The shape of an orthonormal matrix












0














Let $U$ be an orthonormal matrix. $U$ has $n$ rows and $n$ columns. We know that the first row is given by the following vector
$$bigg ( frac{1}{sqrt{n}}, ldots frac{1}{sqrt{n}} bigg).$$
Let's consider a column vector $X$.
$$X = (mu, ... mu)^{T}.$$
I am to prove that
$$UX = big( sqrt{n} mu, 0, 0, ldots, 0)^{T} tag{1}.$$
Both $U$ and $X$ are such matrices that their dimension fits and they can be multiplied in the way shown above.

How can I prove $(1)$?










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    Let $U$ be an orthonormal matrix. $U$ has $n$ rows and $n$ columns. We know that the first row is given by the following vector
    $$bigg ( frac{1}{sqrt{n}}, ldots frac{1}{sqrt{n}} bigg).$$
    Let's consider a column vector $X$.
    $$X = (mu, ... mu)^{T}.$$
    I am to prove that
    $$UX = big( sqrt{n} mu, 0, 0, ldots, 0)^{T} tag{1}.$$
    Both $U$ and $X$ are such matrices that their dimension fits and they can be multiplied in the way shown above.

    How can I prove $(1)$?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      Let $U$ be an orthonormal matrix. $U$ has $n$ rows and $n$ columns. We know that the first row is given by the following vector
      $$bigg ( frac{1}{sqrt{n}}, ldots frac{1}{sqrt{n}} bigg).$$
      Let's consider a column vector $X$.
      $$X = (mu, ... mu)^{T}.$$
      I am to prove that
      $$UX = big( sqrt{n} mu, 0, 0, ldots, 0)^{T} tag{1}.$$
      Both $U$ and $X$ are such matrices that their dimension fits and they can be multiplied in the way shown above.

      How can I prove $(1)$?










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $U$ be an orthonormal matrix. $U$ has $n$ rows and $n$ columns. We know that the first row is given by the following vector
      $$bigg ( frac{1}{sqrt{n}}, ldots frac{1}{sqrt{n}} bigg).$$
      Let's consider a column vector $X$.
      $$X = (mu, ... mu)^{T}.$$
      I am to prove that
      $$UX = big( sqrt{n} mu, 0, 0, ldots, 0)^{T} tag{1}.$$
      Both $U$ and $X$ are such matrices that their dimension fits and they can be multiplied in the way shown above.

      How can I prove $(1)$?







      linear-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 21 '18 at 11:45









      Hendrra

      1,079516




      1,079516






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          It should be clear that the first entry in $UX$ is given by



          $( frac{1}{sqrt{n}}, ldots frac{1}{sqrt{n}} ) cdot(mu, ... mu)^{T}= sqrt{n} mu$.



          Now suppose that the $j -th$ row of $U$ has the form $(a_1,a_2,...,a_n)$. Since $U$ is orthonormal we have



          $0=(a_1,a_2,...,a_n) cdot ( frac{1}{sqrt{n}}, ldots frac{1}{sqrt{n}} )^T =frac{1}{sqrt{n}}(a_1+a_2+...+a_n)$, thus $a_1+a_2+...+a_n=0$.



          The $j -th$ entry in $UX$ is therefore



          $$= mu(a_1+a_2+...+a_n)=0.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer































            3














            Let me give an alternative to @Fred's answer, or at least a more geometric version, based on three observations:




            1. The rows $u_1, u_2, ldots u_n$ of $U$ are orthonormal vectors, i.e., each has length $1$, and they are all perpendicular, i.e., $u_i cdot u_j = 0$ if $i ne j$, and $u_i cdot u_j = 1$ if $i = j$.


            2. The product $UX$ consists of the dot product $u_i cdot X$ of each row with the vector $X$.


            3. The vector $X$ is a scalar multiple $c u_1$ of the first row, with the scalar being $c = sqrt{n} mu$.



            So what's the dot product of the first row with $X$? It's just $c u_1 cdot u_1 = c $.



            What about the dot product $u_i cdot X$ for any $i ne 1$? Well, because $X$ is parallel to $u_1$, but $u_1$ is perpendicular to all the other $u_i$, we must have $u_i cdot X = 0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007611%2fthe-shape-of-an-orthonormal-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3














              It should be clear that the first entry in $UX$ is given by



              $( frac{1}{sqrt{n}}, ldots frac{1}{sqrt{n}} ) cdot(mu, ... mu)^{T}= sqrt{n} mu$.



              Now suppose that the $j -th$ row of $U$ has the form $(a_1,a_2,...,a_n)$. Since $U$ is orthonormal we have



              $0=(a_1,a_2,...,a_n) cdot ( frac{1}{sqrt{n}}, ldots frac{1}{sqrt{n}} )^T =frac{1}{sqrt{n}}(a_1+a_2+...+a_n)$, thus $a_1+a_2+...+a_n=0$.



              The $j -th$ entry in $UX$ is therefore



              $$= mu(a_1+a_2+...+a_n)=0.$$






              share|cite|improve this answer




























                3














                It should be clear that the first entry in $UX$ is given by



                $( frac{1}{sqrt{n}}, ldots frac{1}{sqrt{n}} ) cdot(mu, ... mu)^{T}= sqrt{n} mu$.



                Now suppose that the $j -th$ row of $U$ has the form $(a_1,a_2,...,a_n)$. Since $U$ is orthonormal we have



                $0=(a_1,a_2,...,a_n) cdot ( frac{1}{sqrt{n}}, ldots frac{1}{sqrt{n}} )^T =frac{1}{sqrt{n}}(a_1+a_2+...+a_n)$, thus $a_1+a_2+...+a_n=0$.



                The $j -th$ entry in $UX$ is therefore



                $$= mu(a_1+a_2+...+a_n)=0.$$






                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  3












                  3








                  3






                  It should be clear that the first entry in $UX$ is given by



                  $( frac{1}{sqrt{n}}, ldots frac{1}{sqrt{n}} ) cdot(mu, ... mu)^{T}= sqrt{n} mu$.



                  Now suppose that the $j -th$ row of $U$ has the form $(a_1,a_2,...,a_n)$. Since $U$ is orthonormal we have



                  $0=(a_1,a_2,...,a_n) cdot ( frac{1}{sqrt{n}}, ldots frac{1}{sqrt{n}} )^T =frac{1}{sqrt{n}}(a_1+a_2+...+a_n)$, thus $a_1+a_2+...+a_n=0$.



                  The $j -th$ entry in $UX$ is therefore



                  $$= mu(a_1+a_2+...+a_n)=0.$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  It should be clear that the first entry in $UX$ is given by



                  $( frac{1}{sqrt{n}}, ldots frac{1}{sqrt{n}} ) cdot(mu, ... mu)^{T}= sqrt{n} mu$.



                  Now suppose that the $j -th$ row of $U$ has the form $(a_1,a_2,...,a_n)$. Since $U$ is orthonormal we have



                  $0=(a_1,a_2,...,a_n) cdot ( frac{1}{sqrt{n}}, ldots frac{1}{sqrt{n}} )^T =frac{1}{sqrt{n}}(a_1+a_2+...+a_n)$, thus $a_1+a_2+...+a_n=0$.



                  The $j -th$ entry in $UX$ is therefore



                  $$= mu(a_1+a_2+...+a_n)=0.$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Nov 21 '18 at 12:26

























                  answered Nov 21 '18 at 12:00









                  Fred

                  44.2k1845




                  44.2k1845























                      3














                      Let me give an alternative to @Fred's answer, or at least a more geometric version, based on three observations:




                      1. The rows $u_1, u_2, ldots u_n$ of $U$ are orthonormal vectors, i.e., each has length $1$, and they are all perpendicular, i.e., $u_i cdot u_j = 0$ if $i ne j$, and $u_i cdot u_j = 1$ if $i = j$.


                      2. The product $UX$ consists of the dot product $u_i cdot X$ of each row with the vector $X$.


                      3. The vector $X$ is a scalar multiple $c u_1$ of the first row, with the scalar being $c = sqrt{n} mu$.



                      So what's the dot product of the first row with $X$? It's just $c u_1 cdot u_1 = c $.



                      What about the dot product $u_i cdot X$ for any $i ne 1$? Well, because $X$ is parallel to $u_1$, but $u_1$ is perpendicular to all the other $u_i$, we must have $u_i cdot X = 0$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer


























                        3














                        Let me give an alternative to @Fred's answer, or at least a more geometric version, based on three observations:




                        1. The rows $u_1, u_2, ldots u_n$ of $U$ are orthonormal vectors, i.e., each has length $1$, and they are all perpendicular, i.e., $u_i cdot u_j = 0$ if $i ne j$, and $u_i cdot u_j = 1$ if $i = j$.


                        2. The product $UX$ consists of the dot product $u_i cdot X$ of each row with the vector $X$.


                        3. The vector $X$ is a scalar multiple $c u_1$ of the first row, with the scalar being $c = sqrt{n} mu$.



                        So what's the dot product of the first row with $X$? It's just $c u_1 cdot u_1 = c $.



                        What about the dot product $u_i cdot X$ for any $i ne 1$? Well, because $X$ is parallel to $u_1$, but $u_1$ is perpendicular to all the other $u_i$, we must have $u_i cdot X = 0$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer
























                          3












                          3








                          3






                          Let me give an alternative to @Fred's answer, or at least a more geometric version, based on three observations:




                          1. The rows $u_1, u_2, ldots u_n$ of $U$ are orthonormal vectors, i.e., each has length $1$, and they are all perpendicular, i.e., $u_i cdot u_j = 0$ if $i ne j$, and $u_i cdot u_j = 1$ if $i = j$.


                          2. The product $UX$ consists of the dot product $u_i cdot X$ of each row with the vector $X$.


                          3. The vector $X$ is a scalar multiple $c u_1$ of the first row, with the scalar being $c = sqrt{n} mu$.



                          So what's the dot product of the first row with $X$? It's just $c u_1 cdot u_1 = c $.



                          What about the dot product $u_i cdot X$ for any $i ne 1$? Well, because $X$ is parallel to $u_1$, but $u_1$ is perpendicular to all the other $u_i$, we must have $u_i cdot X = 0$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          Let me give an alternative to @Fred's answer, or at least a more geometric version, based on three observations:




                          1. The rows $u_1, u_2, ldots u_n$ of $U$ are orthonormal vectors, i.e., each has length $1$, and they are all perpendicular, i.e., $u_i cdot u_j = 0$ if $i ne j$, and $u_i cdot u_j = 1$ if $i = j$.


                          2. The product $UX$ consists of the dot product $u_i cdot X$ of each row with the vector $X$.


                          3. The vector $X$ is a scalar multiple $c u_1$ of the first row, with the scalar being $c = sqrt{n} mu$.



                          So what's the dot product of the first row with $X$? It's just $c u_1 cdot u_1 = c $.



                          What about the dot product $u_i cdot X$ for any $i ne 1$? Well, because $X$ is parallel to $u_1$, but $u_1$ is perpendicular to all the other $u_i$, we must have $u_i cdot X = 0$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Nov 21 '18 at 12:32









                          John Hughes

                          62.4k24090




                          62.4k24090






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                              Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                              Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007611%2fthe-shape-of-an-orthonormal-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                              Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                              A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$