5^2 + 5^2 + 5^2 +5^2 ge 5^2 + 5^2 > 1 + 5^2 = 1 + 5*5 = 1 + 5+5 +5 +5+5 ge 1+ 5+5 > 1+1+1 = 3$)



                            We can try to prove that more formally.



                            If $a > 1$ then $a ge 2$ and $a^m ge 2^m =(1+1)^m =_{text{by binomial theorem}} sum_{k=0}^m {mchoose k}1^k ge sum_{k=0}^m ge m+1$.



                            Now for positive numbers if $a|b$ then $ale b$ so $a^m|m$ means $a^m le m$ but that's a contradiction if $a > 1$.



                            So if $a$ is a positive integer and $a^m|m$ then $a =1$.



                            But what about $0$ and negative values?



                            Well $0 not mid k$ if $kne 0$ so that $a ne 0$.



                            And for negative numbers $a|b iff small{|}asmall{|}large{mid}small{|}bsmall{|}$ and if $a < 0$ then $a^m = pm |a|^m$. So this holds for negative $a$ as well.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            If $a > 1$ is should be become apparent that $a^m > m$. After all $a^m = a*a*a.... $ and as $a*a = a+a+a+a... ge a+a$ we have $a*a*a* ge a+a+a+.... > 1+1+1+.... = m$.



                            (To make this clearer consider $5^3 = 5*5^2 = 5^2 + 5^2 + 5^2 + 5^2 +5^2 ge 5^2 + 5^2 > 1 + 5^2 = 1 + 5*5 = 1 + 5+5 +5 +5+5 ge 1+ 5+5 > 1+1+1 = 3$)



                            We can try to prove that more formally.



                            If $a > 1$ then $a ge 2$ and $a^m ge 2^m =(1+1)^m =_{text{by binomial theorem}} sum_{k=0}^m {mchoose k}1^k ge sum_{k=0}^m ge m+1$.



                            Now for positive numbers if $a|b$ then $ale b$ so $a^m|m$ means $a^m le m$ but that's a contradiction if $a > 1$.



                            So if $a$ is a positive integer and $a^m|m$ then $a =1$.



                            But what about $0$ and negative values?



                            Well $0 not mid k$ if $kne 0$ so that $a ne 0$.



                            And for negative numbers $a|b iff small{|}asmall{|}large{mid}small{|}bsmall{|}$ and if $a < 0$ then $a^m = pm |a|^m$. So this holds for negative $a$ as well.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Jan 21 at 5:57









                            fleabloodfleablood

                            71.9k22686




                            71.9k22686






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081543%2fforallx-in-mathbbz-if-forallx-in-mathbbn-ax-midx-then-a-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

                                android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

                                WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]