Fourier transform of general complex signal












0












$begingroup$


I am trying to understand a sinusoid and its fourier transform.



Given an example sinusoid



$Ze^{iwt}$, how do i calculate the fourier transform of it?



How do i even represent this?



In euler form?



like $Zcost(wt) + iZsin(wt)$ ?



Been looking at online materials but still cannot understand










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is it that you don't understand, exactly? Any online resource would tell you, at least from the engineering/physics perspective where you do some hand-waving, that it's a shifted impulse (scaled by some constant).
    $endgroup$
    – Metric
    Jan 23 at 3:33










  • $begingroup$
    @Metric like do i integrate the euler form?
    $endgroup$
    – aceminer
    Jan 23 at 3:35










  • $begingroup$
    No, you integrate it directly, but this is probably from an engineering/physics class, so there's going to be some handwaving.
    $endgroup$
    – Metric
    Jan 23 at 3:38










  • $begingroup$
    To offer some assitance towards the classical approach of finding it, I suggest you look at the inverse fourier transform of the dirac delta.
    $endgroup$
    – Metric
    Jan 23 at 3:39


















0












$begingroup$


I am trying to understand a sinusoid and its fourier transform.



Given an example sinusoid



$Ze^{iwt}$, how do i calculate the fourier transform of it?



How do i even represent this?



In euler form?



like $Zcost(wt) + iZsin(wt)$ ?



Been looking at online materials but still cannot understand










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    What is it that you don't understand, exactly? Any online resource would tell you, at least from the engineering/physics perspective where you do some hand-waving, that it's a shifted impulse (scaled by some constant).
    $endgroup$
    – Metric
    Jan 23 at 3:33










  • $begingroup$
    @Metric like do i integrate the euler form?
    $endgroup$
    – aceminer
    Jan 23 at 3:35










  • $begingroup$
    No, you integrate it directly, but this is probably from an engineering/physics class, so there's going to be some handwaving.
    $endgroup$
    – Metric
    Jan 23 at 3:38










  • $begingroup$
    To offer some assitance towards the classical approach of finding it, I suggest you look at the inverse fourier transform of the dirac delta.
    $endgroup$
    – Metric
    Jan 23 at 3:39
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


I am trying to understand a sinusoid and its fourier transform.



Given an example sinusoid



$Ze^{iwt}$, how do i calculate the fourier transform of it?



How do i even represent this?



In euler form?



like $Zcost(wt) + iZsin(wt)$ ?



Been looking at online materials but still cannot understand










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am trying to understand a sinusoid and its fourier transform.



Given an example sinusoid



$Ze^{iwt}$, how do i calculate the fourier transform of it?



How do i even represent this?



In euler form?



like $Zcost(wt) + iZsin(wt)$ ?



Been looking at online materials but still cannot understand







fourier-series fourier-transform






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 23 at 2:56









acemineraceminer

230111




230111












  • $begingroup$
    What is it that you don't understand, exactly? Any online resource would tell you, at least from the engineering/physics perspective where you do some hand-waving, that it's a shifted impulse (scaled by some constant).
    $endgroup$
    – Metric
    Jan 23 at 3:33










  • $begingroup$
    @Metric like do i integrate the euler form?
    $endgroup$
    – aceminer
    Jan 23 at 3:35










  • $begingroup$
    No, you integrate it directly, but this is probably from an engineering/physics class, so there's going to be some handwaving.
    $endgroup$
    – Metric
    Jan 23 at 3:38










  • $begingroup$
    To offer some assitance towards the classical approach of finding it, I suggest you look at the inverse fourier transform of the dirac delta.
    $endgroup$
    – Metric
    Jan 23 at 3:39




















  • $begingroup$
    What is it that you don't understand, exactly? Any online resource would tell you, at least from the engineering/physics perspective where you do some hand-waving, that it's a shifted impulse (scaled by some constant).
    $endgroup$
    – Metric
    Jan 23 at 3:33










  • $begingroup$
    @Metric like do i integrate the euler form?
    $endgroup$
    – aceminer
    Jan 23 at 3:35










  • $begingroup$
    No, you integrate it directly, but this is probably from an engineering/physics class, so there's going to be some handwaving.
    $endgroup$
    – Metric
    Jan 23 at 3:38










  • $begingroup$
    To offer some assitance towards the classical approach of finding it, I suggest you look at the inverse fourier transform of the dirac delta.
    $endgroup$
    – Metric
    Jan 23 at 3:39


















$begingroup$
What is it that you don't understand, exactly? Any online resource would tell you, at least from the engineering/physics perspective where you do some hand-waving, that it's a shifted impulse (scaled by some constant).
$endgroup$
– Metric
Jan 23 at 3:33




$begingroup$
What is it that you don't understand, exactly? Any online resource would tell you, at least from the engineering/physics perspective where you do some hand-waving, that it's a shifted impulse (scaled by some constant).
$endgroup$
– Metric
Jan 23 at 3:33












$begingroup$
@Metric like do i integrate the euler form?
$endgroup$
– aceminer
Jan 23 at 3:35




$begingroup$
@Metric like do i integrate the euler form?
$endgroup$
– aceminer
Jan 23 at 3:35












$begingroup$
No, you integrate it directly, but this is probably from an engineering/physics class, so there's going to be some handwaving.
$endgroup$
– Metric
Jan 23 at 3:38




$begingroup$
No, you integrate it directly, but this is probably from an engineering/physics class, so there's going to be some handwaving.
$endgroup$
– Metric
Jan 23 at 3:38












$begingroup$
To offer some assitance towards the classical approach of finding it, I suggest you look at the inverse fourier transform of the dirac delta.
$endgroup$
– Metric
Jan 23 at 3:39






$begingroup$
To offer some assitance towards the classical approach of finding it, I suggest you look at the inverse fourier transform of the dirac delta.
$endgroup$
– Metric
Jan 23 at 3:39












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Since I think I know what you're asking for, I'm going to hand-wave a little bit here.



Suppose the fourier transform $F$ of a function $f$ is defined as




$$F(f)(omega) = int_{-infty}^infty f(t) e^{-i omega t} dt$$




and the inverse-fourier transform $F^{-1}$ of a function $g$ is defined as




$$F^{-1}(g)(t) =frac{1}{2pi}int_{-infty}^infty g(omega) e^{i omega t} d omega$$




Since



$$ F(delta)(omega) = int_{-infty}^infty delta(t)e^{-iomega t} d t = int_{-infty}^infty delta(t)e^{0} d t = int_{-infty}^infty delta(t) d t = 1$$



we have that



$$F^{-1}(1)(t) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-infty}^infty e^{iomega t} domega = delta(t) $$



That is,



$$ int_{-infty}^infty e^{i omega t} d omega = 2 pi delta(t) tag 1$$



Now, if your function is $f(t) = ze^{i omega_0 t}$, then using $(1)$ we have that its fourier transform is




$$F(f)(omega) = int_{-infty}^infty f(t) e^{-i omega t} d t = zint_{-infty}^infty e^{i (omega_0-omega) t} dt = 2 pi zdelta(omega_0 - omega) = 2 pi zdelta(omega - omega_0)$$







share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084018%2ffourier-transform-of-general-complex-signal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Since I think I know what you're asking for, I'm going to hand-wave a little bit here.



    Suppose the fourier transform $F$ of a function $f$ is defined as




    $$F(f)(omega) = int_{-infty}^infty f(t) e^{-i omega t} dt$$




    and the inverse-fourier transform $F^{-1}$ of a function $g$ is defined as




    $$F^{-1}(g)(t) =frac{1}{2pi}int_{-infty}^infty g(omega) e^{i omega t} d omega$$




    Since



    $$ F(delta)(omega) = int_{-infty}^infty delta(t)e^{-iomega t} d t = int_{-infty}^infty delta(t)e^{0} d t = int_{-infty}^infty delta(t) d t = 1$$



    we have that



    $$F^{-1}(1)(t) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-infty}^infty e^{iomega t} domega = delta(t) $$



    That is,



    $$ int_{-infty}^infty e^{i omega t} d omega = 2 pi delta(t) tag 1$$



    Now, if your function is $f(t) = ze^{i omega_0 t}$, then using $(1)$ we have that its fourier transform is




    $$F(f)(omega) = int_{-infty}^infty f(t) e^{-i omega t} d t = zint_{-infty}^infty e^{i (omega_0-omega) t} dt = 2 pi zdelta(omega_0 - omega) = 2 pi zdelta(omega - omega_0)$$







    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Since I think I know what you're asking for, I'm going to hand-wave a little bit here.



      Suppose the fourier transform $F$ of a function $f$ is defined as




      $$F(f)(omega) = int_{-infty}^infty f(t) e^{-i omega t} dt$$




      and the inverse-fourier transform $F^{-1}$ of a function $g$ is defined as




      $$F^{-1}(g)(t) =frac{1}{2pi}int_{-infty}^infty g(omega) e^{i omega t} d omega$$




      Since



      $$ F(delta)(omega) = int_{-infty}^infty delta(t)e^{-iomega t} d t = int_{-infty}^infty delta(t)e^{0} d t = int_{-infty}^infty delta(t) d t = 1$$



      we have that



      $$F^{-1}(1)(t) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-infty}^infty e^{iomega t} domega = delta(t) $$



      That is,



      $$ int_{-infty}^infty e^{i omega t} d omega = 2 pi delta(t) tag 1$$



      Now, if your function is $f(t) = ze^{i omega_0 t}$, then using $(1)$ we have that its fourier transform is




      $$F(f)(omega) = int_{-infty}^infty f(t) e^{-i omega t} d t = zint_{-infty}^infty e^{i (omega_0-omega) t} dt = 2 pi zdelta(omega_0 - omega) = 2 pi zdelta(omega - omega_0)$$







      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Since I think I know what you're asking for, I'm going to hand-wave a little bit here.



        Suppose the fourier transform $F$ of a function $f$ is defined as




        $$F(f)(omega) = int_{-infty}^infty f(t) e^{-i omega t} dt$$




        and the inverse-fourier transform $F^{-1}$ of a function $g$ is defined as




        $$F^{-1}(g)(t) =frac{1}{2pi}int_{-infty}^infty g(omega) e^{i omega t} d omega$$




        Since



        $$ F(delta)(omega) = int_{-infty}^infty delta(t)e^{-iomega t} d t = int_{-infty}^infty delta(t)e^{0} d t = int_{-infty}^infty delta(t) d t = 1$$



        we have that



        $$F^{-1}(1)(t) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-infty}^infty e^{iomega t} domega = delta(t) $$



        That is,



        $$ int_{-infty}^infty e^{i omega t} d omega = 2 pi delta(t) tag 1$$



        Now, if your function is $f(t) = ze^{i omega_0 t}$, then using $(1)$ we have that its fourier transform is




        $$F(f)(omega) = int_{-infty}^infty f(t) e^{-i omega t} d t = zint_{-infty}^infty e^{i (omega_0-omega) t} dt = 2 pi zdelta(omega_0 - omega) = 2 pi zdelta(omega - omega_0)$$







        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Since I think I know what you're asking for, I'm going to hand-wave a little bit here.



        Suppose the fourier transform $F$ of a function $f$ is defined as




        $$F(f)(omega) = int_{-infty}^infty f(t) e^{-i omega t} dt$$




        and the inverse-fourier transform $F^{-1}$ of a function $g$ is defined as




        $$F^{-1}(g)(t) =frac{1}{2pi}int_{-infty}^infty g(omega) e^{i omega t} d omega$$




        Since



        $$ F(delta)(omega) = int_{-infty}^infty delta(t)e^{-iomega t} d t = int_{-infty}^infty delta(t)e^{0} d t = int_{-infty}^infty delta(t) d t = 1$$



        we have that



        $$F^{-1}(1)(t) = frac{1}{2pi}int_{-infty}^infty e^{iomega t} domega = delta(t) $$



        That is,



        $$ int_{-infty}^infty e^{i omega t} d omega = 2 pi delta(t) tag 1$$



        Now, if your function is $f(t) = ze^{i omega_0 t}$, then using $(1)$ we have that its fourier transform is




        $$F(f)(omega) = int_{-infty}^infty f(t) e^{-i omega t} d t = zint_{-infty}^infty e^{i (omega_0-omega) t} dt = 2 pi zdelta(omega_0 - omega) = 2 pi zdelta(omega - omega_0)$$








        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 24 at 0:18

























        answered Jan 23 at 3:57









        MetricMetric

        1,25159




        1,25159






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084018%2ffourier-transform-of-general-complex-signal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

            How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

            in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith