On a nonlinear regression problem
$begingroup$
Consider the function $fcolon mathbb{R}^2to mathbb{R}$, $f(x_1,x_2)=x_1^2 +x_2$. Assume that I don't know the form of $f$ and I only have a set of $N$ independent "input-output" data ${(x_1^{(i)},x_2^{(i)}), f(x_1^{(i)},x_2^{(i)})}_{i=1}^N$.
I would like to estimate a "right inverse" of $f$. Specifically, I want to estimate from data a function $gcolon mathbb{R}to mathbb{R}^2$ such that $f(g(x))=x$, for all $xinmathbb{R}$.
In order to solve this problem I'm formulating the following nonlinear regression problem
$$tag{1} label{eq:1}
min_{ginmathcal{G}} |g(Y)-X|,
$$
where $mathcal{G}$ is the set of continuous functions from $mathbb{R}$ to $mathbb{R}^2$, $X:=begin{bmatrix}x_1^{(1)} & cdots & x_1^{(N)}\ x_2^{(1)} & cdots & x_2^{(N)}end{bmatrix}$, $Y:=begin{bmatrix}f(x_1^{(1)},x_2^{(1)}) & cdots & f(x_1^{(N)},x_2^{(N)})end{bmatrix}$, and $g(Y)$ stands for $g$ applied elementwise to vector $Y$.
Let $hat{g}$ be the minimizer of eqref{eq:1}.
My question: Does $hat{g}$ converge to a "right inverse" of $f$ for $N$ large enough? In other words, do we have $hat{g}(f(x))=x$, $xinmathbb{R}$, for $N$ large enough?
If $f$ is a linear function then eqref{eq:1} boils down to a linear regression problem and the answer to my question is in the affirmative. However I do not understand if this holds also for the nonlinear case (as in my simple example above). Numerical simulations suggest that this is not true, but I would like to understand why. (Note that, from a numerical viewpoint, I approximate $G(Y)$ using a finite set of basis functions.)
I'm sorry if my question is not very rigorous, but I've thought a lot about this problem with no luck. So, I would really appreciate any comment or feedback. Thanks!
analysis regression estimation regression-analysis inverse-problems
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the function $fcolon mathbb{R}^2to mathbb{R}$, $f(x_1,x_2)=x_1^2 +x_2$. Assume that I don't know the form of $f$ and I only have a set of $N$ independent "input-output" data ${(x_1^{(i)},x_2^{(i)}), f(x_1^{(i)},x_2^{(i)})}_{i=1}^N$.
I would like to estimate a "right inverse" of $f$. Specifically, I want to estimate from data a function $gcolon mathbb{R}to mathbb{R}^2$ such that $f(g(x))=x$, for all $xinmathbb{R}$.
In order to solve this problem I'm formulating the following nonlinear regression problem
$$tag{1} label{eq:1}
min_{ginmathcal{G}} |g(Y)-X|,
$$
where $mathcal{G}$ is the set of continuous functions from $mathbb{R}$ to $mathbb{R}^2$, $X:=begin{bmatrix}x_1^{(1)} & cdots & x_1^{(N)}\ x_2^{(1)} & cdots & x_2^{(N)}end{bmatrix}$, $Y:=begin{bmatrix}f(x_1^{(1)},x_2^{(1)}) & cdots & f(x_1^{(N)},x_2^{(N)})end{bmatrix}$, and $g(Y)$ stands for $g$ applied elementwise to vector $Y$.
Let $hat{g}$ be the minimizer of eqref{eq:1}.
My question: Does $hat{g}$ converge to a "right inverse" of $f$ for $N$ large enough? In other words, do we have $hat{g}(f(x))=x$, $xinmathbb{R}$, for $N$ large enough?
If $f$ is a linear function then eqref{eq:1} boils down to a linear regression problem and the answer to my question is in the affirmative. However I do not understand if this holds also for the nonlinear case (as in my simple example above). Numerical simulations suggest that this is not true, but I would like to understand why. (Note that, from a numerical viewpoint, I approximate $G(Y)$ using a finite set of basis functions.)
I'm sorry if my question is not very rigorous, but I've thought a lot about this problem with no luck. So, I would really appreciate any comment or feedback. Thanks!
analysis regression estimation regression-analysis inverse-problems
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the function $fcolon mathbb{R}^2to mathbb{R}$, $f(x_1,x_2)=x_1^2 +x_2$. Assume that I don't know the form of $f$ and I only have a set of $N$ independent "input-output" data ${(x_1^{(i)},x_2^{(i)}), f(x_1^{(i)},x_2^{(i)})}_{i=1}^N$.
I would like to estimate a "right inverse" of $f$. Specifically, I want to estimate from data a function $gcolon mathbb{R}to mathbb{R}^2$ such that $f(g(x))=x$, for all $xinmathbb{R}$.
In order to solve this problem I'm formulating the following nonlinear regression problem
$$tag{1} label{eq:1}
min_{ginmathcal{G}} |g(Y)-X|,
$$
where $mathcal{G}$ is the set of continuous functions from $mathbb{R}$ to $mathbb{R}^2$, $X:=begin{bmatrix}x_1^{(1)} & cdots & x_1^{(N)}\ x_2^{(1)} & cdots & x_2^{(N)}end{bmatrix}$, $Y:=begin{bmatrix}f(x_1^{(1)},x_2^{(1)}) & cdots & f(x_1^{(N)},x_2^{(N)})end{bmatrix}$, and $g(Y)$ stands for $g$ applied elementwise to vector $Y$.
Let $hat{g}$ be the minimizer of eqref{eq:1}.
My question: Does $hat{g}$ converge to a "right inverse" of $f$ for $N$ large enough? In other words, do we have $hat{g}(f(x))=x$, $xinmathbb{R}$, for $N$ large enough?
If $f$ is a linear function then eqref{eq:1} boils down to a linear regression problem and the answer to my question is in the affirmative. However I do not understand if this holds also for the nonlinear case (as in my simple example above). Numerical simulations suggest that this is not true, but I would like to understand why. (Note that, from a numerical viewpoint, I approximate $G(Y)$ using a finite set of basis functions.)
I'm sorry if my question is not very rigorous, but I've thought a lot about this problem with no luck. So, I would really appreciate any comment or feedback. Thanks!
analysis regression estimation regression-analysis inverse-problems
$endgroup$
Consider the function $fcolon mathbb{R}^2to mathbb{R}$, $f(x_1,x_2)=x_1^2 +x_2$. Assume that I don't know the form of $f$ and I only have a set of $N$ independent "input-output" data ${(x_1^{(i)},x_2^{(i)}), f(x_1^{(i)},x_2^{(i)})}_{i=1}^N$.
I would like to estimate a "right inverse" of $f$. Specifically, I want to estimate from data a function $gcolon mathbb{R}to mathbb{R}^2$ such that $f(g(x))=x$, for all $xinmathbb{R}$.
In order to solve this problem I'm formulating the following nonlinear regression problem
$$tag{1} label{eq:1}
min_{ginmathcal{G}} |g(Y)-X|,
$$
where $mathcal{G}$ is the set of continuous functions from $mathbb{R}$ to $mathbb{R}^2$, $X:=begin{bmatrix}x_1^{(1)} & cdots & x_1^{(N)}\ x_2^{(1)} & cdots & x_2^{(N)}end{bmatrix}$, $Y:=begin{bmatrix}f(x_1^{(1)},x_2^{(1)}) & cdots & f(x_1^{(N)},x_2^{(N)})end{bmatrix}$, and $g(Y)$ stands for $g$ applied elementwise to vector $Y$.
Let $hat{g}$ be the minimizer of eqref{eq:1}.
My question: Does $hat{g}$ converge to a "right inverse" of $f$ for $N$ large enough? In other words, do we have $hat{g}(f(x))=x$, $xinmathbb{R}$, for $N$ large enough?
If $f$ is a linear function then eqref{eq:1} boils down to a linear regression problem and the answer to my question is in the affirmative. However I do not understand if this holds also for the nonlinear case (as in my simple example above). Numerical simulations suggest that this is not true, but I would like to understand why. (Note that, from a numerical viewpoint, I approximate $G(Y)$ using a finite set of basis functions.)
I'm sorry if my question is not very rigorous, but I've thought a lot about this problem with no luck. So, I would really appreciate any comment or feedback. Thanks!
analysis regression estimation regression-analysis inverse-problems
analysis regression estimation regression-analysis inverse-problems
asked Jan 22 at 21:29
LudwigLudwig
813715
813715
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083725%2fon-a-nonlinear-regression-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083725%2fon-a-nonlinear-regression-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown