Rank of an integer matrix modulo a prime
$begingroup$
Suppose I have a matrix A with integer elements and a matrix A mod p, where p is a prime number. In what circumstances rank(A)=rank(A mod p)?
Based on my understanding,
1) when det(A) is nonzero but not divisible by p, rank(A)=rank(A mod p)
2) when det(A) is zero, rank(A)=rank(A mod p)
If this is correct, how to prove it? Where can I find the relevant references?
Recently I am developing an algorithm where an integer matrix is computed, using modular arithmetic (mod p) can control the growth of integers in the matrix and thus improve the efficiency of my algorithm. The success of the algorithm requires rank of the matrix with mod does not change from the rank of the original matrix. This is where I will apply the problem. If someone can help me, I will really appreciate it.
modular-arithmetic matrix-rank
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose I have a matrix A with integer elements and a matrix A mod p, where p is a prime number. In what circumstances rank(A)=rank(A mod p)?
Based on my understanding,
1) when det(A) is nonzero but not divisible by p, rank(A)=rank(A mod p)
2) when det(A) is zero, rank(A)=rank(A mod p)
If this is correct, how to prove it? Where can I find the relevant references?
Recently I am developing an algorithm where an integer matrix is computed, using modular arithmetic (mod p) can control the growth of integers in the matrix and thus improve the efficiency of my algorithm. The success of the algorithm requires rank of the matrix with mod does not change from the rank of the original matrix. This is where I will apply the problem. If someone can help me, I will really appreciate it.
modular-arithmetic matrix-rank
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The matrix with rows $(2,0)$ and $(0,0)$ has rank $1$ over the integers, rank $0$ mod $2$, so the second assertion is wrong.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 9 at 17:33
$begingroup$
I am comparing the determinants. The matrix with rows (2,0) and (0,0) has rank 1 so it is not full rank; Its determinant is zero which also shows it is not full rank. Now if calculate its determinant mod 2, it is zero, which means det(A)=det(A mod 2)=0. The results coincides.
$endgroup$
– Xiaodong Shi
Jan 10 at 17:27
$begingroup$
Your question says "when det $A$ is $0$, rank $A$ = rank $A pmod{p}$". My example shows that's not true. You never mention "full rank". Your last paragraph doesn't either, so it suggests that your algorithm will fail. The rank is not preserved.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 10 at 20:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose I have a matrix A with integer elements and a matrix A mod p, where p is a prime number. In what circumstances rank(A)=rank(A mod p)?
Based on my understanding,
1) when det(A) is nonzero but not divisible by p, rank(A)=rank(A mod p)
2) when det(A) is zero, rank(A)=rank(A mod p)
If this is correct, how to prove it? Where can I find the relevant references?
Recently I am developing an algorithm where an integer matrix is computed, using modular arithmetic (mod p) can control the growth of integers in the matrix and thus improve the efficiency of my algorithm. The success of the algorithm requires rank of the matrix with mod does not change from the rank of the original matrix. This is where I will apply the problem. If someone can help me, I will really appreciate it.
modular-arithmetic matrix-rank
$endgroup$
Suppose I have a matrix A with integer elements and a matrix A mod p, where p is a prime number. In what circumstances rank(A)=rank(A mod p)?
Based on my understanding,
1) when det(A) is nonzero but not divisible by p, rank(A)=rank(A mod p)
2) when det(A) is zero, rank(A)=rank(A mod p)
If this is correct, how to prove it? Where can I find the relevant references?
Recently I am developing an algorithm where an integer matrix is computed, using modular arithmetic (mod p) can control the growth of integers in the matrix and thus improve the efficiency of my algorithm. The success of the algorithm requires rank of the matrix with mod does not change from the rank of the original matrix. This is where I will apply the problem. If someone can help me, I will really appreciate it.
modular-arithmetic matrix-rank
modular-arithmetic matrix-rank
asked Jan 9 at 17:26


Xiaodong ShiXiaodong Shi
61
61
$begingroup$
The matrix with rows $(2,0)$ and $(0,0)$ has rank $1$ over the integers, rank $0$ mod $2$, so the second assertion is wrong.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 9 at 17:33
$begingroup$
I am comparing the determinants. The matrix with rows (2,0) and (0,0) has rank 1 so it is not full rank; Its determinant is zero which also shows it is not full rank. Now if calculate its determinant mod 2, it is zero, which means det(A)=det(A mod 2)=0. The results coincides.
$endgroup$
– Xiaodong Shi
Jan 10 at 17:27
$begingroup$
Your question says "when det $A$ is $0$, rank $A$ = rank $A pmod{p}$". My example shows that's not true. You never mention "full rank". Your last paragraph doesn't either, so it suggests that your algorithm will fail. The rank is not preserved.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 10 at 20:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The matrix with rows $(2,0)$ and $(0,0)$ has rank $1$ over the integers, rank $0$ mod $2$, so the second assertion is wrong.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 9 at 17:33
$begingroup$
I am comparing the determinants. The matrix with rows (2,0) and (0,0) has rank 1 so it is not full rank; Its determinant is zero which also shows it is not full rank. Now if calculate its determinant mod 2, it is zero, which means det(A)=det(A mod 2)=0. The results coincides.
$endgroup$
– Xiaodong Shi
Jan 10 at 17:27
$begingroup$
Your question says "when det $A$ is $0$, rank $A$ = rank $A pmod{p}$". My example shows that's not true. You never mention "full rank". Your last paragraph doesn't either, so it suggests that your algorithm will fail. The rank is not preserved.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 10 at 20:55
$begingroup$
The matrix with rows $(2,0)$ and $(0,0)$ has rank $1$ over the integers, rank $0$ mod $2$, so the second assertion is wrong.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 9 at 17:33
$begingroup$
The matrix with rows $(2,0)$ and $(0,0)$ has rank $1$ over the integers, rank $0$ mod $2$, so the second assertion is wrong.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 9 at 17:33
$begingroup$
I am comparing the determinants. The matrix with rows (2,0) and (0,0) has rank 1 so it is not full rank; Its determinant is zero which also shows it is not full rank. Now if calculate its determinant mod 2, it is zero, which means det(A)=det(A mod 2)=0. The results coincides.
$endgroup$
– Xiaodong Shi
Jan 10 at 17:27
$begingroup$
I am comparing the determinants. The matrix with rows (2,0) and (0,0) has rank 1 so it is not full rank; Its determinant is zero which also shows it is not full rank. Now if calculate its determinant mod 2, it is zero, which means det(A)=det(A mod 2)=0. The results coincides.
$endgroup$
– Xiaodong Shi
Jan 10 at 17:27
$begingroup$
Your question says "when det $A$ is $0$, rank $A$ = rank $A pmod{p}$". My example shows that's not true. You never mention "full rank". Your last paragraph doesn't either, so it suggests that your algorithm will fail. The rank is not preserved.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 10 at 20:55
$begingroup$
Your question says "when det $A$ is $0$, rank $A$ = rank $A pmod{p}$". My example shows that's not true. You never mention "full rank". Your last paragraph doesn't either, so it suggests that your algorithm will fail. The rank is not preserved.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 10 at 20:55
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067738%2frank-of-an-integer-matrix-modulo-a-prime%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067738%2frank-of-an-integer-matrix-modulo-a-prime%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The matrix with rows $(2,0)$ and $(0,0)$ has rank $1$ over the integers, rank $0$ mod $2$, so the second assertion is wrong.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 9 at 17:33
$begingroup$
I am comparing the determinants. The matrix with rows (2,0) and (0,0) has rank 1 so it is not full rank; Its determinant is zero which also shows it is not full rank. Now if calculate its determinant mod 2, it is zero, which means det(A)=det(A mod 2)=0. The results coincides.
$endgroup$
– Xiaodong Shi
Jan 10 at 17:27
$begingroup$
Your question says "when det $A$ is $0$, rank $A$ = rank $A pmod{p}$". My example shows that's not true. You never mention "full rank". Your last paragraph doesn't either, so it suggests that your algorithm will fail. The rank is not preserved.
$endgroup$
– Ethan Bolker
Jan 10 at 20:55