Are quotients of topological categories also topological categories?
$begingroup$
I am considering quotients of categories as in MacLane's Categories for the working mathematician, as described in the next paragraph.
Let $C$ be a (small) category and $R$ an equivalence relation on (the arrows of) $C$ such that the domain and range maps are invariant on $R$-equivalence classes (i.e., if two arrows are equivalent then they have same domain and range). Assume further that $R$ is a congruence: $f_1Rg_1$ and $f_2Rg_2$ implies $f_1f_2Rg_1g_2$ whenever that makes sense. Then $C/R$ is a category (with same object space $Ob(C/R)=Ob(C)$ as $C$).
Assume further that $C$ is a topological category: $C$ and $Ob(C)$ are endowed with topologies making all structural maps continuous. Endow $C/R$ with the quotient topology.
Is $C/R$ a topological category?
It is quite clear that the domain, range, and unit maps are continuous, however the composition is not clear because $C/Rtimes C/R$ does not necessarily have the quotient topology of $Ctimes C$ (under the obvious map). See "Products of quotient topology same as quotient of product topology".
Ronnie Brown and J. P. L. Hardy have proven that the category of topological categories has quotients in the categorical sense (satisfying the universal property) in this article, but the underlying category of this quotient is not necessarily $C/R$ as defined above.
general-topology category-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am considering quotients of categories as in MacLane's Categories for the working mathematician, as described in the next paragraph.
Let $C$ be a (small) category and $R$ an equivalence relation on (the arrows of) $C$ such that the domain and range maps are invariant on $R$-equivalence classes (i.e., if two arrows are equivalent then they have same domain and range). Assume further that $R$ is a congruence: $f_1Rg_1$ and $f_2Rg_2$ implies $f_1f_2Rg_1g_2$ whenever that makes sense. Then $C/R$ is a category (with same object space $Ob(C/R)=Ob(C)$ as $C$).
Assume further that $C$ is a topological category: $C$ and $Ob(C)$ are endowed with topologies making all structural maps continuous. Endow $C/R$ with the quotient topology.
Is $C/R$ a topological category?
It is quite clear that the domain, range, and unit maps are continuous, however the composition is not clear because $C/Rtimes C/R$ does not necessarily have the quotient topology of $Ctimes C$ (under the obvious map). See "Products of quotient topology same as quotient of product topology".
Ronnie Brown and J. P. L. Hardy have proven that the category of topological categories has quotients in the categorical sense (satisfying the universal property) in this article, but the underlying category of this quotient is not necessarily $C/R$ as defined above.
general-topology category-theory
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So is a topological category a subcategory of the category of all topological spaces and all continuous maps?
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Nov 30 '18 at 23:41
2
$begingroup$
@PaulFrost Not at all. There is no natural topology on the set of all topological spaces. A topological category is a category internal to topological spaces, not a subcategory thereof.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 1 '18 at 7:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am considering quotients of categories as in MacLane's Categories for the working mathematician, as described in the next paragraph.
Let $C$ be a (small) category and $R$ an equivalence relation on (the arrows of) $C$ such that the domain and range maps are invariant on $R$-equivalence classes (i.e., if two arrows are equivalent then they have same domain and range). Assume further that $R$ is a congruence: $f_1Rg_1$ and $f_2Rg_2$ implies $f_1f_2Rg_1g_2$ whenever that makes sense. Then $C/R$ is a category (with same object space $Ob(C/R)=Ob(C)$ as $C$).
Assume further that $C$ is a topological category: $C$ and $Ob(C)$ are endowed with topologies making all structural maps continuous. Endow $C/R$ with the quotient topology.
Is $C/R$ a topological category?
It is quite clear that the domain, range, and unit maps are continuous, however the composition is not clear because $C/Rtimes C/R$ does not necessarily have the quotient topology of $Ctimes C$ (under the obvious map). See "Products of quotient topology same as quotient of product topology".
Ronnie Brown and J. P. L. Hardy have proven that the category of topological categories has quotients in the categorical sense (satisfying the universal property) in this article, but the underlying category of this quotient is not necessarily $C/R$ as defined above.
general-topology category-theory
$endgroup$
I am considering quotients of categories as in MacLane's Categories for the working mathematician, as described in the next paragraph.
Let $C$ be a (small) category and $R$ an equivalence relation on (the arrows of) $C$ such that the domain and range maps are invariant on $R$-equivalence classes (i.e., if two arrows are equivalent then they have same domain and range). Assume further that $R$ is a congruence: $f_1Rg_1$ and $f_2Rg_2$ implies $f_1f_2Rg_1g_2$ whenever that makes sense. Then $C/R$ is a category (with same object space $Ob(C/R)=Ob(C)$ as $C$).
Assume further that $C$ is a topological category: $C$ and $Ob(C)$ are endowed with topologies making all structural maps continuous. Endow $C/R$ with the quotient topology.
Is $C/R$ a topological category?
It is quite clear that the domain, range, and unit maps are continuous, however the composition is not clear because $C/Rtimes C/R$ does not necessarily have the quotient topology of $Ctimes C$ (under the obvious map). See "Products of quotient topology same as quotient of product topology".
Ronnie Brown and J. P. L. Hardy have proven that the category of topological categories has quotients in the categorical sense (satisfying the universal property) in this article, but the underlying category of this quotient is not necessarily $C/R$ as defined above.
general-topology category-theory
general-topology category-theory
edited Jan 7 at 8:18
Questioner
asked Nov 30 '18 at 21:58
QuestionerQuestioner
549321
549321
$begingroup$
So is a topological category a subcategory of the category of all topological spaces and all continuous maps?
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Nov 30 '18 at 23:41
2
$begingroup$
@PaulFrost Not at all. There is no natural topology on the set of all topological spaces. A topological category is a category internal to topological spaces, not a subcategory thereof.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 1 '18 at 7:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So is a topological category a subcategory of the category of all topological spaces and all continuous maps?
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Nov 30 '18 at 23:41
2
$begingroup$
@PaulFrost Not at all. There is no natural topology on the set of all topological spaces. A topological category is a category internal to topological spaces, not a subcategory thereof.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 1 '18 at 7:30
$begingroup$
So is a topological category a subcategory of the category of all topological spaces and all continuous maps?
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Nov 30 '18 at 23:41
$begingroup$
So is a topological category a subcategory of the category of all topological spaces and all continuous maps?
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Nov 30 '18 at 23:41
2
2
$begingroup$
@PaulFrost Not at all. There is no natural topology on the set of all topological spaces. A topological category is a category internal to topological spaces, not a subcategory thereof.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 1 '18 at 7:30
$begingroup$
@PaulFrost Not at all. There is no natural topology on the set of all topological spaces. A topological category is a category internal to topological spaces, not a subcategory thereof.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 1 '18 at 7:30
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020698%2fare-quotients-of-topological-categories-also-topological-categories%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020698%2fare-quotients-of-topological-categories-also-topological-categories%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
So is a topological category a subcategory of the category of all topological spaces and all continuous maps?
$endgroup$
– Paul Frost
Nov 30 '18 at 23:41
2
$begingroup$
@PaulFrost Not at all. There is no natural topology on the set of all topological spaces. A topological category is a category internal to topological spaces, not a subcategory thereof.
$endgroup$
– Kevin Carlson
Dec 1 '18 at 7:30