Forming a query vector in LSA












0














After performing the SVD of a term-document matrix, and getting a reduced rank matrix, various sources have stated the following reduced query vector formula. It seems easy to see how its derived.





However, in this link, the query vector is calculated as centroid of the corresponding reduced term vectors. I tried to see if the two were the same, but the results were different.



What is the difference between the two and what are the pros/cons of using either?










share|improve this question






















  • I'm not an expert on LSA, but based on what you said above, why don't you pick the first option? If it is used by "various sources", it seems there is more support for that one. The link you included is just one source and it seems to be a tutorial question for a course. Of course, if you're enrolled in that course, I suggest you ask the professor. If you're not and you just came across it with Google, it seems to make more sense to stick to the one with the "various sources".
    – Ray
    Nov 19 '18 at 14:48










  • Suppose you use the second option ... what would you cite? Another university's tutorial exercise and a link to this stackoverflow question? You should consider the possibility that those exercises should be seen in the context of the course -- perhaps in the lecture, the professor said s/he made some simplification for the students. I'm not so sure you should take it too seriously as long as your "various sources" are reputable. (I assume they are research publications?)
    – Ray
    Nov 19 '18 at 14:50










  • Yes one of the sources is the irbook by Christopher Manning. That is what i am going to do. I am curious since almost everyone follows the prior formula, but this particular tutorial uses something much simpler. I am not enrolled in this course and i dont have any direct means of communication with the author. I certainly will try to contact him if i dont get a good enough answer.
    – Aarav Pandya
    Nov 19 '18 at 15:05










  • In my humble opinion, I'd stick with what is published, either in books or in research publications. Tutorials are sometimes simplified to make it similar to other topics in the class -- a lecturer has the freedom to make such a decision and not follow the field in order to get the message across to his/her students. Likewise, if you're not enrolled in the course, I'm not so sure if the lecturer feels any obligation to help you. Good luck! (PS: You might want to see if the lecturer has published in the area; it might be based on prior work of his/her's.)
    – Ray
    Nov 20 '18 at 4:46
















0














After performing the SVD of a term-document matrix, and getting a reduced rank matrix, various sources have stated the following reduced query vector formula. It seems easy to see how its derived.





However, in this link, the query vector is calculated as centroid of the corresponding reduced term vectors. I tried to see if the two were the same, but the results were different.



What is the difference between the two and what are the pros/cons of using either?










share|improve this question






















  • I'm not an expert on LSA, but based on what you said above, why don't you pick the first option? If it is used by "various sources", it seems there is more support for that one. The link you included is just one source and it seems to be a tutorial question for a course. Of course, if you're enrolled in that course, I suggest you ask the professor. If you're not and you just came across it with Google, it seems to make more sense to stick to the one with the "various sources".
    – Ray
    Nov 19 '18 at 14:48










  • Suppose you use the second option ... what would you cite? Another university's tutorial exercise and a link to this stackoverflow question? You should consider the possibility that those exercises should be seen in the context of the course -- perhaps in the lecture, the professor said s/he made some simplification for the students. I'm not so sure you should take it too seriously as long as your "various sources" are reputable. (I assume they are research publications?)
    – Ray
    Nov 19 '18 at 14:50










  • Yes one of the sources is the irbook by Christopher Manning. That is what i am going to do. I am curious since almost everyone follows the prior formula, but this particular tutorial uses something much simpler. I am not enrolled in this course and i dont have any direct means of communication with the author. I certainly will try to contact him if i dont get a good enough answer.
    – Aarav Pandya
    Nov 19 '18 at 15:05










  • In my humble opinion, I'd stick with what is published, either in books or in research publications. Tutorials are sometimes simplified to make it similar to other topics in the class -- a lecturer has the freedom to make such a decision and not follow the field in order to get the message across to his/her students. Likewise, if you're not enrolled in the course, I'm not so sure if the lecturer feels any obligation to help you. Good luck! (PS: You might want to see if the lecturer has published in the area; it might be based on prior work of his/her's.)
    – Ray
    Nov 20 '18 at 4:46














0












0








0







After performing the SVD of a term-document matrix, and getting a reduced rank matrix, various sources have stated the following reduced query vector formula. It seems easy to see how its derived.





However, in this link, the query vector is calculated as centroid of the corresponding reduced term vectors. I tried to see if the two were the same, but the results were different.



What is the difference between the two and what are the pros/cons of using either?










share|improve this question













After performing the SVD of a term-document matrix, and getting a reduced rank matrix, various sources have stated the following reduced query vector formula. It seems easy to see how its derived.





However, in this link, the query vector is calculated as centroid of the corresponding reduced term vectors. I tried to see if the two were the same, but the results were different.



What is the difference between the two and what are the pros/cons of using either?







information-retrieval lsa






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 19 '18 at 14:40









Aarav Pandya

102




102












  • I'm not an expert on LSA, but based on what you said above, why don't you pick the first option? If it is used by "various sources", it seems there is more support for that one. The link you included is just one source and it seems to be a tutorial question for a course. Of course, if you're enrolled in that course, I suggest you ask the professor. If you're not and you just came across it with Google, it seems to make more sense to stick to the one with the "various sources".
    – Ray
    Nov 19 '18 at 14:48










  • Suppose you use the second option ... what would you cite? Another university's tutorial exercise and a link to this stackoverflow question? You should consider the possibility that those exercises should be seen in the context of the course -- perhaps in the lecture, the professor said s/he made some simplification for the students. I'm not so sure you should take it too seriously as long as your "various sources" are reputable. (I assume they are research publications?)
    – Ray
    Nov 19 '18 at 14:50










  • Yes one of the sources is the irbook by Christopher Manning. That is what i am going to do. I am curious since almost everyone follows the prior formula, but this particular tutorial uses something much simpler. I am not enrolled in this course and i dont have any direct means of communication with the author. I certainly will try to contact him if i dont get a good enough answer.
    – Aarav Pandya
    Nov 19 '18 at 15:05










  • In my humble opinion, I'd stick with what is published, either in books or in research publications. Tutorials are sometimes simplified to make it similar to other topics in the class -- a lecturer has the freedom to make such a decision and not follow the field in order to get the message across to his/her students. Likewise, if you're not enrolled in the course, I'm not so sure if the lecturer feels any obligation to help you. Good luck! (PS: You might want to see if the lecturer has published in the area; it might be based on prior work of his/her's.)
    – Ray
    Nov 20 '18 at 4:46


















  • I'm not an expert on LSA, but based on what you said above, why don't you pick the first option? If it is used by "various sources", it seems there is more support for that one. The link you included is just one source and it seems to be a tutorial question for a course. Of course, if you're enrolled in that course, I suggest you ask the professor. If you're not and you just came across it with Google, it seems to make more sense to stick to the one with the "various sources".
    – Ray
    Nov 19 '18 at 14:48










  • Suppose you use the second option ... what would you cite? Another university's tutorial exercise and a link to this stackoverflow question? You should consider the possibility that those exercises should be seen in the context of the course -- perhaps in the lecture, the professor said s/he made some simplification for the students. I'm not so sure you should take it too seriously as long as your "various sources" are reputable. (I assume they are research publications?)
    – Ray
    Nov 19 '18 at 14:50










  • Yes one of the sources is the irbook by Christopher Manning. That is what i am going to do. I am curious since almost everyone follows the prior formula, but this particular tutorial uses something much simpler. I am not enrolled in this course and i dont have any direct means of communication with the author. I certainly will try to contact him if i dont get a good enough answer.
    – Aarav Pandya
    Nov 19 '18 at 15:05










  • In my humble opinion, I'd stick with what is published, either in books or in research publications. Tutorials are sometimes simplified to make it similar to other topics in the class -- a lecturer has the freedom to make such a decision and not follow the field in order to get the message across to his/her students. Likewise, if you're not enrolled in the course, I'm not so sure if the lecturer feels any obligation to help you. Good luck! (PS: You might want to see if the lecturer has published in the area; it might be based on prior work of his/her's.)
    – Ray
    Nov 20 '18 at 4:46
















I'm not an expert on LSA, but based on what you said above, why don't you pick the first option? If it is used by "various sources", it seems there is more support for that one. The link you included is just one source and it seems to be a tutorial question for a course. Of course, if you're enrolled in that course, I suggest you ask the professor. If you're not and you just came across it with Google, it seems to make more sense to stick to the one with the "various sources".
– Ray
Nov 19 '18 at 14:48




I'm not an expert on LSA, but based on what you said above, why don't you pick the first option? If it is used by "various sources", it seems there is more support for that one. The link you included is just one source and it seems to be a tutorial question for a course. Of course, if you're enrolled in that course, I suggest you ask the professor. If you're not and you just came across it with Google, it seems to make more sense to stick to the one with the "various sources".
– Ray
Nov 19 '18 at 14:48












Suppose you use the second option ... what would you cite? Another university's tutorial exercise and a link to this stackoverflow question? You should consider the possibility that those exercises should be seen in the context of the course -- perhaps in the lecture, the professor said s/he made some simplification for the students. I'm not so sure you should take it too seriously as long as your "various sources" are reputable. (I assume they are research publications?)
– Ray
Nov 19 '18 at 14:50




Suppose you use the second option ... what would you cite? Another university's tutorial exercise and a link to this stackoverflow question? You should consider the possibility that those exercises should be seen in the context of the course -- perhaps in the lecture, the professor said s/he made some simplification for the students. I'm not so sure you should take it too seriously as long as your "various sources" are reputable. (I assume they are research publications?)
– Ray
Nov 19 '18 at 14:50












Yes one of the sources is the irbook by Christopher Manning. That is what i am going to do. I am curious since almost everyone follows the prior formula, but this particular tutorial uses something much simpler. I am not enrolled in this course and i dont have any direct means of communication with the author. I certainly will try to contact him if i dont get a good enough answer.
– Aarav Pandya
Nov 19 '18 at 15:05




Yes one of the sources is the irbook by Christopher Manning. That is what i am going to do. I am curious since almost everyone follows the prior formula, but this particular tutorial uses something much simpler. I am not enrolled in this course and i dont have any direct means of communication with the author. I certainly will try to contact him if i dont get a good enough answer.
– Aarav Pandya
Nov 19 '18 at 15:05












In my humble opinion, I'd stick with what is published, either in books or in research publications. Tutorials are sometimes simplified to make it similar to other topics in the class -- a lecturer has the freedom to make such a decision and not follow the field in order to get the message across to his/her students. Likewise, if you're not enrolled in the course, I'm not so sure if the lecturer feels any obligation to help you. Good luck! (PS: You might want to see if the lecturer has published in the area; it might be based on prior work of his/her's.)
– Ray
Nov 20 '18 at 4:46




In my humble opinion, I'd stick with what is published, either in books or in research publications. Tutorials are sometimes simplified to make it similar to other topics in the class -- a lecturer has the freedom to make such a decision and not follow the field in order to get the message across to his/her students. Likewise, if you're not enrolled in the course, I'm not so sure if the lecturer feels any obligation to help you. Good luck! (PS: You might want to see if the lecturer has published in the area; it might be based on prior work of his/her's.)
– Ray
Nov 20 '18 at 4:46












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53376958%2fforming-a-query-vector-in-lsa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53376958%2fforming-a-query-vector-in-lsa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter