Dividing by greater number
My question is very simple (I think so), but I have a trouble to get the precise understanding of the following question.
Let's take into consideration the following function:
$$f(n,a,s_1,s_2,...s_n)=frac{1}{n(1+s_1)}+frac{1}{n(1+s_2)^2}+...+frac{1}{n(1+s_n)^n}-left(frac{a}{n(1+s_2)^2}+frac{2a}{n(1+s_3)^3}+...frac{(n-1)a}{n(1+s_n)^n}right)-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^n},$$
where $n$ is integer, $ain(0,1), s_iin(0,1), i=1, 2,...,n$ and $s_1<s_2<...<s_n$. The function $f$ attains positive, negative as well as zero values.
If we replace all $s_i$'s $(i=1,...,n-1)$ by $s_n$ is it correct to write the following relationship (note: $s_1<...<s_n$)
$$frac{1}{n(1+s_1)}+frac{1}{n(1+s_2)^2}+...+frac{1}{n(1+s_n)^n}-left(frac{a}{n(1+s_2)^2}+frac{2a}{n(1+s_3)^3}+frac{(n-1)a}{n(1+s_n)^n}right)-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^n}>frac{1}{n(1+s_n)}+frac{1}{n(1+s_n)^2}+...+frac{1}{n(1+s_n)^n}-left(frac{a}{n(1+s_n)^2}+frac{2a}{n(1+s_n)^3}+...frac{(n-1)a}{n(1+s_n)^n}right)-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^n}.$$
calculus inequality
add a comment |
My question is very simple (I think so), but I have a trouble to get the precise understanding of the following question.
Let's take into consideration the following function:
$$f(n,a,s_1,s_2,...s_n)=frac{1}{n(1+s_1)}+frac{1}{n(1+s_2)^2}+...+frac{1}{n(1+s_n)^n}-left(frac{a}{n(1+s_2)^2}+frac{2a}{n(1+s_3)^3}+...frac{(n-1)a}{n(1+s_n)^n}right)-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^n},$$
where $n$ is integer, $ain(0,1), s_iin(0,1), i=1, 2,...,n$ and $s_1<s_2<...<s_n$. The function $f$ attains positive, negative as well as zero values.
If we replace all $s_i$'s $(i=1,...,n-1)$ by $s_n$ is it correct to write the following relationship (note: $s_1<...<s_n$)
$$frac{1}{n(1+s_1)}+frac{1}{n(1+s_2)^2}+...+frac{1}{n(1+s_n)^n}-left(frac{a}{n(1+s_2)^2}+frac{2a}{n(1+s_3)^3}+frac{(n-1)a}{n(1+s_n)^n}right)-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^n}>frac{1}{n(1+s_n)}+frac{1}{n(1+s_n)^2}+...+frac{1}{n(1+s_n)^n}-left(frac{a}{n(1+s_n)^2}+frac{2a}{n(1+s_n)^3}+...frac{(n-1)a}{n(1+s_n)^n}right)-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^n}.$$
calculus inequality
1
replacing with $s_n$ will make all the terms smaller but some are added but some are subtracted so you have no idea how they compare. If you replace all the terms you add with $s_n$ and all the terms you subtract with $s_1$ you will get something definitely smaller. But it might not be the value you want.
– fleablood
Nov 27 '18 at 4:15
add a comment |
My question is very simple (I think so), but I have a trouble to get the precise understanding of the following question.
Let's take into consideration the following function:
$$f(n,a,s_1,s_2,...s_n)=frac{1}{n(1+s_1)}+frac{1}{n(1+s_2)^2}+...+frac{1}{n(1+s_n)^n}-left(frac{a}{n(1+s_2)^2}+frac{2a}{n(1+s_3)^3}+...frac{(n-1)a}{n(1+s_n)^n}right)-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^n},$$
where $n$ is integer, $ain(0,1), s_iin(0,1), i=1, 2,...,n$ and $s_1<s_2<...<s_n$. The function $f$ attains positive, negative as well as zero values.
If we replace all $s_i$'s $(i=1,...,n-1)$ by $s_n$ is it correct to write the following relationship (note: $s_1<...<s_n$)
$$frac{1}{n(1+s_1)}+frac{1}{n(1+s_2)^2}+...+frac{1}{n(1+s_n)^n}-left(frac{a}{n(1+s_2)^2}+frac{2a}{n(1+s_3)^3}+frac{(n-1)a}{n(1+s_n)^n}right)-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^n}>frac{1}{n(1+s_n)}+frac{1}{n(1+s_n)^2}+...+frac{1}{n(1+s_n)^n}-left(frac{a}{n(1+s_n)^2}+frac{2a}{n(1+s_n)^3}+...frac{(n-1)a}{n(1+s_n)^n}right)-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^n}.$$
calculus inequality
My question is very simple (I think so), but I have a trouble to get the precise understanding of the following question.
Let's take into consideration the following function:
$$f(n,a,s_1,s_2,...s_n)=frac{1}{n(1+s_1)}+frac{1}{n(1+s_2)^2}+...+frac{1}{n(1+s_n)^n}-left(frac{a}{n(1+s_2)^2}+frac{2a}{n(1+s_3)^3}+...frac{(n-1)a}{n(1+s_n)^n}right)-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^n},$$
where $n$ is integer, $ain(0,1), s_iin(0,1), i=1, 2,...,n$ and $s_1<s_2<...<s_n$. The function $f$ attains positive, negative as well as zero values.
If we replace all $s_i$'s $(i=1,...,n-1)$ by $s_n$ is it correct to write the following relationship (note: $s_1<...<s_n$)
$$frac{1}{n(1+s_1)}+frac{1}{n(1+s_2)^2}+...+frac{1}{n(1+s_n)^n}-left(frac{a}{n(1+s_2)^2}+frac{2a}{n(1+s_3)^3}+frac{(n-1)a}{n(1+s_n)^n}right)-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^n}>frac{1}{n(1+s_n)}+frac{1}{n(1+s_n)^2}+...+frac{1}{n(1+s_n)^n}-left(frac{a}{n(1+s_n)^2}+frac{2a}{n(1+s_n)^3}+...frac{(n-1)a}{n(1+s_n)^n}right)-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^n}.$$
calculus inequality
calculus inequality
edited Nov 23 '18 at 15:17
asked Nov 21 '18 at 6:56
David
408
408
1
replacing with $s_n$ will make all the terms smaller but some are added but some are subtracted so you have no idea how they compare. If you replace all the terms you add with $s_n$ and all the terms you subtract with $s_1$ you will get something definitely smaller. But it might not be the value you want.
– fleablood
Nov 27 '18 at 4:15
add a comment |
1
replacing with $s_n$ will make all the terms smaller but some are added but some are subtracted so you have no idea how they compare. If you replace all the terms you add with $s_n$ and all the terms you subtract with $s_1$ you will get something definitely smaller. But it might not be the value you want.
– fleablood
Nov 27 '18 at 4:15
1
1
replacing with $s_n$ will make all the terms smaller but some are added but some are subtracted so you have no idea how they compare. If you replace all the terms you add with $s_n$ and all the terms you subtract with $s_1$ you will get something definitely smaller. But it might not be the value you want.
– fleablood
Nov 27 '18 at 4:15
replacing with $s_n$ will make all the terms smaller but some are added but some are subtracted so you have no idea how they compare. If you replace all the terms you add with $s_n$ and all the terms you subtract with $s_1$ you will get something definitely smaller. But it might not be the value you want.
– fleablood
Nov 27 '18 at 4:15
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It is easy to check that the inequality you asking is equivalent to
$$g(n,a,s_1,s_2,dots,s_n)=sum_{i=1}^n (1-(i-1)a)left(frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}right)>0.$$
This may be wrong for $a$ close to 1. For instance, MathCad calculates $g(4,0.99,0.05,0.1,0.15,0.9)simeq –0.07$.
1
Thank you for your answer. Let me continue the work you have done.
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:36
If we assume that $1-(n-1)a>0$, therefore this inequality holds for every $i's$. From another side, we have that $frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}>0$ for every $i=1,...,n-1$, therefore the function $g(n,a,s_1,....,s_n)>0$. Do you agree?
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:39
1
@David Right. ...
– Alex Ravsky
Nov 27 '18 at 6:41
Please note, that we can write the function $g()$ in the following way: $g(n,a,s_1,s_2,...,s_n)=sum_{i=1}^{n-1} frac{1-(i-1a)}{n}left (frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}right)$
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:46
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007358%2fdividing-by-greater-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It is easy to check that the inequality you asking is equivalent to
$$g(n,a,s_1,s_2,dots,s_n)=sum_{i=1}^n (1-(i-1)a)left(frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}right)>0.$$
This may be wrong for $a$ close to 1. For instance, MathCad calculates $g(4,0.99,0.05,0.1,0.15,0.9)simeq –0.07$.
1
Thank you for your answer. Let me continue the work you have done.
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:36
If we assume that $1-(n-1)a>0$, therefore this inequality holds for every $i's$. From another side, we have that $frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}>0$ for every $i=1,...,n-1$, therefore the function $g(n,a,s_1,....,s_n)>0$. Do you agree?
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:39
1
@David Right. ...
– Alex Ravsky
Nov 27 '18 at 6:41
Please note, that we can write the function $g()$ in the following way: $g(n,a,s_1,s_2,...,s_n)=sum_{i=1}^{n-1} frac{1-(i-1a)}{n}left (frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}right)$
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:46
add a comment |
It is easy to check that the inequality you asking is equivalent to
$$g(n,a,s_1,s_2,dots,s_n)=sum_{i=1}^n (1-(i-1)a)left(frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}right)>0.$$
This may be wrong for $a$ close to 1. For instance, MathCad calculates $g(4,0.99,0.05,0.1,0.15,0.9)simeq –0.07$.
1
Thank you for your answer. Let me continue the work you have done.
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:36
If we assume that $1-(n-1)a>0$, therefore this inequality holds for every $i's$. From another side, we have that $frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}>0$ for every $i=1,...,n-1$, therefore the function $g(n,a,s_1,....,s_n)>0$. Do you agree?
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:39
1
@David Right. ...
– Alex Ravsky
Nov 27 '18 at 6:41
Please note, that we can write the function $g()$ in the following way: $g(n,a,s_1,s_2,...,s_n)=sum_{i=1}^{n-1} frac{1-(i-1a)}{n}left (frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}right)$
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:46
add a comment |
It is easy to check that the inequality you asking is equivalent to
$$g(n,a,s_1,s_2,dots,s_n)=sum_{i=1}^n (1-(i-1)a)left(frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}right)>0.$$
This may be wrong for $a$ close to 1. For instance, MathCad calculates $g(4,0.99,0.05,0.1,0.15,0.9)simeq –0.07$.
It is easy to check that the inequality you asking is equivalent to
$$g(n,a,s_1,s_2,dots,s_n)=sum_{i=1}^n (1-(i-1)a)left(frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}right)>0.$$
This may be wrong for $a$ close to 1. For instance, MathCad calculates $g(4,0.99,0.05,0.1,0.15,0.9)simeq –0.07$.
answered Nov 27 '18 at 3:59


Alex Ravsky
39.3k32181
39.3k32181
1
Thank you for your answer. Let me continue the work you have done.
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:36
If we assume that $1-(n-1)a>0$, therefore this inequality holds for every $i's$. From another side, we have that $frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}>0$ for every $i=1,...,n-1$, therefore the function $g(n,a,s_1,....,s_n)>0$. Do you agree?
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:39
1
@David Right. ...
– Alex Ravsky
Nov 27 '18 at 6:41
Please note, that we can write the function $g()$ in the following way: $g(n,a,s_1,s_2,...,s_n)=sum_{i=1}^{n-1} frac{1-(i-1a)}{n}left (frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}right)$
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:46
add a comment |
1
Thank you for your answer. Let me continue the work you have done.
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:36
If we assume that $1-(n-1)a>0$, therefore this inequality holds for every $i's$. From another side, we have that $frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}>0$ for every $i=1,...,n-1$, therefore the function $g(n,a,s_1,....,s_n)>0$. Do you agree?
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:39
1
@David Right. ...
– Alex Ravsky
Nov 27 '18 at 6:41
Please note, that we can write the function $g()$ in the following way: $g(n,a,s_1,s_2,...,s_n)=sum_{i=1}^{n-1} frac{1-(i-1a)}{n}left (frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}right)$
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:46
1
1
Thank you for your answer. Let me continue the work you have done.
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:36
Thank you for your answer. Let me continue the work you have done.
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:36
If we assume that $1-(n-1)a>0$, therefore this inequality holds for every $i's$. From another side, we have that $frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}>0$ for every $i=1,...,n-1$, therefore the function $g(n,a,s_1,....,s_n)>0$. Do you agree?
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:39
If we assume that $1-(n-1)a>0$, therefore this inequality holds for every $i's$. From another side, we have that $frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}>0$ for every $i=1,...,n-1$, therefore the function $g(n,a,s_1,....,s_n)>0$. Do you agree?
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:39
1
1
@David Right. ...
– Alex Ravsky
Nov 27 '18 at 6:41
@David Right. ...
– Alex Ravsky
Nov 27 '18 at 6:41
Please note, that we can write the function $g()$ in the following way: $g(n,a,s_1,s_2,...,s_n)=sum_{i=1}^{n-1} frac{1-(i-1a)}{n}left (frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}right)$
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:46
Please note, that we can write the function $g()$ in the following way: $g(n,a,s_1,s_2,...,s_n)=sum_{i=1}^{n-1} frac{1-(i-1a)}{n}left (frac{1}{(1+s_i)^i}-frac{1}{(1+s_n)^i}right)$
– David
Nov 27 '18 at 6:46
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007358%2fdividing-by-greater-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
replacing with $s_n$ will make all the terms smaller but some are added but some are subtracted so you have no idea how they compare. If you replace all the terms you add with $s_n$ and all the terms you subtract with $s_1$ you will get something definitely smaller. But it might not be the value you want.
– fleablood
Nov 27 '18 at 4:15