Quadratic eigenvalue problem (QEP)
$begingroup$
$Q(lambda)x=0$ and $Q(lambda) = lambda^2 M+lambda C +K$ are defined in this PDF file
The matrices $M$, $C$, $K$ are $ntimes n $ matrices. The thesis said that when $M$, $C$, $K$ are real or hermitian. the eigenvalues are real or come in pairs $(lambda,overline{lambda})$. But the explanation in the thesis is hard to understand. Would you give me a more clear explanation?
matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors quadratics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$Q(lambda)x=0$ and $Q(lambda) = lambda^2 M+lambda C +K$ are defined in this PDF file
The matrices $M$, $C$, $K$ are $ntimes n $ matrices. The thesis said that when $M$, $C$, $K$ are real or hermitian. the eigenvalues are real or come in pairs $(lambda,overline{lambda})$. But the explanation in the thesis is hard to understand. Would you give me a more clear explanation?
matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors quadratics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$Q(lambda)x=0$ and $Q(lambda) = lambda^2 M+lambda C +K$ are defined in this PDF file
The matrices $M$, $C$, $K$ are $ntimes n $ matrices. The thesis said that when $M$, $C$, $K$ are real or hermitian. the eigenvalues are real or come in pairs $(lambda,overline{lambda})$. But the explanation in the thesis is hard to understand. Would you give me a more clear explanation?
matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors quadratics
$endgroup$
$Q(lambda)x=0$ and $Q(lambda) = lambda^2 M+lambda C +K$ are defined in this PDF file
The matrices $M$, $C$, $K$ are $ntimes n $ matrices. The thesis said that when $M$, $C$, $K$ are real or hermitian. the eigenvalues are real or come in pairs $(lambda,overline{lambda})$. But the explanation in the thesis is hard to understand. Would you give me a more clear explanation?
matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors quadratics
matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors quadratics
edited Jan 21 at 23:07
egreg
183k1486205
183k1486205
asked Jan 21 at 5:50
chen xi chen xi
82
82
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If a square matrix has real entries, its characteristic polynomial has real coefficients as well. Therefore its non real roots must come in pairs $lambda$ and $bar{lambda}$, because if $lambdainmathbb{C}$ is a root of a real polynomial $f(x)$, then $f(lambda)=0$ and so
$$
0=bar{0}=overline{f(lambda)}=f(bar{lambda})
$$
and therefore also $bar{lambda}$ is a root of $f$.
For a real symmetric matrix every eigenvalue is real. Suppose $M$ is real symmetric and $lambda$ is an eigenvalue, with eigenvector $vne0$ (possibly with complex entries). Then, denoting by $^H$ the Hermitian transpose,
$$
lambda v^Hv=v^H(lambda v)=v^HMv=v^HM^Hv=(Mv)^Hv=(lambda v)^Hv=bar{lambda}v^Hv
$$
Therefore $(lambda-bar{lambda})(v^Hv)=0$. Since $vne0$, also $v^Hvne0$ and therefore $lambda-bar{lambda}=0$, which means $lambda$ is real.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What if the matrix is Hermitian, why it is the same with the real matrix?
$endgroup$
– chen xi
Jan 22 at 11:29
$begingroup$
@chenxi The proof for real symmetric goes the same for a Hermitian matrix: I just used that $M=M^H$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 22 at 11:50
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081556%2fquadratic-eigenvalue-problem-qep%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If a square matrix has real entries, its characteristic polynomial has real coefficients as well. Therefore its non real roots must come in pairs $lambda$ and $bar{lambda}$, because if $lambdainmathbb{C}$ is a root of a real polynomial $f(x)$, then $f(lambda)=0$ and so
$$
0=bar{0}=overline{f(lambda)}=f(bar{lambda})
$$
and therefore also $bar{lambda}$ is a root of $f$.
For a real symmetric matrix every eigenvalue is real. Suppose $M$ is real symmetric and $lambda$ is an eigenvalue, with eigenvector $vne0$ (possibly with complex entries). Then, denoting by $^H$ the Hermitian transpose,
$$
lambda v^Hv=v^H(lambda v)=v^HMv=v^HM^Hv=(Mv)^Hv=(lambda v)^Hv=bar{lambda}v^Hv
$$
Therefore $(lambda-bar{lambda})(v^Hv)=0$. Since $vne0$, also $v^Hvne0$ and therefore $lambda-bar{lambda}=0$, which means $lambda$ is real.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What if the matrix is Hermitian, why it is the same with the real matrix?
$endgroup$
– chen xi
Jan 22 at 11:29
$begingroup$
@chenxi The proof for real symmetric goes the same for a Hermitian matrix: I just used that $M=M^H$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 22 at 11:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If a square matrix has real entries, its characteristic polynomial has real coefficients as well. Therefore its non real roots must come in pairs $lambda$ and $bar{lambda}$, because if $lambdainmathbb{C}$ is a root of a real polynomial $f(x)$, then $f(lambda)=0$ and so
$$
0=bar{0}=overline{f(lambda)}=f(bar{lambda})
$$
and therefore also $bar{lambda}$ is a root of $f$.
For a real symmetric matrix every eigenvalue is real. Suppose $M$ is real symmetric and $lambda$ is an eigenvalue, with eigenvector $vne0$ (possibly with complex entries). Then, denoting by $^H$ the Hermitian transpose,
$$
lambda v^Hv=v^H(lambda v)=v^HMv=v^HM^Hv=(Mv)^Hv=(lambda v)^Hv=bar{lambda}v^Hv
$$
Therefore $(lambda-bar{lambda})(v^Hv)=0$. Since $vne0$, also $v^Hvne0$ and therefore $lambda-bar{lambda}=0$, which means $lambda$ is real.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
What if the matrix is Hermitian, why it is the same with the real matrix?
$endgroup$
– chen xi
Jan 22 at 11:29
$begingroup$
@chenxi The proof for real symmetric goes the same for a Hermitian matrix: I just used that $M=M^H$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 22 at 11:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If a square matrix has real entries, its characteristic polynomial has real coefficients as well. Therefore its non real roots must come in pairs $lambda$ and $bar{lambda}$, because if $lambdainmathbb{C}$ is a root of a real polynomial $f(x)$, then $f(lambda)=0$ and so
$$
0=bar{0}=overline{f(lambda)}=f(bar{lambda})
$$
and therefore also $bar{lambda}$ is a root of $f$.
For a real symmetric matrix every eigenvalue is real. Suppose $M$ is real symmetric and $lambda$ is an eigenvalue, with eigenvector $vne0$ (possibly with complex entries). Then, denoting by $^H$ the Hermitian transpose,
$$
lambda v^Hv=v^H(lambda v)=v^HMv=v^HM^Hv=(Mv)^Hv=(lambda v)^Hv=bar{lambda}v^Hv
$$
Therefore $(lambda-bar{lambda})(v^Hv)=0$. Since $vne0$, also $v^Hvne0$ and therefore $lambda-bar{lambda}=0$, which means $lambda$ is real.
$endgroup$
If a square matrix has real entries, its characteristic polynomial has real coefficients as well. Therefore its non real roots must come in pairs $lambda$ and $bar{lambda}$, because if $lambdainmathbb{C}$ is a root of a real polynomial $f(x)$, then $f(lambda)=0$ and so
$$
0=bar{0}=overline{f(lambda)}=f(bar{lambda})
$$
and therefore also $bar{lambda}$ is a root of $f$.
For a real symmetric matrix every eigenvalue is real. Suppose $M$ is real symmetric and $lambda$ is an eigenvalue, with eigenvector $vne0$ (possibly with complex entries). Then, denoting by $^H$ the Hermitian transpose,
$$
lambda v^Hv=v^H(lambda v)=v^HMv=v^HM^Hv=(Mv)^Hv=(lambda v)^Hv=bar{lambda}v^Hv
$$
Therefore $(lambda-bar{lambda})(v^Hv)=0$. Since $vne0$, also $v^Hvne0$ and therefore $lambda-bar{lambda}=0$, which means $lambda$ is real.
answered Jan 21 at 23:15
egregegreg
183k1486205
183k1486205
$begingroup$
What if the matrix is Hermitian, why it is the same with the real matrix?
$endgroup$
– chen xi
Jan 22 at 11:29
$begingroup$
@chenxi The proof for real symmetric goes the same for a Hermitian matrix: I just used that $M=M^H$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 22 at 11:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
What if the matrix is Hermitian, why it is the same with the real matrix?
$endgroup$
– chen xi
Jan 22 at 11:29
$begingroup$
@chenxi The proof for real symmetric goes the same for a Hermitian matrix: I just used that $M=M^H$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 22 at 11:50
$begingroup$
What if the matrix is Hermitian, why it is the same with the real matrix?
$endgroup$
– chen xi
Jan 22 at 11:29
$begingroup$
What if the matrix is Hermitian, why it is the same with the real matrix?
$endgroup$
– chen xi
Jan 22 at 11:29
$begingroup$
@chenxi The proof for real symmetric goes the same for a Hermitian matrix: I just used that $M=M^H$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 22 at 11:50
$begingroup$
@chenxi The proof for real symmetric goes the same for a Hermitian matrix: I just used that $M=M^H$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 22 at 11:50
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081556%2fquadratic-eigenvalue-problem-qep%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown