A Problem of Lagrange Multiplier












2














The problem is find the minimum value of $x^2+y^2+z^2$ subject to the condition $x+y+z=1$ and $xyz+1=0$.





Let $f(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2$, then after some calculation I got this two equations:





$4+6lambda_1+lambda_2(1-f)=0 $ and $2f+lambda_1-3lambda_2=0$



Now I can solve these two equations to find $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ in terms for $f$. Now I cant understand how to proceed.
Please help with explanation.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • You have two equations in two unknowns, $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$. Solve!
    – David G. Stork
    Nov 22 '18 at 7:18










  • Why is $f$ in your equations?
    – smcc
    Nov 22 '18 at 7:22










  • can anybody come with a complete solution...i solved for that two unknown multiplier....then what?
    – nonei
    Nov 22 '18 at 7:28
















2














The problem is find the minimum value of $x^2+y^2+z^2$ subject to the condition $x+y+z=1$ and $xyz+1=0$.





Let $f(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2$, then after some calculation I got this two equations:





$4+6lambda_1+lambda_2(1-f)=0 $ and $2f+lambda_1-3lambda_2=0$



Now I can solve these two equations to find $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ in terms for $f$. Now I cant understand how to proceed.
Please help with explanation.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • You have two equations in two unknowns, $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$. Solve!
    – David G. Stork
    Nov 22 '18 at 7:18










  • Why is $f$ in your equations?
    – smcc
    Nov 22 '18 at 7:22










  • can anybody come with a complete solution...i solved for that two unknown multiplier....then what?
    – nonei
    Nov 22 '18 at 7:28














2












2








2







The problem is find the minimum value of $x^2+y^2+z^2$ subject to the condition $x+y+z=1$ and $xyz+1=0$.





Let $f(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2$, then after some calculation I got this two equations:





$4+6lambda_1+lambda_2(1-f)=0 $ and $2f+lambda_1-3lambda_2=0$



Now I can solve these two equations to find $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ in terms for $f$. Now I cant understand how to proceed.
Please help with explanation.










share|cite|improve this question















The problem is find the minimum value of $x^2+y^2+z^2$ subject to the condition $x+y+z=1$ and $xyz+1=0$.





Let $f(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2+z^2$, then after some calculation I got this two equations:





$4+6lambda_1+lambda_2(1-f)=0 $ and $2f+lambda_1-3lambda_2=0$



Now I can solve these two equations to find $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ in terms for $f$. Now I cant understand how to proceed.
Please help with explanation.







multivariable-calculus lagrange-multiplier maxima-minima






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 22 '18 at 7:11









Jean-Claude Arbaut

14.7k63464




14.7k63464










asked Nov 22 '18 at 7:10









noneinonei

111




111












  • You have two equations in two unknowns, $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$. Solve!
    – David G. Stork
    Nov 22 '18 at 7:18










  • Why is $f$ in your equations?
    – smcc
    Nov 22 '18 at 7:22










  • can anybody come with a complete solution...i solved for that two unknown multiplier....then what?
    – nonei
    Nov 22 '18 at 7:28


















  • You have two equations in two unknowns, $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$. Solve!
    – David G. Stork
    Nov 22 '18 at 7:18










  • Why is $f$ in your equations?
    – smcc
    Nov 22 '18 at 7:22










  • can anybody come with a complete solution...i solved for that two unknown multiplier....then what?
    – nonei
    Nov 22 '18 at 7:28
















You have two equations in two unknowns, $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$. Solve!
– David G. Stork
Nov 22 '18 at 7:18




You have two equations in two unknowns, $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$. Solve!
– David G. Stork
Nov 22 '18 at 7:18












Why is $f$ in your equations?
– smcc
Nov 22 '18 at 7:22




Why is $f$ in your equations?
– smcc
Nov 22 '18 at 7:22












can anybody come with a complete solution...i solved for that two unknown multiplier....then what?
– nonei
Nov 22 '18 at 7:28




can anybody come with a complete solution...i solved for that two unknown multiplier....then what?
– nonei
Nov 22 '18 at 7:28










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














Surely:$$2x=lambda_1+lambda_2yz=lambda_1-{lambda_2over x}$$or equivalently$$2x^2=lambda_1 x-lambda_2\2y^2=lambda_1 y-lambda_2\2z^2=lambda_1 z-lambda_2$$the equation $2u^2-lambda_1 u+lambda_2=0$ has two roots as following$$u_1={lambda_1+ sqrt{lambda_1^2-4lambda_2}over 4}\u={lambda_1- sqrt{lambda_1^2-4lambda_2}over 4}$$Hence of symmetry we consider 2 cases:
case 1: $x=y=z$
this case is impossible since $x+y+z=1$ and $xyz=-1$ don't hold simultaneously
case 2 $x=yne z$
in this case $$2x+z=1\x^2z=-1$$The only answer is $x=y=1,z=-1$ with $lambda_1=0\lambda_2=-2$ and because of symmetry, all the answers are:$$(1,1,-1)\(1,-1,1)\(-1,1,1)$$






share|cite|improve this answer





























    1














    I don't see where those two equations come from. Applying the method of Lagrange multipliers to your problem, you should have obtained a system of $5$ equations and $5$ unknowns:$$left{begin{array}{l}2x=lambda_1+lambda_2yz\2y=lambda_1+lambda_2xz\2z=lambda_1+lambda_2xy\x+y+z=1\xyz=-1.end{array}right.$$There are only $3$ ponts in $mathbb{R}^3$ which are solution of this system: $(-1,1,1)$, $(1,-1,1)$, and $(1,1,-1)$ (and, in each case, $lambda_1=0$ and $lambda_2=-2$).






    share|cite|improve this answer























      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008831%2fa-problem-of-lagrange-multiplier%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      Surely:$$2x=lambda_1+lambda_2yz=lambda_1-{lambda_2over x}$$or equivalently$$2x^2=lambda_1 x-lambda_2\2y^2=lambda_1 y-lambda_2\2z^2=lambda_1 z-lambda_2$$the equation $2u^2-lambda_1 u+lambda_2=0$ has two roots as following$$u_1={lambda_1+ sqrt{lambda_1^2-4lambda_2}over 4}\u={lambda_1- sqrt{lambda_1^2-4lambda_2}over 4}$$Hence of symmetry we consider 2 cases:
      case 1: $x=y=z$
      this case is impossible since $x+y+z=1$ and $xyz=-1$ don't hold simultaneously
      case 2 $x=yne z$
      in this case $$2x+z=1\x^2z=-1$$The only answer is $x=y=1,z=-1$ with $lambda_1=0\lambda_2=-2$ and because of symmetry, all the answers are:$$(1,1,-1)\(1,-1,1)\(-1,1,1)$$






      share|cite|improve this answer


























        1














        Surely:$$2x=lambda_1+lambda_2yz=lambda_1-{lambda_2over x}$$or equivalently$$2x^2=lambda_1 x-lambda_2\2y^2=lambda_1 y-lambda_2\2z^2=lambda_1 z-lambda_2$$the equation $2u^2-lambda_1 u+lambda_2=0$ has two roots as following$$u_1={lambda_1+ sqrt{lambda_1^2-4lambda_2}over 4}\u={lambda_1- sqrt{lambda_1^2-4lambda_2}over 4}$$Hence of symmetry we consider 2 cases:
        case 1: $x=y=z$
        this case is impossible since $x+y+z=1$ and $xyz=-1$ don't hold simultaneously
        case 2 $x=yne z$
        in this case $$2x+z=1\x^2z=-1$$The only answer is $x=y=1,z=-1$ with $lambda_1=0\lambda_2=-2$ and because of symmetry, all the answers are:$$(1,1,-1)\(1,-1,1)\(-1,1,1)$$






        share|cite|improve this answer
























          1












          1








          1






          Surely:$$2x=lambda_1+lambda_2yz=lambda_1-{lambda_2over x}$$or equivalently$$2x^2=lambda_1 x-lambda_2\2y^2=lambda_1 y-lambda_2\2z^2=lambda_1 z-lambda_2$$the equation $2u^2-lambda_1 u+lambda_2=0$ has two roots as following$$u_1={lambda_1+ sqrt{lambda_1^2-4lambda_2}over 4}\u={lambda_1- sqrt{lambda_1^2-4lambda_2}over 4}$$Hence of symmetry we consider 2 cases:
          case 1: $x=y=z$
          this case is impossible since $x+y+z=1$ and $xyz=-1$ don't hold simultaneously
          case 2 $x=yne z$
          in this case $$2x+z=1\x^2z=-1$$The only answer is $x=y=1,z=-1$ with $lambda_1=0\lambda_2=-2$ and because of symmetry, all the answers are:$$(1,1,-1)\(1,-1,1)\(-1,1,1)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Surely:$$2x=lambda_1+lambda_2yz=lambda_1-{lambda_2over x}$$or equivalently$$2x^2=lambda_1 x-lambda_2\2y^2=lambda_1 y-lambda_2\2z^2=lambda_1 z-lambda_2$$the equation $2u^2-lambda_1 u+lambda_2=0$ has two roots as following$$u_1={lambda_1+ sqrt{lambda_1^2-4lambda_2}over 4}\u={lambda_1- sqrt{lambda_1^2-4lambda_2}over 4}$$Hence of symmetry we consider 2 cases:
          case 1: $x=y=z$
          this case is impossible since $x+y+z=1$ and $xyz=-1$ don't hold simultaneously
          case 2 $x=yne z$
          in this case $$2x+z=1\x^2z=-1$$The only answer is $x=y=1,z=-1$ with $lambda_1=0\lambda_2=-2$ and because of symmetry, all the answers are:$$(1,1,-1)\(1,-1,1)\(-1,1,1)$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 22 '18 at 7:35









          Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz

          14.3k3937




          14.3k3937























              1














              I don't see where those two equations come from. Applying the method of Lagrange multipliers to your problem, you should have obtained a system of $5$ equations and $5$ unknowns:$$left{begin{array}{l}2x=lambda_1+lambda_2yz\2y=lambda_1+lambda_2xz\2z=lambda_1+lambda_2xy\x+y+z=1\xyz=-1.end{array}right.$$There are only $3$ ponts in $mathbb{R}^3$ which are solution of this system: $(-1,1,1)$, $(1,-1,1)$, and $(1,1,-1)$ (and, in each case, $lambda_1=0$ and $lambda_2=-2$).






              share|cite|improve this answer




























                1














                I don't see where those two equations come from. Applying the method of Lagrange multipliers to your problem, you should have obtained a system of $5$ equations and $5$ unknowns:$$left{begin{array}{l}2x=lambda_1+lambda_2yz\2y=lambda_1+lambda_2xz\2z=lambda_1+lambda_2xy\x+y+z=1\xyz=-1.end{array}right.$$There are only $3$ ponts in $mathbb{R}^3$ which are solution of this system: $(-1,1,1)$, $(1,-1,1)$, and $(1,1,-1)$ (and, in each case, $lambda_1=0$ and $lambda_2=-2$).






                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1






                  I don't see where those two equations come from. Applying the method of Lagrange multipliers to your problem, you should have obtained a system of $5$ equations and $5$ unknowns:$$left{begin{array}{l}2x=lambda_1+lambda_2yz\2y=lambda_1+lambda_2xz\2z=lambda_1+lambda_2xy\x+y+z=1\xyz=-1.end{array}right.$$There are only $3$ ponts in $mathbb{R}^3$ which are solution of this system: $(-1,1,1)$, $(1,-1,1)$, and $(1,1,-1)$ (and, in each case, $lambda_1=0$ and $lambda_2=-2$).






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  I don't see where those two equations come from. Applying the method of Lagrange multipliers to your problem, you should have obtained a system of $5$ equations and $5$ unknowns:$$left{begin{array}{l}2x=lambda_1+lambda_2yz\2y=lambda_1+lambda_2xz\2z=lambda_1+lambda_2xy\x+y+z=1\xyz=-1.end{array}right.$$There are only $3$ ponts in $mathbb{R}^3$ which are solution of this system: $(-1,1,1)$, $(1,-1,1)$, and $(1,1,-1)$ (and, in each case, $lambda_1=0$ and $lambda_2=-2$).







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Nov 22 '18 at 8:42

























                  answered Nov 22 '18 at 7:28









                  José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

                  152k22123226




                  152k22123226






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008831%2fa-problem-of-lagrange-multiplier%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                      in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith

                      How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter