How to convert the tuple elements to string, without losing the tuple properties?
I created a tuple by reading data from a MySQL table. All the elements are of mixed data types and to be able to apply few string operations (upper case, removal of special characters etc), I need to convert all those elements to string.
I tried "".str() and .join() but the resultant is a pure string and I lose information about individual elements.
Something like:
(ABC, XYZ, 234, QWE, 578) <-- mixed datatypes but I can do tuple[0] to just fetch ABC
The cursor returns multiple records. The struct_address_str[0] returns the first record (like the example above). The struct_address_str[0][0] returns the first element of the row. After I make the first transformation, the struct_address_str[0][0] no more returns the first element but first character of the element.
However, after the transformation, if I do tuple[0][0], I get back A while I want to the output to be ABC.
How do I get this working?
Following is the code that I am using:
cursor = conn.cursor();
### Structure Address Data ###
cursor.execute("SELECT id,... FROM ...");
#converted the cursor to list
struct_address = list(cursor.fetchall())
#converted all the list elements to string
struct_address_str = [str(i) for i in struct_address]
#Checking the values
print(struct_address_str[0][1], sep="n")
print(struct_address_str[0][2], sep="n")
print(struct_address_str[0], sep="n")
#converted all the list elements to uppercase
struct_address_upper = [i.upper() for i in struct_address_str]
#removing all the special characters
#cli_add_no_sp_char = [s.translate(str.maketrans('', '', ''(#),-".')) for s in cli_address_upper]
struct_add_no_sp_char = [s.translate(str.maketrans(''(#),-"./', ' ', '')) for s in struct_address_upper]
python python-3.x
add a comment |
I created a tuple by reading data from a MySQL table. All the elements are of mixed data types and to be able to apply few string operations (upper case, removal of special characters etc), I need to convert all those elements to string.
I tried "".str() and .join() but the resultant is a pure string and I lose information about individual elements.
Something like:
(ABC, XYZ, 234, QWE, 578) <-- mixed datatypes but I can do tuple[0] to just fetch ABC
The cursor returns multiple records. The struct_address_str[0] returns the first record (like the example above). The struct_address_str[0][0] returns the first element of the row. After I make the first transformation, the struct_address_str[0][0] no more returns the first element but first character of the element.
However, after the transformation, if I do tuple[0][0], I get back A while I want to the output to be ABC.
How do I get this working?
Following is the code that I am using:
cursor = conn.cursor();
### Structure Address Data ###
cursor.execute("SELECT id,... FROM ...");
#converted the cursor to list
struct_address = list(cursor.fetchall())
#converted all the list elements to string
struct_address_str = [str(i) for i in struct_address]
#Checking the values
print(struct_address_str[0][1], sep="n")
print(struct_address_str[0][2], sep="n")
print(struct_address_str[0], sep="n")
#converted all the list elements to uppercase
struct_address_upper = [i.upper() for i in struct_address_str]
#removing all the special characters
#cli_add_no_sp_char = [s.translate(str.maketrans('', '', ''(#),-".')) for s in cli_address_upper]
struct_add_no_sp_char = [s.translate(str.maketrans(''(#),-"./', ' ', '')) for s in struct_address_upper]
python python-3.x
The linestruct_address_str = [str(i) for i in struct_address]
seems to be doing exactly what you say you want to do. What exactly is the problem with it?
– jasonharper
Nov 20 '18 at 17:08
Like I mentioned above, I intend to get ABC as output of print(struct_address_str[0][1]), instead of A.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 17:11
That's a completely unreasonable intention.struct_address_str[0]
is the entire first element of the list, if that's a string then adding[1]
can only be a single character from that string.
– jasonharper
Nov 20 '18 at 17:17
The cursor returns multiple records. The struct_address_str[0] returns the first record (like the example above). The struct_address_str[0][0] returns the first element of the row. After I make the first transformation, the struct_address_str[0][0] no more returns the first element but first character of the element. And looks like you downvoted without even understanding the question. Thanks. I take that as my fault too since I probably didn't elaborate well enough.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 17:19
add a comment |
I created a tuple by reading data from a MySQL table. All the elements are of mixed data types and to be able to apply few string operations (upper case, removal of special characters etc), I need to convert all those elements to string.
I tried "".str() and .join() but the resultant is a pure string and I lose information about individual elements.
Something like:
(ABC, XYZ, 234, QWE, 578) <-- mixed datatypes but I can do tuple[0] to just fetch ABC
The cursor returns multiple records. The struct_address_str[0] returns the first record (like the example above). The struct_address_str[0][0] returns the first element of the row. After I make the first transformation, the struct_address_str[0][0] no more returns the first element but first character of the element.
However, after the transformation, if I do tuple[0][0], I get back A while I want to the output to be ABC.
How do I get this working?
Following is the code that I am using:
cursor = conn.cursor();
### Structure Address Data ###
cursor.execute("SELECT id,... FROM ...");
#converted the cursor to list
struct_address = list(cursor.fetchall())
#converted all the list elements to string
struct_address_str = [str(i) for i in struct_address]
#Checking the values
print(struct_address_str[0][1], sep="n")
print(struct_address_str[0][2], sep="n")
print(struct_address_str[0], sep="n")
#converted all the list elements to uppercase
struct_address_upper = [i.upper() for i in struct_address_str]
#removing all the special characters
#cli_add_no_sp_char = [s.translate(str.maketrans('', '', ''(#),-".')) for s in cli_address_upper]
struct_add_no_sp_char = [s.translate(str.maketrans(''(#),-"./', ' ', '')) for s in struct_address_upper]
python python-3.x
I created a tuple by reading data from a MySQL table. All the elements are of mixed data types and to be able to apply few string operations (upper case, removal of special characters etc), I need to convert all those elements to string.
I tried "".str() and .join() but the resultant is a pure string and I lose information about individual elements.
Something like:
(ABC, XYZ, 234, QWE, 578) <-- mixed datatypes but I can do tuple[0] to just fetch ABC
The cursor returns multiple records. The struct_address_str[0] returns the first record (like the example above). The struct_address_str[0][0] returns the first element of the row. After I make the first transformation, the struct_address_str[0][0] no more returns the first element but first character of the element.
However, after the transformation, if I do tuple[0][0], I get back A while I want to the output to be ABC.
How do I get this working?
Following is the code that I am using:
cursor = conn.cursor();
### Structure Address Data ###
cursor.execute("SELECT id,... FROM ...");
#converted the cursor to list
struct_address = list(cursor.fetchall())
#converted all the list elements to string
struct_address_str = [str(i) for i in struct_address]
#Checking the values
print(struct_address_str[0][1], sep="n")
print(struct_address_str[0][2], sep="n")
print(struct_address_str[0], sep="n")
#converted all the list elements to uppercase
struct_address_upper = [i.upper() for i in struct_address_str]
#removing all the special characters
#cli_add_no_sp_char = [s.translate(str.maketrans('', '', ''(#),-".')) for s in cli_address_upper]
struct_add_no_sp_char = [s.translate(str.maketrans(''(#),-"./', ' ', '')) for s in struct_address_upper]
python python-3.x
python python-3.x
edited Nov 20 '18 at 17:44
Sushant Vasishta
asked Nov 20 '18 at 17:04


Sushant VasishtaSushant Vasishta
948
948
The linestruct_address_str = [str(i) for i in struct_address]
seems to be doing exactly what you say you want to do. What exactly is the problem with it?
– jasonharper
Nov 20 '18 at 17:08
Like I mentioned above, I intend to get ABC as output of print(struct_address_str[0][1]), instead of A.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 17:11
That's a completely unreasonable intention.struct_address_str[0]
is the entire first element of the list, if that's a string then adding[1]
can only be a single character from that string.
– jasonharper
Nov 20 '18 at 17:17
The cursor returns multiple records. The struct_address_str[0] returns the first record (like the example above). The struct_address_str[0][0] returns the first element of the row. After I make the first transformation, the struct_address_str[0][0] no more returns the first element but first character of the element. And looks like you downvoted without even understanding the question. Thanks. I take that as my fault too since I probably didn't elaborate well enough.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 17:19
add a comment |
The linestruct_address_str = [str(i) for i in struct_address]
seems to be doing exactly what you say you want to do. What exactly is the problem with it?
– jasonharper
Nov 20 '18 at 17:08
Like I mentioned above, I intend to get ABC as output of print(struct_address_str[0][1]), instead of A.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 17:11
That's a completely unreasonable intention.struct_address_str[0]
is the entire first element of the list, if that's a string then adding[1]
can only be a single character from that string.
– jasonharper
Nov 20 '18 at 17:17
The cursor returns multiple records. The struct_address_str[0] returns the first record (like the example above). The struct_address_str[0][0] returns the first element of the row. After I make the first transformation, the struct_address_str[0][0] no more returns the first element but first character of the element. And looks like you downvoted without even understanding the question. Thanks. I take that as my fault too since I probably didn't elaborate well enough.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 17:19
The line
struct_address_str = [str(i) for i in struct_address]
seems to be doing exactly what you say you want to do. What exactly is the problem with it?– jasonharper
Nov 20 '18 at 17:08
The line
struct_address_str = [str(i) for i in struct_address]
seems to be doing exactly what you say you want to do. What exactly is the problem with it?– jasonharper
Nov 20 '18 at 17:08
Like I mentioned above, I intend to get ABC as output of print(struct_address_str[0][1]), instead of A.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 17:11
Like I mentioned above, I intend to get ABC as output of print(struct_address_str[0][1]), instead of A.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 17:11
That's a completely unreasonable intention.
struct_address_str[0]
is the entire first element of the list, if that's a string then adding [1]
can only be a single character from that string.– jasonharper
Nov 20 '18 at 17:17
That's a completely unreasonable intention.
struct_address_str[0]
is the entire first element of the list, if that's a string then adding [1]
can only be a single character from that string.– jasonharper
Nov 20 '18 at 17:17
The cursor returns multiple records. The struct_address_str[0] returns the first record (like the example above). The struct_address_str[0][0] returns the first element of the row. After I make the first transformation, the struct_address_str[0][0] no more returns the first element but first character of the element. And looks like you downvoted without even understanding the question. Thanks. I take that as my fault too since I probably didn't elaborate well enough.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 17:19
The cursor returns multiple records. The struct_address_str[0] returns the first record (like the example above). The struct_address_str[0][0] returns the first element of the row. After I make the first transformation, the struct_address_str[0][0] no more returns the first element but first character of the element. And looks like you downvoted without even understanding the question. Thanks. I take that as my fault too since I probably didn't elaborate well enough.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 17:19
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
What about :
struct_address_str = [[str(i) for i in x] for x in struct_address]
And then again:
struct_address_upper = [[i.upper() for i in x] for x in struct_address_str]
Of course you could combine the two in one line by using "str(i).upper()". I would probably define a function sanitize(i) making all needed operations and then use it in the list comprehension.
Thanks @Rolvernew that game me an idea. I was able to use that construct.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 18:59
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53398006%2fhow-to-convert-the-tuple-elements-to-string-without-losing-the-tuple-properties%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
What about :
struct_address_str = [[str(i) for i in x] for x in struct_address]
And then again:
struct_address_upper = [[i.upper() for i in x] for x in struct_address_str]
Of course you could combine the two in one line by using "str(i).upper()". I would probably define a function sanitize(i) making all needed operations and then use it in the list comprehension.
Thanks @Rolvernew that game me an idea. I was able to use that construct.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 18:59
add a comment |
What about :
struct_address_str = [[str(i) for i in x] for x in struct_address]
And then again:
struct_address_upper = [[i.upper() for i in x] for x in struct_address_str]
Of course you could combine the two in one line by using "str(i).upper()". I would probably define a function sanitize(i) making all needed operations and then use it in the list comprehension.
Thanks @Rolvernew that game me an idea. I was able to use that construct.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 18:59
add a comment |
What about :
struct_address_str = [[str(i) for i in x] for x in struct_address]
And then again:
struct_address_upper = [[i.upper() for i in x] for x in struct_address_str]
Of course you could combine the two in one line by using "str(i).upper()". I would probably define a function sanitize(i) making all needed operations and then use it in the list comprehension.
What about :
struct_address_str = [[str(i) for i in x] for x in struct_address]
And then again:
struct_address_upper = [[i.upper() for i in x] for x in struct_address_str]
Of course you could combine the two in one line by using "str(i).upper()". I would probably define a function sanitize(i) making all needed operations and then use it in the list comprehension.
edited Nov 20 '18 at 17:56
answered Nov 20 '18 at 17:50


RolvernewRolvernew
1817
1817
Thanks @Rolvernew that game me an idea. I was able to use that construct.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 18:59
add a comment |
Thanks @Rolvernew that game me an idea. I was able to use that construct.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 18:59
Thanks @Rolvernew that game me an idea. I was able to use that construct.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 18:59
Thanks @Rolvernew that game me an idea. I was able to use that construct.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 18:59
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53398006%2fhow-to-convert-the-tuple-elements-to-string-without-losing-the-tuple-properties%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The line
struct_address_str = [str(i) for i in struct_address]
seems to be doing exactly what you say you want to do. What exactly is the problem with it?– jasonharper
Nov 20 '18 at 17:08
Like I mentioned above, I intend to get ABC as output of print(struct_address_str[0][1]), instead of A.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 17:11
That's a completely unreasonable intention.
struct_address_str[0]
is the entire first element of the list, if that's a string then adding[1]
can only be a single character from that string.– jasonharper
Nov 20 '18 at 17:17
The cursor returns multiple records. The struct_address_str[0] returns the first record (like the example above). The struct_address_str[0][0] returns the first element of the row. After I make the first transformation, the struct_address_str[0][0] no more returns the first element but first character of the element. And looks like you downvoted without even understanding the question. Thanks. I take that as my fault too since I probably didn't elaborate well enough.
– Sushant Vasishta
Nov 20 '18 at 17:19