Nearly locally presentable categories












1














Here1, in the remark $2.3 (1)$ how from the fact that ${cal K}(A,-)$ does not preserve coproducts it follows that ${cal K}(A,-)$ sends special $lambda$-directed colimits to $lambda$-directed colimits and not to special $lambda$-directed ones?



1
Leonid Positselski, Jiří Rosický: Nearly locally presentable categories,
Theory and Appl. of Categories 33 (2018), #10, p.253-264;
http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/33/10/33-10abs.html https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10476










share|cite|improve this question
























  • To preserve special directed colimits, which are by definition always coproducts, just with a richer diagram shape than the discrete one, you would have to preserve coproducts.
    – Kevin Carlson
    Nov 14 '18 at 18:53










  • I do not follow the meaning of the middle part of your sentence: " just with a richer diagram shape than the discrete one"
    – user122424
    Nov 14 '18 at 21:07










  • It's a coproduct expressed as a filtered colimit of sub-coproducts of up to size $lambda$ rather than as a discrete colimit. But it's still required to be a coproduct.
    – Kevin Carlson
    Nov 14 '18 at 22:05
















1














Here1, in the remark $2.3 (1)$ how from the fact that ${cal K}(A,-)$ does not preserve coproducts it follows that ${cal K}(A,-)$ sends special $lambda$-directed colimits to $lambda$-directed colimits and not to special $lambda$-directed ones?



1
Leonid Positselski, Jiří Rosický: Nearly locally presentable categories,
Theory and Appl. of Categories 33 (2018), #10, p.253-264;
http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/33/10/33-10abs.html https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10476










share|cite|improve this question
























  • To preserve special directed colimits, which are by definition always coproducts, just with a richer diagram shape than the discrete one, you would have to preserve coproducts.
    – Kevin Carlson
    Nov 14 '18 at 18:53










  • I do not follow the meaning of the middle part of your sentence: " just with a richer diagram shape than the discrete one"
    – user122424
    Nov 14 '18 at 21:07










  • It's a coproduct expressed as a filtered colimit of sub-coproducts of up to size $lambda$ rather than as a discrete colimit. But it's still required to be a coproduct.
    – Kevin Carlson
    Nov 14 '18 at 22:05














1












1








1







Here1, in the remark $2.3 (1)$ how from the fact that ${cal K}(A,-)$ does not preserve coproducts it follows that ${cal K}(A,-)$ sends special $lambda$-directed colimits to $lambda$-directed colimits and not to special $lambda$-directed ones?



1
Leonid Positselski, Jiří Rosický: Nearly locally presentable categories,
Theory and Appl. of Categories 33 (2018), #10, p.253-264;
http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/33/10/33-10abs.html https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10476










share|cite|improve this question















Here1, in the remark $2.3 (1)$ how from the fact that ${cal K}(A,-)$ does not preserve coproducts it follows that ${cal K}(A,-)$ sends special $lambda$-directed colimits to $lambda$-directed colimits and not to special $lambda$-directed ones?



1
Leonid Positselski, Jiří Rosický: Nearly locally presentable categories,
Theory and Appl. of Categories 33 (2018), #10, p.253-264;
http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/33/10/33-10abs.html https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10476







category-theory functors representable-functor hom-functor






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 22 '18 at 10:49









Saad

19.7k92352




19.7k92352










asked Nov 14 '18 at 15:06









user122424user122424

1,1032616




1,1032616












  • To preserve special directed colimits, which are by definition always coproducts, just with a richer diagram shape than the discrete one, you would have to preserve coproducts.
    – Kevin Carlson
    Nov 14 '18 at 18:53










  • I do not follow the meaning of the middle part of your sentence: " just with a richer diagram shape than the discrete one"
    – user122424
    Nov 14 '18 at 21:07










  • It's a coproduct expressed as a filtered colimit of sub-coproducts of up to size $lambda$ rather than as a discrete colimit. But it's still required to be a coproduct.
    – Kevin Carlson
    Nov 14 '18 at 22:05


















  • To preserve special directed colimits, which are by definition always coproducts, just with a richer diagram shape than the discrete one, you would have to preserve coproducts.
    – Kevin Carlson
    Nov 14 '18 at 18:53










  • I do not follow the meaning of the middle part of your sentence: " just with a richer diagram shape than the discrete one"
    – user122424
    Nov 14 '18 at 21:07










  • It's a coproduct expressed as a filtered colimit of sub-coproducts of up to size $lambda$ rather than as a discrete colimit. But it's still required to be a coproduct.
    – Kevin Carlson
    Nov 14 '18 at 22:05
















To preserve special directed colimits, which are by definition always coproducts, just with a richer diagram shape than the discrete one, you would have to preserve coproducts.
– Kevin Carlson
Nov 14 '18 at 18:53




To preserve special directed colimits, which are by definition always coproducts, just with a richer diagram shape than the discrete one, you would have to preserve coproducts.
– Kevin Carlson
Nov 14 '18 at 18:53












I do not follow the meaning of the middle part of your sentence: " just with a richer diagram shape than the discrete one"
– user122424
Nov 14 '18 at 21:07




I do not follow the meaning of the middle part of your sentence: " just with a richer diagram shape than the discrete one"
– user122424
Nov 14 '18 at 21:07












It's a coproduct expressed as a filtered colimit of sub-coproducts of up to size $lambda$ rather than as a discrete colimit. But it's still required to be a coproduct.
– Kevin Carlson
Nov 14 '18 at 22:05




It's a coproduct expressed as a filtered colimit of sub-coproducts of up to size $lambda$ rather than as a discrete colimit. But it's still required to be a coproduct.
– Kevin Carlson
Nov 14 '18 at 22:05










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998365%2fnearly-locally-presentable-categories%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2998365%2fnearly-locally-presentable-categories%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

SQL update select statement

'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules