Quadratic eigenvalue problem (QEP)












0












$begingroup$


$Q(lambda)x=0$ and $Q(lambda) = lambda^2 M+lambda C +K$ are defined in this PDF file



The matrices $M$, $C$, $K$ are $ntimes n $ matrices. The thesis said that when $M$, $C$, $K$ are real or hermitian. the eigenvalues are real or come in pairs $(lambda,overline{lambda})$. But the explanation in the thesis is hard to understand. Would you give me a more clear explanation?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    $Q(lambda)x=0$ and $Q(lambda) = lambda^2 M+lambda C +K$ are defined in this PDF file



    The matrices $M$, $C$, $K$ are $ntimes n $ matrices. The thesis said that when $M$, $C$, $K$ are real or hermitian. the eigenvalues are real or come in pairs $(lambda,overline{lambda})$. But the explanation in the thesis is hard to understand. Would you give me a more clear explanation?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      $Q(lambda)x=0$ and $Q(lambda) = lambda^2 M+lambda C +K$ are defined in this PDF file



      The matrices $M$, $C$, $K$ are $ntimes n $ matrices. The thesis said that when $M$, $C$, $K$ are real or hermitian. the eigenvalues are real or come in pairs $(lambda,overline{lambda})$. But the explanation in the thesis is hard to understand. Would you give me a more clear explanation?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      $Q(lambda)x=0$ and $Q(lambda) = lambda^2 M+lambda C +K$ are defined in this PDF file



      The matrices $M$, $C$, $K$ are $ntimes n $ matrices. The thesis said that when $M$, $C$, $K$ are real or hermitian. the eigenvalues are real or come in pairs $(lambda,overline{lambda})$. But the explanation in the thesis is hard to understand. Would you give me a more clear explanation?







      matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors quadratics






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 21 at 23:07









      egreg

      183k1486205




      183k1486205










      asked Jan 21 at 5:50









      chen xi chen xi

      82




      82






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          If a square matrix has real entries, its characteristic polynomial has real coefficients as well. Therefore its non real roots must come in pairs $lambda$ and $bar{lambda}$, because if $lambdainmathbb{C}$ is a root of a real polynomial $f(x)$, then $f(lambda)=0$ and so
          $$
          0=bar{0}=overline{f(lambda)}=f(bar{lambda})
          $$

          and therefore also $bar{lambda}$ is a root of $f$.



          For a real symmetric matrix every eigenvalue is real. Suppose $M$ is real symmetric and $lambda$ is an eigenvalue, with eigenvector $vne0$ (possibly with complex entries). Then, denoting by $^H$ the Hermitian transpose,
          $$
          lambda v^Hv=v^H(lambda v)=v^HMv=v^HM^Hv=(Mv)^Hv=(lambda v)^Hv=bar{lambda}v^Hv
          $$

          Therefore $(lambda-bar{lambda})(v^Hv)=0$. Since $vne0$, also $v^Hvne0$ and therefore $lambda-bar{lambda}=0$, which means $lambda$ is real.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            What if the matrix is Hermitian, why it is the same with the real matrix?
            $endgroup$
            – chen xi
            Jan 22 at 11:29










          • $begingroup$
            @chenxi The proof for real symmetric goes the same for a Hermitian matrix: I just used that $M=M^H$.
            $endgroup$
            – egreg
            Jan 22 at 11:50













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081556%2fquadratic-eigenvalue-problem-qep%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          If a square matrix has real entries, its characteristic polynomial has real coefficients as well. Therefore its non real roots must come in pairs $lambda$ and $bar{lambda}$, because if $lambdainmathbb{C}$ is a root of a real polynomial $f(x)$, then $f(lambda)=0$ and so
          $$
          0=bar{0}=overline{f(lambda)}=f(bar{lambda})
          $$

          and therefore also $bar{lambda}$ is a root of $f$.



          For a real symmetric matrix every eigenvalue is real. Suppose $M$ is real symmetric and $lambda$ is an eigenvalue, with eigenvector $vne0$ (possibly with complex entries). Then, denoting by $^H$ the Hermitian transpose,
          $$
          lambda v^Hv=v^H(lambda v)=v^HMv=v^HM^Hv=(Mv)^Hv=(lambda v)^Hv=bar{lambda}v^Hv
          $$

          Therefore $(lambda-bar{lambda})(v^Hv)=0$. Since $vne0$, also $v^Hvne0$ and therefore $lambda-bar{lambda}=0$, which means $lambda$ is real.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            What if the matrix is Hermitian, why it is the same with the real matrix?
            $endgroup$
            – chen xi
            Jan 22 at 11:29










          • $begingroup$
            @chenxi The proof for real symmetric goes the same for a Hermitian matrix: I just used that $M=M^H$.
            $endgroup$
            – egreg
            Jan 22 at 11:50


















          0












          $begingroup$

          If a square matrix has real entries, its characteristic polynomial has real coefficients as well. Therefore its non real roots must come in pairs $lambda$ and $bar{lambda}$, because if $lambdainmathbb{C}$ is a root of a real polynomial $f(x)$, then $f(lambda)=0$ and so
          $$
          0=bar{0}=overline{f(lambda)}=f(bar{lambda})
          $$

          and therefore also $bar{lambda}$ is a root of $f$.



          For a real symmetric matrix every eigenvalue is real. Suppose $M$ is real symmetric and $lambda$ is an eigenvalue, with eigenvector $vne0$ (possibly with complex entries). Then, denoting by $^H$ the Hermitian transpose,
          $$
          lambda v^Hv=v^H(lambda v)=v^HMv=v^HM^Hv=(Mv)^Hv=(lambda v)^Hv=bar{lambda}v^Hv
          $$

          Therefore $(lambda-bar{lambda})(v^Hv)=0$. Since $vne0$, also $v^Hvne0$ and therefore $lambda-bar{lambda}=0$, which means $lambda$ is real.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            What if the matrix is Hermitian, why it is the same with the real matrix?
            $endgroup$
            – chen xi
            Jan 22 at 11:29










          • $begingroup$
            @chenxi The proof for real symmetric goes the same for a Hermitian matrix: I just used that $M=M^H$.
            $endgroup$
            – egreg
            Jan 22 at 11:50
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          If a square matrix has real entries, its characteristic polynomial has real coefficients as well. Therefore its non real roots must come in pairs $lambda$ and $bar{lambda}$, because if $lambdainmathbb{C}$ is a root of a real polynomial $f(x)$, then $f(lambda)=0$ and so
          $$
          0=bar{0}=overline{f(lambda)}=f(bar{lambda})
          $$

          and therefore also $bar{lambda}$ is a root of $f$.



          For a real symmetric matrix every eigenvalue is real. Suppose $M$ is real symmetric and $lambda$ is an eigenvalue, with eigenvector $vne0$ (possibly with complex entries). Then, denoting by $^H$ the Hermitian transpose,
          $$
          lambda v^Hv=v^H(lambda v)=v^HMv=v^HM^Hv=(Mv)^Hv=(lambda v)^Hv=bar{lambda}v^Hv
          $$

          Therefore $(lambda-bar{lambda})(v^Hv)=0$. Since $vne0$, also $v^Hvne0$ and therefore $lambda-bar{lambda}=0$, which means $lambda$ is real.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          If a square matrix has real entries, its characteristic polynomial has real coefficients as well. Therefore its non real roots must come in pairs $lambda$ and $bar{lambda}$, because if $lambdainmathbb{C}$ is a root of a real polynomial $f(x)$, then $f(lambda)=0$ and so
          $$
          0=bar{0}=overline{f(lambda)}=f(bar{lambda})
          $$

          and therefore also $bar{lambda}$ is a root of $f$.



          For a real symmetric matrix every eigenvalue is real. Suppose $M$ is real symmetric and $lambda$ is an eigenvalue, with eigenvector $vne0$ (possibly with complex entries). Then, denoting by $^H$ the Hermitian transpose,
          $$
          lambda v^Hv=v^H(lambda v)=v^HMv=v^HM^Hv=(Mv)^Hv=(lambda v)^Hv=bar{lambda}v^Hv
          $$

          Therefore $(lambda-bar{lambda})(v^Hv)=0$. Since $vne0$, also $v^Hvne0$ and therefore $lambda-bar{lambda}=0$, which means $lambda$ is real.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 21 at 23:15









          egregegreg

          183k1486205




          183k1486205












          • $begingroup$
            What if the matrix is Hermitian, why it is the same with the real matrix?
            $endgroup$
            – chen xi
            Jan 22 at 11:29










          • $begingroup$
            @chenxi The proof for real symmetric goes the same for a Hermitian matrix: I just used that $M=M^H$.
            $endgroup$
            – egreg
            Jan 22 at 11:50




















          • $begingroup$
            What if the matrix is Hermitian, why it is the same with the real matrix?
            $endgroup$
            – chen xi
            Jan 22 at 11:29










          • $begingroup$
            @chenxi The proof for real symmetric goes the same for a Hermitian matrix: I just used that $M=M^H$.
            $endgroup$
            – egreg
            Jan 22 at 11:50


















          $begingroup$
          What if the matrix is Hermitian, why it is the same with the real matrix?
          $endgroup$
          – chen xi
          Jan 22 at 11:29




          $begingroup$
          What if the matrix is Hermitian, why it is the same with the real matrix?
          $endgroup$
          – chen xi
          Jan 22 at 11:29












          $begingroup$
          @chenxi The proof for real symmetric goes the same for a Hermitian matrix: I just used that $M=M^H$.
          $endgroup$
          – egreg
          Jan 22 at 11:50






          $begingroup$
          @chenxi The proof for real symmetric goes the same for a Hermitian matrix: I just used that $M=M^H$.
          $endgroup$
          – egreg
          Jan 22 at 11:50




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081556%2fquadratic-eigenvalue-problem-qep%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

          Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

          A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$