Prove that $sin(-x)=-sin(x)$ and $cos(-x)=cos(x)$ using complex conjugation












1












$begingroup$


The Definition of $sin$ and $cos$ is given by the complex function,



$$f:mathbb{C}rightarrowmathbb{C},qquad
f(x)=e^{text{i}x}=cos(x)+text{i}sin(x)$$



I.e. cos is the real part of $e^{ix}$ and sin denotes the immaginary part of $e^{ix}$.



Now we know that $forall z_iinmathbb{C}$



$$overline{sum_{iin I}z_i}=sum_{iin I}bar{z_i}$$



therefore since $e^x:=sum_{k=0}^{infty}frac{x^k}{k!}$



$$overline{e^{ix}}=e^{overline{ix}}$$



for the left side I would get



$cos(x)-text{i}sin(x)$



Can someone explain why we have for the right side



$cos(-x)+ text{i}sin(x)$



And also how do we derive from the Formula
$$cos(-x)+ text{i}sin(x)=cos(x)-text{i}sin(x)$$
that we got from above that



$sin(-x)=sin(x)$



The equation



$cos(-x)=cos(x)$



is clear










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's $overline{e^{ix}}=e^{-ix}=e^{i(-x)}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Isko10986
    Jan 22 at 21:30












  • $begingroup$
    @Isko10986 why is $e^{-ix}=overline{e^{ix}}$
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:38
















1












$begingroup$


The Definition of $sin$ and $cos$ is given by the complex function,



$$f:mathbb{C}rightarrowmathbb{C},qquad
f(x)=e^{text{i}x}=cos(x)+text{i}sin(x)$$



I.e. cos is the real part of $e^{ix}$ and sin denotes the immaginary part of $e^{ix}$.



Now we know that $forall z_iinmathbb{C}$



$$overline{sum_{iin I}z_i}=sum_{iin I}bar{z_i}$$



therefore since $e^x:=sum_{k=0}^{infty}frac{x^k}{k!}$



$$overline{e^{ix}}=e^{overline{ix}}$$



for the left side I would get



$cos(x)-text{i}sin(x)$



Can someone explain why we have for the right side



$cos(-x)+ text{i}sin(x)$



And also how do we derive from the Formula
$$cos(-x)+ text{i}sin(x)=cos(x)-text{i}sin(x)$$
that we got from above that



$sin(-x)=sin(x)$



The equation



$cos(-x)=cos(x)$



is clear










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's $overline{e^{ix}}=e^{-ix}=e^{i(-x)}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Isko10986
    Jan 22 at 21:30












  • $begingroup$
    @Isko10986 why is $e^{-ix}=overline{e^{ix}}$
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:38














1












1








1





$begingroup$


The Definition of $sin$ and $cos$ is given by the complex function,



$$f:mathbb{C}rightarrowmathbb{C},qquad
f(x)=e^{text{i}x}=cos(x)+text{i}sin(x)$$



I.e. cos is the real part of $e^{ix}$ and sin denotes the immaginary part of $e^{ix}$.



Now we know that $forall z_iinmathbb{C}$



$$overline{sum_{iin I}z_i}=sum_{iin I}bar{z_i}$$



therefore since $e^x:=sum_{k=0}^{infty}frac{x^k}{k!}$



$$overline{e^{ix}}=e^{overline{ix}}$$



for the left side I would get



$cos(x)-text{i}sin(x)$



Can someone explain why we have for the right side



$cos(-x)+ text{i}sin(x)$



And also how do we derive from the Formula
$$cos(-x)+ text{i}sin(x)=cos(x)-text{i}sin(x)$$
that we got from above that



$sin(-x)=sin(x)$



The equation



$cos(-x)=cos(x)$



is clear










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




The Definition of $sin$ and $cos$ is given by the complex function,



$$f:mathbb{C}rightarrowmathbb{C},qquad
f(x)=e^{text{i}x}=cos(x)+text{i}sin(x)$$



I.e. cos is the real part of $e^{ix}$ and sin denotes the immaginary part of $e^{ix}$.



Now we know that $forall z_iinmathbb{C}$



$$overline{sum_{iin I}z_i}=sum_{iin I}bar{z_i}$$



therefore since $e^x:=sum_{k=0}^{infty}frac{x^k}{k!}$



$$overline{e^{ix}}=e^{overline{ix}}$$



for the left side I would get



$cos(x)-text{i}sin(x)$



Can someone explain why we have for the right side



$cos(-x)+ text{i}sin(x)$



And also how do we derive from the Formula
$$cos(-x)+ text{i}sin(x)=cos(x)-text{i}sin(x)$$
that we got from above that



$sin(-x)=sin(x)$



The equation



$cos(-x)=cos(x)$



is clear







complex-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 22 at 21:35









egreg

184k1486205




184k1486205










asked Jan 22 at 21:25









RM777RM777

38312




38312








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's $overline{e^{ix}}=e^{-ix}=e^{i(-x)}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Isko10986
    Jan 22 at 21:30












  • $begingroup$
    @Isko10986 why is $e^{-ix}=overline{e^{ix}}$
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:38














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    It's $overline{e^{ix}}=e^{-ix}=e^{i(-x)}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Isko10986
    Jan 22 at 21:30












  • $begingroup$
    @Isko10986 why is $e^{-ix}=overline{e^{ix}}$
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:38








1




1




$begingroup$
It's $overline{e^{ix}}=e^{-ix}=e^{i(-x)}$.
$endgroup$
– Isko10986
Jan 22 at 21:30






$begingroup$
It's $overline{e^{ix}}=e^{-ix}=e^{i(-x)}$.
$endgroup$
– Isko10986
Jan 22 at 21:30














$begingroup$
@Isko10986 why is $e^{-ix}=overline{e^{ix}}$
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 22 at 21:38




$begingroup$
@Isko10986 why is $e^{-ix}=overline{e^{ix}}$
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 22 at 21:38










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

It is not true that $sin x$ is the imaginary part of $e^{ix}$, if $x$ is complex nonreal.



If $x$ is real, then
$$
overline{ix}=bar{i}bar{x}=-ix
$$

Therefore, after noting that $overline{e^z}=e^{bar{z}}$ as you did,
$$
overline{cos x+isin x}=overline{e^{ix}}=e^{overline{ix}}=e^{-ix}=cos(-x)+isin(-x)
$$

Hence
$$
cos x-isin x=cos(-x)+isin(-x)
$$

and the equality is proved.



Note that when $x$ is complex the derivation is slightly different, mainly because
$$
overline{cos x+isin x}necos x-isin x
$$

in general.



On the other hand, the definition of $sin z$ for complex $z$ is
$$
sin z=frac{e^{iz}-e^{-iz}}{2i}
$$

and $sin(-z)=-sin z$ is obvious.





For completeness, if $z=a+ib$, then $e^{iz}=e^{-b+ia}=e^{-b}(cos a+isin a)$, so the real part of $e^{iz}$ is $e^{-b}cos a$, which is not $cos z$ in general, for the simple reason that $cos z$ is not itself real in general and you can observe that the real part is $cos z$ if and only if $b=0$, that is, if $z$ is real.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    if $bar{i}= -i$, I only get $bar{i}bar{x}=-ibar{x}$, why does the bar of x vanish too?
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @RM777 For complex $x$, it is not true that $sin x$ is the imaginary part of $e^{Ix}$. That derivation is only valid for real $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Jan 22 at 21:43












  • $begingroup$
    How do I know if $e^{text{i}x}=cos(x)+text{i}sin(x)$ that $e^{text{-i}x}=cos(-x)+text{i}sin(-x)$?
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @RM777 Change $x$ into $-x$.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Jan 22 at 22:04



















1












$begingroup$

Usually that first equation is a theorem (Euler's formula) rather than a definition. But if you start from there, notice:
$$
e^{-ix} = e^{i(-x)} = cos(-x) + i sin(-x)
$$

From the power series formula $e^z = sum_{k=0}^infty frac{z^k}{k!}$, we see that
$$
e^{-ix} = sum_{k=0}^infty frac{(-ix)^k}{k!} = sum_{k=0}^infty frac{(overline{ix})^k}{k!} = overline{e^{ix}}
$$

Therefore
$$
e^{-ix} = overline{e^{ix}} = overline{cos(x) + i sin(x)} = cos(x) - i sin(x)
$$

Now you just equate real and imaginary parts.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why is $e^{-ix}=overline{e^{ix}}$?
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $overline i = -i$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Jan 22 at 21:38








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @RM777 I've included a line of justification for that formula.
    $endgroup$
    – Matthew Leingang
    Jan 22 at 21:53










  • $begingroup$
    Last sentence was especially helpful I was still wondering how I get the Formula untill now. Thanks
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 22:05











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083719%2fprove-that-sin-x-sinx-and-cos-x-cosx-using-complex-conjugation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

It is not true that $sin x$ is the imaginary part of $e^{ix}$, if $x$ is complex nonreal.



If $x$ is real, then
$$
overline{ix}=bar{i}bar{x}=-ix
$$

Therefore, after noting that $overline{e^z}=e^{bar{z}}$ as you did,
$$
overline{cos x+isin x}=overline{e^{ix}}=e^{overline{ix}}=e^{-ix}=cos(-x)+isin(-x)
$$

Hence
$$
cos x-isin x=cos(-x)+isin(-x)
$$

and the equality is proved.



Note that when $x$ is complex the derivation is slightly different, mainly because
$$
overline{cos x+isin x}necos x-isin x
$$

in general.



On the other hand, the definition of $sin z$ for complex $z$ is
$$
sin z=frac{e^{iz}-e^{-iz}}{2i}
$$

and $sin(-z)=-sin z$ is obvious.





For completeness, if $z=a+ib$, then $e^{iz}=e^{-b+ia}=e^{-b}(cos a+isin a)$, so the real part of $e^{iz}$ is $e^{-b}cos a$, which is not $cos z$ in general, for the simple reason that $cos z$ is not itself real in general and you can observe that the real part is $cos z$ if and only if $b=0$, that is, if $z$ is real.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    if $bar{i}= -i$, I only get $bar{i}bar{x}=-ibar{x}$, why does the bar of x vanish too?
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @RM777 For complex $x$, it is not true that $sin x$ is the imaginary part of $e^{Ix}$. That derivation is only valid for real $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Jan 22 at 21:43












  • $begingroup$
    How do I know if $e^{text{i}x}=cos(x)+text{i}sin(x)$ that $e^{text{-i}x}=cos(-x)+text{i}sin(-x)$?
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @RM777 Change $x$ into $-x$.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Jan 22 at 22:04
















2












$begingroup$

It is not true that $sin x$ is the imaginary part of $e^{ix}$, if $x$ is complex nonreal.



If $x$ is real, then
$$
overline{ix}=bar{i}bar{x}=-ix
$$

Therefore, after noting that $overline{e^z}=e^{bar{z}}$ as you did,
$$
overline{cos x+isin x}=overline{e^{ix}}=e^{overline{ix}}=e^{-ix}=cos(-x)+isin(-x)
$$

Hence
$$
cos x-isin x=cos(-x)+isin(-x)
$$

and the equality is proved.



Note that when $x$ is complex the derivation is slightly different, mainly because
$$
overline{cos x+isin x}necos x-isin x
$$

in general.



On the other hand, the definition of $sin z$ for complex $z$ is
$$
sin z=frac{e^{iz}-e^{-iz}}{2i}
$$

and $sin(-z)=-sin z$ is obvious.





For completeness, if $z=a+ib$, then $e^{iz}=e^{-b+ia}=e^{-b}(cos a+isin a)$, so the real part of $e^{iz}$ is $e^{-b}cos a$, which is not $cos z$ in general, for the simple reason that $cos z$ is not itself real in general and you can observe that the real part is $cos z$ if and only if $b=0$, that is, if $z$ is real.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    if $bar{i}= -i$, I only get $bar{i}bar{x}=-ibar{x}$, why does the bar of x vanish too?
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @RM777 For complex $x$, it is not true that $sin x$ is the imaginary part of $e^{Ix}$. That derivation is only valid for real $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Jan 22 at 21:43












  • $begingroup$
    How do I know if $e^{text{i}x}=cos(x)+text{i}sin(x)$ that $e^{text{-i}x}=cos(-x)+text{i}sin(-x)$?
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @RM777 Change $x$ into $-x$.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Jan 22 at 22:04














2












2








2





$begingroup$

It is not true that $sin x$ is the imaginary part of $e^{ix}$, if $x$ is complex nonreal.



If $x$ is real, then
$$
overline{ix}=bar{i}bar{x}=-ix
$$

Therefore, after noting that $overline{e^z}=e^{bar{z}}$ as you did,
$$
overline{cos x+isin x}=overline{e^{ix}}=e^{overline{ix}}=e^{-ix}=cos(-x)+isin(-x)
$$

Hence
$$
cos x-isin x=cos(-x)+isin(-x)
$$

and the equality is proved.



Note that when $x$ is complex the derivation is slightly different, mainly because
$$
overline{cos x+isin x}necos x-isin x
$$

in general.



On the other hand, the definition of $sin z$ for complex $z$ is
$$
sin z=frac{e^{iz}-e^{-iz}}{2i}
$$

and $sin(-z)=-sin z$ is obvious.





For completeness, if $z=a+ib$, then $e^{iz}=e^{-b+ia}=e^{-b}(cos a+isin a)$, so the real part of $e^{iz}$ is $e^{-b}cos a$, which is not $cos z$ in general, for the simple reason that $cos z$ is not itself real in general and you can observe that the real part is $cos z$ if and only if $b=0$, that is, if $z$ is real.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



It is not true that $sin x$ is the imaginary part of $e^{ix}$, if $x$ is complex nonreal.



If $x$ is real, then
$$
overline{ix}=bar{i}bar{x}=-ix
$$

Therefore, after noting that $overline{e^z}=e^{bar{z}}$ as you did,
$$
overline{cos x+isin x}=overline{e^{ix}}=e^{overline{ix}}=e^{-ix}=cos(-x)+isin(-x)
$$

Hence
$$
cos x-isin x=cos(-x)+isin(-x)
$$

and the equality is proved.



Note that when $x$ is complex the derivation is slightly different, mainly because
$$
overline{cos x+isin x}necos x-isin x
$$

in general.



On the other hand, the definition of $sin z$ for complex $z$ is
$$
sin z=frac{e^{iz}-e^{-iz}}{2i}
$$

and $sin(-z)=-sin z$ is obvious.





For completeness, if $z=a+ib$, then $e^{iz}=e^{-b+ia}=e^{-b}(cos a+isin a)$, so the real part of $e^{iz}$ is $e^{-b}cos a$, which is not $cos z$ in general, for the simple reason that $cos z$ is not itself real in general and you can observe that the real part is $cos z$ if and only if $b=0$, that is, if $z$ is real.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 22 at 21:49

























answered Jan 22 at 21:39









egregegreg

184k1486205




184k1486205












  • $begingroup$
    if $bar{i}= -i$, I only get $bar{i}bar{x}=-ibar{x}$, why does the bar of x vanish too?
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @RM777 For complex $x$, it is not true that $sin x$ is the imaginary part of $e^{Ix}$. That derivation is only valid for real $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Jan 22 at 21:43












  • $begingroup$
    How do I know if $e^{text{i}x}=cos(x)+text{i}sin(x)$ that $e^{text{-i}x}=cos(-x)+text{i}sin(-x)$?
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @RM777 Change $x$ into $-x$.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Jan 22 at 22:04


















  • $begingroup$
    if $bar{i}= -i$, I only get $bar{i}bar{x}=-ibar{x}$, why does the bar of x vanish too?
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:42






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @RM777 For complex $x$, it is not true that $sin x$ is the imaginary part of $e^{Ix}$. That derivation is only valid for real $x$.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Jan 22 at 21:43












  • $begingroup$
    How do I know if $e^{text{i}x}=cos(x)+text{i}sin(x)$ that $e^{text{-i}x}=cos(-x)+text{i}sin(-x)$?
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @RM777 Change $x$ into $-x$.
    $endgroup$
    – egreg
    Jan 22 at 22:04
















$begingroup$
if $bar{i}= -i$, I only get $bar{i}bar{x}=-ibar{x}$, why does the bar of x vanish too?
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 22 at 21:42




$begingroup$
if $bar{i}= -i$, I only get $bar{i}bar{x}=-ibar{x}$, why does the bar of x vanish too?
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 22 at 21:42




1




1




$begingroup$
@RM777 For complex $x$, it is not true that $sin x$ is the imaginary part of $e^{Ix}$. That derivation is only valid for real $x$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 22 at 21:43






$begingroup$
@RM777 For complex $x$, it is not true that $sin x$ is the imaginary part of $e^{Ix}$. That derivation is only valid for real $x$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 22 at 21:43














$begingroup$
How do I know if $e^{text{i}x}=cos(x)+text{i}sin(x)$ that $e^{text{-i}x}=cos(-x)+text{i}sin(-x)$?
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 22 at 21:59




$begingroup$
How do I know if $e^{text{i}x}=cos(x)+text{i}sin(x)$ that $e^{text{-i}x}=cos(-x)+text{i}sin(-x)$?
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 22 at 21:59




1




1




$begingroup$
@RM777 Change $x$ into $-x$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 22 at 22:04




$begingroup$
@RM777 Change $x$ into $-x$.
$endgroup$
– egreg
Jan 22 at 22:04











1












$begingroup$

Usually that first equation is a theorem (Euler's formula) rather than a definition. But if you start from there, notice:
$$
e^{-ix} = e^{i(-x)} = cos(-x) + i sin(-x)
$$

From the power series formula $e^z = sum_{k=0}^infty frac{z^k}{k!}$, we see that
$$
e^{-ix} = sum_{k=0}^infty frac{(-ix)^k}{k!} = sum_{k=0}^infty frac{(overline{ix})^k}{k!} = overline{e^{ix}}
$$

Therefore
$$
e^{-ix} = overline{e^{ix}} = overline{cos(x) + i sin(x)} = cos(x) - i sin(x)
$$

Now you just equate real and imaginary parts.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why is $e^{-ix}=overline{e^{ix}}$?
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $overline i = -i$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Jan 22 at 21:38








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @RM777 I've included a line of justification for that formula.
    $endgroup$
    – Matthew Leingang
    Jan 22 at 21:53










  • $begingroup$
    Last sentence was especially helpful I was still wondering how I get the Formula untill now. Thanks
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 22:05
















1












$begingroup$

Usually that first equation is a theorem (Euler's formula) rather than a definition. But if you start from there, notice:
$$
e^{-ix} = e^{i(-x)} = cos(-x) + i sin(-x)
$$

From the power series formula $e^z = sum_{k=0}^infty frac{z^k}{k!}$, we see that
$$
e^{-ix} = sum_{k=0}^infty frac{(-ix)^k}{k!} = sum_{k=0}^infty frac{(overline{ix})^k}{k!} = overline{e^{ix}}
$$

Therefore
$$
e^{-ix} = overline{e^{ix}} = overline{cos(x) + i sin(x)} = cos(x) - i sin(x)
$$

Now you just equate real and imaginary parts.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why is $e^{-ix}=overline{e^{ix}}$?
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $overline i = -i$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Jan 22 at 21:38








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @RM777 I've included a line of justification for that formula.
    $endgroup$
    – Matthew Leingang
    Jan 22 at 21:53










  • $begingroup$
    Last sentence was especially helpful I was still wondering how I get the Formula untill now. Thanks
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 22:05














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Usually that first equation is a theorem (Euler's formula) rather than a definition. But if you start from there, notice:
$$
e^{-ix} = e^{i(-x)} = cos(-x) + i sin(-x)
$$

From the power series formula $e^z = sum_{k=0}^infty frac{z^k}{k!}$, we see that
$$
e^{-ix} = sum_{k=0}^infty frac{(-ix)^k}{k!} = sum_{k=0}^infty frac{(overline{ix})^k}{k!} = overline{e^{ix}}
$$

Therefore
$$
e^{-ix} = overline{e^{ix}} = overline{cos(x) + i sin(x)} = cos(x) - i sin(x)
$$

Now you just equate real and imaginary parts.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Usually that first equation is a theorem (Euler's formula) rather than a definition. But if you start from there, notice:
$$
e^{-ix} = e^{i(-x)} = cos(-x) + i sin(-x)
$$

From the power series formula $e^z = sum_{k=0}^infty frac{z^k}{k!}$, we see that
$$
e^{-ix} = sum_{k=0}^infty frac{(-ix)^k}{k!} = sum_{k=0}^infty frac{(overline{ix})^k}{k!} = overline{e^{ix}}
$$

Therefore
$$
e^{-ix} = overline{e^{ix}} = overline{cos(x) + i sin(x)} = cos(x) - i sin(x)
$$

Now you just equate real and imaginary parts.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 22 at 21:52

























answered Jan 22 at 21:31









Matthew LeingangMatthew Leingang

16.8k12244




16.8k12244












  • $begingroup$
    Why is $e^{-ix}=overline{e^{ix}}$?
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $overline i = -i$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Jan 22 at 21:38








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @RM777 I've included a line of justification for that formula.
    $endgroup$
    – Matthew Leingang
    Jan 22 at 21:53










  • $begingroup$
    Last sentence was especially helpful I was still wondering how I get the Formula untill now. Thanks
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 22:05


















  • $begingroup$
    Why is $e^{-ix}=overline{e^{ix}}$?
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 21:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $overline i = -i$
    $endgroup$
    – J. W. Tanner
    Jan 22 at 21:38








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @RM777 I've included a line of justification for that formula.
    $endgroup$
    – Matthew Leingang
    Jan 22 at 21:53










  • $begingroup$
    Last sentence was especially helpful I was still wondering how I get the Formula untill now. Thanks
    $endgroup$
    – RM777
    Jan 22 at 22:05
















$begingroup$
Why is $e^{-ix}=overline{e^{ix}}$?
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 22 at 21:34




$begingroup$
Why is $e^{-ix}=overline{e^{ix}}$?
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 22 at 21:34




1




1




$begingroup$
$overline i = -i$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Jan 22 at 21:38






$begingroup$
$overline i = -i$
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Jan 22 at 21:38






1




1




$begingroup$
@RM777 I've included a line of justification for that formula.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Leingang
Jan 22 at 21:53




$begingroup$
@RM777 I've included a line of justification for that formula.
$endgroup$
– Matthew Leingang
Jan 22 at 21:53












$begingroup$
Last sentence was especially helpful I was still wondering how I get the Formula untill now. Thanks
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 22 at 22:05




$begingroup$
Last sentence was especially helpful I was still wondering how I get the Formula untill now. Thanks
$endgroup$
– RM777
Jan 22 at 22:05


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083719%2fprove-that-sin-x-sinx-and-cos-x-cosx-using-complex-conjugation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith