Sum in each loop when object might be nil
I'm trying to loop though a set of objects (people) and sum the values of a bunch of objects that belongs_to :person
, for example to get the cumulative years of different types of experience of a group of people
@people.each do |person|
finance_experience_sum += person.finance_experience.value
management_experience_sum += person.manangement_experience.value
clerical_experience_sum += person.clerical_experience.value
end
However, sometimes I get this error when a person doesn't have a certain type of experience. What's the easiest way to fix this in my each loop?
undefined method `value' for nil:NilClass
I understand why I'm getting the error, but not sure what is the easiest way to get past it in this scenario
ruby-on-rails
add a comment |
I'm trying to loop though a set of objects (people) and sum the values of a bunch of objects that belongs_to :person
, for example to get the cumulative years of different types of experience of a group of people
@people.each do |person|
finance_experience_sum += person.finance_experience.value
management_experience_sum += person.manangement_experience.value
clerical_experience_sum += person.clerical_experience.value
end
However, sometimes I get this error when a person doesn't have a certain type of experience. What's the easiest way to fix this in my each loop?
undefined method `value' for nil:NilClass
I understand why I'm getting the error, but not sure what is the easiest way to get past it in this scenario
ruby-on-rails
1
@phauwni have replied to your question please check.
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 1 at 5:25
Can you share your models and relations? I'm missing something.
– iGian
Jan 1 at 9:57
add a comment |
I'm trying to loop though a set of objects (people) and sum the values of a bunch of objects that belongs_to :person
, for example to get the cumulative years of different types of experience of a group of people
@people.each do |person|
finance_experience_sum += person.finance_experience.value
management_experience_sum += person.manangement_experience.value
clerical_experience_sum += person.clerical_experience.value
end
However, sometimes I get this error when a person doesn't have a certain type of experience. What's the easiest way to fix this in my each loop?
undefined method `value' for nil:NilClass
I understand why I'm getting the error, but not sure what is the easiest way to get past it in this scenario
ruby-on-rails
I'm trying to loop though a set of objects (people) and sum the values of a bunch of objects that belongs_to :person
, for example to get the cumulative years of different types of experience of a group of people
@people.each do |person|
finance_experience_sum += person.finance_experience.value
management_experience_sum += person.manangement_experience.value
clerical_experience_sum += person.clerical_experience.value
end
However, sometimes I get this error when a person doesn't have a certain type of experience. What's the easiest way to fix this in my each loop?
undefined method `value' for nil:NilClass
I understand why I'm getting the error, but not sure what is the easiest way to get past it in this scenario
ruby-on-rails
ruby-on-rails
edited Jan 1 at 9:46
iGian
4,4692625
4,4692625
asked Jan 1 at 2:11
phauwnphauwn
87111
87111
1
@phauwni have replied to your question please check.
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 1 at 5:25
Can you share your models and relations? I'm missing something.
– iGian
Jan 1 at 9:57
add a comment |
1
@phauwni have replied to your question please check.
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 1 at 5:25
Can you share your models and relations? I'm missing something.
– iGian
Jan 1 at 9:57
1
1
@phauwni have replied to your question please check.
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 1 at 5:25
@phauwni have replied to your question please check.
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 1 at 5:25
Can you share your models and relations? I'm missing something.
– iGian
Jan 1 at 9:57
Can you share your models and relations? I'm missing something.
– iGian
Jan 1 at 9:57
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You can do simply like these without using the each loop
finance_experience_sum = People.includes(:finance_experience).sum(:value)
management_experience_sum = People.includes(:manangement_experience).sum(:value)
clerical_experience_sum = People.includes(:clerical_experience).sum(:value)
Always used ruby on rails best practices and predefined methods of ruby.
1
upvoted for reliable answer but need@people
in place ofPeople
– ray
Jan 2 at 11:07
need change in your profile link(experience section) for ajaydhande.github.io forcarrier
(need to be career)
– ray
Jan 2 at 11:09
Okay thanks for your suggestions
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 2 at 11:11
@ray i will do that
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 2 at 11:11
Perfect, thank you. This is the best practice lesson I needed.
– phauwn
Jan 2 at 21:43
add a comment |
You should follow best practices like include nested records using includes
that will avoid N+1 query problem.
If you want to do it anyway then try following:
finance_experience_sum += person.try(:finance_experience).try(:value).to_i #or to_f if float value
management_experience_sum += person.try(:manangement_experience).try(:value).to_i
clerical_experience_sum += person.try(:clerical_experience).try(:value).to_i
If you are using ruby 2.4 or later then use:
finance_experience_sum += person&.finance_experience&.value&.to_i
management_experience_sum += person&.manangement_experience&.value&.to_i
clerical_experience_sum += person&.clerical_experience&.value&.to_i
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53992638%2fsum-in-each-loop-when-object-might-be-nil%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can do simply like these without using the each loop
finance_experience_sum = People.includes(:finance_experience).sum(:value)
management_experience_sum = People.includes(:manangement_experience).sum(:value)
clerical_experience_sum = People.includes(:clerical_experience).sum(:value)
Always used ruby on rails best practices and predefined methods of ruby.
1
upvoted for reliable answer but need@people
in place ofPeople
– ray
Jan 2 at 11:07
need change in your profile link(experience section) for ajaydhande.github.io forcarrier
(need to be career)
– ray
Jan 2 at 11:09
Okay thanks for your suggestions
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 2 at 11:11
@ray i will do that
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 2 at 11:11
Perfect, thank you. This is the best practice lesson I needed.
– phauwn
Jan 2 at 21:43
add a comment |
You can do simply like these without using the each loop
finance_experience_sum = People.includes(:finance_experience).sum(:value)
management_experience_sum = People.includes(:manangement_experience).sum(:value)
clerical_experience_sum = People.includes(:clerical_experience).sum(:value)
Always used ruby on rails best practices and predefined methods of ruby.
1
upvoted for reliable answer but need@people
in place ofPeople
– ray
Jan 2 at 11:07
need change in your profile link(experience section) for ajaydhande.github.io forcarrier
(need to be career)
– ray
Jan 2 at 11:09
Okay thanks for your suggestions
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 2 at 11:11
@ray i will do that
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 2 at 11:11
Perfect, thank you. This is the best practice lesson I needed.
– phauwn
Jan 2 at 21:43
add a comment |
You can do simply like these without using the each loop
finance_experience_sum = People.includes(:finance_experience).sum(:value)
management_experience_sum = People.includes(:manangement_experience).sum(:value)
clerical_experience_sum = People.includes(:clerical_experience).sum(:value)
Always used ruby on rails best practices and predefined methods of ruby.
You can do simply like these without using the each loop
finance_experience_sum = People.includes(:finance_experience).sum(:value)
management_experience_sum = People.includes(:manangement_experience).sum(:value)
clerical_experience_sum = People.includes(:clerical_experience).sum(:value)
Always used ruby on rails best practices and predefined methods of ruby.
answered Jan 1 at 5:24
Cryptex TechnologiesCryptex Technologies
800213
800213
1
upvoted for reliable answer but need@people
in place ofPeople
– ray
Jan 2 at 11:07
need change in your profile link(experience section) for ajaydhande.github.io forcarrier
(need to be career)
– ray
Jan 2 at 11:09
Okay thanks for your suggestions
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 2 at 11:11
@ray i will do that
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 2 at 11:11
Perfect, thank you. This is the best practice lesson I needed.
– phauwn
Jan 2 at 21:43
add a comment |
1
upvoted for reliable answer but need@people
in place ofPeople
– ray
Jan 2 at 11:07
need change in your profile link(experience section) for ajaydhande.github.io forcarrier
(need to be career)
– ray
Jan 2 at 11:09
Okay thanks for your suggestions
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 2 at 11:11
@ray i will do that
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 2 at 11:11
Perfect, thank you. This is the best practice lesson I needed.
– phauwn
Jan 2 at 21:43
1
1
upvoted for reliable answer but need
@people
in place of People
– ray
Jan 2 at 11:07
upvoted for reliable answer but need
@people
in place of People
– ray
Jan 2 at 11:07
need change in your profile link(experience section) for ajaydhande.github.io for
carrier
(need to be career)– ray
Jan 2 at 11:09
need change in your profile link(experience section) for ajaydhande.github.io for
carrier
(need to be career)– ray
Jan 2 at 11:09
Okay thanks for your suggestions
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 2 at 11:11
Okay thanks for your suggestions
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 2 at 11:11
@ray i will do that
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 2 at 11:11
@ray i will do that
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 2 at 11:11
Perfect, thank you. This is the best practice lesson I needed.
– phauwn
Jan 2 at 21:43
Perfect, thank you. This is the best practice lesson I needed.
– phauwn
Jan 2 at 21:43
add a comment |
You should follow best practices like include nested records using includes
that will avoid N+1 query problem.
If you want to do it anyway then try following:
finance_experience_sum += person.try(:finance_experience).try(:value).to_i #or to_f if float value
management_experience_sum += person.try(:manangement_experience).try(:value).to_i
clerical_experience_sum += person.try(:clerical_experience).try(:value).to_i
If you are using ruby 2.4 or later then use:
finance_experience_sum += person&.finance_experience&.value&.to_i
management_experience_sum += person&.manangement_experience&.value&.to_i
clerical_experience_sum += person&.clerical_experience&.value&.to_i
add a comment |
You should follow best practices like include nested records using includes
that will avoid N+1 query problem.
If you want to do it anyway then try following:
finance_experience_sum += person.try(:finance_experience).try(:value).to_i #or to_f if float value
management_experience_sum += person.try(:manangement_experience).try(:value).to_i
clerical_experience_sum += person.try(:clerical_experience).try(:value).to_i
If you are using ruby 2.4 or later then use:
finance_experience_sum += person&.finance_experience&.value&.to_i
management_experience_sum += person&.manangement_experience&.value&.to_i
clerical_experience_sum += person&.clerical_experience&.value&.to_i
add a comment |
You should follow best practices like include nested records using includes
that will avoid N+1 query problem.
If you want to do it anyway then try following:
finance_experience_sum += person.try(:finance_experience).try(:value).to_i #or to_f if float value
management_experience_sum += person.try(:manangement_experience).try(:value).to_i
clerical_experience_sum += person.try(:clerical_experience).try(:value).to_i
If you are using ruby 2.4 or later then use:
finance_experience_sum += person&.finance_experience&.value&.to_i
management_experience_sum += person&.manangement_experience&.value&.to_i
clerical_experience_sum += person&.clerical_experience&.value&.to_i
You should follow best practices like include nested records using includes
that will avoid N+1 query problem.
If you want to do it anyway then try following:
finance_experience_sum += person.try(:finance_experience).try(:value).to_i #or to_f if float value
management_experience_sum += person.try(:manangement_experience).try(:value).to_i
clerical_experience_sum += person.try(:clerical_experience).try(:value).to_i
If you are using ruby 2.4 or later then use:
finance_experience_sum += person&.finance_experience&.value&.to_i
management_experience_sum += person&.manangement_experience&.value&.to_i
clerical_experience_sum += person&.clerical_experience&.value&.to_i
answered Jan 1 at 10:11
G.BG.B
2,90821539
2,90821539
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53992638%2fsum-in-each-loop-when-object-might-be-nil%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
@phauwni have replied to your question please check.
– Cryptex Technologies
Jan 1 at 5:25
Can you share your models and relations? I'm missing something.
– iGian
Jan 1 at 9:57