Mixing
What are S-integral matrices for S a finite set of primes in a number field?
I am reading the paper Geometric construction of cohomology for arithmetic
groups I by Millson and Raghunathan, and unfortunately I know almost no number theory, so I am confused by the following proposition:
Specifically, what does it mean when they say "Let $S={p_1, ldots, p_m}$ be a finite set of primes of $E$ and let $G(O_S)$ be the group of $S$ integral matrices over $E$ that preserve $Q$."
What is $O_S$ exactly? I found the definition of $O_R$ for $R$ a ring to be be the ring of roots of monic polynomials with integer coefficients. But $S$ is obviously not a ring. Is the intent her to look at the subring generated by $S$ and find the roots within this subring?
What do they mean be a "finite set of primes of $E$"? When I look up the definition of a prime element of a ring it says that an element $p$ of a ring $R$ is prime "if it is nonzero, has no multiplicative inverse and satisfies the following requirement: whenever $p$ divides the product $xy$ of two elements of $R$, it also divides at least one of $x$ or $y$." But this doesn't make sense in this context since every non-zero element of a field is invertible. Do you think that the authors mean that these are irreducible elements instead? Or is there some other meaning of prime in this context?
number-theory ring-theory commutative-algebra algebraic-number-theory
asked Nov 22 '18 at 2:59
ಠ_ಠಠ_ಠ
5,41721242
add a comment |
I am reading the paper Geometric construction of cohomology for arithmetic
groups I by Millson and Raghunathan, and unfortunately I know almost no number theory, so I am confused by the following proposition:
Specifically, what does it mean when they say "Let $S={p_1, ldots, p_m}$ be a finite set of primes of $E$ and let $G(O_S)$ be the group of $S$ integral matrices over $E$ that preserve $Q$."
What is $O_S$ exactly? I found the definition of $O_R$ for $R$ a ring to be be the ring of roots of monic polynomials with integer coefficients. But $S$ is obviously not a ring. Is the intent her to look at the subring generated by $S$ and find the roots within this subring?
What do they mean be a "finite set of primes of $E$"? When I look up the definition of a prime element of a ring it says that an element $p$ of a ring $R$ is prime "if it is nonzero, has no multiplicative inverse and satisfies the following requirement: whenever $p$ divides the product $xy$ of two elements of $R$, it also divides at least one of $x$ or $y$." But this doesn't make sense in this context since every non-zero element of a field is invertible. Do you think that the authors mean that these are irreducible elements instead? Or is there some other meaning of prime in this context?
number-theory ring-theory commutative-algebra algebraic-number-theory
asked Nov 22 '18 at 2:59
ಠ_ಠಠ_ಠ
5,41721242
1
planetmath.org/RingOfSintegers
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 22 '18 at 3:03
@QiaochuYuan Thanks! I've added a second question regarding terminology. Could you help me with this as well?
– ಠ_ಠ
Nov 22 '18 at 7:28
1
I think "prime of $E$" means a prime element of the ring of integers of $E$.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 22 '18 at 20:21
add a comment |
I am reading the paper Geometric construction of cohomology for arithmetic
groups I by Millson and Raghunathan, and unfortunately I know almost no number theory, so I am confused by the following proposition:
Specifically, what does it mean when they say "Let $S={p_1, ldots, p_m}$ be a finite set of primes of $E$ and let $G(O_S)$ be the group of $S$ integral matrices over $E$ that preserve $Q$."
What is $O_S$ exactly? I found the definition of $O_R$ for $R$ a ring to be be the ring of roots of monic polynomials with integer coefficients. But $S$ is obviously not a ring. Is the intent her to look at the subring generated by $S$ and find the roots within this subring?
What do they mean be a "finite set of primes of $E$"? When I look up the definition of a prime element of a ring it says that an element $p$ of a ring $R$ is prime "if it is nonzero, has no multiplicative inverse and satisfies the following requirement: whenever $p$ divides the product $xy$ of two elements of $R$, it also divides at least one of $x$ or $y$." But this doesn't make sense in this context since every non-zero element of a field is invertible. Do you think that the authors mean that these are irreducible elements instead? Or is there some other meaning of prime in this context?
number-theory ring-theory commutative-algebra algebraic-number-theory
asked Nov 22 '18 at 2:59
ಠ_ಠಠ_ಠ
5,41721242
I am reading the paper Geometric construction of cohomology for arithmetic
groups I by Millson and Raghunathan, and unfortunately I know almost no number theory, so I am confused by the following proposition:
Specifically, what does it mean when they say "Let $S={p_1, ldots, p_m}$ be a finite set of primes of $E$ and let $G(O_S)$ be the group of $S$ integral matrices over $E$ that preserve $Q$."
What is $O_S$ exactly? I found the definition of $O_R$ for $R$ a ring to be be the ring of roots of monic polynomials with integer coefficients. But $S$ is obviously not a ring. Is the intent her to look at the subring generated by $S$ and find the roots within this subring?
What do they mean be a "finite set of primes of $E$"? When I look up the definition of a prime element of a ring it says that an element $p$ of a ring $R$ is prime "if it is nonzero, has no multiplicative inverse and satisfies the following requirement: whenever $p$ divides the product $xy$ of two elements of $R$, it also divides at least one of $x$ or $y$." But this doesn't make sense in this context since every non-zero element of a field is invertible. Do you think that the authors mean that these are irreducible elements instead? Or is there some other meaning of prime in this context?
number-theory ring-theory commutative-algebra algebraic-number-theory
number-theory ring-theory commutative-algebra algebraic-number-theory
asked Nov 22 '18 at 2:59
ಠ_ಠಠ_ಠ
5,41721242
asked Nov 22 '18 at 2:59
ಠ_ಠಠ_ಠ
5,41721242
edited Nov 22 '18 at 7:02
ಠ_ಠ
asked Nov 22 '18 at 2:59
ಠ_ಠಠ_ಠ
5,41721242
asked Nov 22 '18 at 2:59
ಠ_ಠಠ_ಠ
5,41721242
asked Nov 22 '18 at 2:59
ಠ_ಠಠ_ಠ
5,41721242
5,41721242
1
planetmath.org/RingOfSintegers
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 22 '18 at 3:03
@QiaochuYuan Thanks! I've added a second question regarding terminology. Could you help me with this as well?
– ಠ_ಠ
Nov 22 '18 at 7:28
1
I think "prime of $E$" means a prime element of the ring of integers of $E$.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 22 '18 at 20:21
add a comment |
1
planetmath.org/RingOfSintegers
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 22 '18 at 3:03
@QiaochuYuan Thanks! I've added a second question regarding terminology. Could you help me with this as well?
– ಠ_ಠ
Nov 22 '18 at 7:28
1
I think "prime of $E$" means a prime element of the ring of integers of $E$.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 22 '18 at 20:21
1
1
planetmath.org/RingOfSintegers
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 22 '18 at 3:03
planetmath.org/RingOfSintegers
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 22 '18 at 3:03
@QiaochuYuan Thanks! I've added a second question regarding terminology. Could you help me with this as well?
– ಠ_ಠ
Nov 22 '18 at 7:28
@QiaochuYuan Thanks! I've added a second question regarding terminology. Could you help me with this as well?
– ಠ_ಠ
Nov 22 '18 at 7:28
1
1
I think "prime of $E$" means a prime element of the ring of integers of $E$.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 22 '18 at 20:21
I think "prime of $E$" means a prime element of the ring of integers of $E$.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 22 '18 at 20:21
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Here $O_S$ will be the ring of integers of $E$ with the inverses of the $p_i$
adjoined. That is,
$$O_S=O_E[p_1^{-1},ldots,p_m^{-1}]$$
where $O_E$ is the ring of algebraic integers in $E$.
(This is standard jargon in algebraic number theory.)
answered Nov 22 '18 at 3:04
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k959132
Thanks! Do you happen to know of a good reference for this sort of stuff?
– ಠ_ಠ
Nov 22 '18 at 3:39
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008695%2fwhat-are-s-integral-matrices-for-s-a-finite-set-of-primes-in-a-number-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Here $O_S$ will be the ring of integers of $E$ with the inverses of the $p_i$
adjoined. That is,
$$O_S=O_E[p_1^{-1},ldots,p_m^{-1}]$$
where $O_E$ is the ring of algebraic integers in $E$.
(This is standard jargon in algebraic number theory.)
answered Nov 22 '18 at 3:04
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k959132
Thanks! Do you happen to know of a good reference for this sort of stuff?
– ಠ_ಠ
Nov 22 '18 at 3:39
add a comment |
Here $O_S$ will be the ring of integers of $E$ with the inverses of the $p_i$
adjoined. That is,
$$O_S=O_E[p_1^{-1},ldots,p_m^{-1}]$$
where $O_E$ is the ring of algebraic integers in $E$.
(This is standard jargon in algebraic number theory.)
answered Nov 22 '18 at 3:04
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k959132
Thanks! Do you happen to know of a good reference for this sort of stuff?
– ಠ_ಠ
Nov 22 '18 at 3:39
add a comment |
Here $O_S$ will be the ring of integers of $E$ with the inverses of the $p_i$
adjoined. That is,
$$O_S=O_E[p_1^{-1},ldots,p_m^{-1}]$$
where $O_E$ is the ring of algebraic integers in $E$.
(This is standard jargon in algebraic number theory.)
answered Nov 22 '18 at 3:04
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k959132
Here $O_S$ will be the ring of integers of $E$ with the inverses of the $p_i$
adjoined. That is,
$$O_S=O_E[p_1^{-1},ldots,p_m^{-1}]$$
where $O_E$ is the ring of algebraic integers in $E$.
(This is standard jargon in algebraic number theory.)
answered Nov 22 '18 at 3:04
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k959132
answered Nov 22 '18 at 3:04
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k959132
answered Nov 22 '18 at 3:04
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k959132
answered Nov 22 '18 at 3:04
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
102k959132
102k959132
Thanks! Do you happen to know of a good reference for this sort of stuff?
– ಠ_ಠ
Nov 22 '18 at 3:39
add a comment |
Thanks! Do you happen to know of a good reference for this sort of stuff?
– ಠ_ಠ
Nov 22 '18 at 3:39
Thanks! Do you happen to know of a good reference for this sort of stuff?
– ಠ_ಠ
Nov 22 '18 at 3:39
Thanks! Do you happen to know of a good reference for this sort of stuff?
– ಠ_ಠ
Nov 22 '18 at 3:39
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008695%2fwhat-are-s-integral-matrices-for-s-a-finite-set-of-primes-in-a-number-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
planetmath.org/RingOfSintegers
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 22 '18 at 3:03
@QiaochuYuan Thanks! I've added a second question regarding terminology. Could you help me with this as well?
– ಠ_ಠ
Nov 22 '18 at 7:28
1
I think "prime of $E$" means a prime element of the ring of integers of $E$.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 22 '18 at 20:21