Delete items from DynamoDB by type












0














I have a DynamoDB table with a TTL set on one of the attributes. However when I started ingesting data into the table I accidentally was entering the attribute as a string instead of an integer. This is ignored by the TTL and my records were never being deleted.



After a while I noticed my error and updated the code and the table ceased growing in size as records were being removed as designed. However I still have a few hundred thousand records in the table with the string TTL.



What is the best way for me to delete these records?










share|improve this question



























    0














    I have a DynamoDB table with a TTL set on one of the attributes. However when I started ingesting data into the table I accidentally was entering the attribute as a string instead of an integer. This is ignored by the TTL and my records were never being deleted.



    After a while I noticed my error and updated the code and the table ceased growing in size as records were being removed as designed. However I still have a few hundred thousand records in the table with the string TTL.



    What is the best way for me to delete these records?










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      I have a DynamoDB table with a TTL set on one of the attributes. However when I started ingesting data into the table I accidentally was entering the attribute as a string instead of an integer. This is ignored by the TTL and my records were never being deleted.



      After a while I noticed my error and updated the code and the table ceased growing in size as records were being removed as designed. However I still have a few hundred thousand records in the table with the string TTL.



      What is the best way for me to delete these records?










      share|improve this question













      I have a DynamoDB table with a TTL set on one of the attributes. However when I started ingesting data into the table I accidentally was entering the attribute as a string instead of an integer. This is ignored by the TTL and my records were never being deleted.



      After a while I noticed my error and updated the code and the table ceased growing in size as records were being removed as designed. However I still have a few hundred thousand records in the table with the string TTL.



      What is the best way for me to delete these records?







      amazon-dynamodb






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 19 '18 at 16:23









      Jacob Tomlinson

      1,59021946




      1,59021946
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          I've written a script in python with boto3 which scans the whole table, gets the keys for items with string TTL attributes and deletes them. However deleting the ~500k items seems to be rather slow. So any other answers would be much appreciated.



          import boto3
          dynamodb = boto3.resource('dynamodb')

          table = dynamodb.Table('my-table')

          response = table.scan()
          data = response['Items']
          while 'LastEvaluatedKey' in response:
          response = table.scan(ExclusiveStartKey=response['LastEvaluatedKey'])
          data.extend(response['Items'])

          string_keys = [item['key'] for item in data if type(item['ttl']) == str]

          with table.batch_writer() as batch:
          for key in string_keys:
          batch.delete_item(
          Key={
          'key': key
          },
          )
          string_keys.remove(key)





          share|improve this answer



















          • 1




            This is your only way, unless you don't care about any of the data in the table, then just drop an recreate the table. Increase your provisioned write and/or read capacity to make it go faster,
            – cementblocks
            Nov 19 '18 at 21:42











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53378822%2fdelete-items-from-dynamodb-by-type%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          I've written a script in python with boto3 which scans the whole table, gets the keys for items with string TTL attributes and deletes them. However deleting the ~500k items seems to be rather slow. So any other answers would be much appreciated.



          import boto3
          dynamodb = boto3.resource('dynamodb')

          table = dynamodb.Table('my-table')

          response = table.scan()
          data = response['Items']
          while 'LastEvaluatedKey' in response:
          response = table.scan(ExclusiveStartKey=response['LastEvaluatedKey'])
          data.extend(response['Items'])

          string_keys = [item['key'] for item in data if type(item['ttl']) == str]

          with table.batch_writer() as batch:
          for key in string_keys:
          batch.delete_item(
          Key={
          'key': key
          },
          )
          string_keys.remove(key)





          share|improve this answer



















          • 1




            This is your only way, unless you don't care about any of the data in the table, then just drop an recreate the table. Increase your provisioned write and/or read capacity to make it go faster,
            – cementblocks
            Nov 19 '18 at 21:42
















          0














          I've written a script in python with boto3 which scans the whole table, gets the keys for items with string TTL attributes and deletes them. However deleting the ~500k items seems to be rather slow. So any other answers would be much appreciated.



          import boto3
          dynamodb = boto3.resource('dynamodb')

          table = dynamodb.Table('my-table')

          response = table.scan()
          data = response['Items']
          while 'LastEvaluatedKey' in response:
          response = table.scan(ExclusiveStartKey=response['LastEvaluatedKey'])
          data.extend(response['Items'])

          string_keys = [item['key'] for item in data if type(item['ttl']) == str]

          with table.batch_writer() as batch:
          for key in string_keys:
          batch.delete_item(
          Key={
          'key': key
          },
          )
          string_keys.remove(key)





          share|improve this answer



















          • 1




            This is your only way, unless you don't care about any of the data in the table, then just drop an recreate the table. Increase your provisioned write and/or read capacity to make it go faster,
            – cementblocks
            Nov 19 '18 at 21:42














          0












          0








          0






          I've written a script in python with boto3 which scans the whole table, gets the keys for items with string TTL attributes and deletes them. However deleting the ~500k items seems to be rather slow. So any other answers would be much appreciated.



          import boto3
          dynamodb = boto3.resource('dynamodb')

          table = dynamodb.Table('my-table')

          response = table.scan()
          data = response['Items']
          while 'LastEvaluatedKey' in response:
          response = table.scan(ExclusiveStartKey=response['LastEvaluatedKey'])
          data.extend(response['Items'])

          string_keys = [item['key'] for item in data if type(item['ttl']) == str]

          with table.batch_writer() as batch:
          for key in string_keys:
          batch.delete_item(
          Key={
          'key': key
          },
          )
          string_keys.remove(key)





          share|improve this answer














          I've written a script in python with boto3 which scans the whole table, gets the keys for items with string TTL attributes and deletes them. However deleting the ~500k items seems to be rather slow. So any other answers would be much appreciated.



          import boto3
          dynamodb = boto3.resource('dynamodb')

          table = dynamodb.Table('my-table')

          response = table.scan()
          data = response['Items']
          while 'LastEvaluatedKey' in response:
          response = table.scan(ExclusiveStartKey=response['LastEvaluatedKey'])
          data.extend(response['Items'])

          string_keys = [item['key'] for item in data if type(item['ttl']) == str]

          with table.batch_writer() as batch:
          for key in string_keys:
          batch.delete_item(
          Key={
          'key': key
          },
          )
          string_keys.remove(key)






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 19 '18 at 16:57

























          answered Nov 19 '18 at 16:43









          Jacob Tomlinson

          1,59021946




          1,59021946








          • 1




            This is your only way, unless you don't care about any of the data in the table, then just drop an recreate the table. Increase your provisioned write and/or read capacity to make it go faster,
            – cementblocks
            Nov 19 '18 at 21:42














          • 1




            This is your only way, unless you don't care about any of the data in the table, then just drop an recreate the table. Increase your provisioned write and/or read capacity to make it go faster,
            – cementblocks
            Nov 19 '18 at 21:42








          1




          1




          This is your only way, unless you don't care about any of the data in the table, then just drop an recreate the table. Increase your provisioned write and/or read capacity to make it go faster,
          – cementblocks
          Nov 19 '18 at 21:42




          This is your only way, unless you don't care about any of the data in the table, then just drop an recreate the table. Increase your provisioned write and/or read capacity to make it go faster,
          – cementblocks
          Nov 19 '18 at 21:42


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53378822%2fdelete-items-from-dynamodb-by-type%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

          android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

          WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]