For all integers $w, x, y, z$ with $wneq{y}$ and $wz-xyneq0$, prove that there exists a unique rational...
$begingroup$
For all integers $w, x, y, z$ with $wneq{y}$ and $wz-xyneq0$, prove that there exists a unique rational number $r$ such that $(wr+x)div(yr+z)=1$
How do I prove uniqueness? I know to show that there exists a number all I need to do is use an example.
proof-writing rational-numbers
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For all integers $w, x, y, z$ with $wneq{y}$ and $wz-xyneq0$, prove that there exists a unique rational number $r$ such that $(wr+x)div(yr+z)=1$
How do I prove uniqueness? I know to show that there exists a number all I need to do is use an example.
proof-writing rational-numbers
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Assume $(wr + x)/(yr+z)=(ws+x)/(ys+z)$ and then show $r=s$ under the assumptions.
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Jan 29 at 19:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For all integers $w, x, y, z$ with $wneq{y}$ and $wz-xyneq0$, prove that there exists a unique rational number $r$ such that $(wr+x)div(yr+z)=1$
How do I prove uniqueness? I know to show that there exists a number all I need to do is use an example.
proof-writing rational-numbers
$endgroup$
For all integers $w, x, y, z$ with $wneq{y}$ and $wz-xyneq0$, prove that there exists a unique rational number $r$ such that $(wr+x)div(yr+z)=1$
How do I prove uniqueness? I know to show that there exists a number all I need to do is use an example.
proof-writing rational-numbers
proof-writing rational-numbers
asked Jan 29 at 18:57
macymacy
526
526
$begingroup$
Assume $(wr + x)/(yr+z)=(ws+x)/(ys+z)$ and then show $r=s$ under the assumptions.
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Jan 29 at 19:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume $(wr + x)/(yr+z)=(ws+x)/(ys+z)$ and then show $r=s$ under the assumptions.
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Jan 29 at 19:06
$begingroup$
Assume $(wr + x)/(yr+z)=(ws+x)/(ys+z)$ and then show $r=s$ under the assumptions.
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Jan 29 at 19:06
$begingroup$
Assume $(wr + x)/(yr+z)=(ws+x)/(ys+z)$ and then show $r=s$ under the assumptions.
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Jan 29 at 19:06
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
One way to prove uniqueness, and is a way that can be used here, is to find a closed expression for the value you are searching.
In this case by isolating r (and being careful with divisions by 0, i.e. justifying that what you are dividing is not 0) you will get a closed expression for r. Meaning that the solution is unique (it can only be that exact value).
Hope I was useful.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To prove uniqueness, assume $$(wr + x)/(yr+z)=(ws+x)/(ys+z).$$ Cross-multiplying, $$(wr+x)(ys+z)=(ws+x)(yr+z),$$ so $$wrys+wrz+xys+xz=wsyr+wsz+xyr+xz,$$ so $$wrz+xys=wsz+xyr,$$ so $$wrz-wsz=xyr-xys,$$ i.e., $$(wz-xy)r=(wz-xy)s.$$ Under the assumption $wz-xy ne 0$, this means $r=s$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3092577%2ffor-all-integers-w-x-y-z-with-w-neqy-and-wz-xy-neq0-prove-that-there%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
One way to prove uniqueness, and is a way that can be used here, is to find a closed expression for the value you are searching.
In this case by isolating r (and being careful with divisions by 0, i.e. justifying that what you are dividing is not 0) you will get a closed expression for r. Meaning that the solution is unique (it can only be that exact value).
Hope I was useful.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One way to prove uniqueness, and is a way that can be used here, is to find a closed expression for the value you are searching.
In this case by isolating r (and being careful with divisions by 0, i.e. justifying that what you are dividing is not 0) you will get a closed expression for r. Meaning that the solution is unique (it can only be that exact value).
Hope I was useful.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
One way to prove uniqueness, and is a way that can be used here, is to find a closed expression for the value you are searching.
In this case by isolating r (and being careful with divisions by 0, i.e. justifying that what you are dividing is not 0) you will get a closed expression for r. Meaning that the solution is unique (it can only be that exact value).
Hope I was useful.
$endgroup$
One way to prove uniqueness, and is a way that can be used here, is to find a closed expression for the value you are searching.
In this case by isolating r (and being careful with divisions by 0, i.e. justifying that what you are dividing is not 0) you will get a closed expression for r. Meaning that the solution is unique (it can only be that exact value).
Hope I was useful.
answered Jan 29 at 19:06
maxbpmaxbp
1467
1467
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To prove uniqueness, assume $$(wr + x)/(yr+z)=(ws+x)/(ys+z).$$ Cross-multiplying, $$(wr+x)(ys+z)=(ws+x)(yr+z),$$ so $$wrys+wrz+xys+xz=wsyr+wsz+xyr+xz,$$ so $$wrz+xys=wsz+xyr,$$ so $$wrz-wsz=xyr-xys,$$ i.e., $$(wz-xy)r=(wz-xy)s.$$ Under the assumption $wz-xy ne 0$, this means $r=s$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To prove uniqueness, assume $$(wr + x)/(yr+z)=(ws+x)/(ys+z).$$ Cross-multiplying, $$(wr+x)(ys+z)=(ws+x)(yr+z),$$ so $$wrys+wrz+xys+xz=wsyr+wsz+xyr+xz,$$ so $$wrz+xys=wsz+xyr,$$ so $$wrz-wsz=xyr-xys,$$ i.e., $$(wz-xy)r=(wz-xy)s.$$ Under the assumption $wz-xy ne 0$, this means $r=s$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To prove uniqueness, assume $$(wr + x)/(yr+z)=(ws+x)/(ys+z).$$ Cross-multiplying, $$(wr+x)(ys+z)=(ws+x)(yr+z),$$ so $$wrys+wrz+xys+xz=wsyr+wsz+xyr+xz,$$ so $$wrz+xys=wsz+xyr,$$ so $$wrz-wsz=xyr-xys,$$ i.e., $$(wz-xy)r=(wz-xy)s.$$ Under the assumption $wz-xy ne 0$, this means $r=s$.
$endgroup$
To prove uniqueness, assume $$(wr + x)/(yr+z)=(ws+x)/(ys+z).$$ Cross-multiplying, $$(wr+x)(ys+z)=(ws+x)(yr+z),$$ so $$wrys+wrz+xys+xz=wsyr+wsz+xyr+xz,$$ so $$wrz+xys=wsz+xyr,$$ so $$wrz-wsz=xyr-xys,$$ i.e., $$(wz-xy)r=(wz-xy)s.$$ Under the assumption $wz-xy ne 0$, this means $r=s$.
answered Jan 29 at 19:13
J. W. TannerJ. W. Tanner
4,2361320
4,2361320
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3092577%2ffor-all-integers-w-x-y-z-with-w-neqy-and-wz-xy-neq0-prove-that-there%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Assume $(wr + x)/(yr+z)=(ws+x)/(ys+z)$ and then show $r=s$ under the assumptions.
$endgroup$
– J. W. Tanner
Jan 29 at 19:06