Fundamental group of the $m$-fold suspension of a finite discrete space












3












$begingroup$


Recall that the suspension of a topological space $X$ is the space $SX$ resulting by identifying $Xtimes{0}$ and $Xtimes{1}$ to single points of the "cylinder" $Xtimes[0,1]$. Now let $X_m$ be a discrete space consisting of $m$ points, and denote by $S^nX$ the $n$-fold suspension, i.e., $S^nX=SS^{n-1}X$.




What is the fundamental group of $S^nX_m$ for $n,mgeq1$?




Here is my attempt. The case $m=2$ is easy since $SX_2$ is a circle, so the fundamental group is $mathbb Z$, and $S^2X_2$ is the sphere, whose fundamental group is trivial. Further, the suspension of the $n$-sphere is the $(n+1)$-sphere so $pi_1(S^nX_2)$ is trivial for $ngeq2$.



Now consider $m>2$. Then $SX_m$ is homotopy equivalent to an "$(m-1)$-fold eight"



$$underbrace{bigcirchspace{-.1cm}!bigcirchspace{-.1cm}!bigcirccdotsbigcirc}_{text{$m-1$ circles}}$$



so the fundamental group is $F_{m-1}$, the free group on $m-1$ generators. If I am not mistaken two homotopy equivalent spaces have homotopy equivalent suspensions, so $S^2X_m$ is homotopy equivalent to the wedge product of $m-1$ spheres, and consequently $pi_1(S^2X_m)$ is trivial. I am having trouble, however, to visualise the space $S^nX_m$ for $n>2$. How can $pi_1(S^nX_m)$ be computed?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I had to delete my answer, because it's actually reduced (or pointed) suspension that preserves wedges, and though for spheres reduced and unreduced suspension agree, I don't see an easy argument as to why it should be the same for wedges of spheres (though it seems to be the case in low dimension so it's probably true; but that's really not a good argument)
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 11 at 13:44










  • $begingroup$
    Ok, but thanks anyway!
    $endgroup$
    – iqcd
    Jan 11 at 14:17
















3












$begingroup$


Recall that the suspension of a topological space $X$ is the space $SX$ resulting by identifying $Xtimes{0}$ and $Xtimes{1}$ to single points of the "cylinder" $Xtimes[0,1]$. Now let $X_m$ be a discrete space consisting of $m$ points, and denote by $S^nX$ the $n$-fold suspension, i.e., $S^nX=SS^{n-1}X$.




What is the fundamental group of $S^nX_m$ for $n,mgeq1$?




Here is my attempt. The case $m=2$ is easy since $SX_2$ is a circle, so the fundamental group is $mathbb Z$, and $S^2X_2$ is the sphere, whose fundamental group is trivial. Further, the suspension of the $n$-sphere is the $(n+1)$-sphere so $pi_1(S^nX_2)$ is trivial for $ngeq2$.



Now consider $m>2$. Then $SX_m$ is homotopy equivalent to an "$(m-1)$-fold eight"



$$underbrace{bigcirchspace{-.1cm}!bigcirchspace{-.1cm}!bigcirccdotsbigcirc}_{text{$m-1$ circles}}$$



so the fundamental group is $F_{m-1}$, the free group on $m-1$ generators. If I am not mistaken two homotopy equivalent spaces have homotopy equivalent suspensions, so $S^2X_m$ is homotopy equivalent to the wedge product of $m-1$ spheres, and consequently $pi_1(S^2X_m)$ is trivial. I am having trouble, however, to visualise the space $S^nX_m$ for $n>2$. How can $pi_1(S^nX_m)$ be computed?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I had to delete my answer, because it's actually reduced (or pointed) suspension that preserves wedges, and though for spheres reduced and unreduced suspension agree, I don't see an easy argument as to why it should be the same for wedges of spheres (though it seems to be the case in low dimension so it's probably true; but that's really not a good argument)
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 11 at 13:44










  • $begingroup$
    Ok, but thanks anyway!
    $endgroup$
    – iqcd
    Jan 11 at 14:17














3












3








3


0



$begingroup$


Recall that the suspension of a topological space $X$ is the space $SX$ resulting by identifying $Xtimes{0}$ and $Xtimes{1}$ to single points of the "cylinder" $Xtimes[0,1]$. Now let $X_m$ be a discrete space consisting of $m$ points, and denote by $S^nX$ the $n$-fold suspension, i.e., $S^nX=SS^{n-1}X$.




What is the fundamental group of $S^nX_m$ for $n,mgeq1$?




Here is my attempt. The case $m=2$ is easy since $SX_2$ is a circle, so the fundamental group is $mathbb Z$, and $S^2X_2$ is the sphere, whose fundamental group is trivial. Further, the suspension of the $n$-sphere is the $(n+1)$-sphere so $pi_1(S^nX_2)$ is trivial for $ngeq2$.



Now consider $m>2$. Then $SX_m$ is homotopy equivalent to an "$(m-1)$-fold eight"



$$underbrace{bigcirchspace{-.1cm}!bigcirchspace{-.1cm}!bigcirccdotsbigcirc}_{text{$m-1$ circles}}$$



so the fundamental group is $F_{m-1}$, the free group on $m-1$ generators. If I am not mistaken two homotopy equivalent spaces have homotopy equivalent suspensions, so $S^2X_m$ is homotopy equivalent to the wedge product of $m-1$ spheres, and consequently $pi_1(S^2X_m)$ is trivial. I am having trouble, however, to visualise the space $S^nX_m$ for $n>2$. How can $pi_1(S^nX_m)$ be computed?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Recall that the suspension of a topological space $X$ is the space $SX$ resulting by identifying $Xtimes{0}$ and $Xtimes{1}$ to single points of the "cylinder" $Xtimes[0,1]$. Now let $X_m$ be a discrete space consisting of $m$ points, and denote by $S^nX$ the $n$-fold suspension, i.e., $S^nX=SS^{n-1}X$.




What is the fundamental group of $S^nX_m$ for $n,mgeq1$?




Here is my attempt. The case $m=2$ is easy since $SX_2$ is a circle, so the fundamental group is $mathbb Z$, and $S^2X_2$ is the sphere, whose fundamental group is trivial. Further, the suspension of the $n$-sphere is the $(n+1)$-sphere so $pi_1(S^nX_2)$ is trivial for $ngeq2$.



Now consider $m>2$. Then $SX_m$ is homotopy equivalent to an "$(m-1)$-fold eight"



$$underbrace{bigcirchspace{-.1cm}!bigcirchspace{-.1cm}!bigcirccdotsbigcirc}_{text{$m-1$ circles}}$$



so the fundamental group is $F_{m-1}$, the free group on $m-1$ generators. If I am not mistaken two homotopy equivalent spaces have homotopy equivalent suspensions, so $S^2X_m$ is homotopy equivalent to the wedge product of $m-1$ spheres, and consequently $pi_1(S^2X_m)$ is trivial. I am having trouble, however, to visualise the space $S^nX_m$ for $n>2$. How can $pi_1(S^nX_m)$ be computed?







algebraic-topology fundamental-groups






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 11 at 12:57







iqcd

















asked Jan 11 at 11:28









iqcdiqcd

2,5222926




2,5222926












  • $begingroup$
    I had to delete my answer, because it's actually reduced (or pointed) suspension that preserves wedges, and though for spheres reduced and unreduced suspension agree, I don't see an easy argument as to why it should be the same for wedges of spheres (though it seems to be the case in low dimension so it's probably true; but that's really not a good argument)
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 11 at 13:44










  • $begingroup$
    Ok, but thanks anyway!
    $endgroup$
    – iqcd
    Jan 11 at 14:17


















  • $begingroup$
    I had to delete my answer, because it's actually reduced (or pointed) suspension that preserves wedges, and though for spheres reduced and unreduced suspension agree, I don't see an easy argument as to why it should be the same for wedges of spheres (though it seems to be the case in low dimension so it's probably true; but that's really not a good argument)
    $endgroup$
    – Max
    Jan 11 at 13:44










  • $begingroup$
    Ok, but thanks anyway!
    $endgroup$
    – iqcd
    Jan 11 at 14:17
















$begingroup$
I had to delete my answer, because it's actually reduced (or pointed) suspension that preserves wedges, and though for spheres reduced and unreduced suspension agree, I don't see an easy argument as to why it should be the same for wedges of spheres (though it seems to be the case in low dimension so it's probably true; but that's really not a good argument)
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 11 at 13:44




$begingroup$
I had to delete my answer, because it's actually reduced (or pointed) suspension that preserves wedges, and though for spheres reduced and unreduced suspension agree, I don't see an easy argument as to why it should be the same for wedges of spheres (though it seems to be the case in low dimension so it's probably true; but that's really not a good argument)
$endgroup$
– Max
Jan 11 at 13:44












$begingroup$
Ok, but thanks anyway!
$endgroup$
– iqcd
Jan 11 at 14:17




$begingroup$
Ok, but thanks anyway!
$endgroup$
– iqcd
Jan 11 at 14:17










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$


  1. $m = 1$: All suspensions of $X_1$ are contractible.


  2. $m > 1$:



2.1. $n = 1$: As you stated correctly, $pi_1(SX_m) = F_{m-1}$.



2.2. $n > 1$: Let us prove the following theorem.



If $Y$ is path connected, then $SY$ is simply connected.



This applies to $Y = S^{n-1}X_m$.



Let $p : Y times I to SY$ denote the quotient map. Since $Y$ is path connected, so are $Y times I$ and $SY$. As a basepoint for $SY$ choose $z_0 = p(y_0,1/2)$, where $y_0 in Y$ is an arbitrary point. The sets $U = p(Y times (0,1])$ and $V = p(Y times [0,1))$ are open in $SY$, and we have $z_0 in U cap V = p(Y times (0,1)$ which is pathwise connected. Since $U$ and $V$ are contractible, we get $pi_1(U,z_0) = pi_1(V,z_0) = 0$.
Now apply the Seifert-van Kampen-theorem to see that $pi_1(SY,z_0) = 0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    That's a very useful result, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – iqcd
    Jan 11 at 14:29











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069740%2ffundamental-group-of-the-m-fold-suspension-of-a-finite-discrete-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$


  1. $m = 1$: All suspensions of $X_1$ are contractible.


  2. $m > 1$:



2.1. $n = 1$: As you stated correctly, $pi_1(SX_m) = F_{m-1}$.



2.2. $n > 1$: Let us prove the following theorem.



If $Y$ is path connected, then $SY$ is simply connected.



This applies to $Y = S^{n-1}X_m$.



Let $p : Y times I to SY$ denote the quotient map. Since $Y$ is path connected, so are $Y times I$ and $SY$. As a basepoint for $SY$ choose $z_0 = p(y_0,1/2)$, where $y_0 in Y$ is an arbitrary point. The sets $U = p(Y times (0,1])$ and $V = p(Y times [0,1))$ are open in $SY$, and we have $z_0 in U cap V = p(Y times (0,1)$ which is pathwise connected. Since $U$ and $V$ are contractible, we get $pi_1(U,z_0) = pi_1(V,z_0) = 0$.
Now apply the Seifert-van Kampen-theorem to see that $pi_1(SY,z_0) = 0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    That's a very useful result, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – iqcd
    Jan 11 at 14:29
















2












$begingroup$


  1. $m = 1$: All suspensions of $X_1$ are contractible.


  2. $m > 1$:



2.1. $n = 1$: As you stated correctly, $pi_1(SX_m) = F_{m-1}$.



2.2. $n > 1$: Let us prove the following theorem.



If $Y$ is path connected, then $SY$ is simply connected.



This applies to $Y = S^{n-1}X_m$.



Let $p : Y times I to SY$ denote the quotient map. Since $Y$ is path connected, so are $Y times I$ and $SY$. As a basepoint for $SY$ choose $z_0 = p(y_0,1/2)$, where $y_0 in Y$ is an arbitrary point. The sets $U = p(Y times (0,1])$ and $V = p(Y times [0,1))$ are open in $SY$, and we have $z_0 in U cap V = p(Y times (0,1)$ which is pathwise connected. Since $U$ and $V$ are contractible, we get $pi_1(U,z_0) = pi_1(V,z_0) = 0$.
Now apply the Seifert-van Kampen-theorem to see that $pi_1(SY,z_0) = 0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    That's a very useful result, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – iqcd
    Jan 11 at 14:29














2












2








2





$begingroup$


  1. $m = 1$: All suspensions of $X_1$ are contractible.


  2. $m > 1$:



2.1. $n = 1$: As you stated correctly, $pi_1(SX_m) = F_{m-1}$.



2.2. $n > 1$: Let us prove the following theorem.



If $Y$ is path connected, then $SY$ is simply connected.



This applies to $Y = S^{n-1}X_m$.



Let $p : Y times I to SY$ denote the quotient map. Since $Y$ is path connected, so are $Y times I$ and $SY$. As a basepoint for $SY$ choose $z_0 = p(y_0,1/2)$, where $y_0 in Y$ is an arbitrary point. The sets $U = p(Y times (0,1])$ and $V = p(Y times [0,1))$ are open in $SY$, and we have $z_0 in U cap V = p(Y times (0,1)$ which is pathwise connected. Since $U$ and $V$ are contractible, we get $pi_1(U,z_0) = pi_1(V,z_0) = 0$.
Now apply the Seifert-van Kampen-theorem to see that $pi_1(SY,z_0) = 0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




  1. $m = 1$: All suspensions of $X_1$ are contractible.


  2. $m > 1$:



2.1. $n = 1$: As you stated correctly, $pi_1(SX_m) = F_{m-1}$.



2.2. $n > 1$: Let us prove the following theorem.



If $Y$ is path connected, then $SY$ is simply connected.



This applies to $Y = S^{n-1}X_m$.



Let $p : Y times I to SY$ denote the quotient map. Since $Y$ is path connected, so are $Y times I$ and $SY$. As a basepoint for $SY$ choose $z_0 = p(y_0,1/2)$, where $y_0 in Y$ is an arbitrary point. The sets $U = p(Y times (0,1])$ and $V = p(Y times [0,1))$ are open in $SY$, and we have $z_0 in U cap V = p(Y times (0,1)$ which is pathwise connected. Since $U$ and $V$ are contractible, we get $pi_1(U,z_0) = pi_1(V,z_0) = 0$.
Now apply the Seifert-van Kampen-theorem to see that $pi_1(SY,z_0) = 0$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 11 at 14:19









Paul FrostPaul Frost

10.4k3933




10.4k3933












  • $begingroup$
    That's a very useful result, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – iqcd
    Jan 11 at 14:29


















  • $begingroup$
    That's a very useful result, thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – iqcd
    Jan 11 at 14:29
















$begingroup$
That's a very useful result, thanks!
$endgroup$
– iqcd
Jan 11 at 14:29




$begingroup$
That's a very useful result, thanks!
$endgroup$
– iqcd
Jan 11 at 14:29


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069740%2ffundamental-group-of-the-m-fold-suspension-of-a-finite-discrete-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory

in spring boot 2.1 many test slices are not allowed anymore due to multiple @BootstrapWith