Residue of $f(z)=frac{z}{sin{left(frac{pi}{z+1}right)}}$ in all isolated singularities
$begingroup$
I have this complex function:
$$f(z)=frac{z}{sinleft(frac{pi}{z+1}right)}$$
I'd like to compute residues in all isolate singularities.
If I'm not mistaken $f$ has poles in $z=frac{1}{k}-1$ and a non isolated singularity in $z=-1$, because it is an accumulation point of poles.
I tried to do something similar to this answer, but I don't seem to get a clean expression in terms of $xi$, where $xi$ is $z-frac{1}{k}+1$.
The best I can obtain is this:
$$frac{z}{sinleft(frac{kxi+1-k}{kxi+1}right)}$$
Can you help me?
complex-analysis residue-calculus laurent-series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have this complex function:
$$f(z)=frac{z}{sinleft(frac{pi}{z+1}right)}$$
I'd like to compute residues in all isolate singularities.
If I'm not mistaken $f$ has poles in $z=frac{1}{k}-1$ and a non isolated singularity in $z=-1$, because it is an accumulation point of poles.
I tried to do something similar to this answer, but I don't seem to get a clean expression in terms of $xi$, where $xi$ is $z-frac{1}{k}+1$.
The best I can obtain is this:
$$frac{z}{sinleft(frac{kxi+1-k}{kxi+1}right)}$$
Can you help me?
complex-analysis residue-calculus laurent-series
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have this complex function:
$$f(z)=frac{z}{sinleft(frac{pi}{z+1}right)}$$
I'd like to compute residues in all isolate singularities.
If I'm not mistaken $f$ has poles in $z=frac{1}{k}-1$ and a non isolated singularity in $z=-1$, because it is an accumulation point of poles.
I tried to do something similar to this answer, but I don't seem to get a clean expression in terms of $xi$, where $xi$ is $z-frac{1}{k}+1$.
The best I can obtain is this:
$$frac{z}{sinleft(frac{kxi+1-k}{kxi+1}right)}$$
Can you help me?
complex-analysis residue-calculus laurent-series
$endgroup$
I have this complex function:
$$f(z)=frac{z}{sinleft(frac{pi}{z+1}right)}$$
I'd like to compute residues in all isolate singularities.
If I'm not mistaken $f$ has poles in $z=frac{1}{k}-1$ and a non isolated singularity in $z=-1$, because it is an accumulation point of poles.
I tried to do something similar to this answer, but I don't seem to get a clean expression in terms of $xi$, where $xi$ is $z-frac{1}{k}+1$.
The best I can obtain is this:
$$frac{z}{sinleft(frac{kxi+1-k}{kxi+1}right)}$$
Can you help me?
complex-analysis residue-calculus laurent-series
complex-analysis residue-calculus laurent-series
edited Jan 15 at 22:14
rtybase
10.8k21533
10.8k21533
asked Jan 7 at 13:30
EugenioDiPaolaEugenioDiPaola
513
513
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $f(z)=sinleft(fracpi{z+1}right)$. Then$$f'(z)=-frac{picosleft(fracpi{z+1}right)}{(z+1)^2}$$and therefore$$f'left(frac1k-1right)=(-1)^{k-1}k^2pi.$$So,$$operatorname{res}_{z=frac1k-1}left(frac z{sinleft(fracpi{z+1}right)}right)=frac{frac1k-1}{(-1)^{k-1}k^2pi}=(-1)^{k-1}frac{1-k}{k^3pi}.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thank you, but i don't understand the last equality; why is the residue equal to $frac{frac{1}{k}-1}{f^{'}(frac{1}{k}-1)}$?
$endgroup$
– EugenioDiPaola
Jan 7 at 14:53
1
$begingroup$
If $f$ and $g$ are analytic functions, $f(z_0)neq0$, and $z_0$ is a simple pole of $g$, then$$operatorname{res}_{z=z_0}left(frac{f(z)}{g(z)}right)=frac{f(z_0)}{g'(z_0)}.$$
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 7 at 14:56
1
$begingroup$
@EugenioDiPaola For completeness, you should include the residue at $z = infty$, which is $pi/6$. The sum of all residues will be zero (if we choose smaller and smaller circles around $z = -1$ between the poles, the sequence of integrals tends to zero).
$endgroup$
– Maxim
Jan 16 at 2:29
$begingroup$
right, i forgot about that :) That's interesting, my course material states: "if a function has ONLY isolated singularities the sum of all residues, taken in account also the eventual residue at infinity, is zero". You're saying that the integral that contains only -1 inside and all the isolated singularities outside is zero. So, is there a stronger statement such as "the sum of all residues of isolated singularities is zero", even if the function has not isolated singularities? Or we're just lucky for this particular function?
$endgroup$
– EugenioDiPaola
Jan 16 at 22:37
1
$begingroup$
My guess is that you were just lucky with this particular function.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 16 at 23:26
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065007%2fresidue-of-fz-fracz-sin-left-frac-piz1-right-in-all-isolated-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $f(z)=sinleft(fracpi{z+1}right)$. Then$$f'(z)=-frac{picosleft(fracpi{z+1}right)}{(z+1)^2}$$and therefore$$f'left(frac1k-1right)=(-1)^{k-1}k^2pi.$$So,$$operatorname{res}_{z=frac1k-1}left(frac z{sinleft(fracpi{z+1}right)}right)=frac{frac1k-1}{(-1)^{k-1}k^2pi}=(-1)^{k-1}frac{1-k}{k^3pi}.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thank you, but i don't understand the last equality; why is the residue equal to $frac{frac{1}{k}-1}{f^{'}(frac{1}{k}-1)}$?
$endgroup$
– EugenioDiPaola
Jan 7 at 14:53
1
$begingroup$
If $f$ and $g$ are analytic functions, $f(z_0)neq0$, and $z_0$ is a simple pole of $g$, then$$operatorname{res}_{z=z_0}left(frac{f(z)}{g(z)}right)=frac{f(z_0)}{g'(z_0)}.$$
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 7 at 14:56
1
$begingroup$
@EugenioDiPaola For completeness, you should include the residue at $z = infty$, which is $pi/6$. The sum of all residues will be zero (if we choose smaller and smaller circles around $z = -1$ between the poles, the sequence of integrals tends to zero).
$endgroup$
– Maxim
Jan 16 at 2:29
$begingroup$
right, i forgot about that :) That's interesting, my course material states: "if a function has ONLY isolated singularities the sum of all residues, taken in account also the eventual residue at infinity, is zero". You're saying that the integral that contains only -1 inside and all the isolated singularities outside is zero. So, is there a stronger statement such as "the sum of all residues of isolated singularities is zero", even if the function has not isolated singularities? Or we're just lucky for this particular function?
$endgroup$
– EugenioDiPaola
Jan 16 at 22:37
1
$begingroup$
My guess is that you were just lucky with this particular function.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 16 at 23:26
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $f(z)=sinleft(fracpi{z+1}right)$. Then$$f'(z)=-frac{picosleft(fracpi{z+1}right)}{(z+1)^2}$$and therefore$$f'left(frac1k-1right)=(-1)^{k-1}k^2pi.$$So,$$operatorname{res}_{z=frac1k-1}left(frac z{sinleft(fracpi{z+1}right)}right)=frac{frac1k-1}{(-1)^{k-1}k^2pi}=(-1)^{k-1}frac{1-k}{k^3pi}.$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thank you, but i don't understand the last equality; why is the residue equal to $frac{frac{1}{k}-1}{f^{'}(frac{1}{k}-1)}$?
$endgroup$
– EugenioDiPaola
Jan 7 at 14:53
1
$begingroup$
If $f$ and $g$ are analytic functions, $f(z_0)neq0$, and $z_0$ is a simple pole of $g$, then$$operatorname{res}_{z=z_0}left(frac{f(z)}{g(z)}right)=frac{f(z_0)}{g'(z_0)}.$$
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 7 at 14:56
1
$begingroup$
@EugenioDiPaola For completeness, you should include the residue at $z = infty$, which is $pi/6$. The sum of all residues will be zero (if we choose smaller and smaller circles around $z = -1$ between the poles, the sequence of integrals tends to zero).
$endgroup$
– Maxim
Jan 16 at 2:29
$begingroup$
right, i forgot about that :) That's interesting, my course material states: "if a function has ONLY isolated singularities the sum of all residues, taken in account also the eventual residue at infinity, is zero". You're saying that the integral that contains only -1 inside and all the isolated singularities outside is zero. So, is there a stronger statement such as "the sum of all residues of isolated singularities is zero", even if the function has not isolated singularities? Or we're just lucky for this particular function?
$endgroup$
– EugenioDiPaola
Jan 16 at 22:37
1
$begingroup$
My guess is that you were just lucky with this particular function.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 16 at 23:26
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
Let $f(z)=sinleft(fracpi{z+1}right)$. Then$$f'(z)=-frac{picosleft(fracpi{z+1}right)}{(z+1)^2}$$and therefore$$f'left(frac1k-1right)=(-1)^{k-1}k^2pi.$$So,$$operatorname{res}_{z=frac1k-1}left(frac z{sinleft(fracpi{z+1}right)}right)=frac{frac1k-1}{(-1)^{k-1}k^2pi}=(-1)^{k-1}frac{1-k}{k^3pi}.$$
$endgroup$
Let $f(z)=sinleft(fracpi{z+1}right)$. Then$$f'(z)=-frac{picosleft(fracpi{z+1}right)}{(z+1)^2}$$and therefore$$f'left(frac1k-1right)=(-1)^{k-1}k^2pi.$$So,$$operatorname{res}_{z=frac1k-1}left(frac z{sinleft(fracpi{z+1}right)}right)=frac{frac1k-1}{(-1)^{k-1}k^2pi}=(-1)^{k-1}frac{1-k}{k^3pi}.$$
answered Jan 7 at 13:37
José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos
157k22126227
157k22126227
$begingroup$
thank you, but i don't understand the last equality; why is the residue equal to $frac{frac{1}{k}-1}{f^{'}(frac{1}{k}-1)}$?
$endgroup$
– EugenioDiPaola
Jan 7 at 14:53
1
$begingroup$
If $f$ and $g$ are analytic functions, $f(z_0)neq0$, and $z_0$ is a simple pole of $g$, then$$operatorname{res}_{z=z_0}left(frac{f(z)}{g(z)}right)=frac{f(z_0)}{g'(z_0)}.$$
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 7 at 14:56
1
$begingroup$
@EugenioDiPaola For completeness, you should include the residue at $z = infty$, which is $pi/6$. The sum of all residues will be zero (if we choose smaller and smaller circles around $z = -1$ between the poles, the sequence of integrals tends to zero).
$endgroup$
– Maxim
Jan 16 at 2:29
$begingroup$
right, i forgot about that :) That's interesting, my course material states: "if a function has ONLY isolated singularities the sum of all residues, taken in account also the eventual residue at infinity, is zero". You're saying that the integral that contains only -1 inside and all the isolated singularities outside is zero. So, is there a stronger statement such as "the sum of all residues of isolated singularities is zero", even if the function has not isolated singularities? Or we're just lucky for this particular function?
$endgroup$
– EugenioDiPaola
Jan 16 at 22:37
1
$begingroup$
My guess is that you were just lucky with this particular function.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 16 at 23:26
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
thank you, but i don't understand the last equality; why is the residue equal to $frac{frac{1}{k}-1}{f^{'}(frac{1}{k}-1)}$?
$endgroup$
– EugenioDiPaola
Jan 7 at 14:53
1
$begingroup$
If $f$ and $g$ are analytic functions, $f(z_0)neq0$, and $z_0$ is a simple pole of $g$, then$$operatorname{res}_{z=z_0}left(frac{f(z)}{g(z)}right)=frac{f(z_0)}{g'(z_0)}.$$
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 7 at 14:56
1
$begingroup$
@EugenioDiPaola For completeness, you should include the residue at $z = infty$, which is $pi/6$. The sum of all residues will be zero (if we choose smaller and smaller circles around $z = -1$ between the poles, the sequence of integrals tends to zero).
$endgroup$
– Maxim
Jan 16 at 2:29
$begingroup$
right, i forgot about that :) That's interesting, my course material states: "if a function has ONLY isolated singularities the sum of all residues, taken in account also the eventual residue at infinity, is zero". You're saying that the integral that contains only -1 inside and all the isolated singularities outside is zero. So, is there a stronger statement such as "the sum of all residues of isolated singularities is zero", even if the function has not isolated singularities? Or we're just lucky for this particular function?
$endgroup$
– EugenioDiPaola
Jan 16 at 22:37
1
$begingroup$
My guess is that you were just lucky with this particular function.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 16 at 23:26
$begingroup$
thank you, but i don't understand the last equality; why is the residue equal to $frac{frac{1}{k}-1}{f^{'}(frac{1}{k}-1)}$?
$endgroup$
– EugenioDiPaola
Jan 7 at 14:53
$begingroup$
thank you, but i don't understand the last equality; why is the residue equal to $frac{frac{1}{k}-1}{f^{'}(frac{1}{k}-1)}$?
$endgroup$
– EugenioDiPaola
Jan 7 at 14:53
1
1
$begingroup$
If $f$ and $g$ are analytic functions, $f(z_0)neq0$, and $z_0$ is a simple pole of $g$, then$$operatorname{res}_{z=z_0}left(frac{f(z)}{g(z)}right)=frac{f(z_0)}{g'(z_0)}.$$
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 7 at 14:56
$begingroup$
If $f$ and $g$ are analytic functions, $f(z_0)neq0$, and $z_0$ is a simple pole of $g$, then$$operatorname{res}_{z=z_0}left(frac{f(z)}{g(z)}right)=frac{f(z_0)}{g'(z_0)}.$$
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 7 at 14:56
1
1
$begingroup$
@EugenioDiPaola For completeness, you should include the residue at $z = infty$, which is $pi/6$. The sum of all residues will be zero (if we choose smaller and smaller circles around $z = -1$ between the poles, the sequence of integrals tends to zero).
$endgroup$
– Maxim
Jan 16 at 2:29
$begingroup$
@EugenioDiPaola For completeness, you should include the residue at $z = infty$, which is $pi/6$. The sum of all residues will be zero (if we choose smaller and smaller circles around $z = -1$ between the poles, the sequence of integrals tends to zero).
$endgroup$
– Maxim
Jan 16 at 2:29
$begingroup$
right, i forgot about that :) That's interesting, my course material states: "if a function has ONLY isolated singularities the sum of all residues, taken in account also the eventual residue at infinity, is zero". You're saying that the integral that contains only -1 inside and all the isolated singularities outside is zero. So, is there a stronger statement such as "the sum of all residues of isolated singularities is zero", even if the function has not isolated singularities? Or we're just lucky for this particular function?
$endgroup$
– EugenioDiPaola
Jan 16 at 22:37
$begingroup$
right, i forgot about that :) That's interesting, my course material states: "if a function has ONLY isolated singularities the sum of all residues, taken in account also the eventual residue at infinity, is zero". You're saying that the integral that contains only -1 inside and all the isolated singularities outside is zero. So, is there a stronger statement such as "the sum of all residues of isolated singularities is zero", even if the function has not isolated singularities? Or we're just lucky for this particular function?
$endgroup$
– EugenioDiPaola
Jan 16 at 22:37
1
1
$begingroup$
My guess is that you were just lucky with this particular function.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 16 at 23:26
$begingroup$
My guess is that you were just lucky with this particular function.
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 16 at 23:26
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065007%2fresidue-of-fz-fracz-sin-left-frac-piz1-right-in-all-isolated-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown