Orthogonal Projection Tensor












0












$begingroup$


Hi my question is about this orthogonal projection tensor $P^sigma_nuequivdelta^sigma_nu+U^sigma U_nu$.



It should have the following properties when $V,W$ are vectors parallel and perpendicular to U, and $U$ is a 4-velocity in spacetime. These equations come from (1.121) and (1.122) in Sean Carroll's gravity book.



$
P^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel ~~= ~~0
$



$
P^sigma_nu W^nu_perp ~~=~~ W^sigma_perp
$



However, when I test for the first property I do not get the correct answer. I suppose I am messing up how I am using the Kronecker delta but I'm not sure how. Lets operate on and a vector $V$ that is parallel to $U$ to get the "equal zero" condition above.



$
P^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel ~~=~~delta^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel+U^sigma U_nu V^nu_parallel
$



If $sigma=nu$ then $delta^sigma_nu=1$.



$
P^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel~~=~~ V^sigma_parallel +U^sigma U_sigma V^sigma_parallel qquad qquad [U^sigma U_sigma=-1]\
quadqquad=~~ V^sigma_parallel - V^sigma_parallel \
quadqquad=~~0 quadcheckmark
$



That looks good, now let's check when $sigmaneqnu$ and $delta^sigma_nu=0$.



$
P^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel~~= ~~0 +U^sigma U_nu V^nu_parallel qquad qquad~~~ [Vparallel Uimplies U_nu V^nuneq0]\
quadqquad~neq~~ 0 qquad qquad qquad qquad~~~~~~ [mathrm{contradicts~Eq.}(2)]
$



It looks like I should totally disregard the case where $sigmaneqnu$ but I don't see why.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Hi my question is about this orthogonal projection tensor $P^sigma_nuequivdelta^sigma_nu+U^sigma U_nu$.



    It should have the following properties when $V,W$ are vectors parallel and perpendicular to U, and $U$ is a 4-velocity in spacetime. These equations come from (1.121) and (1.122) in Sean Carroll's gravity book.



    $
    P^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel ~~= ~~0
    $



    $
    P^sigma_nu W^nu_perp ~~=~~ W^sigma_perp
    $



    However, when I test for the first property I do not get the correct answer. I suppose I am messing up how I am using the Kronecker delta but I'm not sure how. Lets operate on and a vector $V$ that is parallel to $U$ to get the "equal zero" condition above.



    $
    P^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel ~~=~~delta^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel+U^sigma U_nu V^nu_parallel
    $



    If $sigma=nu$ then $delta^sigma_nu=1$.



    $
    P^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel~~=~~ V^sigma_parallel +U^sigma U_sigma V^sigma_parallel qquad qquad [U^sigma U_sigma=-1]\
    quadqquad=~~ V^sigma_parallel - V^sigma_parallel \
    quadqquad=~~0 quadcheckmark
    $



    That looks good, now let's check when $sigmaneqnu$ and $delta^sigma_nu=0$.



    $
    P^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel~~= ~~0 +U^sigma U_nu V^nu_parallel qquad qquad~~~ [Vparallel Uimplies U_nu V^nuneq0]\
    quadqquad~neq~~ 0 qquad qquad qquad qquad~~~~~~ [mathrm{contradicts~Eq.}(2)]
    $



    It looks like I should totally disregard the case where $sigmaneqnu$ but I don't see why.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Hi my question is about this orthogonal projection tensor $P^sigma_nuequivdelta^sigma_nu+U^sigma U_nu$.



      It should have the following properties when $V,W$ are vectors parallel and perpendicular to U, and $U$ is a 4-velocity in spacetime. These equations come from (1.121) and (1.122) in Sean Carroll's gravity book.



      $
      P^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel ~~= ~~0
      $



      $
      P^sigma_nu W^nu_perp ~~=~~ W^sigma_perp
      $



      However, when I test for the first property I do not get the correct answer. I suppose I am messing up how I am using the Kronecker delta but I'm not sure how. Lets operate on and a vector $V$ that is parallel to $U$ to get the "equal zero" condition above.



      $
      P^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel ~~=~~delta^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel+U^sigma U_nu V^nu_parallel
      $



      If $sigma=nu$ then $delta^sigma_nu=1$.



      $
      P^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel~~=~~ V^sigma_parallel +U^sigma U_sigma V^sigma_parallel qquad qquad [U^sigma U_sigma=-1]\
      quadqquad=~~ V^sigma_parallel - V^sigma_parallel \
      quadqquad=~~0 quadcheckmark
      $



      That looks good, now let's check when $sigmaneqnu$ and $delta^sigma_nu=0$.



      $
      P^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel~~= ~~0 +U^sigma U_nu V^nu_parallel qquad qquad~~~ [Vparallel Uimplies U_nu V^nuneq0]\
      quadqquad~neq~~ 0 qquad qquad qquad qquad~~~~~~ [mathrm{contradicts~Eq.}(2)]
      $



      It looks like I should totally disregard the case where $sigmaneqnu$ but I don't see why.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Hi my question is about this orthogonal projection tensor $P^sigma_nuequivdelta^sigma_nu+U^sigma U_nu$.



      It should have the following properties when $V,W$ are vectors parallel and perpendicular to U, and $U$ is a 4-velocity in spacetime. These equations come from (1.121) and (1.122) in Sean Carroll's gravity book.



      $
      P^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel ~~= ~~0
      $



      $
      P^sigma_nu W^nu_perp ~~=~~ W^sigma_perp
      $



      However, when I test for the first property I do not get the correct answer. I suppose I am messing up how I am using the Kronecker delta but I'm not sure how. Lets operate on and a vector $V$ that is parallel to $U$ to get the "equal zero" condition above.



      $
      P^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel ~~=~~delta^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel+U^sigma U_nu V^nu_parallel
      $



      If $sigma=nu$ then $delta^sigma_nu=1$.



      $
      P^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel~~=~~ V^sigma_parallel +U^sigma U_sigma V^sigma_parallel qquad qquad [U^sigma U_sigma=-1]\
      quadqquad=~~ V^sigma_parallel - V^sigma_parallel \
      quadqquad=~~0 quadcheckmark
      $



      That looks good, now let's check when $sigmaneqnu$ and $delta^sigma_nu=0$.



      $
      P^sigma_nu V^nu_parallel~~= ~~0 +U^sigma U_nu V^nu_parallel qquad qquad~~~ [Vparallel Uimplies U_nu V^nuneq0]\
      quadqquad~neq~~ 0 qquad qquad qquad qquad~~~~~~ [mathrm{contradicts~Eq.}(2)]
      $



      It looks like I should totally disregard the case where $sigmaneqnu$ but I don't see why.







      tensors






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 30 '16 at 20:14









      Jonathan TookerJonathan Tooker

      62




      62






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Talking about $sigma=nu$ and $neq nu$ are ill defined. $nu$ is a dummy index in the Einstein summation convention so you are, at best, describing terms in the sum. The real cases are about the inner product $V^nu U_nu$, because $delta^sigma_nu V^nu = V^sigma$ always.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you. I am just confused how the delta in the polynomial can also control the indices in the term that it is not multiplied with. Could you say a little more? That seem to violate the interpretation of the delta as a tensor. I am reviewing and I don't remember too well. It's just a rule that if a delta appears anywhere, it contracts the index in $delta^sigma_nu V^nu=V^sigma$ and ALSO all it changes all the other instances of $V^nu$? That is hard for me to wrap my head around.
            $endgroup$
            – Jonathan Tooker
            Aug 30 '16 at 20:27












          • $begingroup$
            Nope. The other $nu$ is contracted with the $U$. So, it works like this:$$begin{align}P_nu^sigma &= delta_nu^sigma + U^sigma U_nu\ P_nu^sigma V^nu &= (delta_nu^sigma + U^sigma U_nu)V^nu\ & = delta_nu^sigma V^nu + U^sigma U_nu V^nu \ & = V^sigma + U^sigma U_nu V^nu. end{align}$$ So, the only question is how $V$ is related to $U$.
            $endgroup$
            – Sean Lake
            Aug 30 '16 at 21:18












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your patience. $V$ is parallel to $U$. How does that ensure that the second term is zero giving the expected $P^sigma_nu V^nu=V^sigma$?
            $endgroup$
            – Jonathan Tooker
            Aug 30 '16 at 21:41












          • $begingroup$
            The thing is that $V$ is not always parallel to $U$. For a general vector, $V$, you can decompose it into a part that's parallel and a part that's perpendicular to $U$: $V = V_{||} + V_{perp},$ where the defining equation of $V_{||}$ is $V_{||}^mu = a U^mu$ for some constant $a$. So: how do we find $a$? Once we have $a$, how do we construct $V_{perp}$? What happens to the equation when we plug this broken down version of $V$ into it?
            $endgroup$
            – Sean Lake
            Aug 30 '16 at 21:51










          • $begingroup$
            LOL I'm all confused. I think I got it now despite the error in my comment above. My previous comment is so wrong! I completely forgot what I was even talking about. Thanks again. $PV=0$ is what I was looking for, not $PV=V$.
            $endgroup$
            – Jonathan Tooker
            Aug 30 '16 at 22:00





















          0












          $begingroup$

          I think what you are missing is the following: by applying the operator $P^{sigma}_{nu}$ to the vector V this is what you are actually doing:
          begin{equation*}
          sum_{nu=0}^{3}P^{sigma}_{nu}V^{nu}=sum_{nu=0}^{3}(delta^{sigma}_{nu}+U^{sigma}U_{nu})V^{nu}
          end{equation*}
          From which follows:
          begin{equation*}
          P^{sigma}_{nu}V^{nu}=V^{sigma}-V^{sigma}
          =0end{equation*}
          As you correctly stated in the beginning of your question. The point is that $nu$ becomes a dummy index only $textbf{after}$ the operator is contracted on the vector.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1908910%2forthogonal-projection-tensor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            Talking about $sigma=nu$ and $neq nu$ are ill defined. $nu$ is a dummy index in the Einstein summation convention so you are, at best, describing terms in the sum. The real cases are about the inner product $V^nu U_nu$, because $delta^sigma_nu V^nu = V^sigma$ always.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you. I am just confused how the delta in the polynomial can also control the indices in the term that it is not multiplied with. Could you say a little more? That seem to violate the interpretation of the delta as a tensor. I am reviewing and I don't remember too well. It's just a rule that if a delta appears anywhere, it contracts the index in $delta^sigma_nu V^nu=V^sigma$ and ALSO all it changes all the other instances of $V^nu$? That is hard for me to wrap my head around.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonathan Tooker
              Aug 30 '16 at 20:27












            • $begingroup$
              Nope. The other $nu$ is contracted with the $U$. So, it works like this:$$begin{align}P_nu^sigma &= delta_nu^sigma + U^sigma U_nu\ P_nu^sigma V^nu &= (delta_nu^sigma + U^sigma U_nu)V^nu\ & = delta_nu^sigma V^nu + U^sigma U_nu V^nu \ & = V^sigma + U^sigma U_nu V^nu. end{align}$$ So, the only question is how $V$ is related to $U$.
              $endgroup$
              – Sean Lake
              Aug 30 '16 at 21:18












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your patience. $V$ is parallel to $U$. How does that ensure that the second term is zero giving the expected $P^sigma_nu V^nu=V^sigma$?
              $endgroup$
              – Jonathan Tooker
              Aug 30 '16 at 21:41












            • $begingroup$
              The thing is that $V$ is not always parallel to $U$. For a general vector, $V$, you can decompose it into a part that's parallel and a part that's perpendicular to $U$: $V = V_{||} + V_{perp},$ where the defining equation of $V_{||}$ is $V_{||}^mu = a U^mu$ for some constant $a$. So: how do we find $a$? Once we have $a$, how do we construct $V_{perp}$? What happens to the equation when we plug this broken down version of $V$ into it?
              $endgroup$
              – Sean Lake
              Aug 30 '16 at 21:51










            • $begingroup$
              LOL I'm all confused. I think I got it now despite the error in my comment above. My previous comment is so wrong! I completely forgot what I was even talking about. Thanks again. $PV=0$ is what I was looking for, not $PV=V$.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonathan Tooker
              Aug 30 '16 at 22:00


















            0












            $begingroup$

            Talking about $sigma=nu$ and $neq nu$ are ill defined. $nu$ is a dummy index in the Einstein summation convention so you are, at best, describing terms in the sum. The real cases are about the inner product $V^nu U_nu$, because $delta^sigma_nu V^nu = V^sigma$ always.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you. I am just confused how the delta in the polynomial can also control the indices in the term that it is not multiplied with. Could you say a little more? That seem to violate the interpretation of the delta as a tensor. I am reviewing and I don't remember too well. It's just a rule that if a delta appears anywhere, it contracts the index in $delta^sigma_nu V^nu=V^sigma$ and ALSO all it changes all the other instances of $V^nu$? That is hard for me to wrap my head around.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonathan Tooker
              Aug 30 '16 at 20:27












            • $begingroup$
              Nope. The other $nu$ is contracted with the $U$. So, it works like this:$$begin{align}P_nu^sigma &= delta_nu^sigma + U^sigma U_nu\ P_nu^sigma V^nu &= (delta_nu^sigma + U^sigma U_nu)V^nu\ & = delta_nu^sigma V^nu + U^sigma U_nu V^nu \ & = V^sigma + U^sigma U_nu V^nu. end{align}$$ So, the only question is how $V$ is related to $U$.
              $endgroup$
              – Sean Lake
              Aug 30 '16 at 21:18












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your patience. $V$ is parallel to $U$. How does that ensure that the second term is zero giving the expected $P^sigma_nu V^nu=V^sigma$?
              $endgroup$
              – Jonathan Tooker
              Aug 30 '16 at 21:41












            • $begingroup$
              The thing is that $V$ is not always parallel to $U$. For a general vector, $V$, you can decompose it into a part that's parallel and a part that's perpendicular to $U$: $V = V_{||} + V_{perp},$ where the defining equation of $V_{||}$ is $V_{||}^mu = a U^mu$ for some constant $a$. So: how do we find $a$? Once we have $a$, how do we construct $V_{perp}$? What happens to the equation when we plug this broken down version of $V$ into it?
              $endgroup$
              – Sean Lake
              Aug 30 '16 at 21:51










            • $begingroup$
              LOL I'm all confused. I think I got it now despite the error in my comment above. My previous comment is so wrong! I completely forgot what I was even talking about. Thanks again. $PV=0$ is what I was looking for, not $PV=V$.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonathan Tooker
              Aug 30 '16 at 22:00
















            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Talking about $sigma=nu$ and $neq nu$ are ill defined. $nu$ is a dummy index in the Einstein summation convention so you are, at best, describing terms in the sum. The real cases are about the inner product $V^nu U_nu$, because $delta^sigma_nu V^nu = V^sigma$ always.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Talking about $sigma=nu$ and $neq nu$ are ill defined. $nu$ is a dummy index in the Einstein summation convention so you are, at best, describing terms in the sum. The real cases are about the inner product $V^nu U_nu$, because $delta^sigma_nu V^nu = V^sigma$ always.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Aug 30 '16 at 20:19









            Sean LakeSean Lake

            1,268517




            1,268517












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you. I am just confused how the delta in the polynomial can also control the indices in the term that it is not multiplied with. Could you say a little more? That seem to violate the interpretation of the delta as a tensor. I am reviewing and I don't remember too well. It's just a rule that if a delta appears anywhere, it contracts the index in $delta^sigma_nu V^nu=V^sigma$ and ALSO all it changes all the other instances of $V^nu$? That is hard for me to wrap my head around.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonathan Tooker
              Aug 30 '16 at 20:27












            • $begingroup$
              Nope. The other $nu$ is contracted with the $U$. So, it works like this:$$begin{align}P_nu^sigma &= delta_nu^sigma + U^sigma U_nu\ P_nu^sigma V^nu &= (delta_nu^sigma + U^sigma U_nu)V^nu\ & = delta_nu^sigma V^nu + U^sigma U_nu V^nu \ & = V^sigma + U^sigma U_nu V^nu. end{align}$$ So, the only question is how $V$ is related to $U$.
              $endgroup$
              – Sean Lake
              Aug 30 '16 at 21:18












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your patience. $V$ is parallel to $U$. How does that ensure that the second term is zero giving the expected $P^sigma_nu V^nu=V^sigma$?
              $endgroup$
              – Jonathan Tooker
              Aug 30 '16 at 21:41












            • $begingroup$
              The thing is that $V$ is not always parallel to $U$. For a general vector, $V$, you can decompose it into a part that's parallel and a part that's perpendicular to $U$: $V = V_{||} + V_{perp},$ where the defining equation of $V_{||}$ is $V_{||}^mu = a U^mu$ for some constant $a$. So: how do we find $a$? Once we have $a$, how do we construct $V_{perp}$? What happens to the equation when we plug this broken down version of $V$ into it?
              $endgroup$
              – Sean Lake
              Aug 30 '16 at 21:51










            • $begingroup$
              LOL I'm all confused. I think I got it now despite the error in my comment above. My previous comment is so wrong! I completely forgot what I was even talking about. Thanks again. $PV=0$ is what I was looking for, not $PV=V$.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonathan Tooker
              Aug 30 '16 at 22:00




















            • $begingroup$
              Thank you. I am just confused how the delta in the polynomial can also control the indices in the term that it is not multiplied with. Could you say a little more? That seem to violate the interpretation of the delta as a tensor. I am reviewing and I don't remember too well. It's just a rule that if a delta appears anywhere, it contracts the index in $delta^sigma_nu V^nu=V^sigma$ and ALSO all it changes all the other instances of $V^nu$? That is hard for me to wrap my head around.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonathan Tooker
              Aug 30 '16 at 20:27












            • $begingroup$
              Nope. The other $nu$ is contracted with the $U$. So, it works like this:$$begin{align}P_nu^sigma &= delta_nu^sigma + U^sigma U_nu\ P_nu^sigma V^nu &= (delta_nu^sigma + U^sigma U_nu)V^nu\ & = delta_nu^sigma V^nu + U^sigma U_nu V^nu \ & = V^sigma + U^sigma U_nu V^nu. end{align}$$ So, the only question is how $V$ is related to $U$.
              $endgroup$
              – Sean Lake
              Aug 30 '16 at 21:18












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your patience. $V$ is parallel to $U$. How does that ensure that the second term is zero giving the expected $P^sigma_nu V^nu=V^sigma$?
              $endgroup$
              – Jonathan Tooker
              Aug 30 '16 at 21:41












            • $begingroup$
              The thing is that $V$ is not always parallel to $U$. For a general vector, $V$, you can decompose it into a part that's parallel and a part that's perpendicular to $U$: $V = V_{||} + V_{perp},$ where the defining equation of $V_{||}$ is $V_{||}^mu = a U^mu$ for some constant $a$. So: how do we find $a$? Once we have $a$, how do we construct $V_{perp}$? What happens to the equation when we plug this broken down version of $V$ into it?
              $endgroup$
              – Sean Lake
              Aug 30 '16 at 21:51










            • $begingroup$
              LOL I'm all confused. I think I got it now despite the error in my comment above. My previous comment is so wrong! I completely forgot what I was even talking about. Thanks again. $PV=0$ is what I was looking for, not $PV=V$.
              $endgroup$
              – Jonathan Tooker
              Aug 30 '16 at 22:00


















            $begingroup$
            Thank you. I am just confused how the delta in the polynomial can also control the indices in the term that it is not multiplied with. Could you say a little more? That seem to violate the interpretation of the delta as a tensor. I am reviewing and I don't remember too well. It's just a rule that if a delta appears anywhere, it contracts the index in $delta^sigma_nu V^nu=V^sigma$ and ALSO all it changes all the other instances of $V^nu$? That is hard for me to wrap my head around.
            $endgroup$
            – Jonathan Tooker
            Aug 30 '16 at 20:27






            $begingroup$
            Thank you. I am just confused how the delta in the polynomial can also control the indices in the term that it is not multiplied with. Could you say a little more? That seem to violate the interpretation of the delta as a tensor. I am reviewing and I don't remember too well. It's just a rule that if a delta appears anywhere, it contracts the index in $delta^sigma_nu V^nu=V^sigma$ and ALSO all it changes all the other instances of $V^nu$? That is hard for me to wrap my head around.
            $endgroup$
            – Jonathan Tooker
            Aug 30 '16 at 20:27














            $begingroup$
            Nope. The other $nu$ is contracted with the $U$. So, it works like this:$$begin{align}P_nu^sigma &= delta_nu^sigma + U^sigma U_nu\ P_nu^sigma V^nu &= (delta_nu^sigma + U^sigma U_nu)V^nu\ & = delta_nu^sigma V^nu + U^sigma U_nu V^nu \ & = V^sigma + U^sigma U_nu V^nu. end{align}$$ So, the only question is how $V$ is related to $U$.
            $endgroup$
            – Sean Lake
            Aug 30 '16 at 21:18






            $begingroup$
            Nope. The other $nu$ is contracted with the $U$. So, it works like this:$$begin{align}P_nu^sigma &= delta_nu^sigma + U^sigma U_nu\ P_nu^sigma V^nu &= (delta_nu^sigma + U^sigma U_nu)V^nu\ & = delta_nu^sigma V^nu + U^sigma U_nu V^nu \ & = V^sigma + U^sigma U_nu V^nu. end{align}$$ So, the only question is how $V$ is related to $U$.
            $endgroup$
            – Sean Lake
            Aug 30 '16 at 21:18














            $begingroup$
            Thank you for your patience. $V$ is parallel to $U$. How does that ensure that the second term is zero giving the expected $P^sigma_nu V^nu=V^sigma$?
            $endgroup$
            – Jonathan Tooker
            Aug 30 '16 at 21:41






            $begingroup$
            Thank you for your patience. $V$ is parallel to $U$. How does that ensure that the second term is zero giving the expected $P^sigma_nu V^nu=V^sigma$?
            $endgroup$
            – Jonathan Tooker
            Aug 30 '16 at 21:41














            $begingroup$
            The thing is that $V$ is not always parallel to $U$. For a general vector, $V$, you can decompose it into a part that's parallel and a part that's perpendicular to $U$: $V = V_{||} + V_{perp},$ where the defining equation of $V_{||}$ is $V_{||}^mu = a U^mu$ for some constant $a$. So: how do we find $a$? Once we have $a$, how do we construct $V_{perp}$? What happens to the equation when we plug this broken down version of $V$ into it?
            $endgroup$
            – Sean Lake
            Aug 30 '16 at 21:51




            $begingroup$
            The thing is that $V$ is not always parallel to $U$. For a general vector, $V$, you can decompose it into a part that's parallel and a part that's perpendicular to $U$: $V = V_{||} + V_{perp},$ where the defining equation of $V_{||}$ is $V_{||}^mu = a U^mu$ for some constant $a$. So: how do we find $a$? Once we have $a$, how do we construct $V_{perp}$? What happens to the equation when we plug this broken down version of $V$ into it?
            $endgroup$
            – Sean Lake
            Aug 30 '16 at 21:51












            $begingroup$
            LOL I'm all confused. I think I got it now despite the error in my comment above. My previous comment is so wrong! I completely forgot what I was even talking about. Thanks again. $PV=0$ is what I was looking for, not $PV=V$.
            $endgroup$
            – Jonathan Tooker
            Aug 30 '16 at 22:00






            $begingroup$
            LOL I'm all confused. I think I got it now despite the error in my comment above. My previous comment is so wrong! I completely forgot what I was even talking about. Thanks again. $PV=0$ is what I was looking for, not $PV=V$.
            $endgroup$
            – Jonathan Tooker
            Aug 30 '16 at 22:00













            0












            $begingroup$

            I think what you are missing is the following: by applying the operator $P^{sigma}_{nu}$ to the vector V this is what you are actually doing:
            begin{equation*}
            sum_{nu=0}^{3}P^{sigma}_{nu}V^{nu}=sum_{nu=0}^{3}(delta^{sigma}_{nu}+U^{sigma}U_{nu})V^{nu}
            end{equation*}
            From which follows:
            begin{equation*}
            P^{sigma}_{nu}V^{nu}=V^{sigma}-V^{sigma}
            =0end{equation*}
            As you correctly stated in the beginning of your question. The point is that $nu$ becomes a dummy index only $textbf{after}$ the operator is contracted on the vector.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              I think what you are missing is the following: by applying the operator $P^{sigma}_{nu}$ to the vector V this is what you are actually doing:
              begin{equation*}
              sum_{nu=0}^{3}P^{sigma}_{nu}V^{nu}=sum_{nu=0}^{3}(delta^{sigma}_{nu}+U^{sigma}U_{nu})V^{nu}
              end{equation*}
              From which follows:
              begin{equation*}
              P^{sigma}_{nu}V^{nu}=V^{sigma}-V^{sigma}
              =0end{equation*}
              As you correctly stated in the beginning of your question. The point is that $nu$ becomes a dummy index only $textbf{after}$ the operator is contracted on the vector.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                I think what you are missing is the following: by applying the operator $P^{sigma}_{nu}$ to the vector V this is what you are actually doing:
                begin{equation*}
                sum_{nu=0}^{3}P^{sigma}_{nu}V^{nu}=sum_{nu=0}^{3}(delta^{sigma}_{nu}+U^{sigma}U_{nu})V^{nu}
                end{equation*}
                From which follows:
                begin{equation*}
                P^{sigma}_{nu}V^{nu}=V^{sigma}-V^{sigma}
                =0end{equation*}
                As you correctly stated in the beginning of your question. The point is that $nu$ becomes a dummy index only $textbf{after}$ the operator is contracted on the vector.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                I think what you are missing is the following: by applying the operator $P^{sigma}_{nu}$ to the vector V this is what you are actually doing:
                begin{equation*}
                sum_{nu=0}^{3}P^{sigma}_{nu}V^{nu}=sum_{nu=0}^{3}(delta^{sigma}_{nu}+U^{sigma}U_{nu})V^{nu}
                end{equation*}
                From which follows:
                begin{equation*}
                P^{sigma}_{nu}V^{nu}=V^{sigma}-V^{sigma}
                =0end{equation*}
                As you correctly stated in the beginning of your question. The point is that $nu$ becomes a dummy index only $textbf{after}$ the operator is contracted on the vector.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jul 21 '18 at 9:56









                user9862720user9862720

                1




                1






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1908910%2forthogonal-projection-tensor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                    Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory