Show $f(x)=frac{1}{|x|}$ is discontinuous at x=0
$begingroup$
I am struggling to explicitly show that the function is discontinuous at $x=0$ since the usual technique of finding two sequences $x_n$,$y_n$ where $x_nrightarrow0$, $y_nrightarrow0$ but $f(x_n)$ and $f(y_n)$ tend to different values, doesnt seem to work as all seuqnces tend to $+infty$.
My only other thought would be that since $f(0)$ doesn't exist, then from this $f(x)$ cannot be continuous. But I'm unsure if this would suffice as an answer.
real-analysis
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am struggling to explicitly show that the function is discontinuous at $x=0$ since the usual technique of finding two sequences $x_n$,$y_n$ where $x_nrightarrow0$, $y_nrightarrow0$ but $f(x_n)$ and $f(y_n)$ tend to different values, doesnt seem to work as all seuqnces tend to $+infty$.
My only other thought would be that since $f(0)$ doesn't exist, then from this $f(x)$ cannot be continuous. But I'm unsure if this would suffice as an answer.
real-analysis
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The function $frac{1}{|x|}$ is not defined at $x=0$, and so you cannot ask whether it is continuous there. It is continuous on $mathbb{R}setminus {0}$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Beale
May 21 '18 at 11:33
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Can we talk about the continuity/discontinuity of a function at a point which is not in its domain?
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 21 '18 at 12:36
$begingroup$
Roughly speaking, the following ensemble of symbols and words: ‘$1/|x| colonmathbb R^*tomathbb R$ is not continuous in $0$.’ is no statement, i.e., neither true nor false.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 21 '18 at 12:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am struggling to explicitly show that the function is discontinuous at $x=0$ since the usual technique of finding two sequences $x_n$,$y_n$ where $x_nrightarrow0$, $y_nrightarrow0$ but $f(x_n)$ and $f(y_n)$ tend to different values, doesnt seem to work as all seuqnces tend to $+infty$.
My only other thought would be that since $f(0)$ doesn't exist, then from this $f(x)$ cannot be continuous. But I'm unsure if this would suffice as an answer.
real-analysis
$endgroup$
I am struggling to explicitly show that the function is discontinuous at $x=0$ since the usual technique of finding two sequences $x_n$,$y_n$ where $x_nrightarrow0$, $y_nrightarrow0$ but $f(x_n)$ and $f(y_n)$ tend to different values, doesnt seem to work as all seuqnces tend to $+infty$.
My only other thought would be that since $f(0)$ doesn't exist, then from this $f(x)$ cannot be continuous. But I'm unsure if this would suffice as an answer.
real-analysis
real-analysis
edited May 21 '18 at 11:16
Siminore
30.4k33368
30.4k33368
asked May 21 '18 at 11:15
DLBDLB
548
548
$begingroup$
The function $frac{1}{|x|}$ is not defined at $x=0$, and so you cannot ask whether it is continuous there. It is continuous on $mathbb{R}setminus {0}$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Beale
May 21 '18 at 11:33
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Can we talk about the continuity/discontinuity of a function at a point which is not in its domain?
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 21 '18 at 12:36
$begingroup$
Roughly speaking, the following ensemble of symbols and words: ‘$1/|x| colonmathbb R^*tomathbb R$ is not continuous in $0$.’ is no statement, i.e., neither true nor false.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 21 '18 at 12:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The function $frac{1}{|x|}$ is not defined at $x=0$, and so you cannot ask whether it is continuous there. It is continuous on $mathbb{R}setminus {0}$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Beale
May 21 '18 at 11:33
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Can we talk about the continuity/discontinuity of a function at a point which is not in its domain?
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 21 '18 at 12:36
$begingroup$
Roughly speaking, the following ensemble of symbols and words: ‘$1/|x| colonmathbb R^*tomathbb R$ is not continuous in $0$.’ is no statement, i.e., neither true nor false.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 21 '18 at 12:40
$begingroup$
The function $frac{1}{|x|}$ is not defined at $x=0$, and so you cannot ask whether it is continuous there. It is continuous on $mathbb{R}setminus {0}$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Beale
May 21 '18 at 11:33
$begingroup$
The function $frac{1}{|x|}$ is not defined at $x=0$, and so you cannot ask whether it is continuous there. It is continuous on $mathbb{R}setminus {0}$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Beale
May 21 '18 at 11:33
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Can we talk about the continuity/discontinuity of a function at a point which is not in its domain?
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 21 '18 at 12:36
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Can we talk about the continuity/discontinuity of a function at a point which is not in its domain?
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 21 '18 at 12:36
$begingroup$
Roughly speaking, the following ensemble of symbols and words: ‘$1/|x| colonmathbb R^*tomathbb R$ is not continuous in $0$.’ is no statement, i.e., neither true nor false.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 21 '18 at 12:40
$begingroup$
Roughly speaking, the following ensemble of symbols and words: ‘$1/|x| colonmathbb R^*tomathbb R$ is not continuous in $0$.’ is no statement, i.e., neither true nor false.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 21 '18 at 12:40
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If my students dare to say that this function is discontinuous at $0$, they will miserably fail. But we all know that the definition of discontinuity is somehow vague.
- Many mathematicians clearly state that a function can be discontinuous only at points of the domain. For these people, your work is useless, since your function is continuous throughout the domain of definition.
- Other mathematicians say that a function is always discontinuous at points that do not belong to the domain of definition, but they are accumulation points for the domain. Indeed, since $f(x_0)=lim_{x to x_0}f(x)$ is the characterizing property of continuous functions, it is violated as soon as $f(x_0)$ does not exist. Even in this case your work is useless, since your function is automatically continuous.
I won't write here a long discussion about the "best" definition of discontinuity, since it has been done several times in the past.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is what I was taught in high school: For continuity at $x=a$ (this being a limit point), the function $f(x)$ must satisfy the condition $$lim_{xto a^+}f(x)=lim_{xto a^-}f(x)=f(a)$$ and the limit must exist.
In this case, $f(x)=dfrac 1{|x|}$ is not even defined at $x=0$, and hence is not continuous. Not only that, but the limit $lim_{xto a}f(x)=infty$ and hence does not exist.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $displaystyle x_n=frac{1}{n}$ then $displaystyle x_n underset{n rightarrow +infty}{rightarrow}0$ and
$$
fleft(x_nright) underset{n rightarrow +infty}{rightarrow}+infty
$$
Hence $f$ is not continuous at $x=0$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
But $f(x)=frac{1}{|x|}$ is not definied for $x=0$ so your question is senseless
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
May 21 '18 at 11:22
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2789923%2fshow-fx-frac1x-is-discontinuous-at-x-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If my students dare to say that this function is discontinuous at $0$, they will miserably fail. But we all know that the definition of discontinuity is somehow vague.
- Many mathematicians clearly state that a function can be discontinuous only at points of the domain. For these people, your work is useless, since your function is continuous throughout the domain of definition.
- Other mathematicians say that a function is always discontinuous at points that do not belong to the domain of definition, but they are accumulation points for the domain. Indeed, since $f(x_0)=lim_{x to x_0}f(x)$ is the characterizing property of continuous functions, it is violated as soon as $f(x_0)$ does not exist. Even in this case your work is useless, since your function is automatically continuous.
I won't write here a long discussion about the "best" definition of discontinuity, since it has been done several times in the past.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If my students dare to say that this function is discontinuous at $0$, they will miserably fail. But we all know that the definition of discontinuity is somehow vague.
- Many mathematicians clearly state that a function can be discontinuous only at points of the domain. For these people, your work is useless, since your function is continuous throughout the domain of definition.
- Other mathematicians say that a function is always discontinuous at points that do not belong to the domain of definition, but they are accumulation points for the domain. Indeed, since $f(x_0)=lim_{x to x_0}f(x)$ is the characterizing property of continuous functions, it is violated as soon as $f(x_0)$ does not exist. Even in this case your work is useless, since your function is automatically continuous.
I won't write here a long discussion about the "best" definition of discontinuity, since it has been done several times in the past.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If my students dare to say that this function is discontinuous at $0$, they will miserably fail. But we all know that the definition of discontinuity is somehow vague.
- Many mathematicians clearly state that a function can be discontinuous only at points of the domain. For these people, your work is useless, since your function is continuous throughout the domain of definition.
- Other mathematicians say that a function is always discontinuous at points that do not belong to the domain of definition, but they are accumulation points for the domain. Indeed, since $f(x_0)=lim_{x to x_0}f(x)$ is the characterizing property of continuous functions, it is violated as soon as $f(x_0)$ does not exist. Even in this case your work is useless, since your function is automatically continuous.
I won't write here a long discussion about the "best" definition of discontinuity, since it has been done several times in the past.
$endgroup$
If my students dare to say that this function is discontinuous at $0$, they will miserably fail. But we all know that the definition of discontinuity is somehow vague.
- Many mathematicians clearly state that a function can be discontinuous only at points of the domain. For these people, your work is useless, since your function is continuous throughout the domain of definition.
- Other mathematicians say that a function is always discontinuous at points that do not belong to the domain of definition, but they are accumulation points for the domain. Indeed, since $f(x_0)=lim_{x to x_0}f(x)$ is the characterizing property of continuous functions, it is violated as soon as $f(x_0)$ does not exist. Even in this case your work is useless, since your function is automatically continuous.
I won't write here a long discussion about the "best" definition of discontinuity, since it has been done several times in the past.
answered May 21 '18 at 11:21
SiminoreSiminore
30.4k33368
30.4k33368
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is what I was taught in high school: For continuity at $x=a$ (this being a limit point), the function $f(x)$ must satisfy the condition $$lim_{xto a^+}f(x)=lim_{xto a^-}f(x)=f(a)$$ and the limit must exist.
In this case, $f(x)=dfrac 1{|x|}$ is not even defined at $x=0$, and hence is not continuous. Not only that, but the limit $lim_{xto a}f(x)=infty$ and hence does not exist.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is what I was taught in high school: For continuity at $x=a$ (this being a limit point), the function $f(x)$ must satisfy the condition $$lim_{xto a^+}f(x)=lim_{xto a^-}f(x)=f(a)$$ and the limit must exist.
In this case, $f(x)=dfrac 1{|x|}$ is not even defined at $x=0$, and hence is not continuous. Not only that, but the limit $lim_{xto a}f(x)=infty$ and hence does not exist.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is what I was taught in high school: For continuity at $x=a$ (this being a limit point), the function $f(x)$ must satisfy the condition $$lim_{xto a^+}f(x)=lim_{xto a^-}f(x)=f(a)$$ and the limit must exist.
In this case, $f(x)=dfrac 1{|x|}$ is not even defined at $x=0$, and hence is not continuous. Not only that, but the limit $lim_{xto a}f(x)=infty$ and hence does not exist.
$endgroup$
This is what I was taught in high school: For continuity at $x=a$ (this being a limit point), the function $f(x)$ must satisfy the condition $$lim_{xto a^+}f(x)=lim_{xto a^-}f(x)=f(a)$$ and the limit must exist.
In this case, $f(x)=dfrac 1{|x|}$ is not even defined at $x=0$, and hence is not continuous. Not only that, but the limit $lim_{xto a}f(x)=infty$ and hence does not exist.
edited Jan 11 at 7:08
answered May 21 '18 at 11:22
IshanIshan
2,0221927
2,0221927
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $displaystyle x_n=frac{1}{n}$ then $displaystyle x_n underset{n rightarrow +infty}{rightarrow}0$ and
$$
fleft(x_nright) underset{n rightarrow +infty}{rightarrow}+infty
$$
Hence $f$ is not continuous at $x=0$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
But $f(x)=frac{1}{|x|}$ is not definied for $x=0$ so your question is senseless
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
May 21 '18 at 11:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $displaystyle x_n=frac{1}{n}$ then $displaystyle x_n underset{n rightarrow +infty}{rightarrow}0$ and
$$
fleft(x_nright) underset{n rightarrow +infty}{rightarrow}+infty
$$
Hence $f$ is not continuous at $x=0$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
But $f(x)=frac{1}{|x|}$ is not definied for $x=0$ so your question is senseless
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
May 21 '18 at 11:22
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $displaystyle x_n=frac{1}{n}$ then $displaystyle x_n underset{n rightarrow +infty}{rightarrow}0$ and
$$
fleft(x_nright) underset{n rightarrow +infty}{rightarrow}+infty
$$
Hence $f$ is not continuous at $x=0$
$endgroup$
Let $displaystyle x_n=frac{1}{n}$ then $displaystyle x_n underset{n rightarrow +infty}{rightarrow}0$ and
$$
fleft(x_nright) underset{n rightarrow +infty}{rightarrow}+infty
$$
Hence $f$ is not continuous at $x=0$
answered May 21 '18 at 11:19


AtmosAtmos
4,805420
4,805420
1
$begingroup$
But $f(x)=frac{1}{|x|}$ is not definied for $x=0$ so your question is senseless
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
May 21 '18 at 11:22
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
But $f(x)=frac{1}{|x|}$ is not definied for $x=0$ so your question is senseless
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
May 21 '18 at 11:22
1
1
$begingroup$
But $f(x)=frac{1}{|x|}$ is not definied for $x=0$ so your question is senseless
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
May 21 '18 at 11:22
$begingroup$
But $f(x)=frac{1}{|x|}$ is not definied for $x=0$ so your question is senseless
$endgroup$
– Dr. Sonnhard Graubner
May 21 '18 at 11:22
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2789923%2fshow-fx-frac1x-is-discontinuous-at-x-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The function $frac{1}{|x|}$ is not defined at $x=0$, and so you cannot ask whether it is continuous there. It is continuous on $mathbb{R}setminus {0}$.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Beale
May 21 '18 at 11:33
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Can we talk about the continuity/discontinuity of a function at a point which is not in its domain?
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 21 '18 at 12:36
$begingroup$
Roughly speaking, the following ensemble of symbols and words: ‘$1/|x| colonmathbb R^*tomathbb R$ is not continuous in $0$.’ is no statement, i.e., neither true nor false.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hoppe
May 21 '18 at 12:40