Mixing
why separable algebra is a generalisation of separable field extension?
$begingroup$
They are defined differently.
Suppose we have a field $K$.
We say a finite field extension $L$ is separable over $K$ iff the number of embeddings $Lhookrightarrow bar K$ into the algebraic closure $bar K$ which is invariant on $K$ is $[L:K]$.
We say a finitely generated $K$-algebra $A$ is separable iff for any field extension $E/K$, $Aotimes_KE$ is reduced.
I have read that separable algebra is a generalisation of separable field extension. I think there is a proposition that
For a finite field extension $L/K$, if the field extension is
separable, then for any other field extension $E/K$, the $E$-algebra
$Lotimes_KE$ is reduced.
Can someone give some suggestions, I have no idea how to apply separability of field extensions. Or even a simpler case about $K[alpha]$ for $alpha$ separable over $K$.
commutative-algebra field-theory
asked Jan 4 at 19:09
Display NameDisplay Name
432212
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They are defined differently.
Suppose we have a field $K$.
We say a finite field extension $L$ is separable over $K$ iff the number of embeddings $Lhookrightarrow bar K$ into the algebraic closure $bar K$ which is invariant on $K$ is $[L:K]$.
We say a finitely generated $K$-algebra $A$ is separable iff for any field extension $E/K$, $Aotimes_KE$ is reduced.
I have read that separable algebra is a generalisation of separable field extension. I think there is a proposition that
For a finite field extension $L/K$, if the field extension is
separable, then for any other field extension $E/K$, the $E$-algebra
$Lotimes_KE$ is reduced.
Can someone give some suggestions, I have no idea how to apply separability of field extensions. Or even a simpler case about $K[alpha]$ for $alpha$ separable over $K$.
commutative-algebra field-theory
asked Jan 4 at 19:09
Display NameDisplay Name
432212
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
See wikipedia and its references. A separable algebra is a generalization to associative algebras of the notion of a separable field extension.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 4 at 20:15
1
$begingroup$
Gosh are you using some weird definitions. Do you know how to define separable algebras in terms of separability idempotents? And how to define separable field extensions in terms of minimal polynomials? In that case, you can look up the proof of Theorem 23 in my A problem on bilinear maps (to be precise, I only prove Proposition 24 there; but the primitive element theorem says that any separable field extension $L$ of $K$ can be written as $Kleft[xright]$ for some $x in L$, and thus Proposition 24 yields Theorem 23).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Jan 4 at 20:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They are defined differently.
Suppose we have a field $K$.
We say a finite field extension $L$ is separable over $K$ iff the number of embeddings $Lhookrightarrow bar K$ into the algebraic closure $bar K$ which is invariant on $K$ is $[L:K]$.
We say a finitely generated $K$-algebra $A$ is separable iff for any field extension $E/K$, $Aotimes_KE$ is reduced.
I have read that separable algebra is a generalisation of separable field extension. I think there is a proposition that
For a finite field extension $L/K$, if the field extension is
separable, then for any other field extension $E/K$, the $E$-algebra
$Lotimes_KE$ is reduced.
Can someone give some suggestions, I have no idea how to apply separability of field extensions. Or even a simpler case about $K[alpha]$ for $alpha$ separable over $K$.
commutative-algebra field-theory
asked Jan 4 at 19:09
Display NameDisplay Name
432212
$endgroup$
They are defined differently.
Suppose we have a field $K$.
We say a finite field extension $L$ is separable over $K$ iff the number of embeddings $Lhookrightarrow bar K$ into the algebraic closure $bar K$ which is invariant on $K$ is $[L:K]$.
We say a finitely generated $K$-algebra $A$ is separable iff for any field extension $E/K$, $Aotimes_KE$ is reduced.
I have read that separable algebra is a generalisation of separable field extension. I think there is a proposition that
For a finite field extension $L/K$, if the field extension is
separable, then for any other field extension $E/K$, the $E$-algebra
$Lotimes_KE$ is reduced.
Can someone give some suggestions, I have no idea how to apply separability of field extensions. Or even a simpler case about $K[alpha]$ for $alpha$ separable over $K$.
commutative-algebra field-theory
commutative-algebra field-theory
asked Jan 4 at 19:09
Display NameDisplay Name
432212
asked Jan 4 at 19:09
Display NameDisplay Name
432212
asked Jan 4 at 19:09
Display NameDisplay Name
432212
asked Jan 4 at 19:09
Display NameDisplay Name
432212
asked Jan 4 at 19:09
Display NameDisplay Name
432212
432212
$begingroup$
See wikipedia and its references. A separable algebra is a generalization to associative algebras of the notion of a separable field extension.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 4 at 20:15
1
$begingroup$
Gosh are you using some weird definitions. Do you know how to define separable algebras in terms of separability idempotents? And how to define separable field extensions in terms of minimal polynomials? In that case, you can look up the proof of Theorem 23 in my A problem on bilinear maps (to be precise, I only prove Proposition 24 there; but the primitive element theorem says that any separable field extension $L$ of $K$ can be written as $Kleft[xright]$ for some $x in L$, and thus Proposition 24 yields Theorem 23).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Jan 4 at 20:19
add a comment |
$begingroup$
See wikipedia and its references. A separable algebra is a generalization to associative algebras of the notion of a separable field extension.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 4 at 20:15
1
$begingroup$
Gosh are you using some weird definitions. Do you know how to define separable algebras in terms of separability idempotents? And how to define separable field extensions in terms of minimal polynomials? In that case, you can look up the proof of Theorem 23 in my A problem on bilinear maps (to be precise, I only prove Proposition 24 there; but the primitive element theorem says that any separable field extension $L$ of $K$ can be written as $Kleft[xright]$ for some $x in L$, and thus Proposition 24 yields Theorem 23).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Jan 4 at 20:19
$begingroup$
See wikipedia and its references. A separable algebra is a generalization to associative algebras of the notion of a separable field extension.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 4 at 20:15
$begingroup$
See wikipedia and its references. A separable algebra is a generalization to associative algebras of the notion of a separable field extension.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 4 at 20:15
1
1
$begingroup$
Gosh are you using some weird definitions. Do you know how to define separable algebras in terms of separability idempotents? And how to define separable field extensions in terms of minimal polynomials? In that case, you can look up the proof of Theorem 23 in my A problem on bilinear maps (to be precise, I only prove Proposition 24 there; but the primitive element theorem says that any separable field extension $L$ of $K$ can be written as $Kleft[xright]$ for some $x in L$, and thus Proposition 24 yields Theorem 23).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Jan 4 at 20:19
$begingroup$
Gosh are you using some weird definitions. Do you know how to define separable algebras in terms of separability idempotents? And how to define separable field extensions in terms of minimal polynomials? In that case, you can look up the proof of Theorem 23 in my A problem on bilinear maps (to be precise, I only prove Proposition 24 there; but the primitive element theorem says that any separable field extension $L$ of $K$ can be written as $Kleft[xright]$ for some $x in L$, and thus Proposition 24 yields Theorem 23).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Jan 4 at 20:19
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061980%2fwhy-separable-algebra-is-a-generalisation-of-separable-field-extension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061980%2fwhy-separable-algebra-is-a-generalisation-of-separable-field-extension%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
See wikipedia and its references. A separable algebra is a generalization to associative algebras of the notion of a separable field extension.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 4 at 20:15
1
$begingroup$
Gosh are you using some weird definitions. Do you know how to define separable algebras in terms of separability idempotents? And how to define separable field extensions in terms of minimal polynomials? In that case, you can look up the proof of Theorem 23 in my A problem on bilinear maps (to be precise, I only prove Proposition 24 there; but the primitive element theorem says that any separable field extension $L$ of $K$ can be written as $Kleft[xright]$ for some $x in L$, and thus Proposition 24 yields Theorem 23).
$endgroup$
– darij grinberg
Jan 4 at 20:19