Alternative analysis of the Monty Hall problem












-1














The widely accepted answer for the Monty Hall problem is that it is better for a contestant to switch doors because there is a $frac23$ probability he picked the door with a goat behind it the first time and only a $frac13$ probability the he picked the door with the car behind it.



We can look at this problem in a different way. There are three ways of arranging one car and two goats behind three doors, assuming that we do not distinguish between the two goats:



    Door1    Door2    Door3

1. CAR goat goat
2. goat CAR goat
3. goat goat CAR


Consider arrangement $1$. If the contestant first picks door $1$ and then the host opens say, door $2$ to reveal a goat and the contestant then switches to door $3$, the contestant ends up with a goat. Thus we have a combination of contestant's first pick, the door the host opens and whether the contestant then switches doors or not. There are eight such combinations for each arrangement.



The eight combinations and their outcomes for arrangement $1$ are listed here.



enter image description here



The contestant gets the car in four of these eight combinations, in two of them by switching doors and in two by not switching doors. The other arrangements will be similar. So considering all three arrangements, the contestant will get the car in $12$ of the $24$ total combinations, in $6$ of them by switching doors and $6$ by not switching.



Analyzing the Monty Hall problem this way we see that switching doors or not switching doors is all the same. What is wrong with this analysis ?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 5




    "widely accepted" is wrong - it's the correct answer. It's a mathematical problem, not an empirical one.
    – MathematicsStudent1122
    Jul 29 '17 at 4:32








  • 4




    The eight outcomes you list are not all equally probable.
    – Graham Kemp
    Jul 29 '17 at 4:39
















-1














The widely accepted answer for the Monty Hall problem is that it is better for a contestant to switch doors because there is a $frac23$ probability he picked the door with a goat behind it the first time and only a $frac13$ probability the he picked the door with the car behind it.



We can look at this problem in a different way. There are three ways of arranging one car and two goats behind three doors, assuming that we do not distinguish between the two goats:



    Door1    Door2    Door3

1. CAR goat goat
2. goat CAR goat
3. goat goat CAR


Consider arrangement $1$. If the contestant first picks door $1$ and then the host opens say, door $2$ to reveal a goat and the contestant then switches to door $3$, the contestant ends up with a goat. Thus we have a combination of contestant's first pick, the door the host opens and whether the contestant then switches doors or not. There are eight such combinations for each arrangement.



The eight combinations and their outcomes for arrangement $1$ are listed here.



enter image description here



The contestant gets the car in four of these eight combinations, in two of them by switching doors and in two by not switching doors. The other arrangements will be similar. So considering all three arrangements, the contestant will get the car in $12$ of the $24$ total combinations, in $6$ of them by switching doors and $6$ by not switching.



Analyzing the Monty Hall problem this way we see that switching doors or not switching doors is all the same. What is wrong with this analysis ?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 5




    "widely accepted" is wrong - it's the correct answer. It's a mathematical problem, not an empirical one.
    – MathematicsStudent1122
    Jul 29 '17 at 4:32








  • 4




    The eight outcomes you list are not all equally probable.
    – Graham Kemp
    Jul 29 '17 at 4:39














-1












-1








-1







The widely accepted answer for the Monty Hall problem is that it is better for a contestant to switch doors because there is a $frac23$ probability he picked the door with a goat behind it the first time and only a $frac13$ probability the he picked the door with the car behind it.



We can look at this problem in a different way. There are three ways of arranging one car and two goats behind three doors, assuming that we do not distinguish between the two goats:



    Door1    Door2    Door3

1. CAR goat goat
2. goat CAR goat
3. goat goat CAR


Consider arrangement $1$. If the contestant first picks door $1$ and then the host opens say, door $2$ to reveal a goat and the contestant then switches to door $3$, the contestant ends up with a goat. Thus we have a combination of contestant's first pick, the door the host opens and whether the contestant then switches doors or not. There are eight such combinations for each arrangement.



The eight combinations and their outcomes for arrangement $1$ are listed here.



enter image description here



The contestant gets the car in four of these eight combinations, in two of them by switching doors and in two by not switching doors. The other arrangements will be similar. So considering all three arrangements, the contestant will get the car in $12$ of the $24$ total combinations, in $6$ of them by switching doors and $6$ by not switching.



Analyzing the Monty Hall problem this way we see that switching doors or not switching doors is all the same. What is wrong with this analysis ?










share|cite|improve this question















The widely accepted answer for the Monty Hall problem is that it is better for a contestant to switch doors because there is a $frac23$ probability he picked the door with a goat behind it the first time and only a $frac13$ probability the he picked the door with the car behind it.



We can look at this problem in a different way. There are three ways of arranging one car and two goats behind three doors, assuming that we do not distinguish between the two goats:



    Door1    Door2    Door3

1. CAR goat goat
2. goat CAR goat
3. goat goat CAR


Consider arrangement $1$. If the contestant first picks door $1$ and then the host opens say, door $2$ to reveal a goat and the contestant then switches to door $3$, the contestant ends up with a goat. Thus we have a combination of contestant's first pick, the door the host opens and whether the contestant then switches doors or not. There are eight such combinations for each arrangement.



The eight combinations and their outcomes for arrangement $1$ are listed here.



enter image description here



The contestant gets the car in four of these eight combinations, in two of them by switching doors and in two by not switching doors. The other arrangements will be similar. So considering all three arrangements, the contestant will get the car in $12$ of the $24$ total combinations, in $6$ of them by switching doors and $6$ by not switching.



Analyzing the Monty Hall problem this way we see that switching doors or not switching doors is all the same. What is wrong with this analysis ?







probability monty-hall






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 29 '17 at 4:37









Siong Thye Goh

99.9k1465117




99.9k1465117










asked Jul 29 '17 at 4:30









CrankyShaftCrankyShaft

1091




1091








  • 5




    "widely accepted" is wrong - it's the correct answer. It's a mathematical problem, not an empirical one.
    – MathematicsStudent1122
    Jul 29 '17 at 4:32








  • 4




    The eight outcomes you list are not all equally probable.
    – Graham Kemp
    Jul 29 '17 at 4:39














  • 5




    "widely accepted" is wrong - it's the correct answer. It's a mathematical problem, not an empirical one.
    – MathematicsStudent1122
    Jul 29 '17 at 4:32








  • 4




    The eight outcomes you list are not all equally probable.
    – Graham Kemp
    Jul 29 '17 at 4:39








5




5




"widely accepted" is wrong - it's the correct answer. It's a mathematical problem, not an empirical one.
– MathematicsStudent1122
Jul 29 '17 at 4:32






"widely accepted" is wrong - it's the correct answer. It's a mathematical problem, not an empirical one.
– MathematicsStudent1122
Jul 29 '17 at 4:32






4




4




The eight outcomes you list are not all equally probable.
– Graham Kemp
Jul 29 '17 at 4:39




The eight outcomes you list are not all equally probable.
– Graham Kemp
Jul 29 '17 at 4:39










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














The second choice you list, the door the host opens, is not independent of the door the contestant chooses. If the contestant chooses a door with a goat, Monty has only one door to open to show a goat.



Now that your spreadsheet has been posted, the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Hey, be a little nicer. The OP has presented a question very nicely.
    – zhw.
    Jul 29 '17 at 6:54










  • the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
    – CrankyShaft
    Jul 31 '17 at 23:58



















6














There are only two distinct outcomes in a million dollar lottery: win or lose.   Therefore #favoured/#total tells us that the probability for winning is $1/2$ ... no?





You cannot just count the outcomes, you have to weight their probability too.



Assuming no bias when offered equally viable choices.




  • There is a probability of $1/3$ for the contestant to pick any one from the three doors.


  • If the contestant happens to pick the door hiding the car, then the host has a probability of $1/2$ for selecting either of the remaining doors.


  • However, if the contestant picks either of the doors hiding the goat, then the host has only one viable choice -- she certainly reveals the other door hiding a goat.



$begin{array}{|l:l:l|l|} hline
text{Door }1 & text{Door }2 & text{Door } 3 & text{Probability} & text{Win by}\ hdashline
text{(Car)} & text{(Goat)} & text{(Goat)} \hline
text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
text{Pick} & & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
&text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \
& text{Reveal} &text{Pick} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \ hline
end{array}$



Thus the probability that "Stay" is the winning strategy is $1/3$ while the probability that "Switch" is the winning strategy is $2/3$.





Of course, if you completely ignore this advice and just randomly decide to stay or switch (say by a coin toss), then the probability that you win is $1/2$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2375451%2falternative-analysis-of-the-monty-hall-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    The second choice you list, the door the host opens, is not independent of the door the contestant chooses. If the contestant chooses a door with a goat, Monty has only one door to open to show a goat.



    Now that your spreadsheet has been posted, the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Hey, be a little nicer. The OP has presented a question very nicely.
      – zhw.
      Jul 29 '17 at 6:54










    • the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
      – CrankyShaft
      Jul 31 '17 at 23:58
















    2














    The second choice you list, the door the host opens, is not independent of the door the contestant chooses. If the contestant chooses a door with a goat, Monty has only one door to open to show a goat.



    Now that your spreadsheet has been posted, the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Hey, be a little nicer. The OP has presented a question very nicely.
      – zhw.
      Jul 29 '17 at 6:54










    • the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
      – CrankyShaft
      Jul 31 '17 at 23:58














    2












    2








    2






    The second choice you list, the door the host opens, is not independent of the door the contestant chooses. If the contestant chooses a door with a goat, Monty has only one door to open to show a goat.



    Now that your spreadsheet has been posted, the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    The second choice you list, the door the host opens, is not independent of the door the contestant chooses. If the contestant chooses a door with a goat, Monty has only one door to open to show a goat.



    Now that your spreadsheet has been posted, the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Jul 29 '17 at 14:46

























    answered Jul 29 '17 at 4:40









    Ross MillikanRoss Millikan

    292k23197371




    292k23197371












    • Hey, be a little nicer. The OP has presented a question very nicely.
      – zhw.
      Jul 29 '17 at 6:54










    • the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
      – CrankyShaft
      Jul 31 '17 at 23:58


















    • Hey, be a little nicer. The OP has presented a question very nicely.
      – zhw.
      Jul 29 '17 at 6:54










    • the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
      – CrankyShaft
      Jul 31 '17 at 23:58
















    Hey, be a little nicer. The OP has presented a question very nicely.
    – zhw.
    Jul 29 '17 at 6:54




    Hey, be a little nicer. The OP has presented a question very nicely.
    – zhw.
    Jul 29 '17 at 6:54












    the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
    – CrankyShaft
    Jul 31 '17 at 23:58




    the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
    – CrankyShaft
    Jul 31 '17 at 23:58











    6














    There are only two distinct outcomes in a million dollar lottery: win or lose.   Therefore #favoured/#total tells us that the probability for winning is $1/2$ ... no?





    You cannot just count the outcomes, you have to weight their probability too.



    Assuming no bias when offered equally viable choices.




    • There is a probability of $1/3$ for the contestant to pick any one from the three doors.


    • If the contestant happens to pick the door hiding the car, then the host has a probability of $1/2$ for selecting either of the remaining doors.


    • However, if the contestant picks either of the doors hiding the goat, then the host has only one viable choice -- she certainly reveals the other door hiding a goat.



    $begin{array}{|l:l:l|l|} hline
    text{Door }1 & text{Door }2 & text{Door } 3 & text{Probability} & text{Win by}\ hdashline
    text{(Car)} & text{(Goat)} & text{(Goat)} \hline
    text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
    text{Pick} & & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
    &text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \
    & text{Reveal} &text{Pick} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \ hline
    end{array}$



    Thus the probability that "Stay" is the winning strategy is $1/3$ while the probability that "Switch" is the winning strategy is $2/3$.





    Of course, if you completely ignore this advice and just randomly decide to stay or switch (say by a coin toss), then the probability that you win is $1/2$.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      6














      There are only two distinct outcomes in a million dollar lottery: win or lose.   Therefore #favoured/#total tells us that the probability for winning is $1/2$ ... no?





      You cannot just count the outcomes, you have to weight their probability too.



      Assuming no bias when offered equally viable choices.




      • There is a probability of $1/3$ for the contestant to pick any one from the three doors.


      • If the contestant happens to pick the door hiding the car, then the host has a probability of $1/2$ for selecting either of the remaining doors.


      • However, if the contestant picks either of the doors hiding the goat, then the host has only one viable choice -- she certainly reveals the other door hiding a goat.



      $begin{array}{|l:l:l|l|} hline
      text{Door }1 & text{Door }2 & text{Door } 3 & text{Probability} & text{Win by}\ hdashline
      text{(Car)} & text{(Goat)} & text{(Goat)} \hline
      text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
      text{Pick} & & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
      &text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \
      & text{Reveal} &text{Pick} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \ hline
      end{array}$



      Thus the probability that "Stay" is the winning strategy is $1/3$ while the probability that "Switch" is the winning strategy is $2/3$.





      Of course, if you completely ignore this advice and just randomly decide to stay or switch (say by a coin toss), then the probability that you win is $1/2$.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        6












        6








        6






        There are only two distinct outcomes in a million dollar lottery: win or lose.   Therefore #favoured/#total tells us that the probability for winning is $1/2$ ... no?





        You cannot just count the outcomes, you have to weight their probability too.



        Assuming no bias when offered equally viable choices.




        • There is a probability of $1/3$ for the contestant to pick any one from the three doors.


        • If the contestant happens to pick the door hiding the car, then the host has a probability of $1/2$ for selecting either of the remaining doors.


        • However, if the contestant picks either of the doors hiding the goat, then the host has only one viable choice -- she certainly reveals the other door hiding a goat.



        $begin{array}{|l:l:l|l|} hline
        text{Door }1 & text{Door }2 & text{Door } 3 & text{Probability} & text{Win by}\ hdashline
        text{(Car)} & text{(Goat)} & text{(Goat)} \hline
        text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
        text{Pick} & & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
        &text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \
        & text{Reveal} &text{Pick} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \ hline
        end{array}$



        Thus the probability that "Stay" is the winning strategy is $1/3$ while the probability that "Switch" is the winning strategy is $2/3$.





        Of course, if you completely ignore this advice and just randomly decide to stay or switch (say by a coin toss), then the probability that you win is $1/2$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        There are only two distinct outcomes in a million dollar lottery: win or lose.   Therefore #favoured/#total tells us that the probability for winning is $1/2$ ... no?





        You cannot just count the outcomes, you have to weight their probability too.



        Assuming no bias when offered equally viable choices.




        • There is a probability of $1/3$ for the contestant to pick any one from the three doors.


        • If the contestant happens to pick the door hiding the car, then the host has a probability of $1/2$ for selecting either of the remaining doors.


        • However, if the contestant picks either of the doors hiding the goat, then the host has only one viable choice -- she certainly reveals the other door hiding a goat.



        $begin{array}{|l:l:l|l|} hline
        text{Door }1 & text{Door }2 & text{Door } 3 & text{Probability} & text{Win by}\ hdashline
        text{(Car)} & text{(Goat)} & text{(Goat)} \hline
        text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
        text{Pick} & & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
        &text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \
        & text{Reveal} &text{Pick} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \ hline
        end{array}$



        Thus the probability that "Stay" is the winning strategy is $1/3$ while the probability that "Switch" is the winning strategy is $2/3$.





        Of course, if you completely ignore this advice and just randomly decide to stay or switch (say by a coin toss), then the probability that you win is $1/2$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jul 29 '17 at 4:59









        Graham KempGraham Kemp

        84.7k43378




        84.7k43378






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2375451%2falternative-analysis-of-the-monty-hall-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

            android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

            WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]