Fastest way to multiply small numbers with decimals mentally
$begingroup$
Is there a fast way to multiply these numbers mentally? Some examples:
- $0.85 times 1.15$
- $0.5 times 1.5$
- $0.2 times 1.4$
mental-arithmetic
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a fast way to multiply these numbers mentally? Some examples:
- $0.85 times 1.15$
- $0.5 times 1.5$
- $0.2 times 1.4$
mental-arithmetic
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Confusing to read, because of lack of line breaks and the inconsistent use of comma/period convention for the decimal.
$endgroup$
– Jason Zimba
Apr 2 '14 at 11:25
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is there a fast way to multiply these numbers mentally? Some examples:
- $0.85 times 1.15$
- $0.5 times 1.5$
- $0.2 times 1.4$
mental-arithmetic
$endgroup$
Is there a fast way to multiply these numbers mentally? Some examples:
- $0.85 times 1.15$
- $0.5 times 1.5$
- $0.2 times 1.4$
mental-arithmetic
mental-arithmetic
edited Jan 4 at 15:09
gwg
9771922
9771922
asked Apr 2 '14 at 10:59
Math is funMath is fun
5218
5218
3
$begingroup$
Confusing to read, because of lack of line breaks and the inconsistent use of comma/period convention for the decimal.
$endgroup$
– Jason Zimba
Apr 2 '14 at 11:25
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Confusing to read, because of lack of line breaks and the inconsistent use of comma/period convention for the decimal.
$endgroup$
– Jason Zimba
Apr 2 '14 at 11:25
3
3
$begingroup$
Confusing to read, because of lack of line breaks and the inconsistent use of comma/period convention for the decimal.
$endgroup$
– Jason Zimba
Apr 2 '14 at 11:25
$begingroup$
Confusing to read, because of lack of line breaks and the inconsistent use of comma/period convention for the decimal.
$endgroup$
– Jason Zimba
Apr 2 '14 at 11:25
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
when the numbers are simple, for example your second and third example, you can multiply directly, but pay attention of the posion of the point.
$$0.5*1.5=0.75\0.2*1.4=0.28$$
when the numbers are not simple enough, you can use the formula for the difference of square: $(a+b)(a-b)=a^2-b^2$. for example,
$$0.85*1.15=(1-0.15)*(1+0.15)=1-0.15^2=0.9775\
0.5*1.5=(1-0.5)*(1+0.5)=1-0.5^2=0.75\
0.2*1.4=(0.8-0.6)*(0.8+0.6)=0.8^2-0.6^2=0.28$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I move the decimal points around as needed, then move them back. I also use fraction-decimal equivalents.
For example, for $0.5times 1.5$ I think "half of 150 is 75," then put the decimal back: $0.75$.
For $0.2times 1.4$, I think "a fifth of 140, which is a fifth of 100 plus a fifth of 40, or 20 + 8 = 28." Then put the decimal back: 0.28. Or just: $2times 14 = 28$.
For $0.85times 1.15$ I would estimate "very close to 1," because $(1-x)(1+x) approx 1$ when $x$ is small.
(In the last case, I might next adjust the estimate by thinking "$15^2=225$, so come back 0.02" to give approximately 0.98.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well for 0.2 x 0.14 you can convert it to 2 x 14, but remember that there were 2 numbers after the decimal point (2 and 14). So when you multiply 2 by 14 you get 28. But wait! What about the 2 spaces after the decimal point? Well that's easy! If you want to make 28, two numbers after the decimal point just make it 0.8! Therefore 0.2 x 0.14 = 0.28
Hope this worked!!!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
We have that $0.2cdot 0.14 = 0.028$.
$endgroup$
– Winther
Oct 8 '15 at 0:34
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f736424%2ffastest-way-to-multiply-small-numbers-with-decimals-mentally%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
when the numbers are simple, for example your second and third example, you can multiply directly, but pay attention of the posion of the point.
$$0.5*1.5=0.75\0.2*1.4=0.28$$
when the numbers are not simple enough, you can use the formula for the difference of square: $(a+b)(a-b)=a^2-b^2$. for example,
$$0.85*1.15=(1-0.15)*(1+0.15)=1-0.15^2=0.9775\
0.5*1.5=(1-0.5)*(1+0.5)=1-0.5^2=0.75\
0.2*1.4=(0.8-0.6)*(0.8+0.6)=0.8^2-0.6^2=0.28$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
when the numbers are simple, for example your second and third example, you can multiply directly, but pay attention of the posion of the point.
$$0.5*1.5=0.75\0.2*1.4=0.28$$
when the numbers are not simple enough, you can use the formula for the difference of square: $(a+b)(a-b)=a^2-b^2$. for example,
$$0.85*1.15=(1-0.15)*(1+0.15)=1-0.15^2=0.9775\
0.5*1.5=(1-0.5)*(1+0.5)=1-0.5^2=0.75\
0.2*1.4=(0.8-0.6)*(0.8+0.6)=0.8^2-0.6^2=0.28$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
when the numbers are simple, for example your second and third example, you can multiply directly, but pay attention of the posion of the point.
$$0.5*1.5=0.75\0.2*1.4=0.28$$
when the numbers are not simple enough, you can use the formula for the difference of square: $(a+b)(a-b)=a^2-b^2$. for example,
$$0.85*1.15=(1-0.15)*(1+0.15)=1-0.15^2=0.9775\
0.5*1.5=(1-0.5)*(1+0.5)=1-0.5^2=0.75\
0.2*1.4=(0.8-0.6)*(0.8+0.6)=0.8^2-0.6^2=0.28$$
$endgroup$
when the numbers are simple, for example your second and third example, you can multiply directly, but pay attention of the posion of the point.
$$0.5*1.5=0.75\0.2*1.4=0.28$$
when the numbers are not simple enough, you can use the formula for the difference of square: $(a+b)(a-b)=a^2-b^2$. for example,
$$0.85*1.15=(1-0.15)*(1+0.15)=1-0.15^2=0.9775\
0.5*1.5=(1-0.5)*(1+0.5)=1-0.5^2=0.75\
0.2*1.4=(0.8-0.6)*(0.8+0.6)=0.8^2-0.6^2=0.28$$
answered Apr 2 '14 at 11:11
MartialMartial
9991717
9991717
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I move the decimal points around as needed, then move them back. I also use fraction-decimal equivalents.
For example, for $0.5times 1.5$ I think "half of 150 is 75," then put the decimal back: $0.75$.
For $0.2times 1.4$, I think "a fifth of 140, which is a fifth of 100 plus a fifth of 40, or 20 + 8 = 28." Then put the decimal back: 0.28. Or just: $2times 14 = 28$.
For $0.85times 1.15$ I would estimate "very close to 1," because $(1-x)(1+x) approx 1$ when $x$ is small.
(In the last case, I might next adjust the estimate by thinking "$15^2=225$, so come back 0.02" to give approximately 0.98.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I move the decimal points around as needed, then move them back. I also use fraction-decimal equivalents.
For example, for $0.5times 1.5$ I think "half of 150 is 75," then put the decimal back: $0.75$.
For $0.2times 1.4$, I think "a fifth of 140, which is a fifth of 100 plus a fifth of 40, or 20 + 8 = 28." Then put the decimal back: 0.28. Or just: $2times 14 = 28$.
For $0.85times 1.15$ I would estimate "very close to 1," because $(1-x)(1+x) approx 1$ when $x$ is small.
(In the last case, I might next adjust the estimate by thinking "$15^2=225$, so come back 0.02" to give approximately 0.98.)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I move the decimal points around as needed, then move them back. I also use fraction-decimal equivalents.
For example, for $0.5times 1.5$ I think "half of 150 is 75," then put the decimal back: $0.75$.
For $0.2times 1.4$, I think "a fifth of 140, which is a fifth of 100 plus a fifth of 40, or 20 + 8 = 28." Then put the decimal back: 0.28. Or just: $2times 14 = 28$.
For $0.85times 1.15$ I would estimate "very close to 1," because $(1-x)(1+x) approx 1$ when $x$ is small.
(In the last case, I might next adjust the estimate by thinking "$15^2=225$, so come back 0.02" to give approximately 0.98.)
$endgroup$
I move the decimal points around as needed, then move them back. I also use fraction-decimal equivalents.
For example, for $0.5times 1.5$ I think "half of 150 is 75," then put the decimal back: $0.75$.
For $0.2times 1.4$, I think "a fifth of 140, which is a fifth of 100 plus a fifth of 40, or 20 + 8 = 28." Then put the decimal back: 0.28. Or just: $2times 14 = 28$.
For $0.85times 1.15$ I would estimate "very close to 1," because $(1-x)(1+x) approx 1$ when $x$ is small.
(In the last case, I might next adjust the estimate by thinking "$15^2=225$, so come back 0.02" to give approximately 0.98.)
edited Apr 2 '14 at 20:19
answered Apr 2 '14 at 11:30
Jason ZimbaJason Zimba
2,203611
2,203611
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well for 0.2 x 0.14 you can convert it to 2 x 14, but remember that there were 2 numbers after the decimal point (2 and 14). So when you multiply 2 by 14 you get 28. But wait! What about the 2 spaces after the decimal point? Well that's easy! If you want to make 28, two numbers after the decimal point just make it 0.8! Therefore 0.2 x 0.14 = 0.28
Hope this worked!!!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
We have that $0.2cdot 0.14 = 0.028$.
$endgroup$
– Winther
Oct 8 '15 at 0:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well for 0.2 x 0.14 you can convert it to 2 x 14, but remember that there were 2 numbers after the decimal point (2 and 14). So when you multiply 2 by 14 you get 28. But wait! What about the 2 spaces after the decimal point? Well that's easy! If you want to make 28, two numbers after the decimal point just make it 0.8! Therefore 0.2 x 0.14 = 0.28
Hope this worked!!!
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
We have that $0.2cdot 0.14 = 0.028$.
$endgroup$
– Winther
Oct 8 '15 at 0:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well for 0.2 x 0.14 you can convert it to 2 x 14, but remember that there were 2 numbers after the decimal point (2 and 14). So when you multiply 2 by 14 you get 28. But wait! What about the 2 spaces after the decimal point? Well that's easy! If you want to make 28, two numbers after the decimal point just make it 0.8! Therefore 0.2 x 0.14 = 0.28
Hope this worked!!!
$endgroup$
Well for 0.2 x 0.14 you can convert it to 2 x 14, but remember that there were 2 numbers after the decimal point (2 and 14). So when you multiply 2 by 14 you get 28. But wait! What about the 2 spaces after the decimal point? Well that's easy! If you want to make 28, two numbers after the decimal point just make it 0.8! Therefore 0.2 x 0.14 = 0.28
Hope this worked!!!
answered Oct 8 '15 at 0:02
NaomiNaomi
1
1
$begingroup$
We have that $0.2cdot 0.14 = 0.028$.
$endgroup$
– Winther
Oct 8 '15 at 0:34
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have that $0.2cdot 0.14 = 0.028$.
$endgroup$
– Winther
Oct 8 '15 at 0:34
$begingroup$
We have that $0.2cdot 0.14 = 0.028$.
$endgroup$
– Winther
Oct 8 '15 at 0:34
$begingroup$
We have that $0.2cdot 0.14 = 0.028$.
$endgroup$
– Winther
Oct 8 '15 at 0:34
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f736424%2ffastest-way-to-multiply-small-numbers-with-decimals-mentally%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Confusing to read, because of lack of line breaks and the inconsistent use of comma/period convention for the decimal.
$endgroup$
– Jason Zimba
Apr 2 '14 at 11:25