Ito Isometry for Brownian Bridge
$begingroup$
I have been looking at the following expression, and I'm a bit stuck:
$$left(int_{0}^{t}frac{dW_{u}}{1-u}(B_{1} - B_{u})right)^{2}$$ where ${W_{t}}_{tin[0,1]}$ is a standard Weiner Process and ${B_{t}}_{tin[0,1]}$ is a generalized Brownian bridge (endpoints need not be the same). If I apply expectation to this, will the Ito Isometry hold? Is the resulting expression just:
$$mathbb{E}left[int_{0}^{t}frac{du}{(1-u)^{2}}(u - u^{2})^{2}right] = mathbb{E}left[int_{0}^{t}u^{2}duright]?$$ Any help or clarity is greatly appreciated.
stochastic-processes brownian-motion
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have been looking at the following expression, and I'm a bit stuck:
$$left(int_{0}^{t}frac{dW_{u}}{1-u}(B_{1} - B_{u})right)^{2}$$ where ${W_{t}}_{tin[0,1]}$ is a standard Weiner Process and ${B_{t}}_{tin[0,1]}$ is a generalized Brownian bridge (endpoints need not be the same). If I apply expectation to this, will the Ito Isometry hold? Is the resulting expression just:
$$mathbb{E}left[int_{0}^{t}frac{du}{(1-u)^{2}}(u - u^{2})^{2}right] = mathbb{E}left[int_{0}^{t}u^{2}duright]?$$ Any help or clarity is greatly appreciated.
stochastic-processes brownian-motion
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Why were you able to move the squaring inside the integral?
$endgroup$
– Larry B.
Jan 22 at 23:25
$begingroup$
@LarryB. Assuming the Ito Isometry holds.
$endgroup$
– Index
Jan 23 at 3:49
$begingroup$
How are $W$ and $B$ related?
$endgroup$
– John Dawkins
Jan 23 at 21:49
$begingroup$
@John Dawkins I've been just using the fact that B is the solution to the SDE $$dB_{t} = frac{b- B_{t}}{1-t}dt + dW_{t}.$$ However, I could also use $$B_t = (1-t)a + tb + Z_{t}$$ where $Z_{t} = W_t - tW_1$ and that would be fine.
$endgroup$
– Index
Jan 24 at 13:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have been looking at the following expression, and I'm a bit stuck:
$$left(int_{0}^{t}frac{dW_{u}}{1-u}(B_{1} - B_{u})right)^{2}$$ where ${W_{t}}_{tin[0,1]}$ is a standard Weiner Process and ${B_{t}}_{tin[0,1]}$ is a generalized Brownian bridge (endpoints need not be the same). If I apply expectation to this, will the Ito Isometry hold? Is the resulting expression just:
$$mathbb{E}left[int_{0}^{t}frac{du}{(1-u)^{2}}(u - u^{2})^{2}right] = mathbb{E}left[int_{0}^{t}u^{2}duright]?$$ Any help or clarity is greatly appreciated.
stochastic-processes brownian-motion
$endgroup$
I have been looking at the following expression, and I'm a bit stuck:
$$left(int_{0}^{t}frac{dW_{u}}{1-u}(B_{1} - B_{u})right)^{2}$$ where ${W_{t}}_{tin[0,1]}$ is a standard Weiner Process and ${B_{t}}_{tin[0,1]}$ is a generalized Brownian bridge (endpoints need not be the same). If I apply expectation to this, will the Ito Isometry hold? Is the resulting expression just:
$$mathbb{E}left[int_{0}^{t}frac{du}{(1-u)^{2}}(u - u^{2})^{2}right] = mathbb{E}left[int_{0}^{t}u^{2}duright]?$$ Any help or clarity is greatly appreciated.
stochastic-processes brownian-motion
stochastic-processes brownian-motion
asked Jan 22 at 21:33
IndexIndex
213
213
$begingroup$
Why were you able to move the squaring inside the integral?
$endgroup$
– Larry B.
Jan 22 at 23:25
$begingroup$
@LarryB. Assuming the Ito Isometry holds.
$endgroup$
– Index
Jan 23 at 3:49
$begingroup$
How are $W$ and $B$ related?
$endgroup$
– John Dawkins
Jan 23 at 21:49
$begingroup$
@John Dawkins I've been just using the fact that B is the solution to the SDE $$dB_{t} = frac{b- B_{t}}{1-t}dt + dW_{t}.$$ However, I could also use $$B_t = (1-t)a + tb + Z_{t}$$ where $Z_{t} = W_t - tW_1$ and that would be fine.
$endgroup$
– Index
Jan 24 at 13:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Why were you able to move the squaring inside the integral?
$endgroup$
– Larry B.
Jan 22 at 23:25
$begingroup$
@LarryB. Assuming the Ito Isometry holds.
$endgroup$
– Index
Jan 23 at 3:49
$begingroup$
How are $W$ and $B$ related?
$endgroup$
– John Dawkins
Jan 23 at 21:49
$begingroup$
@John Dawkins I've been just using the fact that B is the solution to the SDE $$dB_{t} = frac{b- B_{t}}{1-t}dt + dW_{t}.$$ However, I could also use $$B_t = (1-t)a + tb + Z_{t}$$ where $Z_{t} = W_t - tW_1$ and that would be fine.
$endgroup$
– Index
Jan 24 at 13:45
$begingroup$
Why were you able to move the squaring inside the integral?
$endgroup$
– Larry B.
Jan 22 at 23:25
$begingroup$
Why were you able to move the squaring inside the integral?
$endgroup$
– Larry B.
Jan 22 at 23:25
$begingroup$
@LarryB. Assuming the Ito Isometry holds.
$endgroup$
– Index
Jan 23 at 3:49
$begingroup$
@LarryB. Assuming the Ito Isometry holds.
$endgroup$
– Index
Jan 23 at 3:49
$begingroup$
How are $W$ and $B$ related?
$endgroup$
– John Dawkins
Jan 23 at 21:49
$begingroup$
How are $W$ and $B$ related?
$endgroup$
– John Dawkins
Jan 23 at 21:49
$begingroup$
@John Dawkins I've been just using the fact that B is the solution to the SDE $$dB_{t} = frac{b- B_{t}}{1-t}dt + dW_{t}.$$ However, I could also use $$B_t = (1-t)a + tb + Z_{t}$$ where $Z_{t} = W_t - tW_1$ and that would be fine.
$endgroup$
– Index
Jan 24 at 13:45
$begingroup$
@John Dawkins I've been just using the fact that B is the solution to the SDE $$dB_{t} = frac{b- B_{t}}{1-t}dt + dW_{t}.$$ However, I could also use $$B_t = (1-t)a + tb + Z_{t}$$ where $Z_{t} = W_t - tW_1$ and that would be fine.
$endgroup$
– Index
Jan 24 at 13:45
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083733%2fito-isometry-for-brownian-bridge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083733%2fito-isometry-for-brownian-bridge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Why were you able to move the squaring inside the integral?
$endgroup$
– Larry B.
Jan 22 at 23:25
$begingroup$
@LarryB. Assuming the Ito Isometry holds.
$endgroup$
– Index
Jan 23 at 3:49
$begingroup$
How are $W$ and $B$ related?
$endgroup$
– John Dawkins
Jan 23 at 21:49
$begingroup$
@John Dawkins I've been just using the fact that B is the solution to the SDE $$dB_{t} = frac{b- B_{t}}{1-t}dt + dW_{t}.$$ However, I could also use $$B_t = (1-t)a + tb + Z_{t}$$ where $Z_{t} = W_t - tW_1$ and that would be fine.
$endgroup$
– Index
Jan 24 at 13:45