Finitely generated $k$-algebras beginner examples.












1












$begingroup$


I just found out about finitely generated $k$-algebras (where $k$ is a field). So it is an algebra $A$ for which we have a finite set of elements $(a_1,...,a_n)$ such that every element in $A$ can be expressed as $p(a_1,...,a_n)$ where $p$ is a polynomial $p in k[x_1,...,x_n]$. This is pretty abstract for the moment so I am trying to illustrate with some examples. So I understand $k[x_1,...,x_n]$ itself is an example where the generators are $x_1,...,x_n$. It seems that in this particular case, the generators are even algebraically independent. What would be a nice example where the set of generators are not algebraically independent?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Any quotient of your example; a simple example would be $k[x,y]/(xy)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Jan 27 at 0:16








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe this is to concrete for you, but how about $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}, pi]$? The generators $sqrt{2}, pi$ are not algebraically independent, because $$ (sqrt{2})^2 + 0 cdot pi - 2 =0.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Severin Schraven
    Jan 27 at 0:20
















1












$begingroup$


I just found out about finitely generated $k$-algebras (where $k$ is a field). So it is an algebra $A$ for which we have a finite set of elements $(a_1,...,a_n)$ such that every element in $A$ can be expressed as $p(a_1,...,a_n)$ where $p$ is a polynomial $p in k[x_1,...,x_n]$. This is pretty abstract for the moment so I am trying to illustrate with some examples. So I understand $k[x_1,...,x_n]$ itself is an example where the generators are $x_1,...,x_n$. It seems that in this particular case, the generators are even algebraically independent. What would be a nice example where the set of generators are not algebraically independent?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Any quotient of your example; a simple example would be $k[x,y]/(xy)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Jan 27 at 0:16








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe this is to concrete for you, but how about $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}, pi]$? The generators $sqrt{2}, pi$ are not algebraically independent, because $$ (sqrt{2})^2 + 0 cdot pi - 2 =0.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Severin Schraven
    Jan 27 at 0:20














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I just found out about finitely generated $k$-algebras (where $k$ is a field). So it is an algebra $A$ for which we have a finite set of elements $(a_1,...,a_n)$ such that every element in $A$ can be expressed as $p(a_1,...,a_n)$ where $p$ is a polynomial $p in k[x_1,...,x_n]$. This is pretty abstract for the moment so I am trying to illustrate with some examples. So I understand $k[x_1,...,x_n]$ itself is an example where the generators are $x_1,...,x_n$. It seems that in this particular case, the generators are even algebraically independent. What would be a nice example where the set of generators are not algebraically independent?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I just found out about finitely generated $k$-algebras (where $k$ is a field). So it is an algebra $A$ for which we have a finite set of elements $(a_1,...,a_n)$ such that every element in $A$ can be expressed as $p(a_1,...,a_n)$ where $p$ is a polynomial $p in k[x_1,...,x_n]$. This is pretty abstract for the moment so I am trying to illustrate with some examples. So I understand $k[x_1,...,x_n]$ itself is an example where the generators are $x_1,...,x_n$. It seems that in this particular case, the generators are even algebraically independent. What would be a nice example where the set of generators are not algebraically independent?







commutative-algebra finitely-generated algebras






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 27 at 0:13









roi_saumonroi_saumon

62838




62838








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Any quotient of your example; a simple example would be $k[x,y]/(xy)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Jan 27 at 0:16








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe this is to concrete for you, but how about $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}, pi]$? The generators $sqrt{2}, pi$ are not algebraically independent, because $$ (sqrt{2})^2 + 0 cdot pi - 2 =0.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Severin Schraven
    Jan 27 at 0:20














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Any quotient of your example; a simple example would be $k[x,y]/(xy)$.
    $endgroup$
    – Servaes
    Jan 27 at 0:16








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Maybe this is to concrete for you, but how about $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}, pi]$? The generators $sqrt{2}, pi$ are not algebraically independent, because $$ (sqrt{2})^2 + 0 cdot pi - 2 =0.$$
    $endgroup$
    – Severin Schraven
    Jan 27 at 0:20








1




1




$begingroup$
Any quotient of your example; a simple example would be $k[x,y]/(xy)$.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 27 at 0:16






$begingroup$
Any quotient of your example; a simple example would be $k[x,y]/(xy)$.
$endgroup$
– Servaes
Jan 27 at 0:16






1




1




$begingroup$
Maybe this is to concrete for you, but how about $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}, pi]$? The generators $sqrt{2}, pi$ are not algebraically independent, because $$ (sqrt{2})^2 + 0 cdot pi - 2 =0.$$
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
Jan 27 at 0:20




$begingroup$
Maybe this is to concrete for you, but how about $mathbb{Q}[sqrt{2}, pi]$? The generators $sqrt{2}, pi$ are not algebraically independent, because $$ (sqrt{2})^2 + 0 cdot pi - 2 =0.$$
$endgroup$
– Severin Schraven
Jan 27 at 0:20










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Consider $A = k[x,y]/(y-x^2)$. This is a finitely generated $k$-algebra where the generators, i.e. the images of $(x,y)$ in the quotient, are not algebraically independent. Can you see why not?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But the quotient is basically just $k[x] $. Better perhaps to use $y^3-x^2$ so it isn't trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jan 27 at 1:19












  • $begingroup$
    @Mr.chip Yes, thank you. The generators are $bar{x}$ and $bar{y}$ but there is an algebraic relation $bar{y}=bar{x}^2$ so they are not algebraically independent. So basically every finitely generated $k$-Algebra is isomorphic to a quotient of $k[x_1,...,x_n]$ if $A$ has generator $a_1,...,a_n$?
    $endgroup$
    – roi_saumon
    Jan 27 at 12:23












  • $begingroup$
    Also I think that the definition of finitely generated algebras looks suspiciously different to the definition of finitely generated modules...
    $endgroup$
    – roi_saumon
    Jan 27 at 12:29











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088956%2ffinitely-generated-k-algebras-beginner-examples%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

Consider $A = k[x,y]/(y-x^2)$. This is a finitely generated $k$-algebra where the generators, i.e. the images of $(x,y)$ in the quotient, are not algebraically independent. Can you see why not?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But the quotient is basically just $k[x] $. Better perhaps to use $y^3-x^2$ so it isn't trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jan 27 at 1:19












  • $begingroup$
    @Mr.chip Yes, thank you. The generators are $bar{x}$ and $bar{y}$ but there is an algebraic relation $bar{y}=bar{x}^2$ so they are not algebraically independent. So basically every finitely generated $k$-Algebra is isomorphic to a quotient of $k[x_1,...,x_n]$ if $A$ has generator $a_1,...,a_n$?
    $endgroup$
    – roi_saumon
    Jan 27 at 12:23












  • $begingroup$
    Also I think that the definition of finitely generated algebras looks suspiciously different to the definition of finitely generated modules...
    $endgroup$
    – roi_saumon
    Jan 27 at 12:29
















2












$begingroup$

Consider $A = k[x,y]/(y-x^2)$. This is a finitely generated $k$-algebra where the generators, i.e. the images of $(x,y)$ in the quotient, are not algebraically independent. Can you see why not?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But the quotient is basically just $k[x] $. Better perhaps to use $y^3-x^2$ so it isn't trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jan 27 at 1:19












  • $begingroup$
    @Mr.chip Yes, thank you. The generators are $bar{x}$ and $bar{y}$ but there is an algebraic relation $bar{y}=bar{x}^2$ so they are not algebraically independent. So basically every finitely generated $k$-Algebra is isomorphic to a quotient of $k[x_1,...,x_n]$ if $A$ has generator $a_1,...,a_n$?
    $endgroup$
    – roi_saumon
    Jan 27 at 12:23












  • $begingroup$
    Also I think that the definition of finitely generated algebras looks suspiciously different to the definition of finitely generated modules...
    $endgroup$
    – roi_saumon
    Jan 27 at 12:29














2












2








2





$begingroup$

Consider $A = k[x,y]/(y-x^2)$. This is a finitely generated $k$-algebra where the generators, i.e. the images of $(x,y)$ in the quotient, are not algebraically independent. Can you see why not?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Consider $A = k[x,y]/(y-x^2)$. This is a finitely generated $k$-algebra where the generators, i.e. the images of $(x,y)$ in the quotient, are not algebraically independent. Can you see why not?







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 27 at 0:16









Mr. ChipMr. Chip

3,2851129




3,2851129








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But the quotient is basically just $k[x] $. Better perhaps to use $y^3-x^2$ so it isn't trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jan 27 at 1:19












  • $begingroup$
    @Mr.chip Yes, thank you. The generators are $bar{x}$ and $bar{y}$ but there is an algebraic relation $bar{y}=bar{x}^2$ so they are not algebraically independent. So basically every finitely generated $k$-Algebra is isomorphic to a quotient of $k[x_1,...,x_n]$ if $A$ has generator $a_1,...,a_n$?
    $endgroup$
    – roi_saumon
    Jan 27 at 12:23












  • $begingroup$
    Also I think that the definition of finitely generated algebras looks suspiciously different to the definition of finitely generated modules...
    $endgroup$
    – roi_saumon
    Jan 27 at 12:29














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    But the quotient is basically just $k[x] $. Better perhaps to use $y^3-x^2$ so it isn't trivial.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt Samuel
    Jan 27 at 1:19












  • $begingroup$
    @Mr.chip Yes, thank you. The generators are $bar{x}$ and $bar{y}$ but there is an algebraic relation $bar{y}=bar{x}^2$ so they are not algebraically independent. So basically every finitely generated $k$-Algebra is isomorphic to a quotient of $k[x_1,...,x_n]$ if $A$ has generator $a_1,...,a_n$?
    $endgroup$
    – roi_saumon
    Jan 27 at 12:23












  • $begingroup$
    Also I think that the definition of finitely generated algebras looks suspiciously different to the definition of finitely generated modules...
    $endgroup$
    – roi_saumon
    Jan 27 at 12:29








1




1




$begingroup$
But the quotient is basically just $k[x] $. Better perhaps to use $y^3-x^2$ so it isn't trivial.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 27 at 1:19






$begingroup$
But the quotient is basically just $k[x] $. Better perhaps to use $y^3-x^2$ so it isn't trivial.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 27 at 1:19














$begingroup$
@Mr.chip Yes, thank you. The generators are $bar{x}$ and $bar{y}$ but there is an algebraic relation $bar{y}=bar{x}^2$ so they are not algebraically independent. So basically every finitely generated $k$-Algebra is isomorphic to a quotient of $k[x_1,...,x_n]$ if $A$ has generator $a_1,...,a_n$?
$endgroup$
– roi_saumon
Jan 27 at 12:23






$begingroup$
@Mr.chip Yes, thank you. The generators are $bar{x}$ and $bar{y}$ but there is an algebraic relation $bar{y}=bar{x}^2$ so they are not algebraically independent. So basically every finitely generated $k$-Algebra is isomorphic to a quotient of $k[x_1,...,x_n]$ if $A$ has generator $a_1,...,a_n$?
$endgroup$
– roi_saumon
Jan 27 at 12:23














$begingroup$
Also I think that the definition of finitely generated algebras looks suspiciously different to the definition of finitely generated modules...
$endgroup$
– roi_saumon
Jan 27 at 12:29




$begingroup$
Also I think that the definition of finitely generated algebras looks suspiciously different to the definition of finitely generated modules...
$endgroup$
– roi_saumon
Jan 27 at 12:29


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088956%2ffinitely-generated-k-algebras-beginner-examples%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$