Why is the circulation the line integral of the vector field over closed path bounding the region?












0












$begingroup$


The circulation of vector field around some region is the line integral of the field over the closed curve surrounding it and that integral is integrating the field dotted with the vector of the derivative of the vector valued function that represents the curve (the parametrization of the curve) with respect to the parameter(t) right??
But since the parametrization of the curve determines the value of the derivative of the vector valued function at each point.
Then the parametrization of the curve should change the value of the circulation for the same curve??










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    The circulation of vector field around some region is the line integral of the field over the closed curve surrounding it and that integral is integrating the field dotted with the vector of the derivative of the vector valued function that represents the curve (the parametrization of the curve) with respect to the parameter(t) right??
    But since the parametrization of the curve determines the value of the derivative of the vector valued function at each point.
    Then the parametrization of the curve should change the value of the circulation for the same curve??










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      The circulation of vector field around some region is the line integral of the field over the closed curve surrounding it and that integral is integrating the field dotted with the vector of the derivative of the vector valued function that represents the curve (the parametrization of the curve) with respect to the parameter(t) right??
      But since the parametrization of the curve determines the value of the derivative of the vector valued function at each point.
      Then the parametrization of the curve should change the value of the circulation for the same curve??










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      The circulation of vector field around some region is the line integral of the field over the closed curve surrounding it and that integral is integrating the field dotted with the vector of the derivative of the vector valued function that represents the curve (the parametrization of the curve) with respect to the parameter(t) right??
      But since the parametrization of the curve determines the value of the derivative of the vector valued function at each point.
      Then the parametrization of the curve should change the value of the circulation for the same curve??







      calculus derivatives vector-fields






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 26 at 18:11









      gogo okagogo oka

      11




      11






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          No, it actually does not change the circulation. The circulation can only change its sign if you reverse the orientation of your parametrization. If you take two different parametrizations $gamma_1(t)$ and $gamma_2(s)$ linked by some smooth change $s=s(t)$ preserving orientation, you have
          $$
          intlimits_{t_1}^{t_2}F(gamma_1(t))cdotgamma_1'(t),dt=intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_1(t(s))cdotgamma_1'(t(s))frac{dt}{ds},ds
          $$

          $$
          =intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_2(s))cdotgamma_2'(s),ds
          $$

          You can easily check that if the change of parameter changes orientation you get a minus sign.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088548%2fwhy-is-the-circulation-the-line-integral-of-the-vector-field-over-closed-path-bo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            No, it actually does not change the circulation. The circulation can only change its sign if you reverse the orientation of your parametrization. If you take two different parametrizations $gamma_1(t)$ and $gamma_2(s)$ linked by some smooth change $s=s(t)$ preserving orientation, you have
            $$
            intlimits_{t_1}^{t_2}F(gamma_1(t))cdotgamma_1'(t),dt=intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_1(t(s))cdotgamma_1'(t(s))frac{dt}{ds},ds
            $$

            $$
            =intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_2(s))cdotgamma_2'(s),ds
            $$

            You can easily check that if the change of parameter changes orientation you get a minus sign.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              No, it actually does not change the circulation. The circulation can only change its sign if you reverse the orientation of your parametrization. If you take two different parametrizations $gamma_1(t)$ and $gamma_2(s)$ linked by some smooth change $s=s(t)$ preserving orientation, you have
              $$
              intlimits_{t_1}^{t_2}F(gamma_1(t))cdotgamma_1'(t),dt=intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_1(t(s))cdotgamma_1'(t(s))frac{dt}{ds},ds
              $$

              $$
              =intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_2(s))cdotgamma_2'(s),ds
              $$

              You can easily check that if the change of parameter changes orientation you get a minus sign.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                No, it actually does not change the circulation. The circulation can only change its sign if you reverse the orientation of your parametrization. If you take two different parametrizations $gamma_1(t)$ and $gamma_2(s)$ linked by some smooth change $s=s(t)$ preserving orientation, you have
                $$
                intlimits_{t_1}^{t_2}F(gamma_1(t))cdotgamma_1'(t),dt=intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_1(t(s))cdotgamma_1'(t(s))frac{dt}{ds},ds
                $$

                $$
                =intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_2(s))cdotgamma_2'(s),ds
                $$

                You can easily check that if the change of parameter changes orientation you get a minus sign.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                No, it actually does not change the circulation. The circulation can only change its sign if you reverse the orientation of your parametrization. If you take two different parametrizations $gamma_1(t)$ and $gamma_2(s)$ linked by some smooth change $s=s(t)$ preserving orientation, you have
                $$
                intlimits_{t_1}^{t_2}F(gamma_1(t))cdotgamma_1'(t),dt=intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_1(t(s))cdotgamma_1'(t(s))frac{dt}{ds},ds
                $$

                $$
                =intlimits_{s_1}^{s_2}F(gamma_2(s))cdotgamma_2'(s),ds
                $$

                You can easily check that if the change of parameter changes orientation you get a minus sign.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 26 at 18:27









                GReyesGReyes

                2,23315




                2,23315






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3088548%2fwhy-is-the-circulation-the-line-integral-of-the-vector-field-over-closed-path-bo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith