Subgroup of $C^*$ (nonzero complex) with finite index.












4














True or false:



Let $C^*$ be the set of all nonzero complex numbers and $H$ be a subgroup of $C^*$(with respect to multiplication) be such that $[C^*:H]$ is finite then $H=C^*$.



I'm guessing it true as I am thinking that if suppose there is such a proper subgroup $H$ for which the number of coset will be finite then I'm guessing that there is a gap between $C^*$ and $H$ and that gap cannot be filled up by finite union. But I am unable to give a concrete prove.
Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question



























    4














    True or false:



    Let $C^*$ be the set of all nonzero complex numbers and $H$ be a subgroup of $C^*$(with respect to multiplication) be such that $[C^*:H]$ is finite then $H=C^*$.



    I'm guessing it true as I am thinking that if suppose there is such a proper subgroup $H$ for which the number of coset will be finite then I'm guessing that there is a gap between $C^*$ and $H$ and that gap cannot be filled up by finite union. But I am unable to give a concrete prove.
    Thanks in advance.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      4












      4








      4


      0





      True or false:



      Let $C^*$ be the set of all nonzero complex numbers and $H$ be a subgroup of $C^*$(with respect to multiplication) be such that $[C^*:H]$ is finite then $H=C^*$.



      I'm guessing it true as I am thinking that if suppose there is such a proper subgroup $H$ for which the number of coset will be finite then I'm guessing that there is a gap between $C^*$ and $H$ and that gap cannot be filled up by finite union. But I am unable to give a concrete prove.
      Thanks in advance.










      share|cite|improve this question













      True or false:



      Let $C^*$ be the set of all nonzero complex numbers and $H$ be a subgroup of $C^*$(with respect to multiplication) be such that $[C^*:H]$ is finite then $H=C^*$.



      I'm guessing it true as I am thinking that if suppose there is such a proper subgroup $H$ for which the number of coset will be finite then I'm guessing that there is a gap between $C^*$ and $H$ and that gap cannot be filled up by finite union. But I am unable to give a concrete prove.
      Thanks in advance.







      abstract-algebra group-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 20 '16 at 20:01









      user322390user322390

      9916




      9916






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7














          Suppose $H$ has finite index in $Bbb C^times$, let $m=[Bbb C^times:H]$. Then for any nonzero complex number, $z^min H$. Now given $winBbb C$ we can always solve $z^m-w=0$, so $win H$.



          Alternatively, a finite divisible abelian group is trivial. Now $Bbb C^times /H$ is finite, and it is divisible, so it must be trivial.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Why is $z^m in H$? I don't follow that one step in this proof.
            – Mehdi2277
            Mar 21 '16 at 6:04










          • $(zH)^m=H$ as the order of the group ${gH: gin C^*}$ is m. Now $(zH)^m = (z^m)H = H$, so $z^m in H$.
            – user322390
            Apr 1 '16 at 10:32










          • The claim that a torsion divisible abelian group is trivial is blatantly false. However it holds that a finite divisible abelian group is trivial.
            – YCor
            Jun 2 '18 at 9:44










          • @YCor True, what I wanted to say is that finite (or torsion of finite index?) plus divisible implies trivial. An obvious counterexample is $mathbb Q/mathbb Z$.
            – Pedro Tamaroff
            Jun 2 '18 at 9:48



















          4














          More generally, an (abelian) divisible group has no nontrivial subgroups of finite index. The proof is essentially the same as for this question.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1706207%2fsubgroup-of-c-nonzero-complex-with-finite-index%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            7














            Suppose $H$ has finite index in $Bbb C^times$, let $m=[Bbb C^times:H]$. Then for any nonzero complex number, $z^min H$. Now given $winBbb C$ we can always solve $z^m-w=0$, so $win H$.



            Alternatively, a finite divisible abelian group is trivial. Now $Bbb C^times /H$ is finite, and it is divisible, so it must be trivial.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Why is $z^m in H$? I don't follow that one step in this proof.
              – Mehdi2277
              Mar 21 '16 at 6:04










            • $(zH)^m=H$ as the order of the group ${gH: gin C^*}$ is m. Now $(zH)^m = (z^m)H = H$, so $z^m in H$.
              – user322390
              Apr 1 '16 at 10:32










            • The claim that a torsion divisible abelian group is trivial is blatantly false. However it holds that a finite divisible abelian group is trivial.
              – YCor
              Jun 2 '18 at 9:44










            • @YCor True, what I wanted to say is that finite (or torsion of finite index?) plus divisible implies trivial. An obvious counterexample is $mathbb Q/mathbb Z$.
              – Pedro Tamaroff
              Jun 2 '18 at 9:48
















            7














            Suppose $H$ has finite index in $Bbb C^times$, let $m=[Bbb C^times:H]$. Then for any nonzero complex number, $z^min H$. Now given $winBbb C$ we can always solve $z^m-w=0$, so $win H$.



            Alternatively, a finite divisible abelian group is trivial. Now $Bbb C^times /H$ is finite, and it is divisible, so it must be trivial.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Why is $z^m in H$? I don't follow that one step in this proof.
              – Mehdi2277
              Mar 21 '16 at 6:04










            • $(zH)^m=H$ as the order of the group ${gH: gin C^*}$ is m. Now $(zH)^m = (z^m)H = H$, so $z^m in H$.
              – user322390
              Apr 1 '16 at 10:32










            • The claim that a torsion divisible abelian group is trivial is blatantly false. However it holds that a finite divisible abelian group is trivial.
              – YCor
              Jun 2 '18 at 9:44










            • @YCor True, what I wanted to say is that finite (or torsion of finite index?) plus divisible implies trivial. An obvious counterexample is $mathbb Q/mathbb Z$.
              – Pedro Tamaroff
              Jun 2 '18 at 9:48














            7












            7








            7






            Suppose $H$ has finite index in $Bbb C^times$, let $m=[Bbb C^times:H]$. Then for any nonzero complex number, $z^min H$. Now given $winBbb C$ we can always solve $z^m-w=0$, so $win H$.



            Alternatively, a finite divisible abelian group is trivial. Now $Bbb C^times /H$ is finite, and it is divisible, so it must be trivial.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Suppose $H$ has finite index in $Bbb C^times$, let $m=[Bbb C^times:H]$. Then for any nonzero complex number, $z^min H$. Now given $winBbb C$ we can always solve $z^m-w=0$, so $win H$.



            Alternatively, a finite divisible abelian group is trivial. Now $Bbb C^times /H$ is finite, and it is divisible, so it must be trivial.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jun 2 '18 at 9:49

























            answered Mar 20 '16 at 20:23









            Pedro TamaroffPedro Tamaroff

            96.4k10151296




            96.4k10151296












            • Why is $z^m in H$? I don't follow that one step in this proof.
              – Mehdi2277
              Mar 21 '16 at 6:04










            • $(zH)^m=H$ as the order of the group ${gH: gin C^*}$ is m. Now $(zH)^m = (z^m)H = H$, so $z^m in H$.
              – user322390
              Apr 1 '16 at 10:32










            • The claim that a torsion divisible abelian group is trivial is blatantly false. However it holds that a finite divisible abelian group is trivial.
              – YCor
              Jun 2 '18 at 9:44










            • @YCor True, what I wanted to say is that finite (or torsion of finite index?) plus divisible implies trivial. An obvious counterexample is $mathbb Q/mathbb Z$.
              – Pedro Tamaroff
              Jun 2 '18 at 9:48


















            • Why is $z^m in H$? I don't follow that one step in this proof.
              – Mehdi2277
              Mar 21 '16 at 6:04










            • $(zH)^m=H$ as the order of the group ${gH: gin C^*}$ is m. Now $(zH)^m = (z^m)H = H$, so $z^m in H$.
              – user322390
              Apr 1 '16 at 10:32










            • The claim that a torsion divisible abelian group is trivial is blatantly false. However it holds that a finite divisible abelian group is trivial.
              – YCor
              Jun 2 '18 at 9:44










            • @YCor True, what I wanted to say is that finite (or torsion of finite index?) plus divisible implies trivial. An obvious counterexample is $mathbb Q/mathbb Z$.
              – Pedro Tamaroff
              Jun 2 '18 at 9:48
















            Why is $z^m in H$? I don't follow that one step in this proof.
            – Mehdi2277
            Mar 21 '16 at 6:04




            Why is $z^m in H$? I don't follow that one step in this proof.
            – Mehdi2277
            Mar 21 '16 at 6:04












            $(zH)^m=H$ as the order of the group ${gH: gin C^*}$ is m. Now $(zH)^m = (z^m)H = H$, so $z^m in H$.
            – user322390
            Apr 1 '16 at 10:32




            $(zH)^m=H$ as the order of the group ${gH: gin C^*}$ is m. Now $(zH)^m = (z^m)H = H$, so $z^m in H$.
            – user322390
            Apr 1 '16 at 10:32












            The claim that a torsion divisible abelian group is trivial is blatantly false. However it holds that a finite divisible abelian group is trivial.
            – YCor
            Jun 2 '18 at 9:44




            The claim that a torsion divisible abelian group is trivial is blatantly false. However it holds that a finite divisible abelian group is trivial.
            – YCor
            Jun 2 '18 at 9:44












            @YCor True, what I wanted to say is that finite (or torsion of finite index?) plus divisible implies trivial. An obvious counterexample is $mathbb Q/mathbb Z$.
            – Pedro Tamaroff
            Jun 2 '18 at 9:48




            @YCor True, what I wanted to say is that finite (or torsion of finite index?) plus divisible implies trivial. An obvious counterexample is $mathbb Q/mathbb Z$.
            – Pedro Tamaroff
            Jun 2 '18 at 9:48











            4














            More generally, an (abelian) divisible group has no nontrivial subgroups of finite index. The proof is essentially the same as for this question.






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              4














              More generally, an (abelian) divisible group has no nontrivial subgroups of finite index. The proof is essentially the same as for this question.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                4












                4








                4






                More generally, an (abelian) divisible group has no nontrivial subgroups of finite index. The proof is essentially the same as for this question.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                More generally, an (abelian) divisible group has no nontrivial subgroups of finite index. The proof is essentially the same as for this question.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:20









                Community

                1




                1










                answered Mar 20 '16 at 20:14









                user324381user324381

                1112




                1112






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1706207%2fsubgroup-of-c-nonzero-complex-with-finite-index%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

                    How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

                    in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith