Table Formatting using siunitx












8















I am trying to make a table with four columns: three of the columns are to be center aligned, and one is to be aligned by decimal places ( using S[table-format=3.2]). Here is my code:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}

begin{document}

begin{tabular}{c c S[table-format=3.2] c}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
%hline hline
midrule midrule
Prefix & Symbol & Multiplication Factor & $ldots$ in Scientific Notation \
midrule
giga & G & 1000000000 & $10^9$ \
mega & M & 1000000 & $10^6$ \
kilo & k & 1000 & $10^3$ \
deca & D & 10 & $10^1$ \
rowcolor{gray!20} - & - & 1 & $10^0$ \
deci & d & 0.1 & $10^{-1}$ \
centi & c & 0.01 & $10^{-2}$ \
milli & m & 0.001 & $10^{-3}$ \
micro & $mu$ & 0.000001 & $10^{-6}$ \
nano & n & 0.000000001 & $10^{-9}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}

end{document}


However, here is my result:



enter image description here



The columns are overlapping, and I cannot figure out how to fix it. I can't think of a way to set the width of the third column, as that would fix the issue, but to my understanding, you can only fix the width by doing something like p{5cm}; the S type will not allow that.










share|improve this question


















  • 3





    you need {...} around the heading so it isn't parsed as a number but main issue is you have specified a format of 3.2 so 2 decimal places but your numbers are 0.000000001 which have rather more than 2 digits after the point. Use a format that matches your data

    – David Carlisle
    Jan 4 at 15:59













  • How would I format it then? Sorry, I've never used siunitx before. The max amount of digits is 9, so would I put 3.9?

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:03











  • It just hit me, the number left of . is the number of digits left of the decimal and same with the right. So I should put 10.9.

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:07






  • 1





    Slightly off-topic: The shortened form of deca (deka works too...) is da, not D.

    – Mico
    Jan 4 at 16:15











  • Good point... I was not aware of this

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:41
















8















I am trying to make a table with four columns: three of the columns are to be center aligned, and one is to be aligned by decimal places ( using S[table-format=3.2]). Here is my code:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}

begin{document}

begin{tabular}{c c S[table-format=3.2] c}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
%hline hline
midrule midrule
Prefix & Symbol & Multiplication Factor & $ldots$ in Scientific Notation \
midrule
giga & G & 1000000000 & $10^9$ \
mega & M & 1000000 & $10^6$ \
kilo & k & 1000 & $10^3$ \
deca & D & 10 & $10^1$ \
rowcolor{gray!20} - & - & 1 & $10^0$ \
deci & d & 0.1 & $10^{-1}$ \
centi & c & 0.01 & $10^{-2}$ \
milli & m & 0.001 & $10^{-3}$ \
micro & $mu$ & 0.000001 & $10^{-6}$ \
nano & n & 0.000000001 & $10^{-9}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}

end{document}


However, here is my result:



enter image description here



The columns are overlapping, and I cannot figure out how to fix it. I can't think of a way to set the width of the third column, as that would fix the issue, but to my understanding, you can only fix the width by doing something like p{5cm}; the S type will not allow that.










share|improve this question


















  • 3





    you need {...} around the heading so it isn't parsed as a number but main issue is you have specified a format of 3.2 so 2 decimal places but your numbers are 0.000000001 which have rather more than 2 digits after the point. Use a format that matches your data

    – David Carlisle
    Jan 4 at 15:59













  • How would I format it then? Sorry, I've never used siunitx before. The max amount of digits is 9, so would I put 3.9?

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:03











  • It just hit me, the number left of . is the number of digits left of the decimal and same with the right. So I should put 10.9.

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:07






  • 1





    Slightly off-topic: The shortened form of deca (deka works too...) is da, not D.

    – Mico
    Jan 4 at 16:15











  • Good point... I was not aware of this

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:41














8












8








8








I am trying to make a table with four columns: three of the columns are to be center aligned, and one is to be aligned by decimal places ( using S[table-format=3.2]). Here is my code:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}

begin{document}

begin{tabular}{c c S[table-format=3.2] c}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
%hline hline
midrule midrule
Prefix & Symbol & Multiplication Factor & $ldots$ in Scientific Notation \
midrule
giga & G & 1000000000 & $10^9$ \
mega & M & 1000000 & $10^6$ \
kilo & k & 1000 & $10^3$ \
deca & D & 10 & $10^1$ \
rowcolor{gray!20} - & - & 1 & $10^0$ \
deci & d & 0.1 & $10^{-1}$ \
centi & c & 0.01 & $10^{-2}$ \
milli & m & 0.001 & $10^{-3}$ \
micro & $mu$ & 0.000001 & $10^{-6}$ \
nano & n & 0.000000001 & $10^{-9}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}

end{document}


However, here is my result:



enter image description here



The columns are overlapping, and I cannot figure out how to fix it. I can't think of a way to set the width of the third column, as that would fix the issue, but to my understanding, you can only fix the width by doing something like p{5cm}; the S type will not allow that.










share|improve this question














I am trying to make a table with four columns: three of the columns are to be center aligned, and one is to be aligned by decimal places ( using S[table-format=3.2]). Here is my code:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}

begin{document}

begin{tabular}{c c S[table-format=3.2] c}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
%hline hline
midrule midrule
Prefix & Symbol & Multiplication Factor & $ldots$ in Scientific Notation \
midrule
giga & G & 1000000000 & $10^9$ \
mega & M & 1000000 & $10^6$ \
kilo & k & 1000 & $10^3$ \
deca & D & 10 & $10^1$ \
rowcolor{gray!20} - & - & 1 & $10^0$ \
deci & d & 0.1 & $10^{-1}$ \
centi & c & 0.01 & $10^{-2}$ \
milli & m & 0.001 & $10^{-3}$ \
micro & $mu$ & 0.000001 & $10^{-6}$ \
nano & n & 0.000000001 & $10^{-9}$ \
bottomrule
end{tabular}

end{document}


However, here is my result:



enter image description here



The columns are overlapping, and I cannot figure out how to fix it. I can't think of a way to set the width of the third column, as that would fix the issue, but to my understanding, you can only fix the width by doing something like p{5cm}; the S type will not allow that.







tables siunitx






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jan 4 at 15:49









Aiden KennyAiden Kenny

3576




3576








  • 3





    you need {...} around the heading so it isn't parsed as a number but main issue is you have specified a format of 3.2 so 2 decimal places but your numbers are 0.000000001 which have rather more than 2 digits after the point. Use a format that matches your data

    – David Carlisle
    Jan 4 at 15:59













  • How would I format it then? Sorry, I've never used siunitx before. The max amount of digits is 9, so would I put 3.9?

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:03











  • It just hit me, the number left of . is the number of digits left of the decimal and same with the right. So I should put 10.9.

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:07






  • 1





    Slightly off-topic: The shortened form of deca (deka works too...) is da, not D.

    – Mico
    Jan 4 at 16:15











  • Good point... I was not aware of this

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:41














  • 3





    you need {...} around the heading so it isn't parsed as a number but main issue is you have specified a format of 3.2 so 2 decimal places but your numbers are 0.000000001 which have rather more than 2 digits after the point. Use a format that matches your data

    – David Carlisle
    Jan 4 at 15:59













  • How would I format it then? Sorry, I've never used siunitx before. The max amount of digits is 9, so would I put 3.9?

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:03











  • It just hit me, the number left of . is the number of digits left of the decimal and same with the right. So I should put 10.9.

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:07






  • 1





    Slightly off-topic: The shortened form of deca (deka works too...) is da, not D.

    – Mico
    Jan 4 at 16:15











  • Good point... I was not aware of this

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:41








3




3





you need {...} around the heading so it isn't parsed as a number but main issue is you have specified a format of 3.2 so 2 decimal places but your numbers are 0.000000001 which have rather more than 2 digits after the point. Use a format that matches your data

– David Carlisle
Jan 4 at 15:59







you need {...} around the heading so it isn't parsed as a number but main issue is you have specified a format of 3.2 so 2 decimal places but your numbers are 0.000000001 which have rather more than 2 digits after the point. Use a format that matches your data

– David Carlisle
Jan 4 at 15:59















How would I format it then? Sorry, I've never used siunitx before. The max amount of digits is 9, so would I put 3.9?

– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:03





How would I format it then? Sorry, I've never used siunitx before. The max amount of digits is 9, so would I put 3.9?

– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:03













It just hit me, the number left of . is the number of digits left of the decimal and same with the right. So I should put 10.9.

– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:07





It just hit me, the number left of . is the number of digits left of the decimal and same with the right. So I should put 10.9.

– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:07




1




1





Slightly off-topic: The shortened form of deca (deka works too...) is da, not D.

– Mico
Jan 4 at 16:15





Slightly off-topic: The shortened form of deca (deka works too...) is da, not D.

– Mico
Jan 4 at 16:15













Good point... I was not aware of this

– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:41





Good point... I was not aware of this

– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:41










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















9














As David Carlisle has already pointed out in a comment, you must (a) change S[table-format=3.2] to S[table-format=10.9] and (b) encase the string Multiplication Factor in curly braces, to keep it from being interpreted by siunitx.



In addition, you may want to (c) write si{micro} instead of $mu$ in the second column. The text-mu and math-mu glyphs look quite different in most fonts. Finally, since you're using the siunitx package, why not (d) use the S column type for the final column as well and write e9 thru e-9 instead of $10^9$ thru $10^{-9}$?



A separate observation: the standard short form of deca (or deka) is da, not D. For sure, si{deca} (si{deka} works too...) produces da.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage[table]{xcolor}
begin{document}
noindent
begin{tabular}{l c S[table-format=10.9] S[retain-zero-exponent=true]}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
addlinespace %midrule
Prefix & Symbol & {Multiplication Factor} & {dots in Scientific Notation} \
midrule
giga & si{giga} & 1000000000 & e9 \
mega & si{mega} & 1000000 & e6 \
kilo & si{kilo} & 1000 & e3 \
deca & si{deka} & 10 & e1 \
rowcolor{gray!20} -- & -- & 1 & e0 \
deci & si{deci} & 0.1 & e-1 \
centi & si{centi}& 0.01 & e-2 \
milli & si{milli}& 0.001 & e-3 \
micro & si{micro}& 0.000001 & e-6 \
nano & si{nano} & 0.000000001& e-9 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
end{document}





share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    What a great, comprehensive answer! Thanks!

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:46











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468585%2ftable-formatting-using-siunitx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









9














As David Carlisle has already pointed out in a comment, you must (a) change S[table-format=3.2] to S[table-format=10.9] and (b) encase the string Multiplication Factor in curly braces, to keep it from being interpreted by siunitx.



In addition, you may want to (c) write si{micro} instead of $mu$ in the second column. The text-mu and math-mu glyphs look quite different in most fonts. Finally, since you're using the siunitx package, why not (d) use the S column type for the final column as well and write e9 thru e-9 instead of $10^9$ thru $10^{-9}$?



A separate observation: the standard short form of deca (or deka) is da, not D. For sure, si{deca} (si{deka} works too...) produces da.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage[table]{xcolor}
begin{document}
noindent
begin{tabular}{l c S[table-format=10.9] S[retain-zero-exponent=true]}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
addlinespace %midrule
Prefix & Symbol & {Multiplication Factor} & {dots in Scientific Notation} \
midrule
giga & si{giga} & 1000000000 & e9 \
mega & si{mega} & 1000000 & e6 \
kilo & si{kilo} & 1000 & e3 \
deca & si{deka} & 10 & e1 \
rowcolor{gray!20} -- & -- & 1 & e0 \
deci & si{deci} & 0.1 & e-1 \
centi & si{centi}& 0.01 & e-2 \
milli & si{milli}& 0.001 & e-3 \
micro & si{micro}& 0.000001 & e-6 \
nano & si{nano} & 0.000000001& e-9 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
end{document}





share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    What a great, comprehensive answer! Thanks!

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:46
















9














As David Carlisle has already pointed out in a comment, you must (a) change S[table-format=3.2] to S[table-format=10.9] and (b) encase the string Multiplication Factor in curly braces, to keep it from being interpreted by siunitx.



In addition, you may want to (c) write si{micro} instead of $mu$ in the second column. The text-mu and math-mu glyphs look quite different in most fonts. Finally, since you're using the siunitx package, why not (d) use the S column type for the final column as well and write e9 thru e-9 instead of $10^9$ thru $10^{-9}$?



A separate observation: the standard short form of deca (or deka) is da, not D. For sure, si{deca} (si{deka} works too...) produces da.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage[table]{xcolor}
begin{document}
noindent
begin{tabular}{l c S[table-format=10.9] S[retain-zero-exponent=true]}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
addlinespace %midrule
Prefix & Symbol & {Multiplication Factor} & {dots in Scientific Notation} \
midrule
giga & si{giga} & 1000000000 & e9 \
mega & si{mega} & 1000000 & e6 \
kilo & si{kilo} & 1000 & e3 \
deca & si{deka} & 10 & e1 \
rowcolor{gray!20} -- & -- & 1 & e0 \
deci & si{deci} & 0.1 & e-1 \
centi & si{centi}& 0.01 & e-2 \
milli & si{milli}& 0.001 & e-3 \
micro & si{micro}& 0.000001 & e-6 \
nano & si{nano} & 0.000000001& e-9 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
end{document}





share|improve this answer



















  • 2





    What a great, comprehensive answer! Thanks!

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:46














9












9








9







As David Carlisle has already pointed out in a comment, you must (a) change S[table-format=3.2] to S[table-format=10.9] and (b) encase the string Multiplication Factor in curly braces, to keep it from being interpreted by siunitx.



In addition, you may want to (c) write si{micro} instead of $mu$ in the second column. The text-mu and math-mu glyphs look quite different in most fonts. Finally, since you're using the siunitx package, why not (d) use the S column type for the final column as well and write e9 thru e-9 instead of $10^9$ thru $10^{-9}$?



A separate observation: the standard short form of deca (or deka) is da, not D. For sure, si{deca} (si{deka} works too...) produces da.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage[table]{xcolor}
begin{document}
noindent
begin{tabular}{l c S[table-format=10.9] S[retain-zero-exponent=true]}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
addlinespace %midrule
Prefix & Symbol & {Multiplication Factor} & {dots in Scientific Notation} \
midrule
giga & si{giga} & 1000000000 & e9 \
mega & si{mega} & 1000000 & e6 \
kilo & si{kilo} & 1000 & e3 \
deca & si{deka} & 10 & e1 \
rowcolor{gray!20} -- & -- & 1 & e0 \
deci & si{deci} & 0.1 & e-1 \
centi & si{centi}& 0.01 & e-2 \
milli & si{milli}& 0.001 & e-3 \
micro & si{micro}& 0.000001 & e-6 \
nano & si{nano} & 0.000000001& e-9 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
end{document}





share|improve this answer













As David Carlisle has already pointed out in a comment, you must (a) change S[table-format=3.2] to S[table-format=10.9] and (b) encase the string Multiplication Factor in curly braces, to keep it from being interpreted by siunitx.



In addition, you may want to (c) write si{micro} instead of $mu$ in the second column. The text-mu and math-mu glyphs look quite different in most fonts. Finally, since you're using the siunitx package, why not (d) use the S column type for the final column as well and write e9 thru e-9 instead of $10^9$ thru $10^{-9}$?



A separate observation: the standard short form of deca (or deka) is da, not D. For sure, si{deca} (si{deka} works too...) produces da.



enter image description here



documentclass{article}
usepackage{siunitx}
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage[table]{xcolor}
begin{document}
noindent
begin{tabular}{l c S[table-format=10.9] S[retain-zero-exponent=true]}
toprule
multicolumn{4}{c}{SI Prefixes} \
addlinespace %midrule
Prefix & Symbol & {Multiplication Factor} & {dots in Scientific Notation} \
midrule
giga & si{giga} & 1000000000 & e9 \
mega & si{mega} & 1000000 & e6 \
kilo & si{kilo} & 1000 & e3 \
deca & si{deka} & 10 & e1 \
rowcolor{gray!20} -- & -- & 1 & e0 \
deci & si{deci} & 0.1 & e-1 \
centi & si{centi}& 0.01 & e-2 \
milli & si{milli}& 0.001 & e-3 \
micro & si{micro}& 0.000001 & e-6 \
nano & si{nano} & 0.000000001& e-9 \
bottomrule
end{tabular}
end{document}






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jan 4 at 16:30









MicoMico

275k30373761




275k30373761








  • 2





    What a great, comprehensive answer! Thanks!

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:46














  • 2





    What a great, comprehensive answer! Thanks!

    – Aiden Kenny
    Jan 4 at 16:46








2




2





What a great, comprehensive answer! Thanks!

– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:46





What a great, comprehensive answer! Thanks!

– Aiden Kenny
Jan 4 at 16:46


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468585%2ftable-formatting-using-siunitx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

'app-layout' is not a known element: how to share Component with different Modules

android studio warns about leanback feature tag usage required on manifest while using Unity exported app?

WPF add header to Image with URL pettitions [duplicate]