evaluate $int_0^{infty}frac{x^a}{x^2+1}dx$ for $ain(0,1)$
$begingroup$
I am stuck on this complex analysis homework problem :( here is my attack so far:
If I integrate around a keyhole contour, I can show that $$int_0^{infty}frac{x^a}{x^2+1}dx=frac{2pi i}{1-e^{2api i}}sum_{win{i,-i}}RES(frac{e^{alog z}}{z^2+1},w).$$ Now, luckily the poles in this integrand are simple, so it's easy enough to find: $$RES(frac{e^{alog z}}{z^2+1},i)=frac{e^{api i/2}}{2i},$$ while $$RES(frac{e^{alog z}}{z^2+1},-i)=frac{-e^{-api i/2}}{2i},$$ and adding these fellas together we get $sin(api/2)$ by Euler's i.d. So it goes $$int_0^{infty}frac{x^a}{x^2+1}dx=frac{2pi isin(api/2)}{1-e^{2api i}}.$$ But where to go now? The integral on the left is real, while I have my doubts about the term on the right.
Have I made a mistake, or there's some further trick I don't see? (I'm almost certain it's the former, since I'm an expert at mistakes but an amateur at finding them). Anyways, I would appreciate any help, or advice on this problem. Thanks!
contour-integration
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am stuck on this complex analysis homework problem :( here is my attack so far:
If I integrate around a keyhole contour, I can show that $$int_0^{infty}frac{x^a}{x^2+1}dx=frac{2pi i}{1-e^{2api i}}sum_{win{i,-i}}RES(frac{e^{alog z}}{z^2+1},w).$$ Now, luckily the poles in this integrand are simple, so it's easy enough to find: $$RES(frac{e^{alog z}}{z^2+1},i)=frac{e^{api i/2}}{2i},$$ while $$RES(frac{e^{alog z}}{z^2+1},-i)=frac{-e^{-api i/2}}{2i},$$ and adding these fellas together we get $sin(api/2)$ by Euler's i.d. So it goes $$int_0^{infty}frac{x^a}{x^2+1}dx=frac{2pi isin(api/2)}{1-e^{2api i}}.$$ But where to go now? The integral on the left is real, while I have my doubts about the term on the right.
Have I made a mistake, or there's some further trick I don't see? (I'm almost certain it's the former, since I'm an expert at mistakes but an amateur at finding them). Anyways, I would appreciate any help, or advice on this problem. Thanks!
contour-integration
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Factor out an $e^{pi a i}$ from the denominator
$endgroup$
– Frank W.
Jan 26 at 22:06
$begingroup$
@ Frank W. Oh I see! haha wow I'm dumb, thank you so much!!
$endgroup$
– T. Alexander
Jan 26 at 22:20
$begingroup$
While a useful technique, that doesn't actually solve the issue here. The expression written down is indeed not real.
$endgroup$
– jmerry
Jan 26 at 22:24
$begingroup$
@jmerry yes but it made it more clear what the issue with my solution was, also thank you for your answer as well!
$endgroup$
– T. Alexander
Jan 26 at 22:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am stuck on this complex analysis homework problem :( here is my attack so far:
If I integrate around a keyhole contour, I can show that $$int_0^{infty}frac{x^a}{x^2+1}dx=frac{2pi i}{1-e^{2api i}}sum_{win{i,-i}}RES(frac{e^{alog z}}{z^2+1},w).$$ Now, luckily the poles in this integrand are simple, so it's easy enough to find: $$RES(frac{e^{alog z}}{z^2+1},i)=frac{e^{api i/2}}{2i},$$ while $$RES(frac{e^{alog z}}{z^2+1},-i)=frac{-e^{-api i/2}}{2i},$$ and adding these fellas together we get $sin(api/2)$ by Euler's i.d. So it goes $$int_0^{infty}frac{x^a}{x^2+1}dx=frac{2pi isin(api/2)}{1-e^{2api i}}.$$ But where to go now? The integral on the left is real, while I have my doubts about the term on the right.
Have I made a mistake, or there's some further trick I don't see? (I'm almost certain it's the former, since I'm an expert at mistakes but an amateur at finding them). Anyways, I would appreciate any help, or advice on this problem. Thanks!
contour-integration
$endgroup$
I am stuck on this complex analysis homework problem :( here is my attack so far:
If I integrate around a keyhole contour, I can show that $$int_0^{infty}frac{x^a}{x^2+1}dx=frac{2pi i}{1-e^{2api i}}sum_{win{i,-i}}RES(frac{e^{alog z}}{z^2+1},w).$$ Now, luckily the poles in this integrand are simple, so it's easy enough to find: $$RES(frac{e^{alog z}}{z^2+1},i)=frac{e^{api i/2}}{2i},$$ while $$RES(frac{e^{alog z}}{z^2+1},-i)=frac{-e^{-api i/2}}{2i},$$ and adding these fellas together we get $sin(api/2)$ by Euler's i.d. So it goes $$int_0^{infty}frac{x^a}{x^2+1}dx=frac{2pi isin(api/2)}{1-e^{2api i}}.$$ But where to go now? The integral on the left is real, while I have my doubts about the term on the right.
Have I made a mistake, or there's some further trick I don't see? (I'm almost certain it's the former, since I'm an expert at mistakes but an amateur at finding them). Anyways, I would appreciate any help, or advice on this problem. Thanks!
contour-integration
contour-integration
asked Jan 26 at 22:03
T. AlexanderT. Alexander
273
273
2
$begingroup$
Factor out an $e^{pi a i}$ from the denominator
$endgroup$
– Frank W.
Jan 26 at 22:06
$begingroup$
@ Frank W. Oh I see! haha wow I'm dumb, thank you so much!!
$endgroup$
– T. Alexander
Jan 26 at 22:20
$begingroup$
While a useful technique, that doesn't actually solve the issue here. The expression written down is indeed not real.
$endgroup$
– jmerry
Jan 26 at 22:24
$begingroup$
@jmerry yes but it made it more clear what the issue with my solution was, also thank you for your answer as well!
$endgroup$
– T. Alexander
Jan 26 at 22:39
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Factor out an $e^{pi a i}$ from the denominator
$endgroup$
– Frank W.
Jan 26 at 22:06
$begingroup$
@ Frank W. Oh I see! haha wow I'm dumb, thank you so much!!
$endgroup$
– T. Alexander
Jan 26 at 22:20
$begingroup$
While a useful technique, that doesn't actually solve the issue here. The expression written down is indeed not real.
$endgroup$
– jmerry
Jan 26 at 22:24
$begingroup$
@jmerry yes but it made it more clear what the issue with my solution was, also thank you for your answer as well!
$endgroup$
– T. Alexander
Jan 26 at 22:39
2
2
$begingroup$
Factor out an $e^{pi a i}$ from the denominator
$endgroup$
– Frank W.
Jan 26 at 22:06
$begingroup$
Factor out an $e^{pi a i}$ from the denominator
$endgroup$
– Frank W.
Jan 26 at 22:06
$begingroup$
@ Frank W. Oh I see! haha wow I'm dumb, thank you so much!!
$endgroup$
– T. Alexander
Jan 26 at 22:20
$begingroup$
@ Frank W. Oh I see! haha wow I'm dumb, thank you so much!!
$endgroup$
– T. Alexander
Jan 26 at 22:20
$begingroup$
While a useful technique, that doesn't actually solve the issue here. The expression written down is indeed not real.
$endgroup$
– jmerry
Jan 26 at 22:24
$begingroup$
While a useful technique, that doesn't actually solve the issue here. The expression written down is indeed not real.
$endgroup$
– jmerry
Jan 26 at 22:24
$begingroup$
@jmerry yes but it made it more clear what the issue with my solution was, also thank you for your answer as well!
$endgroup$
– T. Alexander
Jan 26 at 22:39
$begingroup$
@jmerry yes but it made it more clear what the issue with my solution was, also thank you for your answer as well!
$endgroup$
– T. Alexander
Jan 26 at 22:39
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The trick to this one? You've got the wrong residues. We have to use the same branch of the function in calculating the residues that we did in setting up the integral. Specifically, since we run $arg z$ from $0$ to $2pi$, we should write the two zeros of the denominator as $i=expleft(frac{pi i}{2}right)$ and $-i=expleft(frac{3pi i}{2}right)$. The residues are then $frac1{2i}e^{api i/2}{2i}$ and $frac{-1}{2i}e^{3api i/2}$.
That leads to a factor of $e^{api i}$ in the numerator. Divide through by it, the denominator becomes $i$ times a sine, and it all comes out real.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088825%2fevaluate-int-0-infty-fracxax21dx-for-a-in0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The trick to this one? You've got the wrong residues. We have to use the same branch of the function in calculating the residues that we did in setting up the integral. Specifically, since we run $arg z$ from $0$ to $2pi$, we should write the two zeros of the denominator as $i=expleft(frac{pi i}{2}right)$ and $-i=expleft(frac{3pi i}{2}right)$. The residues are then $frac1{2i}e^{api i/2}{2i}$ and $frac{-1}{2i}e^{3api i/2}$.
That leads to a factor of $e^{api i}$ in the numerator. Divide through by it, the denominator becomes $i$ times a sine, and it all comes out real.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The trick to this one? You've got the wrong residues. We have to use the same branch of the function in calculating the residues that we did in setting up the integral. Specifically, since we run $arg z$ from $0$ to $2pi$, we should write the two zeros of the denominator as $i=expleft(frac{pi i}{2}right)$ and $-i=expleft(frac{3pi i}{2}right)$. The residues are then $frac1{2i}e^{api i/2}{2i}$ and $frac{-1}{2i}e^{3api i/2}$.
That leads to a factor of $e^{api i}$ in the numerator. Divide through by it, the denominator becomes $i$ times a sine, and it all comes out real.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The trick to this one? You've got the wrong residues. We have to use the same branch of the function in calculating the residues that we did in setting up the integral. Specifically, since we run $arg z$ from $0$ to $2pi$, we should write the two zeros of the denominator as $i=expleft(frac{pi i}{2}right)$ and $-i=expleft(frac{3pi i}{2}right)$. The residues are then $frac1{2i}e^{api i/2}{2i}$ and $frac{-1}{2i}e^{3api i/2}$.
That leads to a factor of $e^{api i}$ in the numerator. Divide through by it, the denominator becomes $i$ times a sine, and it all comes out real.
$endgroup$
The trick to this one? You've got the wrong residues. We have to use the same branch of the function in calculating the residues that we did in setting up the integral. Specifically, since we run $arg z$ from $0$ to $2pi$, we should write the two zeros of the denominator as $i=expleft(frac{pi i}{2}right)$ and $-i=expleft(frac{3pi i}{2}right)$. The residues are then $frac1{2i}e^{api i/2}{2i}$ and $frac{-1}{2i}e^{3api i/2}$.
That leads to a factor of $e^{api i}$ in the numerator. Divide through by it, the denominator becomes $i$ times a sine, and it all comes out real.
answered Jan 26 at 22:24


jmerryjmerry
15.8k1632
15.8k1632
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088825%2fevaluate-int-0-infty-fracxax21dx-for-a-in0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Factor out an $e^{pi a i}$ from the denominator
$endgroup$
– Frank W.
Jan 26 at 22:06
$begingroup$
@ Frank W. Oh I see! haha wow I'm dumb, thank you so much!!
$endgroup$
– T. Alexander
Jan 26 at 22:20
$begingroup$
While a useful technique, that doesn't actually solve the issue here. The expression written down is indeed not real.
$endgroup$
– jmerry
Jan 26 at 22:24
$begingroup$
@jmerry yes but it made it more clear what the issue with my solution was, also thank you for your answer as well!
$endgroup$
– T. Alexander
Jan 26 at 22:39