Size of the vocabulary in Laplace smoothing for a trigram language model












5












$begingroup$


Let's say we have a text document with $N$ unique words making up a vocabulary $V$, $|V| = N$. For a bigram language model with add-one smoothing, we define a conditional probability of any word $w_{i}$ given the preceeding word $w_{i-1}$ as: $$P(w_{i}|w_{i-1}) = frac{count(w_{i-1}w_{i}) + 1}{count(w_{i-1}) + |V|}$$ As far as I understand (or not) the conditional probability, and basing on a 3rd point of this Wikipedia article, $w_{i-1}$ might be assumed to be "constant" here, so by summing this expression for all possible $w_{i}$ we should obtain 1, and so it is, which is obvious.



However, I do not understand the answers given for this question saying that for n-gram model the size of the vocabulary should be the count of the unique (n-1)-grams occuring in a document, for example, given a 3-gram model (let $V_{2}$ be the dictionary of bigrams): $$P(w_{i}|w_{i-2}w_{i-1}) = frac{count(w_{i-2}w_{i-1}w_{i}) + 1}{count(w_{i-2}w_{i-1}) + |V_{2}|}$$ It just doesn't add up to 1 when we try to sum it for every possible $w_{i}$. Therefore - should the $|V|$ really be equal to the count of unique (n-1)-grams given an n-gram language model or should it be the count of unique unigrams?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    5












    $begingroup$


    Let's say we have a text document with $N$ unique words making up a vocabulary $V$, $|V| = N$. For a bigram language model with add-one smoothing, we define a conditional probability of any word $w_{i}$ given the preceeding word $w_{i-1}$ as: $$P(w_{i}|w_{i-1}) = frac{count(w_{i-1}w_{i}) + 1}{count(w_{i-1}) + |V|}$$ As far as I understand (or not) the conditional probability, and basing on a 3rd point of this Wikipedia article, $w_{i-1}$ might be assumed to be "constant" here, so by summing this expression for all possible $w_{i}$ we should obtain 1, and so it is, which is obvious.



    However, I do not understand the answers given for this question saying that for n-gram model the size of the vocabulary should be the count of the unique (n-1)-grams occuring in a document, for example, given a 3-gram model (let $V_{2}$ be the dictionary of bigrams): $$P(w_{i}|w_{i-2}w_{i-1}) = frac{count(w_{i-2}w_{i-1}w_{i}) + 1}{count(w_{i-2}w_{i-1}) + |V_{2}|}$$ It just doesn't add up to 1 when we try to sum it for every possible $w_{i}$. Therefore - should the $|V|$ really be equal to the count of unique (n-1)-grams given an n-gram language model or should it be the count of unique unigrams?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      Let's say we have a text document with $N$ unique words making up a vocabulary $V$, $|V| = N$. For a bigram language model with add-one smoothing, we define a conditional probability of any word $w_{i}$ given the preceeding word $w_{i-1}$ as: $$P(w_{i}|w_{i-1}) = frac{count(w_{i-1}w_{i}) + 1}{count(w_{i-1}) + |V|}$$ As far as I understand (or not) the conditional probability, and basing on a 3rd point of this Wikipedia article, $w_{i-1}$ might be assumed to be "constant" here, so by summing this expression for all possible $w_{i}$ we should obtain 1, and so it is, which is obvious.



      However, I do not understand the answers given for this question saying that for n-gram model the size of the vocabulary should be the count of the unique (n-1)-grams occuring in a document, for example, given a 3-gram model (let $V_{2}$ be the dictionary of bigrams): $$P(w_{i}|w_{i-2}w_{i-1}) = frac{count(w_{i-2}w_{i-1}w_{i}) + 1}{count(w_{i-2}w_{i-1}) + |V_{2}|}$$ It just doesn't add up to 1 when we try to sum it for every possible $w_{i}$. Therefore - should the $|V|$ really be equal to the count of unique (n-1)-grams given an n-gram language model or should it be the count of unique unigrams?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let's say we have a text document with $N$ unique words making up a vocabulary $V$, $|V| = N$. For a bigram language model with add-one smoothing, we define a conditional probability of any word $w_{i}$ given the preceeding word $w_{i-1}$ as: $$P(w_{i}|w_{i-1}) = frac{count(w_{i-1}w_{i}) + 1}{count(w_{i-1}) + |V|}$$ As far as I understand (or not) the conditional probability, and basing on a 3rd point of this Wikipedia article, $w_{i-1}$ might be assumed to be "constant" here, so by summing this expression for all possible $w_{i}$ we should obtain 1, and so it is, which is obvious.



      However, I do not understand the answers given for this question saying that for n-gram model the size of the vocabulary should be the count of the unique (n-1)-grams occuring in a document, for example, given a 3-gram model (let $V_{2}$ be the dictionary of bigrams): $$P(w_{i}|w_{i-2}w_{i-1}) = frac{count(w_{i-2}w_{i-1}w_{i}) + 1}{count(w_{i-2}w_{i-1}) + |V_{2}|}$$ It just doesn't add up to 1 when we try to sum it for every possible $w_{i}$. Therefore - should the $|V|$ really be equal to the count of unique (n-1)-grams given an n-gram language model or should it be the count of unique unigrams?







      probability machine-learning






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited May 30 '16 at 23:21







      cafe_

















      asked May 30 '16 at 22:51









      cafe_cafe_

      263




      263






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          The slides here mention that V should be the size of the vocabulary which makes sense for me.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1806317%2fsize-of-the-vocabulary-in-laplace-smoothing-for-a-trigram-language-model%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            The slides here mention that V should be the size of the vocabulary which makes sense for me.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              The slides here mention that V should be the size of the vocabulary which makes sense for me.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                The slides here mention that V should be the size of the vocabulary which makes sense for me.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                The slides here mention that V should be the size of the vocabulary which makes sense for me.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Feb 4 '18 at 5:09









                Avinash KumarAvinash Kumar

                1286




                1286






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1806317%2fsize-of-the-vocabulary-in-laplace-smoothing-for-a-trigram-language-model%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

                    Does disintegrating a polymorphed enemy still kill it after the 2018 errata?

                    A Topological Invariant for $pi_3(U(n))$