Explanation of Error in Euler's Method (first order differential equations)












0












$begingroup$


Can anyone provide a simple explanation why halving the step size tends to decrease the numerical error in Euler's method by one-half?



I've looked at some online sources but they do provide very complex explanations.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    See also Euler Method - Global Error: How to calculate $C_1$ in $error=C_1h$ and similar
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Jan 27 at 9:24


















0












$begingroup$


Can anyone provide a simple explanation why halving the step size tends to decrease the numerical error in Euler's method by one-half?



I've looked at some online sources but they do provide very complex explanations.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    See also Euler Method - Global Error: How to calculate $C_1$ in $error=C_1h$ and similar
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Jan 27 at 9:24
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


Can anyone provide a simple explanation why halving the step size tends to decrease the numerical error in Euler's method by one-half?



I've looked at some online sources but they do provide very complex explanations.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Can anyone provide a simple explanation why halving the step size tends to decrease the numerical error in Euler's method by one-half?



I've looked at some online sources but they do provide very complex explanations.







calculus ordinary-differential-equations numerical-methods






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 27 at 0:11









Meghan CMeghan C

21828




21828












  • $begingroup$
    See also Euler Method - Global Error: How to calculate $C_1$ in $error=C_1h$ and similar
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Jan 27 at 9:24




















  • $begingroup$
    See also Euler Method - Global Error: How to calculate $C_1$ in $error=C_1h$ and similar
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Jan 27 at 9:24


















$begingroup$
See also Euler Method - Global Error: How to calculate $C_1$ in $error=C_1h$ and similar
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Jan 27 at 9:24






$begingroup$
See also Euler Method - Global Error: How to calculate $C_1$ in $error=C_1h$ and similar
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Jan 27 at 9:24












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Here's an AoPS thread with some fairly simple explanations.



In short: the error added in one step of length $h$ is $h^2frac{y''(c)}{2}$, where $c$ is some point in the interval we stepped over. To cover a certain fixed distance $A$, we need about $frac{A}{h}$ steps, so the total error looks like a constant times $h$.



There's also compounded error - in later steps, our $y$ values will be in error, and that will affect our estimated $y'$ values. With some calculation, we can show that this basically only makes the proportionality constant bigger; the error will still be proportional to $h$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088954%2fexplanation-of-error-in-eulers-method-first-order-differential-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    Here's an AoPS thread with some fairly simple explanations.



    In short: the error added in one step of length $h$ is $h^2frac{y''(c)}{2}$, where $c$ is some point in the interval we stepped over. To cover a certain fixed distance $A$, we need about $frac{A}{h}$ steps, so the total error looks like a constant times $h$.



    There's also compounded error - in later steps, our $y$ values will be in error, and that will affect our estimated $y'$ values. With some calculation, we can show that this basically only makes the proportionality constant bigger; the error will still be proportional to $h$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Here's an AoPS thread with some fairly simple explanations.



      In short: the error added in one step of length $h$ is $h^2frac{y''(c)}{2}$, where $c$ is some point in the interval we stepped over. To cover a certain fixed distance $A$, we need about $frac{A}{h}$ steps, so the total error looks like a constant times $h$.



      There's also compounded error - in later steps, our $y$ values will be in error, and that will affect our estimated $y'$ values. With some calculation, we can show that this basically only makes the proportionality constant bigger; the error will still be proportional to $h$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Here's an AoPS thread with some fairly simple explanations.



        In short: the error added in one step of length $h$ is $h^2frac{y''(c)}{2}$, where $c$ is some point in the interval we stepped over. To cover a certain fixed distance $A$, we need about $frac{A}{h}$ steps, so the total error looks like a constant times $h$.



        There's also compounded error - in later steps, our $y$ values will be in error, and that will affect our estimated $y'$ values. With some calculation, we can show that this basically only makes the proportionality constant bigger; the error will still be proportional to $h$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Here's an AoPS thread with some fairly simple explanations.



        In short: the error added in one step of length $h$ is $h^2frac{y''(c)}{2}$, where $c$ is some point in the interval we stepped over. To cover a certain fixed distance $A$, we need about $frac{A}{h}$ steps, so the total error looks like a constant times $h$.



        There's also compounded error - in later steps, our $y$ values will be in error, and that will affect our estimated $y'$ values. With some calculation, we can show that this basically only makes the proportionality constant bigger; the error will still be proportional to $h$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 27 at 0:51









        jmerryjmerry

        15.8k1632




        15.8k1632






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088954%2fexplanation-of-error-in-eulers-method-first-order-differential-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

            Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

            A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$