Hartshorne II-3.22(b)
$begingroup$
Let $f:Xto Y$ be a dominant morphism of integral schemes of finite type over a field $k$.
Let $e=dim(X)-dim(Y)$. For any point $yin f(X)$, show that every irreducible component of the fibre $X_y$ has dimension $geq e$. [Hint: Let $Y'=overline{{y}}$ and use (a) and Ex. 3.20b]
I think there is a typo and we have to use Ex 3.20d, which says that if $Y$ is a closed subset of $X$ then $dim(Y)+mathrm{codim}(Y,X)=dim(X)$. In addition, (a) says that if $Y'$ is a closed irreducible subset of $Y$ whose generic point $eta'$ is contained in $f(X)$ and $Z$ is any irreducible componet of $f^{-1}(Y')$ such that $eta'in f(Z)$, then $mathrm{codim}(Z,X)leqmathrm{codim}(Y',Y)$.
What I have done
By exercise 3.10a, $X_y$ is homeomorphic to $f^{-1}(y)$ with the induced topology, so I'm trying to show the result for $f^{-1}(y)$ since it looks easier, but using the hint I've only managed to prove it for $f^{-1}(Y')$. This is my proof:
Since $y$ is obviously the genereic point of $Y'$, if we take $Z$ to be an irreducible component of $f^{-1}(Y')$ containing $y$, by (a) we have
$$operatorname{codim}(Z,X) leq operatorname{codim}(Y',Y)$$
Now Ex 3.20d implies
$$dim (X) - dim (Z) leq dim (Y) - dim (Y')$$
and thus
$$e = dim (X) - dim (Y) leq dim (Z) - dim (Y') leq dim (Z)$$
But this only shows that any irreducible component of $f^{-1}(Y')$ has dimension $geq e$. How can I conclude that this is true also for the irreducible components of the fibre $f^{-1}(y)$?
general-topology algebraic-geometry dimension-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:Xto Y$ be a dominant morphism of integral schemes of finite type over a field $k$.
Let $e=dim(X)-dim(Y)$. For any point $yin f(X)$, show that every irreducible component of the fibre $X_y$ has dimension $geq e$. [Hint: Let $Y'=overline{{y}}$ and use (a) and Ex. 3.20b]
I think there is a typo and we have to use Ex 3.20d, which says that if $Y$ is a closed subset of $X$ then $dim(Y)+mathrm{codim}(Y,X)=dim(X)$. In addition, (a) says that if $Y'$ is a closed irreducible subset of $Y$ whose generic point $eta'$ is contained in $f(X)$ and $Z$ is any irreducible componet of $f^{-1}(Y')$ such that $eta'in f(Z)$, then $mathrm{codim}(Z,X)leqmathrm{codim}(Y',Y)$.
What I have done
By exercise 3.10a, $X_y$ is homeomorphic to $f^{-1}(y)$ with the induced topology, so I'm trying to show the result for $f^{-1}(y)$ since it looks easier, but using the hint I've only managed to prove it for $f^{-1}(Y')$. This is my proof:
Since $y$ is obviously the genereic point of $Y'$, if we take $Z$ to be an irreducible component of $f^{-1}(Y')$ containing $y$, by (a) we have
$$operatorname{codim}(Z,X) leq operatorname{codim}(Y',Y)$$
Now Ex 3.20d implies
$$dim (X) - dim (Z) leq dim (Y) - dim (Y')$$
and thus
$$e = dim (X) - dim (Y) leq dim (Z) - dim (Y') leq dim (Z)$$
But this only shows that any irreducible component of $f^{-1}(Y')$ has dimension $geq e$. How can I conclude that this is true also for the irreducible components of the fibre $f^{-1}(y)$?
general-topology algebraic-geometry dimension-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f:Xto Y$ be a dominant morphism of integral schemes of finite type over a field $k$.
Let $e=dim(X)-dim(Y)$. For any point $yin f(X)$, show that every irreducible component of the fibre $X_y$ has dimension $geq e$. [Hint: Let $Y'=overline{{y}}$ and use (a) and Ex. 3.20b]
I think there is a typo and we have to use Ex 3.20d, which says that if $Y$ is a closed subset of $X$ then $dim(Y)+mathrm{codim}(Y,X)=dim(X)$. In addition, (a) says that if $Y'$ is a closed irreducible subset of $Y$ whose generic point $eta'$ is contained in $f(X)$ and $Z$ is any irreducible componet of $f^{-1}(Y')$ such that $eta'in f(Z)$, then $mathrm{codim}(Z,X)leqmathrm{codim}(Y',Y)$.
What I have done
By exercise 3.10a, $X_y$ is homeomorphic to $f^{-1}(y)$ with the induced topology, so I'm trying to show the result for $f^{-1}(y)$ since it looks easier, but using the hint I've only managed to prove it for $f^{-1}(Y')$. This is my proof:
Since $y$ is obviously the genereic point of $Y'$, if we take $Z$ to be an irreducible component of $f^{-1}(Y')$ containing $y$, by (a) we have
$$operatorname{codim}(Z,X) leq operatorname{codim}(Y',Y)$$
Now Ex 3.20d implies
$$dim (X) - dim (Z) leq dim (Y) - dim (Y')$$
and thus
$$e = dim (X) - dim (Y) leq dim (Z) - dim (Y') leq dim (Z)$$
But this only shows that any irreducible component of $f^{-1}(Y')$ has dimension $geq e$. How can I conclude that this is true also for the irreducible components of the fibre $f^{-1}(y)$?
general-topology algebraic-geometry dimension-theory
$endgroup$
Let $f:Xto Y$ be a dominant morphism of integral schemes of finite type over a field $k$.
Let $e=dim(X)-dim(Y)$. For any point $yin f(X)$, show that every irreducible component of the fibre $X_y$ has dimension $geq e$. [Hint: Let $Y'=overline{{y}}$ and use (a) and Ex. 3.20b]
I think there is a typo and we have to use Ex 3.20d, which says that if $Y$ is a closed subset of $X$ then $dim(Y)+mathrm{codim}(Y,X)=dim(X)$. In addition, (a) says that if $Y'$ is a closed irreducible subset of $Y$ whose generic point $eta'$ is contained in $f(X)$ and $Z$ is any irreducible componet of $f^{-1}(Y')$ such that $eta'in f(Z)$, then $mathrm{codim}(Z,X)leqmathrm{codim}(Y',Y)$.
What I have done
By exercise 3.10a, $X_y$ is homeomorphic to $f^{-1}(y)$ with the induced topology, so I'm trying to show the result for $f^{-1}(y)$ since it looks easier, but using the hint I've only managed to prove it for $f^{-1}(Y')$. This is my proof:
Since $y$ is obviously the genereic point of $Y'$, if we take $Z$ to be an irreducible component of $f^{-1}(Y')$ containing $y$, by (a) we have
$$operatorname{codim}(Z,X) leq operatorname{codim}(Y',Y)$$
Now Ex 3.20d implies
$$dim (X) - dim (Z) leq dim (Y) - dim (Y')$$
and thus
$$e = dim (X) - dim (Y) leq dim (Z) - dim (Y') leq dim (Z)$$
But this only shows that any irreducible component of $f^{-1}(Y')$ has dimension $geq e$. How can I conclude that this is true also for the irreducible components of the fibre $f^{-1}(y)$?
general-topology algebraic-geometry dimension-theory
general-topology algebraic-geometry dimension-theory
asked Jan 27 at 0:02
JaviJavi
3,0212832
3,0212832
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $W$ be an irreducible component of $X_y$, and let $k$, $k'$ be the codimensions of $overline{W}$ (closure in $X$) in $X$ and $Y'$ in $Y$, respectively.
One argues that $overline{W}$ is an irreducible component of $f^{-1}(Y’)$. Thus $k leq k'$ by part (a).
Applying Ex. 3.20b and using the additivity of transcendence degrees in towers, we see that $$text{dim}(W)=e+k'-k geq e.
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In general the preimage of the closure is not the closure of the preimage. Why do we know that $overline{f^{-1}(y)}=f^{-1}(Y')$? In principle we only have inclusion to the right since $f^{-1}(Y')$ is a closed subset containing $f^{-1}(y)$. Equality only holds if $f$ is closed.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Jan 27 at 12:16
1
$begingroup$
I took that part out (it was not important).
$endgroup$
– Oven
Jan 27 at 14:41
$begingroup$
Ok I'll try to fill the details
$endgroup$
– Javi
Jan 27 at 17:38
$begingroup$
I have a doubt about the transcendence degrees. I actually don't know which tower you're using to get the last equality.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Feb 1 at 17:57
1
$begingroup$
The tower is $F/K/k$, where $F$ is the function field of $W$ and $K$ is the residue field of $y$.
$endgroup$
– Oven
Feb 2 at 0:10
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088944%2fhartshorne-ii-3-22b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $W$ be an irreducible component of $X_y$, and let $k$, $k'$ be the codimensions of $overline{W}$ (closure in $X$) in $X$ and $Y'$ in $Y$, respectively.
One argues that $overline{W}$ is an irreducible component of $f^{-1}(Y’)$. Thus $k leq k'$ by part (a).
Applying Ex. 3.20b and using the additivity of transcendence degrees in towers, we see that $$text{dim}(W)=e+k'-k geq e.
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In general the preimage of the closure is not the closure of the preimage. Why do we know that $overline{f^{-1}(y)}=f^{-1}(Y')$? In principle we only have inclusion to the right since $f^{-1}(Y')$ is a closed subset containing $f^{-1}(y)$. Equality only holds if $f$ is closed.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Jan 27 at 12:16
1
$begingroup$
I took that part out (it was not important).
$endgroup$
– Oven
Jan 27 at 14:41
$begingroup$
Ok I'll try to fill the details
$endgroup$
– Javi
Jan 27 at 17:38
$begingroup$
I have a doubt about the transcendence degrees. I actually don't know which tower you're using to get the last equality.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Feb 1 at 17:57
1
$begingroup$
The tower is $F/K/k$, where $F$ is the function field of $W$ and $K$ is the residue field of $y$.
$endgroup$
– Oven
Feb 2 at 0:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $W$ be an irreducible component of $X_y$, and let $k$, $k'$ be the codimensions of $overline{W}$ (closure in $X$) in $X$ and $Y'$ in $Y$, respectively.
One argues that $overline{W}$ is an irreducible component of $f^{-1}(Y’)$. Thus $k leq k'$ by part (a).
Applying Ex. 3.20b and using the additivity of transcendence degrees in towers, we see that $$text{dim}(W)=e+k'-k geq e.
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In general the preimage of the closure is not the closure of the preimage. Why do we know that $overline{f^{-1}(y)}=f^{-1}(Y')$? In principle we only have inclusion to the right since $f^{-1}(Y')$ is a closed subset containing $f^{-1}(y)$. Equality only holds if $f$ is closed.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Jan 27 at 12:16
1
$begingroup$
I took that part out (it was not important).
$endgroup$
– Oven
Jan 27 at 14:41
$begingroup$
Ok I'll try to fill the details
$endgroup$
– Javi
Jan 27 at 17:38
$begingroup$
I have a doubt about the transcendence degrees. I actually don't know which tower you're using to get the last equality.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Feb 1 at 17:57
1
$begingroup$
The tower is $F/K/k$, where $F$ is the function field of $W$ and $K$ is the residue field of $y$.
$endgroup$
– Oven
Feb 2 at 0:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $W$ be an irreducible component of $X_y$, and let $k$, $k'$ be the codimensions of $overline{W}$ (closure in $X$) in $X$ and $Y'$ in $Y$, respectively.
One argues that $overline{W}$ is an irreducible component of $f^{-1}(Y’)$. Thus $k leq k'$ by part (a).
Applying Ex. 3.20b and using the additivity of transcendence degrees in towers, we see that $$text{dim}(W)=e+k'-k geq e.
$$
$endgroup$
Let $W$ be an irreducible component of $X_y$, and let $k$, $k'$ be the codimensions of $overline{W}$ (closure in $X$) in $X$ and $Y'$ in $Y$, respectively.
One argues that $overline{W}$ is an irreducible component of $f^{-1}(Y’)$. Thus $k leq k'$ by part (a).
Applying Ex. 3.20b and using the additivity of transcendence degrees in towers, we see that $$text{dim}(W)=e+k'-k geq e.
$$
edited Jan 27 at 14:38
answered Jan 27 at 3:02
OvenOven
1416
1416
$begingroup$
In general the preimage of the closure is not the closure of the preimage. Why do we know that $overline{f^{-1}(y)}=f^{-1}(Y')$? In principle we only have inclusion to the right since $f^{-1}(Y')$ is a closed subset containing $f^{-1}(y)$. Equality only holds if $f$ is closed.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Jan 27 at 12:16
1
$begingroup$
I took that part out (it was not important).
$endgroup$
– Oven
Jan 27 at 14:41
$begingroup$
Ok I'll try to fill the details
$endgroup$
– Javi
Jan 27 at 17:38
$begingroup$
I have a doubt about the transcendence degrees. I actually don't know which tower you're using to get the last equality.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Feb 1 at 17:57
1
$begingroup$
The tower is $F/K/k$, where $F$ is the function field of $W$ and $K$ is the residue field of $y$.
$endgroup$
– Oven
Feb 2 at 0:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In general the preimage of the closure is not the closure of the preimage. Why do we know that $overline{f^{-1}(y)}=f^{-1}(Y')$? In principle we only have inclusion to the right since $f^{-1}(Y')$ is a closed subset containing $f^{-1}(y)$. Equality only holds if $f$ is closed.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Jan 27 at 12:16
1
$begingroup$
I took that part out (it was not important).
$endgroup$
– Oven
Jan 27 at 14:41
$begingroup$
Ok I'll try to fill the details
$endgroup$
– Javi
Jan 27 at 17:38
$begingroup$
I have a doubt about the transcendence degrees. I actually don't know which tower you're using to get the last equality.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Feb 1 at 17:57
1
$begingroup$
The tower is $F/K/k$, where $F$ is the function field of $W$ and $K$ is the residue field of $y$.
$endgroup$
– Oven
Feb 2 at 0:10
$begingroup$
In general the preimage of the closure is not the closure of the preimage. Why do we know that $overline{f^{-1}(y)}=f^{-1}(Y')$? In principle we only have inclusion to the right since $f^{-1}(Y')$ is a closed subset containing $f^{-1}(y)$. Equality only holds if $f$ is closed.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Jan 27 at 12:16
$begingroup$
In general the preimage of the closure is not the closure of the preimage. Why do we know that $overline{f^{-1}(y)}=f^{-1}(Y')$? In principle we only have inclusion to the right since $f^{-1}(Y')$ is a closed subset containing $f^{-1}(y)$. Equality only holds if $f$ is closed.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Jan 27 at 12:16
1
1
$begingroup$
I took that part out (it was not important).
$endgroup$
– Oven
Jan 27 at 14:41
$begingroup$
I took that part out (it was not important).
$endgroup$
– Oven
Jan 27 at 14:41
$begingroup$
Ok I'll try to fill the details
$endgroup$
– Javi
Jan 27 at 17:38
$begingroup$
Ok I'll try to fill the details
$endgroup$
– Javi
Jan 27 at 17:38
$begingroup$
I have a doubt about the transcendence degrees. I actually don't know which tower you're using to get the last equality.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Feb 1 at 17:57
$begingroup$
I have a doubt about the transcendence degrees. I actually don't know which tower you're using to get the last equality.
$endgroup$
– Javi
Feb 1 at 17:57
1
1
$begingroup$
The tower is $F/K/k$, where $F$ is the function field of $W$ and $K$ is the residue field of $y$.
$endgroup$
– Oven
Feb 2 at 0:10
$begingroup$
The tower is $F/K/k$, where $F$ is the function field of $W$ and $K$ is the residue field of $y$.
$endgroup$
– Oven
Feb 2 at 0:10
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088944%2fhartshorne-ii-3-22b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown