Alternative analysis of the Monty Hall problem
The widely accepted answer for the Monty Hall problem is that it is better for a contestant to switch doors because there is a $frac23$ probability he picked the door with a goat behind it the first time and only a $frac13$ probability the he picked the door with the car behind it.
We can look at this problem in a different way. There are three ways of arranging one car and two goats behind three doors, assuming that we do not distinguish between the two goats:
Door1 Door2 Door3
1. CAR goat goat
2. goat CAR goat
3. goat goat CAR
Consider arrangement $1$. If the contestant first picks door $1$ and then the host opens say, door $2$ to reveal a goat and the contestant then switches to door $3$, the contestant ends up with a goat. Thus we have a combination of contestant's first pick, the door the host opens and whether the contestant then switches doors or not. There are eight such combinations for each arrangement.
The eight combinations and their outcomes for arrangement $1$ are listed here.
The contestant gets the car in four of these eight combinations, in two of them by switching doors and in two by not switching doors. The other arrangements will be similar. So considering all three arrangements, the contestant will get the car in $12$ of the $24$ total combinations, in $6$ of them by switching doors and $6$ by not switching.
Analyzing the Monty Hall problem this way we see that switching doors or not switching doors is all the same. What is wrong with this analysis ?
probability monty-hall
add a comment |
The widely accepted answer for the Monty Hall problem is that it is better for a contestant to switch doors because there is a $frac23$ probability he picked the door with a goat behind it the first time and only a $frac13$ probability the he picked the door with the car behind it.
We can look at this problem in a different way. There are three ways of arranging one car and two goats behind three doors, assuming that we do not distinguish between the two goats:
Door1 Door2 Door3
1. CAR goat goat
2. goat CAR goat
3. goat goat CAR
Consider arrangement $1$. If the contestant first picks door $1$ and then the host opens say, door $2$ to reveal a goat and the contestant then switches to door $3$, the contestant ends up with a goat. Thus we have a combination of contestant's first pick, the door the host opens and whether the contestant then switches doors or not. There are eight such combinations for each arrangement.
The eight combinations and their outcomes for arrangement $1$ are listed here.
The contestant gets the car in four of these eight combinations, in two of them by switching doors and in two by not switching doors. The other arrangements will be similar. So considering all three arrangements, the contestant will get the car in $12$ of the $24$ total combinations, in $6$ of them by switching doors and $6$ by not switching.
Analyzing the Monty Hall problem this way we see that switching doors or not switching doors is all the same. What is wrong with this analysis ?
probability monty-hall
5
"widely accepted" is wrong - it's the correct answer. It's a mathematical problem, not an empirical one.
– MathematicsStudent1122
Jul 29 '17 at 4:32
4
The eight outcomes you list are not all equally probable.
– Graham Kemp
Jul 29 '17 at 4:39
add a comment |
The widely accepted answer for the Monty Hall problem is that it is better for a contestant to switch doors because there is a $frac23$ probability he picked the door with a goat behind it the first time and only a $frac13$ probability the he picked the door with the car behind it.
We can look at this problem in a different way. There are three ways of arranging one car and two goats behind three doors, assuming that we do not distinguish between the two goats:
Door1 Door2 Door3
1. CAR goat goat
2. goat CAR goat
3. goat goat CAR
Consider arrangement $1$. If the contestant first picks door $1$ and then the host opens say, door $2$ to reveal a goat and the contestant then switches to door $3$, the contestant ends up with a goat. Thus we have a combination of contestant's first pick, the door the host opens and whether the contestant then switches doors or not. There are eight such combinations for each arrangement.
The eight combinations and their outcomes for arrangement $1$ are listed here.
The contestant gets the car in four of these eight combinations, in two of them by switching doors and in two by not switching doors. The other arrangements will be similar. So considering all three arrangements, the contestant will get the car in $12$ of the $24$ total combinations, in $6$ of them by switching doors and $6$ by not switching.
Analyzing the Monty Hall problem this way we see that switching doors or not switching doors is all the same. What is wrong with this analysis ?
probability monty-hall
The widely accepted answer for the Monty Hall problem is that it is better for a contestant to switch doors because there is a $frac23$ probability he picked the door with a goat behind it the first time and only a $frac13$ probability the he picked the door with the car behind it.
We can look at this problem in a different way. There are three ways of arranging one car and two goats behind three doors, assuming that we do not distinguish between the two goats:
Door1 Door2 Door3
1. CAR goat goat
2. goat CAR goat
3. goat goat CAR
Consider arrangement $1$. If the contestant first picks door $1$ and then the host opens say, door $2$ to reveal a goat and the contestant then switches to door $3$, the contestant ends up with a goat. Thus we have a combination of contestant's first pick, the door the host opens and whether the contestant then switches doors or not. There are eight such combinations for each arrangement.
The eight combinations and their outcomes for arrangement $1$ are listed here.
The contestant gets the car in four of these eight combinations, in two of them by switching doors and in two by not switching doors. The other arrangements will be similar. So considering all three arrangements, the contestant will get the car in $12$ of the $24$ total combinations, in $6$ of them by switching doors and $6$ by not switching.
Analyzing the Monty Hall problem this way we see that switching doors or not switching doors is all the same. What is wrong with this analysis ?
probability monty-hall
probability monty-hall
edited Jul 29 '17 at 4:37
Siong Thye Goh
99.9k1465117
99.9k1465117
asked Jul 29 '17 at 4:30
CrankyShaftCrankyShaft
1091
1091
5
"widely accepted" is wrong - it's the correct answer. It's a mathematical problem, not an empirical one.
– MathematicsStudent1122
Jul 29 '17 at 4:32
4
The eight outcomes you list are not all equally probable.
– Graham Kemp
Jul 29 '17 at 4:39
add a comment |
5
"widely accepted" is wrong - it's the correct answer. It's a mathematical problem, not an empirical one.
– MathematicsStudent1122
Jul 29 '17 at 4:32
4
The eight outcomes you list are not all equally probable.
– Graham Kemp
Jul 29 '17 at 4:39
5
5
"widely accepted" is wrong - it's the correct answer. It's a mathematical problem, not an empirical one.
– MathematicsStudent1122
Jul 29 '17 at 4:32
"widely accepted" is wrong - it's the correct answer. It's a mathematical problem, not an empirical one.
– MathematicsStudent1122
Jul 29 '17 at 4:32
4
4
The eight outcomes you list are not all equally probable.
– Graham Kemp
Jul 29 '17 at 4:39
The eight outcomes you list are not all equally probable.
– Graham Kemp
Jul 29 '17 at 4:39
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The second choice you list, the door the host opens, is not independent of the door the contestant chooses. If the contestant chooses a door with a goat, Monty has only one door to open to show a goat.
Now that your spreadsheet has been posted, the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
Hey, be a little nicer. The OP has presented a question very nicely.
– zhw.
Jul 29 '17 at 6:54
the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
– CrankyShaft
Jul 31 '17 at 23:58
add a comment |
There are only two distinct outcomes in a million dollar lottery: win or lose. Therefore #favoured/#total tells us that the probability for winning is $1/2$ ... no?
You cannot just count the outcomes, you have to weight their probability too.
Assuming no bias when offered equally viable choices.
There is a probability of $1/3$ for the contestant to pick any one from the three doors.
If the contestant happens to pick the door hiding the car, then the host has a probability of $1/2$ for selecting either of the remaining doors.
However, if the contestant picks either of the doors hiding the goat, then the host has only one viable choice -- she certainly reveals the other door hiding a goat.
$begin{array}{|l:l:l|l|} hline
text{Door }1 & text{Door }2 & text{Door } 3 & text{Probability} & text{Win by}\ hdashline
text{(Car)} & text{(Goat)} & text{(Goat)} \hline
text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
text{Pick} & & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
&text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \
& text{Reveal} &text{Pick} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \ hline
end{array}$
Thus the probability that "Stay" is the winning strategy is $1/3$ while the probability that "Switch" is the winning strategy is $2/3$.
Of course, if you completely ignore this advice and just randomly decide to stay or switch (say by a coin toss), then the probability that you win is $1/2$.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2375451%2falternative-analysis-of-the-monty-hall-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The second choice you list, the door the host opens, is not independent of the door the contestant chooses. If the contestant chooses a door with a goat, Monty has only one door to open to show a goat.
Now that your spreadsheet has been posted, the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
Hey, be a little nicer. The OP has presented a question very nicely.
– zhw.
Jul 29 '17 at 6:54
the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
– CrankyShaft
Jul 31 '17 at 23:58
add a comment |
The second choice you list, the door the host opens, is not independent of the door the contestant chooses. If the contestant chooses a door with a goat, Monty has only one door to open to show a goat.
Now that your spreadsheet has been posted, the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
Hey, be a little nicer. The OP has presented a question very nicely.
– zhw.
Jul 29 '17 at 6:54
the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
– CrankyShaft
Jul 31 '17 at 23:58
add a comment |
The second choice you list, the door the host opens, is not independent of the door the contestant chooses. If the contestant chooses a door with a goat, Monty has only one door to open to show a goat.
Now that your spreadsheet has been posted, the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
The second choice you list, the door the host opens, is not independent of the door the contestant chooses. If the contestant chooses a door with a goat, Monty has only one door to open to show a goat.
Now that your spreadsheet has been posted, the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
edited Jul 29 '17 at 14:46
answered Jul 29 '17 at 4:40
Ross MillikanRoss Millikan
292k23197371
292k23197371
Hey, be a little nicer. The OP has presented a question very nicely.
– zhw.
Jul 29 '17 at 6:54
the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
– CrankyShaft
Jul 31 '17 at 23:58
add a comment |
Hey, be a little nicer. The OP has presented a question very nicely.
– zhw.
Jul 29 '17 at 6:54
the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
– CrankyShaft
Jul 31 '17 at 23:58
Hey, be a little nicer. The OP has presented a question very nicely.
– zhw.
Jul 29 '17 at 6:54
Hey, be a little nicer. The OP has presented a question very nicely.
– zhw.
Jul 29 '17 at 6:54
the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
– CrankyShaft
Jul 31 '17 at 23:58
the first four lines are half as probable as the last four lines.
– CrankyShaft
Jul 31 '17 at 23:58
add a comment |
There are only two distinct outcomes in a million dollar lottery: win or lose. Therefore #favoured/#total tells us that the probability for winning is $1/2$ ... no?
You cannot just count the outcomes, you have to weight their probability too.
Assuming no bias when offered equally viable choices.
There is a probability of $1/3$ for the contestant to pick any one from the three doors.
If the contestant happens to pick the door hiding the car, then the host has a probability of $1/2$ for selecting either of the remaining doors.
However, if the contestant picks either of the doors hiding the goat, then the host has only one viable choice -- she certainly reveals the other door hiding a goat.
$begin{array}{|l:l:l|l|} hline
text{Door }1 & text{Door }2 & text{Door } 3 & text{Probability} & text{Win by}\ hdashline
text{(Car)} & text{(Goat)} & text{(Goat)} \hline
text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
text{Pick} & & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
&text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \
& text{Reveal} &text{Pick} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \ hline
end{array}$
Thus the probability that "Stay" is the winning strategy is $1/3$ while the probability that "Switch" is the winning strategy is $2/3$.
Of course, if you completely ignore this advice and just randomly decide to stay or switch (say by a coin toss), then the probability that you win is $1/2$.
add a comment |
There are only two distinct outcomes in a million dollar lottery: win or lose. Therefore #favoured/#total tells us that the probability for winning is $1/2$ ... no?
You cannot just count the outcomes, you have to weight their probability too.
Assuming no bias when offered equally viable choices.
There is a probability of $1/3$ for the contestant to pick any one from the three doors.
If the contestant happens to pick the door hiding the car, then the host has a probability of $1/2$ for selecting either of the remaining doors.
However, if the contestant picks either of the doors hiding the goat, then the host has only one viable choice -- she certainly reveals the other door hiding a goat.
$begin{array}{|l:l:l|l|} hline
text{Door }1 & text{Door }2 & text{Door } 3 & text{Probability} & text{Win by}\ hdashline
text{(Car)} & text{(Goat)} & text{(Goat)} \hline
text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
text{Pick} & & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
&text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \
& text{Reveal} &text{Pick} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \ hline
end{array}$
Thus the probability that "Stay" is the winning strategy is $1/3$ while the probability that "Switch" is the winning strategy is $2/3$.
Of course, if you completely ignore this advice and just randomly decide to stay or switch (say by a coin toss), then the probability that you win is $1/2$.
add a comment |
There are only two distinct outcomes in a million dollar lottery: win or lose. Therefore #favoured/#total tells us that the probability for winning is $1/2$ ... no?
You cannot just count the outcomes, you have to weight their probability too.
Assuming no bias when offered equally viable choices.
There is a probability of $1/3$ for the contestant to pick any one from the three doors.
If the contestant happens to pick the door hiding the car, then the host has a probability of $1/2$ for selecting either of the remaining doors.
However, if the contestant picks either of the doors hiding the goat, then the host has only one viable choice -- she certainly reveals the other door hiding a goat.
$begin{array}{|l:l:l|l|} hline
text{Door }1 & text{Door }2 & text{Door } 3 & text{Probability} & text{Win by}\ hdashline
text{(Car)} & text{(Goat)} & text{(Goat)} \hline
text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
text{Pick} & & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
&text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \
& text{Reveal} &text{Pick} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \ hline
end{array}$
Thus the probability that "Stay" is the winning strategy is $1/3$ while the probability that "Switch" is the winning strategy is $2/3$.
Of course, if you completely ignore this advice and just randomly decide to stay or switch (say by a coin toss), then the probability that you win is $1/2$.
There are only two distinct outcomes in a million dollar lottery: win or lose. Therefore #favoured/#total tells us that the probability for winning is $1/2$ ... no?
You cannot just count the outcomes, you have to weight their probability too.
Assuming no bias when offered equally viable choices.
There is a probability of $1/3$ for the contestant to pick any one from the three doors.
If the contestant happens to pick the door hiding the car, then the host has a probability of $1/2$ for selecting either of the remaining doors.
However, if the contestant picks either of the doors hiding the goat, then the host has only one viable choice -- she certainly reveals the other door hiding a goat.
$begin{array}{|l:l:l|l|} hline
text{Door }1 & text{Door }2 & text{Door } 3 & text{Probability} & text{Win by}\ hdashline
text{(Car)} & text{(Goat)} & text{(Goat)} \hline
text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
text{Pick} & & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 12 & text{Stay} \
&text{Pick} & text{Reveal} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \
& text{Reveal} &text{Pick} & tfrac 13cdottfrac 11 & text{Switch} \ hline
end{array}$
Thus the probability that "Stay" is the winning strategy is $1/3$ while the probability that "Switch" is the winning strategy is $2/3$.
Of course, if you completely ignore this advice and just randomly decide to stay or switch (say by a coin toss), then the probability that you win is $1/2$.
answered Jul 29 '17 at 4:59
Graham KempGraham Kemp
84.7k43378
84.7k43378
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2375451%2falternative-analysis-of-the-monty-hall-problem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
5
"widely accepted" is wrong - it's the correct answer. It's a mathematical problem, not an empirical one.
– MathematicsStudent1122
Jul 29 '17 at 4:32
4
The eight outcomes you list are not all equally probable.
– Graham Kemp
Jul 29 '17 at 4:39