Prove that $mathbb{Z}_{2^k}^* cong mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_{2^{k-2}}$












2












$begingroup$


In order to compute the value of the Carmichael function for $2^k$ with $k > 2$, my notes indicate that one has to stablish that $mathbb{Z}_{2^k}^* cong mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_{2^{k-2}}$ .



However, I have not been able to find this theorem in the bibliography (essentially Shoup's number theory), nor googling nor on stack exchange.



Does anyone know proof of this fact?



Edit



Here is a python script for the powers I was asked to compute:



for i in range(3,40):
find = True
for j in range(1,280):
if(5**j % 2**i == 1 and find == True):
find = False
print(2**i," has finished with ", j)


and here the results:



8  has finished with  2
16 has finished with 4
32 has finished with 8
64 has finished with 16
128 has finished with 32
256 has finished with 64
512 has finished with 128
1024 has finished with 256


So experimentally, it seems that $ord(5) = 2^{k-2}$ for $k > 2$.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    In order to compute the value of the Carmichael function for $2^k$ with $k > 2$, my notes indicate that one has to stablish that $mathbb{Z}_{2^k}^* cong mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_{2^{k-2}}$ .



    However, I have not been able to find this theorem in the bibliography (essentially Shoup's number theory), nor googling nor on stack exchange.



    Does anyone know proof of this fact?



    Edit



    Here is a python script for the powers I was asked to compute:



    for i in range(3,40):
    find = True
    for j in range(1,280):
    if(5**j % 2**i == 1 and find == True):
    find = False
    print(2**i," has finished with ", j)


    and here the results:



    8  has finished with  2
    16 has finished with 4
    32 has finished with 8
    64 has finished with 16
    128 has finished with 32
    256 has finished with 64
    512 has finished with 128
    1024 has finished with 256


    So experimentally, it seems that $ord(5) = 2^{k-2}$ for $k > 2$.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      In order to compute the value of the Carmichael function for $2^k$ with $k > 2$, my notes indicate that one has to stablish that $mathbb{Z}_{2^k}^* cong mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_{2^{k-2}}$ .



      However, I have not been able to find this theorem in the bibliography (essentially Shoup's number theory), nor googling nor on stack exchange.



      Does anyone know proof of this fact?



      Edit



      Here is a python script for the powers I was asked to compute:



      for i in range(3,40):
      find = True
      for j in range(1,280):
      if(5**j % 2**i == 1 and find == True):
      find = False
      print(2**i," has finished with ", j)


      and here the results:



      8  has finished with  2
      16 has finished with 4
      32 has finished with 8
      64 has finished with 16
      128 has finished with 32
      256 has finished with 64
      512 has finished with 128
      1024 has finished with 256


      So experimentally, it seems that $ord(5) = 2^{k-2}$ for $k > 2$.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      In order to compute the value of the Carmichael function for $2^k$ with $k > 2$, my notes indicate that one has to stablish that $mathbb{Z}_{2^k}^* cong mathbb{Z}_2 times mathbb{Z}_{2^{k-2}}$ .



      However, I have not been able to find this theorem in the bibliography (essentially Shoup's number theory), nor googling nor on stack exchange.



      Does anyone know proof of this fact?



      Edit



      Here is a python script for the powers I was asked to compute:



      for i in range(3,40):
      find = True
      for j in range(1,280):
      if(5**j % 2**i == 1 and find == True):
      find = False
      print(2**i," has finished with ", j)


      and here the results:



      8  has finished with  2
      16 has finished with 4
      32 has finished with 8
      64 has finished with 16
      128 has finished with 32
      256 has finished with 64
      512 has finished with 128
      1024 has finished with 256


      So experimentally, it seems that $ord(5) = 2^{k-2}$ for $k > 2$.







      abstract-algebra group-theory number-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 9 at 0:32







      Javier

















      asked Jan 9 at 0:12









      JavierJavier

      2,01821133




      2,01821133






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Hint: compute the order of $5$ in $(mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$.



          Edit: I was asked to be more specific.
          I suggest that you prove that $2^k$ does not divide $5^{2^{k-3}}-1$ but divides $5^{2^{k-2}}-1$. Thus, you can deduce that $(x,y) in mathbb{Z}/(2) times mathbb{Z}/(2^{k-2}) rightarrow (-1)^x5^y in (mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$ is an isomorphism.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Is this using the classification group of finite abelian groups?
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            Jan 9 at 0:36










          • $begingroup$
            No. Just elementary number theory and basic finite group theory.
            $endgroup$
            – Mindlack
            Jan 9 at 0:37












          • $begingroup$
            To be honest I'm a bit lost. Could you provide some extra information?
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            Jan 9 at 0:46











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066903%2fprove-that-mathbbz-2k-cong-mathbbz-2-times-mathbbz-2k-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          Hint: compute the order of $5$ in $(mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$.



          Edit: I was asked to be more specific.
          I suggest that you prove that $2^k$ does not divide $5^{2^{k-3}}-1$ but divides $5^{2^{k-2}}-1$. Thus, you can deduce that $(x,y) in mathbb{Z}/(2) times mathbb{Z}/(2^{k-2}) rightarrow (-1)^x5^y in (mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$ is an isomorphism.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Is this using the classification group of finite abelian groups?
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            Jan 9 at 0:36










          • $begingroup$
            No. Just elementary number theory and basic finite group theory.
            $endgroup$
            – Mindlack
            Jan 9 at 0:37












          • $begingroup$
            To be honest I'm a bit lost. Could you provide some extra information?
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            Jan 9 at 0:46
















          3












          $begingroup$

          Hint: compute the order of $5$ in $(mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$.



          Edit: I was asked to be more specific.
          I suggest that you prove that $2^k$ does not divide $5^{2^{k-3}}-1$ but divides $5^{2^{k-2}}-1$. Thus, you can deduce that $(x,y) in mathbb{Z}/(2) times mathbb{Z}/(2^{k-2}) rightarrow (-1)^x5^y in (mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$ is an isomorphism.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Is this using the classification group of finite abelian groups?
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            Jan 9 at 0:36










          • $begingroup$
            No. Just elementary number theory and basic finite group theory.
            $endgroup$
            – Mindlack
            Jan 9 at 0:37












          • $begingroup$
            To be honest I'm a bit lost. Could you provide some extra information?
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            Jan 9 at 0:46














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Hint: compute the order of $5$ in $(mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$.



          Edit: I was asked to be more specific.
          I suggest that you prove that $2^k$ does not divide $5^{2^{k-3}}-1$ but divides $5^{2^{k-2}}-1$. Thus, you can deduce that $(x,y) in mathbb{Z}/(2) times mathbb{Z}/(2^{k-2}) rightarrow (-1)^x5^y in (mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$ is an isomorphism.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Hint: compute the order of $5$ in $(mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$.



          Edit: I was asked to be more specific.
          I suggest that you prove that $2^k$ does not divide $5^{2^{k-3}}-1$ but divides $5^{2^{k-2}}-1$. Thus, you can deduce that $(x,y) in mathbb{Z}/(2) times mathbb{Z}/(2^{k-2}) rightarrow (-1)^x5^y in (mathbb{Z}/(2^k))^{times}$ is an isomorphism.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 9 at 0:52

























          answered Jan 9 at 0:14









          MindlackMindlack

          3,49217




          3,49217












          • $begingroup$
            Is this using the classification group of finite abelian groups?
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            Jan 9 at 0:36










          • $begingroup$
            No. Just elementary number theory and basic finite group theory.
            $endgroup$
            – Mindlack
            Jan 9 at 0:37












          • $begingroup$
            To be honest I'm a bit lost. Could you provide some extra information?
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            Jan 9 at 0:46


















          • $begingroup$
            Is this using the classification group of finite abelian groups?
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            Jan 9 at 0:36










          • $begingroup$
            No. Just elementary number theory and basic finite group theory.
            $endgroup$
            – Mindlack
            Jan 9 at 0:37












          • $begingroup$
            To be honest I'm a bit lost. Could you provide some extra information?
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            Jan 9 at 0:46
















          $begingroup$
          Is this using the classification group of finite abelian groups?
          $endgroup$
          – Javier
          Jan 9 at 0:36




          $begingroup$
          Is this using the classification group of finite abelian groups?
          $endgroup$
          – Javier
          Jan 9 at 0:36












          $begingroup$
          No. Just elementary number theory and basic finite group theory.
          $endgroup$
          – Mindlack
          Jan 9 at 0:37






          $begingroup$
          No. Just elementary number theory and basic finite group theory.
          $endgroup$
          – Mindlack
          Jan 9 at 0:37














          $begingroup$
          To be honest I'm a bit lost. Could you provide some extra information?
          $endgroup$
          – Javier
          Jan 9 at 0:46




          $begingroup$
          To be honest I'm a bit lost. Could you provide some extra information?
          $endgroup$
          – Javier
          Jan 9 at 0:46


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066903%2fprove-that-mathbbz-2k-cong-mathbbz-2-times-mathbbz-2k-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          MongoDB - Not Authorized To Execute Command

          How to fix TextFormField cause rebuild widget in Flutter

          Npm cannot find a required file even through it is in the searched directory