How to label equation with particular format?












3















I have several equations, I want to label equation 1 and 2 to be (eqt1) and (eqt2), any other equations after it use normal equation number, say (1), (2), (3),... How to do it in latex?



E.g.



begin{align}
1+1=2 (eqt1)
end{align}

begin{align}
2+3=5 (eqt2)
end{align}

begin{align}
3+3=6 (1)
end{align}

begin{align}
4+3=7 (2)
end{align}









share|improve this question

























  • That's the work for tag{hello}

    – JouleV
    Jan 11 at 10:51











  • please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command

    – Yorgos
    Jan 11 at 10:53











  • @Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it with tag{...} (which is part of amsmath package) to customise the label of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations with eqref{...}.

    – Raaja
    Jan 11 at 10:54








  • 1





    @Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am using mathtools instead of amsmath

    – Yorgos
    Jan 11 at 10:57











  • @Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable for mathtools as well ;)

    – Raaja
    Jan 11 at 10:58
















3















I have several equations, I want to label equation 1 and 2 to be (eqt1) and (eqt2), any other equations after it use normal equation number, say (1), (2), (3),... How to do it in latex?



E.g.



begin{align}
1+1=2 (eqt1)
end{align}

begin{align}
2+3=5 (eqt2)
end{align}

begin{align}
3+3=6 (1)
end{align}

begin{align}
4+3=7 (2)
end{align}









share|improve this question

























  • That's the work for tag{hello}

    – JouleV
    Jan 11 at 10:51











  • please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command

    – Yorgos
    Jan 11 at 10:53











  • @Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it with tag{...} (which is part of amsmath package) to customise the label of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations with eqref{...}.

    – Raaja
    Jan 11 at 10:54








  • 1





    @Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am using mathtools instead of amsmath

    – Yorgos
    Jan 11 at 10:57











  • @Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable for mathtools as well ;)

    – Raaja
    Jan 11 at 10:58














3












3








3








I have several equations, I want to label equation 1 and 2 to be (eqt1) and (eqt2), any other equations after it use normal equation number, say (1), (2), (3),... How to do it in latex?



E.g.



begin{align}
1+1=2 (eqt1)
end{align}

begin{align}
2+3=5 (eqt2)
end{align}

begin{align}
3+3=6 (1)
end{align}

begin{align}
4+3=7 (2)
end{align}









share|improve this question
















I have several equations, I want to label equation 1 and 2 to be (eqt1) and (eqt2), any other equations after it use normal equation number, say (1), (2), (3),... How to do it in latex?



E.g.



begin{align}
1+1=2 (eqt1)
end{align}

begin{align}
2+3=5 (eqt2)
end{align}

begin{align}
3+3=6 (1)
end{align}

begin{align}
4+3=7 (2)
end{align}






equations numbering






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 11 at 10:49









Raaja

3,47521037




3,47521037










asked Jan 11 at 10:47









will_cheukwill_cheuk

161




161













  • That's the work for tag{hello}

    – JouleV
    Jan 11 at 10:51











  • please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command

    – Yorgos
    Jan 11 at 10:53











  • @Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it with tag{...} (which is part of amsmath package) to customise the label of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations with eqref{...}.

    – Raaja
    Jan 11 at 10:54








  • 1





    @Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am using mathtools instead of amsmath

    – Yorgos
    Jan 11 at 10:57











  • @Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable for mathtools as well ;)

    – Raaja
    Jan 11 at 10:58



















  • That's the work for tag{hello}

    – JouleV
    Jan 11 at 10:51











  • please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command

    – Yorgos
    Jan 11 at 10:53











  • @Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it with tag{...} (which is part of amsmath package) to customise the label of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations with eqref{...}.

    – Raaja
    Jan 11 at 10:54








  • 1





    @Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am using mathtools instead of amsmath

    – Yorgos
    Jan 11 at 10:57











  • @Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable for mathtools as well ;)

    – Raaja
    Jan 11 at 10:58

















That's the work for tag{hello}

– JouleV
Jan 11 at 10:51





That's the work for tag{hello}

– JouleV
Jan 11 at 10:51













please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command

– Yorgos
Jan 11 at 10:53





please have a look at tex.stackexchange.com/questions/28894/modify-eqref-command

– Yorgos
Jan 11 at 10:53













@Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it with tag{...} (which is part of amsmath package) to customise the label of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations with eqref{...}.

– Raaja
Jan 11 at 10:54







@Yorgos We can straightaway achieve it with tag{...} (which is part of amsmath package) to customise the label of equations and then use the normal way of cross-referencing the equations with eqref{...}.

– Raaja
Jan 11 at 10:54






1




1





@Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am using mathtools instead of amsmath

– Yorgos
Jan 11 at 10:57





@Raaja oo nice... i didn't know this command, since i am using mathtools instead of amsmath

– Yorgos
Jan 11 at 10:57













@Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable for mathtools as well ;)

– Raaja
Jan 11 at 10:58





@Yorgos [Fun-fact] It is applicable for mathtools as well ;)

– Raaja
Jan 11 at 10:58










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6














With amsmath package, you can achieve it with tag environment.



documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
usepackage{amsmath}

begin{document}
begin{align}
label{e1} 1+1=2 tag{eqt1}
end{align}

begin{align}
label{e2} 2+3=5 tag{eqt2}
end{align}

begin{align}
label{e3} 3+3=6
end{align}

begin{align}
label{e4} 4+3=7
end{align}
I am referring eqref{e1}, eqref{e2}, eqref{e3}, eqref{e4}.
end{document}


Which would give you



enter image description here






share|improve this answer































    4














    Another possibility, using the same equation counter as the default: mathtools has a newtagform command, which can be used to customise the appearance of the equation number, and a usetagform command which can be used within the document body:



    documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
    usepackage{mathtools}
    newtagform{eqt}{(eqt,}{)}

    begin{document}

    usetagform{eqt}
    begin{align}
    label{e1} 1+1=2
    end{align}

    begin{align}
    label{e2} 2+3=5
    end{align}

    usetagform{default}
    begin{align}
    label{e3} 3+3=6
    end{align}

    begin{align}
    label{e4} 4+3=7
    end{align}

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


























    • The OP asked for (eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2). You have given them (eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4). You would need to reset the counter after (eqt2) to give the behaviour asked for

      – lioness99a
      Jan 11 at 13:39








    • 1





      This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.

      – Bernard
      Jan 11 at 13:46











    • They said they wanted to have (eqt1) and (eqt2) and then start counting from (1) again. Your answer continues counting after (eqt2) with (3) so you need to include setcounter{equation}{0} at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted

      – lioness99a
      Jan 11 at 14:02













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469677%2fhow-to-label-equation-with-particular-format%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6














    With amsmath package, you can achieve it with tag environment.



    documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
    usepackage{amsmath}

    begin{document}
    begin{align}
    label{e1} 1+1=2 tag{eqt1}
    end{align}

    begin{align}
    label{e2} 2+3=5 tag{eqt2}
    end{align}

    begin{align}
    label{e3} 3+3=6
    end{align}

    begin{align}
    label{e4} 4+3=7
    end{align}
    I am referring eqref{e1}, eqref{e2}, eqref{e3}, eqref{e4}.
    end{document}


    Which would give you



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer




























      6














      With amsmath package, you can achieve it with tag environment.



      documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
      usepackage{amsmath}

      begin{document}
      begin{align}
      label{e1} 1+1=2 tag{eqt1}
      end{align}

      begin{align}
      label{e2} 2+3=5 tag{eqt2}
      end{align}

      begin{align}
      label{e3} 3+3=6
      end{align}

      begin{align}
      label{e4} 4+3=7
      end{align}
      I am referring eqref{e1}, eqref{e2}, eqref{e3}, eqref{e4}.
      end{document}


      Which would give you



      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer


























        6












        6








        6







        With amsmath package, you can achieve it with tag environment.



        documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
        usepackage{amsmath}

        begin{document}
        begin{align}
        label{e1} 1+1=2 tag{eqt1}
        end{align}

        begin{align}
        label{e2} 2+3=5 tag{eqt2}
        end{align}

        begin{align}
        label{e3} 3+3=6
        end{align}

        begin{align}
        label{e4} 4+3=7
        end{align}
        I am referring eqref{e1}, eqref{e2}, eqref{e3}, eqref{e4}.
        end{document}


        Which would give you



        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer













        With amsmath package, you can achieve it with tag environment.



        documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
        usepackage{amsmath}

        begin{document}
        begin{align}
        label{e1} 1+1=2 tag{eqt1}
        end{align}

        begin{align}
        label{e2} 2+3=5 tag{eqt2}
        end{align}

        begin{align}
        label{e3} 3+3=6
        end{align}

        begin{align}
        label{e4} 4+3=7
        end{align}
        I am referring eqref{e1}, eqref{e2}, eqref{e3}, eqref{e4}.
        end{document}


        Which would give you



        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jan 11 at 10:53









        RaajaRaaja

        3,47521037




        3,47521037























            4














            Another possibility, using the same equation counter as the default: mathtools has a newtagform command, which can be used to customise the appearance of the equation number, and a usetagform command which can be used within the document body:



            documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
            usepackage{mathtools}
            newtagform{eqt}{(eqt,}{)}

            begin{document}

            usetagform{eqt}
            begin{align}
            label{e1} 1+1=2
            end{align}

            begin{align}
            label{e2} 2+3=5
            end{align}

            usetagform{default}
            begin{align}
            label{e3} 3+3=6
            end{align}

            begin{align}
            label{e4} 4+3=7
            end{align}

            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer


























            • The OP asked for (eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2). You have given them (eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4). You would need to reset the counter after (eqt2) to give the behaviour asked for

              – lioness99a
              Jan 11 at 13:39








            • 1





              This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.

              – Bernard
              Jan 11 at 13:46











            • They said they wanted to have (eqt1) and (eqt2) and then start counting from (1) again. Your answer continues counting after (eqt2) with (3) so you need to include setcounter{equation}{0} at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted

              – lioness99a
              Jan 11 at 14:02


















            4














            Another possibility, using the same equation counter as the default: mathtools has a newtagform command, which can be used to customise the appearance of the equation number, and a usetagform command which can be used within the document body:



            documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
            usepackage{mathtools}
            newtagform{eqt}{(eqt,}{)}

            begin{document}

            usetagform{eqt}
            begin{align}
            label{e1} 1+1=2
            end{align}

            begin{align}
            label{e2} 2+3=5
            end{align}

            usetagform{default}
            begin{align}
            label{e3} 3+3=6
            end{align}

            begin{align}
            label{e4} 4+3=7
            end{align}

            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer


























            • The OP asked for (eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2). You have given them (eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4). You would need to reset the counter after (eqt2) to give the behaviour asked for

              – lioness99a
              Jan 11 at 13:39








            • 1





              This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.

              – Bernard
              Jan 11 at 13:46











            • They said they wanted to have (eqt1) and (eqt2) and then start counting from (1) again. Your answer continues counting after (eqt2) with (3) so you need to include setcounter{equation}{0} at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted

              – lioness99a
              Jan 11 at 14:02
















            4












            4








            4







            Another possibility, using the same equation counter as the default: mathtools has a newtagform command, which can be used to customise the appearance of the equation number, and a usetagform command which can be used within the document body:



            documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
            usepackage{mathtools}
            newtagform{eqt}{(eqt,}{)}

            begin{document}

            usetagform{eqt}
            begin{align}
            label{e1} 1+1=2
            end{align}

            begin{align}
            label{e2} 2+3=5
            end{align}

            usetagform{default}
            begin{align}
            label{e3} 3+3=6
            end{align}

            begin{align}
            label{e4} 4+3=7
            end{align}

            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer















            Another possibility, using the same equation counter as the default: mathtools has a newtagform command, which can be used to customise the appearance of the equation number, and a usetagform command which can be used within the document body:



            documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
            usepackage{mathtools}
            newtagform{eqt}{(eqt,}{)}

            begin{document}

            usetagform{eqt}
            begin{align}
            label{e1} 1+1=2
            end{align}

            begin{align}
            label{e2} 2+3=5
            end{align}

            usetagform{default}
            begin{align}
            label{e3} 3+3=6
            end{align}

            begin{align}
            label{e4} 4+3=7
            end{align}

            end{document}


            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jan 11 at 12:43









            Raaja

            3,47521037




            3,47521037










            answered Jan 11 at 12:23









            BernardBernard

            169k773198




            169k773198













            • The OP asked for (eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2). You have given them (eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4). You would need to reset the counter after (eqt2) to give the behaviour asked for

              – lioness99a
              Jan 11 at 13:39








            • 1





              This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.

              – Bernard
              Jan 11 at 13:46











            • They said they wanted to have (eqt1) and (eqt2) and then start counting from (1) again. Your answer continues counting after (eqt2) with (3) so you need to include setcounter{equation}{0} at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted

              – lioness99a
              Jan 11 at 14:02





















            • The OP asked for (eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2). You have given them (eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4). You would need to reset the counter after (eqt2) to give the behaviour asked for

              – lioness99a
              Jan 11 at 13:39








            • 1





              This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.

              – Bernard
              Jan 11 at 13:46











            • They said they wanted to have (eqt1) and (eqt2) and then start counting from (1) again. Your answer continues counting after (eqt2) with (3) so you need to include setcounter{equation}{0} at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted

              – lioness99a
              Jan 11 at 14:02



















            The OP asked for (eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2). You have given them (eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4). You would need to reset the counter after (eqt2) to give the behaviour asked for

            – lioness99a
            Jan 11 at 13:39







            The OP asked for (eqt1), (eqt2), (1), (2). You have given them (eqt1), (eqt2), (3), (4). You would need to reset the counter after (eqt2) to give the behaviour asked for

            – lioness99a
            Jan 11 at 13:39






            1




            1





            This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.

            – Bernard
            Jan 11 at 13:46





            This was not quite clear to me. I indeed mentioned that in what I propose, both types of equation share the same counter – only the formatting differs.

            – Bernard
            Jan 11 at 13:46













            They said they wanted to have (eqt1) and (eqt2) and then start counting from (1) again. Your answer continues counting after (eqt2) with (3) so you need to include setcounter{equation}{0} at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted

            – lioness99a
            Jan 11 at 14:02







            They said they wanted to have (eqt1) and (eqt2) and then start counting from (1) again. Your answer continues counting after (eqt2) with (3) so you need to include setcounter{equation}{0} at that point to get the behaviour the OP wanted

            – lioness99a
            Jan 11 at 14:02




















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f469677%2fhow-to-label-equation-with-particular-format%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

            Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

            A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$