Why is the circulation the line integral of the vector field over closed path bounding the region?
$begingroup$
The circulation of vector field around some region is the line integral of the field over the closed curve surrounding it and that integral is integrating the field dotted with the vector of the derivative of the vector valued function that represents the curve (the parametrization of the curve) with respect to the parameter(t) right??
But since the parametrization of the curve determines the value of the derivative of the vector valued function at each point.
Then the parametrization of the curve should change the value of the circulation for the same curve??
calculus derivatives vector-fields
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The circulation of vector field around some region is the line integral of the field over the closed curve surrounding it and that integral is integrating the field dotted with the vector of the derivative of the vector valued function that represents the curve (the parametrization of the curve) with respect to the parameter(t) right??
But since the parametrization of the curve determines the value of the derivative of the vector valued function at each point.
Then the parametrization of the curve should change the value of the circulation for the same curve??
calculus derivatives vector-fields
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The circulation of vector field around some region is the line integral of the field over the closed curve surrounding it and that integral is integrating the field dotted with the vector of the derivative of the vector valued function that represents the curve (the parametrization of the curve) with respect to the parameter(t) right??
But since the parametrization of the curve determines the value of the derivative of the vector valued function at each point.
Then the parametrization of the curve should change the value of the circulation for the same curve??
calculus derivatives vector-fields
$endgroup$
The circulation of vector field around some region is the line integral of the field over the closed curve surrounding it and that integral is integrating the field dotted with the vector of the derivative of the vector valued function that represents the curve (the parametrization of the curve) with respect to the parameter(t) right??
But since the parametrization of the curve determines the value of the derivative of the vector valued function at each point.
Then the parametrization of the curve should change the value of the circulation for the same curve??
calculus derivatives vector-fields
calculus derivatives vector-fields
asked Jan 26 at 18:11


gogo okagogo oka
11
11
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, it actually does not change the circulation. The circulation can only change its sign if you reverse the orientation of your parametrization. If you take two different parametrizations $gamma_1(t)$ and $gamma_2(s)$ linked by some smooth change $s=s(t)$ preserving orientation, you have
$$
intlimits_{t_1}^{t_2}F(gamma_1(t))cdotgamma_1'(t),dt=intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_1(t(s))cdotgamma_1'(t(s))frac{dt}{ds},ds
$$
$$
=intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_2(s))cdotgamma_2'(s),ds
$$
You can easily check that if the change of parameter changes orientation you get a minus sign.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088548%2fwhy-is-the-circulation-the-line-integral-of-the-vector-field-over-closed-path-bo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, it actually does not change the circulation. The circulation can only change its sign if you reverse the orientation of your parametrization. If you take two different parametrizations $gamma_1(t)$ and $gamma_2(s)$ linked by some smooth change $s=s(t)$ preserving orientation, you have
$$
intlimits_{t_1}^{t_2}F(gamma_1(t))cdotgamma_1'(t),dt=intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_1(t(s))cdotgamma_1'(t(s))frac{dt}{ds},ds
$$
$$
=intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_2(s))cdotgamma_2'(s),ds
$$
You can easily check that if the change of parameter changes orientation you get a minus sign.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, it actually does not change the circulation. The circulation can only change its sign if you reverse the orientation of your parametrization. If you take two different parametrizations $gamma_1(t)$ and $gamma_2(s)$ linked by some smooth change $s=s(t)$ preserving orientation, you have
$$
intlimits_{t_1}^{t_2}F(gamma_1(t))cdotgamma_1'(t),dt=intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_1(t(s))cdotgamma_1'(t(s))frac{dt}{ds},ds
$$
$$
=intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_2(s))cdotgamma_2'(s),ds
$$
You can easily check that if the change of parameter changes orientation you get a minus sign.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, it actually does not change the circulation. The circulation can only change its sign if you reverse the orientation of your parametrization. If you take two different parametrizations $gamma_1(t)$ and $gamma_2(s)$ linked by some smooth change $s=s(t)$ preserving orientation, you have
$$
intlimits_{t_1}^{t_2}F(gamma_1(t))cdotgamma_1'(t),dt=intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_1(t(s))cdotgamma_1'(t(s))frac{dt}{ds},ds
$$
$$
=intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_2(s))cdotgamma_2'(s),ds
$$
You can easily check that if the change of parameter changes orientation you get a minus sign.
$endgroup$
No, it actually does not change the circulation. The circulation can only change its sign if you reverse the orientation of your parametrization. If you take two different parametrizations $gamma_1(t)$ and $gamma_2(s)$ linked by some smooth change $s=s(t)$ preserving orientation, you have
$$
intlimits_{t_1}^{t_2}F(gamma_1(t))cdotgamma_1'(t),dt=intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_1(t(s))cdotgamma_1'(t(s))frac{dt}{ds},ds
$$
$$
=intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_2(s))cdotgamma_2'(s),ds
$$
You can easily check that if the change of parameter changes orientation you get a minus sign.
answered Jan 26 at 18:27


GReyesGReyes
2,23315
2,23315
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088548%2fwhy-is-the-circulation-the-line-integral-of-the-vector-field-over-closed-path-bo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown