How to label equation with particular format?
I have several equations, I want to label equation 1 and 2 to be (eqt1) and (eqt2), any other equations after it use normal equation number, say (1), (2), (3),... How to do it in latex?
E.g.
begin{align}
1+1=2 (eqt1)
end{align}
begin{align}
2+3=5 (eqt2)
end{align}
begin{align}
3+3=6 (1)
end{align}
begin{align}
4+3=7 (2)
end{align}
equations numbering
|
show 3 more comments
I have several equations, I want to label equation 1 and 2 to be (eqt1) and (eqt2), any other equations after it use normal equation number, say (1), (2), (3),... How to do it in latex?
E.g.
begin{align}
1+1=2 (eqt1)
end{align}
begin{align}
2+3=5 (eqt2)
end{align}
begin{align}
3+3=6 (1)
end{align}
begin{align}
4+3=7 (2)
end{align}
equations numbering
That's the work fortag{hello}
– JouleV
Jan 11 at 10:51
please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command
– Yorgos
Jan 11 at 10:53
@Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it withtag{...}
(which is part ofamsmath
package) to customise thelabel
of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations witheqref{...}
.
– Raaja
Jan 11 at 10:54
1
@Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am usingmathtools
instead ofamsmath
– Yorgos
Jan 11 at 10:57
@Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable formathtools
as well ;)
– Raaja
Jan 11 at 10:58
|
show 3 more comments
I have several equations, I want to label equation 1 and 2 to be (eqt1) and (eqt2), any other equations after it use normal equation number, say (1), (2), (3),... How to do it in latex?
E.g.
begin{align}
1+1=2 (eqt1)
end{align}
begin{align}
2+3=5 (eqt2)
end{align}
begin{align}
3+3=6 (1)
end{align}
begin{align}
4+3=7 (2)
end{align}
equations numbering
I have several equations, I want to label equation 1 and 2 to be (eqt1) and (eqt2), any other equations after it use normal equation number, say (1), (2), (3),... How to do it in latex?
E.g.
begin{align}
1+1=2 (eqt1)
end{align}
begin{align}
2+3=5 (eqt2)
end{align}
begin{align}
3+3=6 (1)
end{align}
begin{align}
4+3=7 (2)
end{align}
equations numbering
equations numbering
edited Jan 11 at 10:49
Raaja
3,47521037
3,47521037
asked Jan 11 at 10:47
will_cheukwill_cheuk
161
161
That's the work fortag{hello}
– JouleV
Jan 11 at 10:51
please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command
– Yorgos
Jan 11 at 10:53
@Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it withtag{...}
(which is part ofamsmath
package) to customise thelabel
of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations witheqref{...}
.
– Raaja
Jan 11 at 10:54
1
@Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am usingmathtools
instead ofamsmath
– Yorgos
Jan 11 at 10:57
@Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable formathtools
as well ;)
– Raaja
Jan 11 at 10:58
|
show 3 more comments
That's the work fortag{hello}
– JouleV
Jan 11 at 10:51
please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command
– Yorgos
Jan 11 at 10:53
@Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it withtag{...}
(which is part ofamsmath
package) to customise thelabel
of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations witheqref{...}
.
– Raaja
Jan 11 at 10:54
1
@Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am usingmathtools
instead ofamsmath
– Yorgos
Jan 11 at 10:57
@Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable formathtools
as well ;)
– Raaja
Jan 11 at 10:58
That's the work for
tag{hello}
– JouleV
Jan 11 at 10:51
That's the work for
tag{hello}
– JouleV
Jan 11 at 10:51
please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command
– Yorgos
Jan 11 at 10:53
please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command
– Yorgos
Jan 11 at 10:53
@Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it with
tag{...}
(which is part of amsmath
package) to customise the label
of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations with eqref{...}
.– Raaja
Jan 11 at 10:54
@Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it with
tag{...}
(which is part of amsmath
package) to customise the label
of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations with eqref{...}
.– Raaja
Jan 11 at 10:54
1
1
@Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am using
mathtools
instead of amsmath
– Yorgos
Jan 11 at 10:57
@Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am using
mathtools
instead of amsmath
– Yorgos
Jan 11 at 10:57
@Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable for
mathtools
as well ;)– Raaja
Jan 11 at 10:58
@Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable for
mathtools
as well ;)– Raaja
Jan 11 at 10:58
|
show 3 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
With amsmath
package, you can achieve it with tag
environment.
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2 tag{eqt1}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5 tag{eqt2}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
I am referring eqref{e1}, eqref{e2}, eqref{e3}, eqref{e4}.
end{document}
Which would give you
add a comment |
Another possibility, using the same equation counter as the default: mathtools
has a newtagform
command, which can be used to customise the appearance of the equation number, and a usetagform
command which can be used within the document body:
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newtagform{eqt}{(eqt,}{)}
begin{document}
usetagform{eqt}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5
end{align}
usetagform{default}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
end{document}
The OP asked for(eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2)
. You have given them(eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4)
. You would need to reset the counter after(eqt2)
to give the behaviour asked for
– lioness99a
Jan 11 at 13:39
1
This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.
– Bernard
Jan 11 at 13:46
They said they wanted to have(eqt1)
and(eqt2)
and then start counting from(1)
again. Your answer continues counting after(eqt2)
with(3)
so you need to includesetcounter{equation}{0}
at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted
– lioness99a
Jan 11 at 14:02
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469677%2fhow-to-label-equation-with-particular-format%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
With amsmath
package, you can achieve it with tag
environment.
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2 tag{eqt1}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5 tag{eqt2}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
I am referring eqref{e1}, eqref{e2}, eqref{e3}, eqref{e4}.
end{document}
Which would give you
add a comment |
With amsmath
package, you can achieve it with tag
environment.
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2 tag{eqt1}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5 tag{eqt2}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
I am referring eqref{e1}, eqref{e2}, eqref{e3}, eqref{e4}.
end{document}
Which would give you
add a comment |
With amsmath
package, you can achieve it with tag
environment.
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2 tag{eqt1}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5 tag{eqt2}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
I am referring eqref{e1}, eqref{e2}, eqref{e3}, eqref{e4}.
end{document}
Which would give you
With amsmath
package, you can achieve it with tag
environment.
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}
begin{document}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2 tag{eqt1}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5 tag{eqt2}
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
I am referring eqref{e1}, eqref{e2}, eqref{e3}, eqref{e4}.
end{document}
Which would give you
answered Jan 11 at 10:53
RaajaRaaja
3,47521037
3,47521037
add a comment |
add a comment |
Another possibility, using the same equation counter as the default: mathtools
has a newtagform
command, which can be used to customise the appearance of the equation number, and a usetagform
command which can be used within the document body:
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newtagform{eqt}{(eqt,}{)}
begin{document}
usetagform{eqt}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5
end{align}
usetagform{default}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
end{document}
The OP asked for(eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2)
. You have given them(eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4)
. You would need to reset the counter after(eqt2)
to give the behaviour asked for
– lioness99a
Jan 11 at 13:39
1
This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.
– Bernard
Jan 11 at 13:46
They said they wanted to have(eqt1)
and(eqt2)
and then start counting from(1)
again. Your answer continues counting after(eqt2)
with(3)
so you need to includesetcounter{equation}{0}
at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted
– lioness99a
Jan 11 at 14:02
add a comment |
Another possibility, using the same equation counter as the default: mathtools
has a newtagform
command, which can be used to customise the appearance of the equation number, and a usetagform
command which can be used within the document body:
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newtagform{eqt}{(eqt,}{)}
begin{document}
usetagform{eqt}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5
end{align}
usetagform{default}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
end{document}
The OP asked for(eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2)
. You have given them(eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4)
. You would need to reset the counter after(eqt2)
to give the behaviour asked for
– lioness99a
Jan 11 at 13:39
1
This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.
– Bernard
Jan 11 at 13:46
They said they wanted to have(eqt1)
and(eqt2)
and then start counting from(1)
again. Your answer continues counting after(eqt2)
with(3)
so you need to includesetcounter{equation}{0}
at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted
– lioness99a
Jan 11 at 14:02
add a comment |
Another possibility, using the same equation counter as the default: mathtools
has a newtagform
command, which can be used to customise the appearance of the equation number, and a usetagform
command which can be used within the document body:
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newtagform{eqt}{(eqt,}{)}
begin{document}
usetagform{eqt}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5
end{align}
usetagform{default}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
end{document}
Another possibility, using the same equation counter as the default: mathtools
has a newtagform
command, which can be used to customise the appearance of the equation number, and a usetagform
command which can be used within the document body:
documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{mathtools}
newtagform{eqt}{(eqt,}{)}
begin{document}
usetagform{eqt}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5
end{align}
usetagform{default}
begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}
begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
end{document}
edited Jan 11 at 12:43
Raaja
3,47521037
3,47521037
answered Jan 11 at 12:23
BernardBernard
169k773198
169k773198
The OP asked for(eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2)
. You have given them(eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4)
. You would need to reset the counter after(eqt2)
to give the behaviour asked for
– lioness99a
Jan 11 at 13:39
1
This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.
– Bernard
Jan 11 at 13:46
They said they wanted to have(eqt1)
and(eqt2)
and then start counting from(1)
again. Your answer continues counting after(eqt2)
with(3)
so you need to includesetcounter{equation}{0}
at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted
– lioness99a
Jan 11 at 14:02
add a comment |
The OP asked for(eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2)
. You have given them(eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4)
. You would need to reset the counter after(eqt2)
to give the behaviour asked for
– lioness99a
Jan 11 at 13:39
1
This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.
– Bernard
Jan 11 at 13:46
They said they wanted to have(eqt1)
and(eqt2)
and then start counting from(1)
again. Your answer continues counting after(eqt2)
with(3)
so you need to includesetcounter{equation}{0}
at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted
– lioness99a
Jan 11 at 14:02
The OP asked for
(eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2)
. You have given them (eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4)
. You would need to reset the counter after (eqt2)
to give the behaviour asked for– lioness99a
Jan 11 at 13:39
The OP asked for
(eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2)
. You have given them (eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4)
. You would need to reset the counter after (eqt2)
to give the behaviour asked for– lioness99a
Jan 11 at 13:39
1
1
This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.
– Bernard
Jan 11 at 13:46
This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.
– Bernard
Jan 11 at 13:46
They said they wanted to have
(eqt1)
and (eqt2)
and then start counting from (1)
again. Your answer continues counting after (eqt2)
with (3)
so you need to include setcounter{equation}{0}
at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted– lioness99a
Jan 11 at 14:02
They said they wanted to have
(eqt1)
and (eqt2)
and then start counting from (1)
again. Your answer continues counting after (eqt2)
with (3)
so you need to include setcounter{equation}{0}
at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted– lioness99a
Jan 11 at 14:02
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469677%2fhow-to-label-equation-with-particular-format%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
That's the work for
tag{hello}
– JouleV
Jan 11 at 10:51
please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command
– Yorgos
Jan 11 at 10:53
@Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it with
tag{...}
(which is part ofamsmath
package) to customise thelabel
of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations witheqref{...}
.– Raaja
Jan 11 at 10:54
1
@Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am using
mathtools
instead ofamsmath
– Yorgos
Jan 11 at 10:57
@Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable for
mathtools
as well ;)– Raaja
Jan 11 at 10:58