Prove that $mathbb{Z}_{2^k}^* cong mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_{2^{k-2}}$
$begingroup$
In order to compute the value of the Carmichael function for $2^k$ with $k > 2$, my notes indicate that one has to stablish that $mathbb{Z}_{2^k}^* cong mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_{2^{k-2}}$ .
However, I have not been able to find this theorem in the bibliography (essentially Shoup's number theory), nor googling nor on stack exchange.
Does anyone know proof of this fact?
Edit
Here is a python script for the powers I was asked to compute:
for i in range(3,40):
find = True
for j in range(1,280):
if(5**j % 2**i == 1 and find == True):
find = False
print(2**i," has finished with ", j)
and here the results:
8 has finished with 2
16 has finished with 4
32 has finished with 8
64 has finished with 16
128 has finished with 32
256 has finished with 64
512 has finished with 128
1024 has finished with 256
So experimentally, it seems that $ord(5) = 2^{k-2}$ for $k > 2$.
abstract-algebra group-theory number-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In order to compute the value of the Carmichael function for $2^k$ with $k > 2$, my notes indicate that one has to stablish that $mathbb{Z}_{2^k}^* cong mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_{2^{k-2}}$ .
However, I have not been able to find this theorem in the bibliography (essentially Shoup's number theory), nor googling nor on stack exchange.
Does anyone know proof of this fact?
Edit
Here is a python script for the powers I was asked to compute:
for i in range(3,40):
find = True
for j in range(1,280):
if(5**j % 2**i == 1 and find == True):
find = False
print(2**i," has finished with ", j)
and here the results:
8 has finished with 2
16 has finished with 4
32 has finished with 8
64 has finished with 16
128 has finished with 32
256 has finished with 64
512 has finished with 128
1024 has finished with 256
So experimentally, it seems that $ord(5) = 2^{k-2}$ for $k > 2$.
abstract-algebra group-theory number-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In order to compute the value of the Carmichael function for $2^k$ with $k > 2$, my notes indicate that one has to stablish that $mathbb{Z}_{2^k}^* cong mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_{2^{k-2}}$ .
However, I have not been able to find this theorem in the bibliography (essentially Shoup's number theory), nor googling nor on stack exchange.
Does anyone know proof of this fact?
Edit
Here is a python script for the powers I was asked to compute:
for i in range(3,40):
find = True
for j in range(1,280):
if(5**j % 2**i == 1 and find == True):
find = False
print(2**i," has finished with ", j)
and here the results:
8 has finished with 2
16 has finished with 4
32 has finished with 8
64 has finished with 16
128 has finished with 32
256 has finished with 64
512 has finished with 128
1024 has finished with 256
So experimentally, it seems that $ord(5) = 2^{k-2}$ for $k > 2$.
abstract-algebra group-theory number-theory
$endgroup$
In order to compute the value of the Carmichael function for $2^k$ with $k > 2$, my notes indicate that one has to stablish that $mathbb{Z}_{2^k}^* cong mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_{2^{k-2}}$ .
However, I have not been able to find this theorem in the bibliography (essentially Shoup's number theory), nor googling nor on stack exchange.
Does anyone know proof of this fact?
Edit
Here is a python script for the powers I was asked to compute:
for i in range(3,40):
find = True
for j in range(1,280):
if(5**j % 2**i == 1 and find == True):
find = False
print(2**i," has finished with ", j)
and here the results:
8 has finished with 2
16 has finished with 4
32 has finished with 8
64 has finished with 16
128 has finished with 32
256 has finished with 64
512 has finished with 128
1024 has finished with 256
So experimentally, it seems that $ord(5) = 2^{k-2}$ for $k > 2$.
abstract-algebra group-theory number-theory
abstract-algebra group-theory number-theory
edited Jan 9 at 0:32
Javier
asked Jan 9 at 0:12
JavierJavier
2,01821133
2,01821133
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint: compute the order of $5$ in $(mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$.
Edit: I was asked to be more specific.
I suggest that you prove that $2^k$ does not divide $5^{2^{k-3}}-1$ but divides $5^{2^{k-2}}-1$. Thus, you can deduce that $(x,y) in mathbb{Z}/(2) times mathbb{Z}/(2^{k-2}) rightarrow (-1)^x5^y in (mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$ is an isomorphism.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is this using the classification group of finite abelian groups?
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 9 at 0:36
$begingroup$
No. Just elementary number theory and basic finite group theory.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 9 at 0:37
$begingroup$
To be honest I'm a bit lost. Could you provide some extra information?
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 9 at 0:46
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066903%2fprove-that-mathbbz-2k-cong-mathbbz-2-times-mathbbz-2k-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint: compute the order of $5$ in $(mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$.
Edit: I was asked to be more specific.
I suggest that you prove that $2^k$ does not divide $5^{2^{k-3}}-1$ but divides $5^{2^{k-2}}-1$. Thus, you can deduce that $(x,y) in mathbb{Z}/(2) times mathbb{Z}/(2^{k-2}) rightarrow (-1)^x5^y in (mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$ is an isomorphism.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is this using the classification group of finite abelian groups?
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 9 at 0:36
$begingroup$
No. Just elementary number theory and basic finite group theory.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 9 at 0:37
$begingroup$
To be honest I'm a bit lost. Could you provide some extra information?
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 9 at 0:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: compute the order of $5$ in $(mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$.
Edit: I was asked to be more specific.
I suggest that you prove that $2^k$ does not divide $5^{2^{k-3}}-1$ but divides $5^{2^{k-2}}-1$. Thus, you can deduce that $(x,y) in mathbb{Z}/(2) times mathbb{Z}/(2^{k-2}) rightarrow (-1)^x5^y in (mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$ is an isomorphism.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Is this using the classification group of finite abelian groups?
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 9 at 0:36
$begingroup$
No. Just elementary number theory and basic finite group theory.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 9 at 0:37
$begingroup$
To be honest I'm a bit lost. Could you provide some extra information?
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 9 at 0:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint: compute the order of $5$ in $(mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$.
Edit: I was asked to be more specific.
I suggest that you prove that $2^k$ does not divide $5^{2^{k-3}}-1$ but divides $5^{2^{k-2}}-1$. Thus, you can deduce that $(x,y) in mathbb{Z}/(2) times mathbb{Z}/(2^{k-2}) rightarrow (-1)^x5^y in (mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$ is an isomorphism.
$endgroup$
Hint: compute the order of $5$ in $(mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$.
Edit: I was asked to be more specific.
I suggest that you prove that $2^k$ does not divide $5^{2^{k-3}}-1$ but divides $5^{2^{k-2}}-1$. Thus, you can deduce that $(x,y) in mathbb{Z}/(2) times mathbb{Z}/(2^{k-2}) rightarrow (-1)^x5^y in (mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$ is an isomorphism.
edited Jan 9 at 0:52
answered Jan 9 at 0:14
MindlackMindlack
3,49217
3,49217
$begingroup$
Is this using the classification group of finite abelian groups?
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 9 at 0:36
$begingroup$
No. Just elementary number theory and basic finite group theory.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 9 at 0:37
$begingroup$
To be honest I'm a bit lost. Could you provide some extra information?
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 9 at 0:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Is this using the classification group of finite abelian groups?
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 9 at 0:36
$begingroup$
No. Just elementary number theory and basic finite group theory.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 9 at 0:37
$begingroup$
To be honest I'm a bit lost. Could you provide some extra information?
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 9 at 0:46
$begingroup$
Is this using the classification group of finite abelian groups?
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 9 at 0:36
$begingroup$
Is this using the classification group of finite abelian groups?
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 9 at 0:36
$begingroup$
No. Just elementary number theory and basic finite group theory.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 9 at 0:37
$begingroup$
No. Just elementary number theory and basic finite group theory.
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 9 at 0:37
$begingroup$
To be honest I'm a bit lost. Could you provide some extra information?
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 9 at 0:46
$begingroup$
To be honest I'm a bit lost. Could you provide some extra information?
$endgroup$
– Javier
Jan 9 at 0:46
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066903%2fprove-that-mathbbz-2k-cong-mathbbz-2-times-mathbbz-2k-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown